Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–19 | Cite as

Experiences with Benevolent Sexism: Scale Development and Associations with Women’s Well-Being

  • Debra L. Oswald
  • Maha Baalbaki
  • Mackenzie Kirkman
Original Article

Abstract

Ambivalent sexism theory (Glick and Fiske 1996, 1997) suggests that sexism takes two forms: an overt hostility as well as a subtle benevolence. We examined benevolent sexist behaviors and developed a 25-item Experiences with Benevolent Sexism Scale. Exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, U.S. college sample of 489 women) and confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2, online sample of 216 women) revealed three subscales of benevolently sexist experiences: Heterosexual Intimacy, Protective Paternalism, and Complementary Gender Differences. Women reported experiencing benevolently sexist events more frequently than overtly hostile sexist events; however, they perceived the hostile events to be more distressing and sexist (Studies 1 and 2). Experiencing Protective Paternalism was positively associated with self-doubt and negatively associated with self-esteem (Studies 1 and 2), and psychological well-being (Study 2). However, experiencing Complementary Gender Differentiation was negatively associated with self-doubt and positively associated with self-esteem (Studies 1 and 2), psychological well-being, flourishing, and submission to authority (Study 2). Finally, women in romantic relationships reported more benevolently sexist experiences than did those not in romantic relationships and the frequency of those experiences was positively associated with perceptions of the partner’s benevolently sexist attitudes (Study 2). The results highlight that women frequently experience sexism, ranging from overtly hostile to a subtle benevolence, and the different types of benevolent sexism each have unique associations with women’s well-being.

Keywords

Sexism Benevolent sexism Women Well-being 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Steve Franzoi and Kristine Chapleau for their helpful comments on this manuscript and feedback on item development. Thank you to Brooke Magnus for her assistance with the confirmatory factor analysis.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This study was approved by the institutional review board at Marquette University and conforms to the APA research ethics. All authors have read and approve of submitting the manuscript to Sex Roles. This manuscript has not been published, in any part, elsewhere. This manuscript has not received any grant funding.

Supplementary material

11199_2018_933_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15.8 kb)

References

  1. Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 User’s guide. Chicago IL: Small Waters Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Baalbaki, M., & Oswald, D. L. (2017, March). College women write about sexism: What does it look like? Where does it happen? How do they respond? Poster presented at the 2017 Association for Women in Psychology Meetings, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
  4. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barreto, M., Ellemers, B., Piebinga, L., & Moya, M. (2010). How nice of us and how dumb of me: The effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. Sex Roles, 62, 532–544.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9699-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, J. C., & Swim, J. K. (2011). Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily encounters with sexism as way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 227–242.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310397509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, J. C., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62–77.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, J. C., Glick, P., Ilic, M., & Bohner, G. (2011). Damned if she does, damned if she doesn’t: Consequences of accepting versus confronting patronizing help for the female target and male actor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 761–773.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Begany, J. J., & Milburn, M. A. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3, 119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.3.2.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosson, J. K., Pinel, E. C., & Vandello, J. A. (2010). The emotional impact of ambivalent sexism: Forecasts versus real experiences. Sex Roles, 62, 520–531.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9664-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryant, A. N. (2003). Changes in attitudes toward women's roles: Predicting gender-role traditionalism among college students. Sex Roles, 48, 131–142.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022451205292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57, 131–136.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9196-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chisango, T., & Javangwe, G. (2012). Are people better at recognizing ambivalent sexism on the basis of non-standard profiles than the standard ASI ones? Sex Roles, 67, 69–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0146-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connelly, K., & Heesacker, M. (2012). Why is benevolent sexism appealing? Associations with system justification and life satisfaction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 432–443.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312456369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian Unity Well-being Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024704320683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/sll205-009-9493-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2015). Measures of self-esteem. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 131–157). London, UK: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dumont, M., Sarlet, M., & Dardenne, B. (2010). Be too kind to a woman, she’ll feel incompetent: Benevolent sexism shifts self-construal and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles, 62, 545–553.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9582-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farkas, T., & Leaper, C. (2016). Chivalry’s double-edged sword: How girls’ and boys’ paternalistic attitudes relate to their possible family and work selves. Sex Roles, 74, 220–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0556-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ford, T. E., Boxer, C. F., Armstrong, J., & Edel, J. R. (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 159–170.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gervais, S. J., & Vescio, T. K. (2012). The effect of patronizing behaviour and control on men and women’s performance in stereotypically masculine domains. Sex Roles, 66, 479–491.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0115-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001a). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 115–188). San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001b). An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-66X.56.2.109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammond, M. D., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Benevolent sexism and support of romantic partner’s goals: Undermining women’s competence while fulfilling men’s intimacy needs. Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1180–1194.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215593492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hammond, M. D., & Sibley, C. G. (2011). Why are benevolent sexists happier? Sex Roles, 65, 332–343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0017-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hammond, M. D., Sibley, C. G., & Overall, N. C. (2014). The allure of sexism: Psychological entitlement fosters women’s endorsement of sexism over time. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 422–429.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613506124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hammond, M. D., Overall, N. C., & Cross, E. J. (2016). Internalizing sexism within close relationships: Perceptions of intimate partner’s benevolent sexism promote women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 214–238.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hideg, I., & Ferris, D. L. (2016). The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 706–727.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, K., Stewart, K., King, E., Morgan, W. B., Gilrane, V., & Hylton, K. (2014). Negative consequence of benevolent sexism on efficacy and performance. Gender in Management, 29, 171–189.  https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2013-0086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Killianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333–352.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018814924402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. King, E. B., Botsford, W., Hebl, M. R., Kazama, S., Dawson, J. F., & Perkins, A. (2012). Benevolent sexism at work: Gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. Journal of Management, 38, 1835–1866.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klonoff, E. A., & Landrine, H. (1995). The Schedule of Sexist Events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women’s lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 439–472.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00086.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klonoff, E. A., Landrine, H., & Campbell, R. (2000). Sexist discrimination may account for well-known gender differences in psychiatric symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01025.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Landrine, H., & Klonoff, E. A. (1997). Discrimination against women: Prevalence, consequences, remedies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Gibbs, J., Manning, V., & Lund, M. (1995). Physical and psychiatric correlates of gender discrimination: An application of the Schedule of Sexist Events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 473–492.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00087.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2010). Next gen ambivalent sexism: Converging correlates, causality in context, and converse causality, an introduction to the special issue. Sex Roles, 62, 395–404.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9747-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. LeMaire, K. L., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2016). Labeling sexual victimization experiences; The role of sexism, rape myth acceptance, and tolerance for sexual harassment. Violence and Victims, 31, 332–346.  https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Masser, B., & Abrams, D. (1999). Contemporary sexism: The relationships among hostility, benevolence and neosexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 503–571.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00378.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: The consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51, 609–615.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-5470-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matteson, A. V., & Moradi, B. (2005). Examining the structure of the Schedule of Sexist Events: Replication and extension. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 47–57.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-6843.2005.00167.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McDonald, R., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practices in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.  https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mirels, H. L., Greblo, P., & Dean, J. B. (2002). Judgmental self-doubt: Beliefs about one’s judgmental prowess. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 741–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00189-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002). Perceived sexist events and feminist identity development attitudes: Links to women’s psychological distress. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 44–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000002301003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moya, M., Glick, P., Exposito, F., de Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Napier, J. L., Thorsisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2010). The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles, 62, 405–419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9712-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oleson, K. C., Poehlmann, K. M., Yost, J. H., Lynch, M. E., & Arkin, R. M. (2000). Subjective overachievement: Individual differences in self-doubt and concern with performance. Journal of Personality, 68, 491–542.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Oswald, D. L., Franzoi, S., & Frost, K. (2012). Experiencing sexism and young women's body esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 1112–1137.  https://doi.org/10.1037/t00700-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pettijohn, T. F., & Walzer, A. S. (2008). Reducing racism, sexism, and homophobia in college students by completing a psychology of prejudice course. College Student Journal, 42, 459–468.Google Scholar
  54. Rigby, K. (1987). An authority behavior inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 615–625.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5104_14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  57. Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., & Beydogan, B. (2002). Turkish college students’ attitudes toward women managers: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and gender differences. The Journal of Psychology, 136, 647–656.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209604825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Shepherd, M., Erchull, M. J., Rosner, A., Taubenberger, L., Queen, E. F., & McKee, J. (2011). “I’ll get that for you”: The relationship between benevolent sexism and body self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 64, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9859-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shnabel, N., Bar-Anan, Y., Kende, A., Bareket, O., & Lazar, Y. (2016). Help to perpetuate traditional gender roles: Benevolent sexism increases engagement in dependency-oriented cross-gender helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 55–75.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Silvan-Ferrero, M. P., & Bustillos Lopez, A. (2007). Benevolent sexism toward men and women: Justifications of the traditional system and conventional gender roles in Spain. Sex Roles, 57, 607–614.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9271-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence of its incidence, nature and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., Russo-Devosa, Y., & Stangor, C. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments of sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 406–411.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00240.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ullman, J. B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In B. Tabachnick & L Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed., pp. 709–812). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  65. Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021342912248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Hutchinson, P. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533–537.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888824749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295–303.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000029140.72880.69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang, K., & Dovidio, J. F. (2017). Perceiving and confronting sexism: The causal role of gender identity salience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 65–76.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316670628.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debra L. Oswald
    • 1
  • Maha Baalbaki
    • 1
  • Mackenzie Kirkman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMarquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations