Feeling Powerful but Incompetent: Fear of Negative Evaluation Predicts Men’s Sexual Harassment of Subordinates
Although research has examined the role of power in men’s likelihood of perpetrating sexual harassment against women, less is known about specific personality traits that might predict sexual harassment. Building upon theorizing that men are especially prone to engage in sexual harassment to the extent that their social status is threatened (Berdahl 2007a), we conducted three studies with samples of adults (Studies 1 and 3) and college students (Study 2). In Studies 1 and 3, we asked participants to indicate their likelihood of engaging in sexual harassment of subordinates across a variety of scenarios. In Study 2, we experimentally primed power and had participants choose to send either neutral or sexuality-related articles to an ostensibly real female participant. Results demonstrated that concerns about being perceived as incompetent (i.e., Fear of Negative Evaluation scores) positively predicted men’s sexual harassment of female subordinates. Among women, Fear of Negative Evaluation scores were unrelated to sexual harassment of male subordinates. Further, this relationship held controlling for Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and Generalized Self-Efficacy scores, suggesting that the fear that others would see oneself as incompetent was a better predictor of sexual harassment than one’s self-perceived incompetence. Implications for the relationship between power, personality, and sexual harassment, and for interventions designed to curb sexual harassment, are discussed.
KeywordsSexual harassment Power Incompetence Gender harassment Fear of negative evaluation
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The material in this paper has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All who participated provided informed consent. The paper complies with APA ethical standards, and all authors have seen and approved of the paper in its current form. All research in this manuscript was completed at Ohio University although the first author has since changed her affiliation.
- Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power→ sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 768–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bergman, M. E., Langhout, R. D., Palmieri, P. A., Cortina, L. M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). The (un) reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.2.230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bushman, B. J., Bonacci, A. M., Van Dijk, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Narcissism, sexual refusal, and aggression: Testing a narcissistic reactance model of sexual coercion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1027–1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Criss, D. (2017, Nov 1). The (incomplete) list of powerful men accused of sexual harassment after Harvey Weinstein. CNN. Retrieved from cnn.com.
- Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01312.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harvey Weinstein timeline: How the scandal unfolded (2018, Feb 12), BBC News. Retrieved from bbc.com/news.
- Kantor, J., & Abrams, R. (2017, Oct 10). Gwyneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie and others say Weinstein harassed them. The New York Times. Retrieved from nytimes.com.
- Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in healthy psychology: A user’s portfolio: Casual and controlled beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar