Sex Roles

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Her/His Ethics? Managerial Ethics in Moral Decision-Making from a Contextual, Gendered, and Relational Perspective

Original Article

Abstract

For the last decades, the question of differences in the moral judgments of women and men and the role of an “ethics of care” versus an “ethics of justice” have been debated. The aim of the present study was to explore the gendered aspects of leaders’ moral judgments and how they interact with more communal (health/welfare services) versus agentic (banking) organizational contexts. Using qualitative-interpretative analysis, 50 men and women Israeli managers participated in in-depth interviews focused on the ways they construct, understand, and react to ethical work dilemmas. Results suggested that both gender and organizational context contributed to shaping the managers’ understandings and decisions regarding the ethical dilemmas in their work. Additionally, the relational target of the dilemma (i.e., clients, employees, supervisors) and situational variables (e.g., ambiguity) affected their moral judgments. Although feminist scholars often have claimed that the ethics of care is excluded from organizational discourse, our findings show that the ethics of care is a significant model for understanding managerial moral judgments. We discuss implications for managers and consultants regarding training of responsible leaders who can represent different moral orientations in their work with multiple stakeholders.

Keywords

Gender differences Moral reasoning Leadership ethics Ethics of care Ethics of justice Relational self Agentic Communal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the late Prof. Dafna Izraeli who gave the us the inspiration to study this topic. They also thank Tyler Okimoto for his comments on an earlier versions of the manuscript ​and Shulamit Zimmerman Kalker for her professional assistance with editing and translations.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The research was unfunded and conduct in accordance with the ethical standards of Bar-Ilan University. All participants gave informed consent prior to their participation.

References

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139–158. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/189609.
  2. Ashmore, R. D., & Sewell, A. D. (1998). Sex/gender and the individual. In D. F. Barone, M. Hersen, & V. B. Van Hasselt (Eds.), Advanced personality (pp. 486–526). Boston, MA: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8580-4_16.Google Scholar
  3. Baier, A. C. (1987). Hume, the women's moral theorist? In E. F. Kittay & D. T. Meyers (Eds.), Women and moral theory (pp. 37–55). Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Beckwith, K. (2005). A common language of gender? Politics & Gender, 1(1), 128–137.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X05001017.127.128.Google Scholar
  6. Benhabib, S. (1992). The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg- Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics (pp. 148–177). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brabeck, M. (1993). Moral judgment: Theory and research on differences between males and females. In M. J. Larrabee (Ed.), An ethic of care: Feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 33–48). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Callas, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1997). Predicando la moral en calzoncillos? Feminist inquiries into business ethics. In A. Larson & R. E. Freeman (Eds.), Women's studies and business ethics: Toward a new conversation (pp. 50–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.5840/ruffinoup19975.Google Scholar
  9. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ciulla, J. B. (2003). The ethics of leadership. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  11. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basic of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153.Google Scholar
  12. Crandall, C. S., Tsang, J. A., Goldman, S., & Pennington, J. T. (1999). Newsworthy moral dilemmas: Justice, caring, and gender. Sex Roles, 40, 187–209.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018894820652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawson, L. M. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in sales profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1143–1152.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005721916646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–32). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Derry, R. (1997). Feminism: How does it play in the corporate theater? In A. Larson & R. E. Freeman (Eds.), Women's studies and business ethics: Towards a new conversation (pp. 11–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.5840/ruffinoup19973.Google Scholar
  16. Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eagly, A. H., Johnson, H., & Blair, T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/chip_docs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ely, R. J. (1995). The power of demography: Women's social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 586–635.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Enderle, G. (1987). Some perspective of managerial ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 657–663.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fang, M. L. (2006). Evaluating ethical decision making of individual employees in organizations - an integration framework. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8, 105–112.Google Scholar
  22. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gilligan, C. (1987). Moral orientation and moral development. In E. F. Kittay & D. T. Meyer (Eds.), Women and moral theory (pp. 19–33). Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Glover, S. H., Bumpus, M. A., Sharp, G. F., & Munchus, G. A. (2002). Gender differences in ethical decision making. Women in Management Review, 17, 217–227.  https://doi.org/10.1108/0964942021043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Groves, K. S., & Larocca, M. A. (2011). An empirical study of leader ethical values, transformational and transactional leadership, and follower attitudes toward corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 511–528.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0877-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hawkesworth, M. (2003). Congressional enactments of race-gender: Toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions. The American Political Science Review, 97(4), 529–550. Retrieved from http://library.mla.ac.il/sso/ezproxy.aspx?docurl=123#/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/214414511?accountid=40368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hawkesworth, M. (2006). Feminist inquiry: From political conviction to methodological innovation. New-Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Held, V. (1993). Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Helgeson, V. S. (2012). The psychology of gender. NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 703–726.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individual in organization: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1991.4278958.Google Scholar
  32. Kark, R. (2004). The transformational leader: Who is (s)he? A feminist perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kark, R., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender and leadership: Negotiating the labyrinth. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 443–468). New York: Springer Science and Business.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kark, R., & Weismal-Manor, R. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: What’s gender got to do with it? Organization, 12(6), 889–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kark, R., Weismal-Manor, R., & Shamir, B. (2012). Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership and identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 620–640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages and sequence: The cognitive development approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  38. Krebs, D. L., & Denton, K. (2005). Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: A critical evaluation of Kohlberg's model. Psychological Review, 112, 629–649.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.629.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kujala, J., & Pietilainen, T. (2004). Female managers' ethical decision-making: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 153–163.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039405.20533.1c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kujala, J., & Pietilainen, T. (2007). Developing moral principles and scenarios in the light of diversity: An extension to the multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 141–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9101-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewicki, R. J., Weiss, S. E., & Lewin, D. (1992). Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 209–252.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Loo, R. (2003). Are women more ethical than men? Finding from three independent studies. Women in Management Review, 18, 169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1108/096494203104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marchese, M. R., Bassham, G., & Ryan, J. (2002). Work family conflict: A virtue ethics analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020317500891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mason, E. S., & Mudrack, P. E. (1996). Gender and ethical orientation: A test of gender and occupational socialization theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 599–604.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press. http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/45398347.Google Scholar
  46. Messick, D. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making. Sloan Management Review, 37, 9–22.Google Scholar
  47. Mizrachi, S. (2015). Women in senior roles in the public sector. Jerusalem, Israel: Knesset (House of Parliament), Center for Research and Knowledge. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  48. Moi, T. (1999). What is a women? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminist approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. Orme, J. (2002). Social work: Gender, care and justice. British Journal of Social Work, 32, 799–814.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/32.6.799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1988). Some initial steps towards improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marking activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 871–879.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryan, M. K., David, B., & Reynolds, K. J. (2004). Who cares? The effect of gender and context on the self and moral reasoning. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 246–255.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00142.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Miles, J. A. (2003). The impact of gender and setting on perceptions of others' ethics. Sex Roles, 48, 361–382.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022994631566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sikula, A., & Costa, A. (1994). Are women more ethical than men? Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 859–871.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Slote, M. (1998). The justice of caring. Social Philosophy and Policy, 15, 171–195.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, A., & Rogers, V. (2000). Ethics-related responses to specific situation vignettes: Evidence of gender-based differences and occupational socialization. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 73–86.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006388923834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. State Comptroller. (2014). Comptroller report on the representation of women in senior roles in the public sector. Jerusalem, Israel: State Comptroller Office. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  58. Statman, D. (1991). Moral dilemmas. Jerusalem: Magnes Press. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  59. Toffler, B. L. (1991). Managers talk ethics: Making tough choices in a competitive business world. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  60. Turner, N., Barling, J., Epitropaki, O., Butcher, V., & Milner, C. (2002). Transformational leadership and moral reasoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 304–311.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Vianen, A. E., & Fischer, A. H. (2002). Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 315–337.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902320369730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wahn, J. (2003). Sex differences in competitive and compliant unethical work behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wark, G. B., & Krebs, D. L. (1996). Gender and dilemma in real life moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 32, 220–230.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weber, J. (1993). Exploring the relationship between personal values and moral reasoning. Human Relations, 46, 435–463.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weeks, W. A., Moore, C. W., McKinney, J. A., & Longenecker, J. G. (1999). The effects of gender and career stage on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 301–313.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005955501120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, School of ManagementThe College for Academic StudiesOr YehudaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Psychology & The Graduate Gender Studies ProgramBar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael
  3. 3.Department of PhilosophyBar Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations