Many people hold negative stereotypes about feminists. Verbally, feminist women are often described in masculine terms whereas feminist men tend to be described in feminine terms. Here, we demonstrate that these effects extend to a fundamental perceptual level, more specifically, to the domain of face perception even in Norway, the most gender-egalitarian country of the world. Four studies were conducted using a data-driven reverse-correlation technique to test how feminist women and men are visually represented. In Studies 1 (n = 123) and 2 (n = 61), Norwegians had more masculine-looking and less feminine-looking visual representations of feminist women as compared to women with moderate gender-related beliefs or other activist identities (i.e., the control conditions). These effects, which were particularly pronounced among male participants and those with stronger hostile sexist beliefs, further explained why feminist women were perceived as threatening. In Studies 3 (n = 131) and 4 (n = 74), participants had a less masculine-looking visual representation of feminist men as compared to the control condition. This effect was especially pronounced among female participants. In addition, effects were again moderated by hostile sexism, such that participants with stronger hostile sexist beliefs visualized the feminist man as less masculine than the man in the control condition. In sum, the results suggest that people have asymmetrically gendered visual representations of feminist women and men. Feminist women are visually represented as more masculine whereas the opposite is true for feminist men. We discuss our findings in light of women’s and men’s reluctance to identify as feminists and suggest potential interventions to change biased visual representations of feminists.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adams, R. B., Ambady, N., Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (2011). The science of social vision. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333176.001.0001.
Alexander, S., & Ryan, M. (1997). Social constructs of feminism: A study of undergraduates at a women’s college. College Student Journal, 31, 555–567.
Anderson, V. A. (2009). What’s in a label? Judgements of feminist men and feminist women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01490.x.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: Methodological and philosophical foundations. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044044.
Bashir, N. Y., Lockwood, P., Chasteen, A. L., Nadolny, D., & Noyes, I. (2013). The ironic impact of activists: Negative stereotypes reduce social change influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1983.
Beasley, C. (1999). What is feminism? An introduction to feminist theory. New York: Sage.
Berryman-Fink, C., & Verderber, K. S. (1985). Attributions of the term feminist: A factor analytic development of a measuring instrument. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00860.x.
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., & Chapleau, K. M. (2004). The influence of afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science, 15(10), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00739.x.
Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2007). Partner characteristics associated with masculinity, health and maturity in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.008.
Breen, A. B., & Karpinski, A. (2008). What’s in a name? Two approaches to evaluating the label feminist. Sex Roles, 58, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9317-y.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301.
Burn, S. M., Aboud, R., & Moyles, C. (2000). The relationship between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles, 42, 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007044802798.
Bye, H. H., Herrebrøden, H., Hjetland, G. J., Røyset, G. Ø., & Westby, L. L. (2014). Stereotypes of Norwegian social groups. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55(5), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12141.
Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. New York: Norton.
Carré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behavior in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2651–2656. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0873.
Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3522.214.171.1249.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1991.
Dall’Ara, E., & Maass, A. (1999). Studying sexual harassment in the laboratory: Are egalitarian women at higher risk? Sex Roles, 41, 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018816025988.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1994). Evolutionary psychology of male violence. In J. Archer (Ed.), Male violence (pp. 253–288). New York, NY: Routledge.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35188.8.131.52.
Dotsch, R. (2016). Rcicr: Reverse correlation image classification toolbox. R package version 0.3.4.1. Retrieved from http://www.rondotsch.nl/rcicr/.
Dotsch, R., & Todorov, A. (2012). Reverse correlating social face perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611430272.
Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H., Langner, O., & van Knippenberg, A. (2008). Ethnic out-group faces are biased in the prejudiced mind. Psychological Science, 19(10), 978–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02186.x.
Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H., & van Knippenberg, A. (2013). Behavioral information biases the expected facial appearance of members of novel groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1928.
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(04)36001-6.
Durante, F., Fiske, S. T., Gelfand, M. J., Crippa, F., Suttora, C., Stillwell, A., … Björklund, F. (2017). Ambivalent stereotypes link to peace, conflict, and inequality across 38 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(4), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611874114.
Eberhardt, J. L., Davies, P. G., Purdie-Vaughns, V. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x.
Ellis, L., Das, S., & Buker, H. (2008). Androgen-promoted physiological traits and criminality: A test of the evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.003.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.
Fiske, S. T., & Lee, T. L. (2008). Stereotypes and prejudice create workspace discrimination. In A. P. Brief (Ed.), Diversity at work (pp. 13–52). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511753725.004.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35184.108.40.2068.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.
Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022327.
Glick, P. (2013, February). BS at work: How benevolent sexism undermines women and justifies backlash. In Harvard Business School Symposium Gender & Work: Challenging Conventional Wisdom. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/conferences/2013-w50-research-symposium/Documents/glick.pdf.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.111.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.56.2.109.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414832.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., … López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3518.104.22.1683.
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., ... Castro, Y. R. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1243.
Glick, P., Wilkerson, M., & Cuffe, M. (2015). Masculine identity, ambivalent sexism, and attitudes toward gender subtypes. Social Psychology, 46(4), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000228.
Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1994). Preferring “housewives” to “feminists”: Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00295.x.
Hartung, P. J., & Rogers, J. R. (2000). Work-family commitment and attitudes toward feminism in medical students. The Career Development Quarterly, 48(3), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2000.tb00291.x.
Heath, S. (1987). Male feminism. In A. Jardine & P. Smith (Eds.), Men in feminism. New York: Methuen. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361900_chapter_1.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00234.
Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Prototypes and dimensions of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 31, 653–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01544286.
Henderson-King, D., & Zhermer, N. (2003). Feminist consciousness among Russians and Americans. Sex Roles, 48(3–4), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022403322131.
Holland, K. J., & Cortina, L. M. (2013). When sexism and feminism collide: The sexual harassment of feminist working women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313482873.
Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Bianchi, M., Banse, R., & Wigboldus, D. H. (2011). Facing Europe visualizing spontaneous in-group projection. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1583–1590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611419675.
Jackson, L. A., Fleury, R. E., & Lewandowski, D. A. (1996). Feminism: Definitions, support, and correlates of support among female and male college students. Sex Roles, 34(9), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01551502.
Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2010). Do attitudes toward gender equality really differ between Norway and Sweden? Journal of European Social Policy, 20(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928709358790.
Johnson, K. L., Freeman, J. B., & Pauker, K. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025335.
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(01)00066-6.
Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.6.2.115.
Kamen, P. (1991). Feminist fatale. New York: Donald I. Fine.
Kilmartin, C. T. (2007). The masculine self (3rd ed.). Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.
Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Koch, A., Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Unkelbach, C., & Alves, H. (2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 675–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000046.
Krueger, J. (1996). Personal beliefs and cultural stereotypes about racial characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1996.
Kunst, J. R., Fischer, R., Sidanius, J., & Thomsen, L. (2017a). Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(21), 5407–5412. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616572114.
Kunst, J. R., Kteily, N., & Thomsen, L. (2017b). “You little creep”: Evidence of blatant dehumanization of short groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617740613.
Kunst, J. R., Dovidio, J. F., & Dotsch, R. (2018). White look-alikes: Mainstream culture adoption makes immigrants “look” phenotypically white. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739279.
Liss, M., O’Connor, C., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00014.
Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268(1462), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1327.
Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces – KDEF [CD ROM]. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institute. https://doi.org/10.1037/t27732-000.
Macrea, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 808–817. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.528.
McCreary, D. R. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles, 31, 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01544277.
Meijs, M., Ratliff, K. A., & Lammers, J. (2017). Perceptions of feminist beliefs influence ratings of warmth and competence. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication, 136843021773311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217733115.
Messner, M. A. (2004). Becoming 100 percent straight. In M. S. Kimmel & M. A. Messner (Eds.), Men’s lives (6th ed., pp. 421–426). Boston: Pearson Education.
Montepare, J. M., & Dobish, H. (2003). The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(4), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027332800296.
Montoya, A. K., & Hayes, A. F. (2016). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000086.
Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., & Schaller, M. (2011). Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance. Neuroscience & Behavioral Reviews, 35(4), 1042–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.011.
New Oxford American Dictionary. (2015). Sexism. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sexism.
Noseworthy, C. M., & Lott, A. J. (1984). The cognitive organization of gender-stereotypic categories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167284103016.
Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces change cyclically: Further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(99)00033-1.
Percy, C., & Kremer, J. (1995). Feminist identifications in a troubled society. Feminism & Psychology, 5(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353595052007.
Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., .... Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394(6696), 884–887. https://doi.org/10.1038/29772.
Roy, R. E., Weibust, K. S., & Miller, C. T. (2007). Effects of stereotypes about feminists on feminist self-identification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00348.x.
Rubin, L. (1994). Families on the fault line: America’s working class speaks about the family, the economy, race, and ethnicity. New York: HarperPerennial.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
Ruthig, J. C., Kehn, A., Gamblin, B. W., Vanderzanden, K., & Jones, K. (2016). When women’s gains equal men’s losses: Predicting a zero-sum perspective of gender status. Sex Roles, 76(1–2), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0651-9.
Sechrist, G. B., & Stangor, C. (2001). Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35184.108.40.2065.
Segal, L. (1990). Slow motion: Changing masculinities, changing men. London: Virago. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582521.
Shameless Photo. (2017). This is what a feminist looks like. Retrieved from http://www.shamelessphoto.com/shameless-feminist-portraits/.
Sibley, C., Overall, N., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their own gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9306-1.
Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24(1–2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00288703.
Stolier, R. M., & Freeman, J. B. (2016). Neural pattern similarity reveals the inherent intersection of social categories. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 795–797. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4296.
Toller, P. W., Suter, E. A., & Trautman, T. C. (2004). Gender role identity and attitudes toward feminism. Sex Roles, 51(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000032316.71165.45.
Twenge, J. M., & Zucker, A. N. (1999). What is a feminist? Evaluations and stereotypes in closed-and open-ended responses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00383.x.
United Nations Development Program. (2016). Human Development Report 2016. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/2016-report/download.
Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 797–826. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.127.6.797.
Williams, R., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but…”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02936345.
Windhager, S., Schaefer, K., & Fink, B. (2011). Geometrics morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology, 23(6), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.21219.
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262–386. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35220.127.116.112.
Yiannopoulos, M. (2015, July 26). Does feminism make women ugly? Breitbart News. Retrieved from http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/26/does-feminism-make-women-ugly/.
Yoder, J. D., Tobias, A., & Snell, A. F. (2011). When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64(1–2), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9890-3.
Hereby we confirm that the present research complied with the ethical standards of the APA and laws and regulations of the country where it was conducted. The research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the first author.
Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest needs to be declared.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Gundersen, A.B., Kunst, J.R. Feminist ≠ Feminine? Feminist Women Are Visually Masculinized Whereas Feminist Men Are Feminized. Sex Roles 80, 291–309 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0931-7
- Face perception
- Hostile sexism