Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Lay (Mis)Perceptions of Sexual Harassment toward Transgender, Lesbian, and Gay Employees

  • Sheila T. Brassel
  • Isis H. Settles
  • NiCole T. Buchanan
Original Article

Abstract

LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer-identified) employees commonly experience sexual harassment at work. The perceptions of lay observers of this harassment, such as their coworkers and managers, likely influence beliefs about appropriate individual and organizational responses to harassment. Thus, we conducted an experiment (n = 279 U.S. college students) to examine (a) whether four motivations (power, prejudice, gender policing, and sexual attraction) were perceived to underlie harassment toward LGT individuals; (b) how these motivations were related to perceived acceptability of the harassment; and (c) and how acceptability was related to recommended responses to the harassment. We found that compared to lesbian, gay, or cisgender heterosexual targets, participants perceived harassment toward transgender targets as less acceptable when they viewed it as more motivated by power and prejudice and less by attraction. Compared to male targets, participants perceived sexual harassment toward female targets as less acceptable when they viewed it as more motivated by prejudice. Finally, perceiving the harassment as less acceptable was associated with recommending that the target report the harassment. These results suggest that harassment targeting men and gay and lesbian employees may be minimized, underlining the need for organizations to protect against employees’ mistreatment and challenge beliefs about sexual harassment motivations and acceptability.

Keywords

LGBTQ employees Sexual harassment motivations Sexual harassment perceptions Organizational responses to harassment Harassment intervention Harassment policy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Portions of this manuscript were completed while NiCole T. Buchanan was on sabbatical leave as a Senior Visiting Scholar with the University of Michigan’s Institute for Research on Women and Gender and the Department of Psychology.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All APA standards for the treatment of participants were followed when conducting the research upon which this manuscript is based (including informed consent). Additionally, this manuscript has not been published elsewhere in whole or in part. The authors have no known conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Antecol, H., & Cobb-Clark, D. (2001). Men, women, and sexual harassment in the U.S. military. Gender Issues, 19, 3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-001-0001-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berdahl, J. L. (2007a). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 425–437.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berdahl, J. L. (2007b). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641–658.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobbitt-Zeher, D. (2011). Gender discrimination at work connecting gender stereotypes, institutional policies, and gender composition of workplace. Gender & Society, 25(6), 764–786.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211424741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan, N. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2008). The effects of racial and sexual harassment on work and the psychological well-being of African American women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(2), 137–151.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.2.137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan, N. T., Settles, I. H., Hall, A. T., & O’Connor, R. (2014). A review of organizational strategies for reducing sexual harassment: Insights from the U. S. Military. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 687–702.  https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan, N. T., Settles, I. H., & Woods, K. C. (2008). Comparing sexual harassment subtypes for black and white women: Double jeopardy, the Jezebel, and the cult of true womanhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 347–361.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00450.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1997). Refining sex-role spillover theory: The role of gender subtypes and harasser attributions. Social Cognition, 15(4), 291–311.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1997.15.4.291.
  9. Butler, A. M., & Chung-Yan, G. (2011). The influence of sexual harassment frequency and perceptions of organizational justice on victim responses to sexual harassment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(6), 729–754.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.507351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantisano, G. T., Domínguez, J. M., & Depolo, M. (2008). Perceived sexual harassment at work: Meta-analysis and structural model of antecedents and consequences. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 207–218.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S113874160000425X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleveland, J. N., & Kerst, M. E. (1993). Sexual harassment and perceptions of power: An under articulated relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(1), 49–67.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coffman, K. B., Coffman, L. C., & Ericson, K. M. M. (2016). The size of the LGBT population and the magnitude of antigay sentiment are substantially underestimated. Management Science, 63, 3168–3186.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 33, 55–75.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.27745097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cortina, L. M., & Berdahl, J. L. (2008). Sexual harassment in organizations: A decade of research in review. In C. L. Cooper & J. Barling (Eds.), Handbook of organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 469–497). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Costa-Lopes, R., Dovidio, J. F., Pereira, C. R., & Jost, J. T. (2013). Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(4), 229–237.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Culbertson, A. L., Rosenfeld, P., Booth-Kewley, S., & Magnusson, P. (1992). Assessment of sexual harassment in the navy: Results of the 1989 navy-wide survey (TR-92-1 I). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.Google Scholar
  17. DeSouza, E., & Solberg, J. (2004). Women’s and men’s reactions to man-on-man sexual harassment: Does the sexual orientation of the victim matter? Sex Roles, 50(9/10), 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 316–326.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fain, T. C., & Anderton, D. L. (1987). Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse status. Sex Roles, 17(5–6), 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitzgerald, L. F. (1993). Sexual harassment: Violence against women in the workplace. American Psychologist, 48, 1070–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.10.1070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Funk, L. C., & Werhun, C. D. (2011). “You’re such a girl!” the psychological drain of the gender-role harassment of men. Sex Roles, 65, 13–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9948-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gates, G. J. (2013). Demographics and LGBT health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(1), 72–74.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512474429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerhardstein, K. R., & Anderson, V. N. (2010). There’s more than meets the eye: Facial appearance and evaluations of transsexual people. Sex Roles, 62, 361–373.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9746-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118 http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.umich.edu/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Glomb, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (2005). The influence of restrictive emotionality in men's emotional appraisal of sexual harassment: A gender role interpretation. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6(4), 240–253.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.6.4.240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grant, J., Mottet, L., Tanis, J., Harrison, J., Herman, J., & Keisling, M. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the national transgender discrimination survey. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.Google Scholar
  27. Grauerholz, E. (1989). Sexual harassment of women professors by students: Exploring the dynamics of power, authority, and gender in a university setting. Sex Roles, 21(11–12), 789–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gruber, J. E., & Fineran, S. (2008). Comparing the impact of bullying and sexual harassment victimization on the mental and physical health of adolescents. Sex Roles, 59, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9431-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 38(4), 55–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01910.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
  31. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hendrix, W. H., Rueb, J. D., & Steel, R. P. (1988). Sexual harassment and gender differences. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 235–252.Google Scholar
  33. Henry, P. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow database on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychology Inquiry, 19, 114–125.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400802049936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herek, G. M. (1996). Why tell if you’re not asked? Self-disclosure, intergroup contact, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. In G. M. Herek, J. Jobe, & R. Carney (Eds.), Out in force; sexual orientation and the military (pp. 197–225). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Herek, G. M. (2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ? Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), 251–266.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Herrera, A., Herrera, C., & Exposito, F. (2016). Is the beautiful always so good? Influence of physical attractiveness on the social perception of sexual harassment. International Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 224–253.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2016.1143179.Google Scholar
  37. Hill, C., & Silva, E. (2005). Drawing the line: Sexual harassment on campus. Washington, D.C.: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Hitlan, R. T., Schneider, K. T., & Walsh, B. M. (2006). Upsetting behavior: Reactions to personal and bystander sexual harassment experiences. Sex Roles, 55, 187–195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9072-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurt, J. L., Maver, J. A., & Hoffman, D. (1999). Situational and individual influences on judgements of hostile environment sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(7), 1395–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ilies, R., Hauserman, N., Schwochau, S., & Stibal, J. (2003). Reported incidence rates of work related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta-analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56, 607–631.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00752.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Isbell, L. M., Swedish, K., & Gazan, D. B. (2005). Who says it’s sexual harassment? The effects of gender and likelihood to sexually harass on legal judgments of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(4), 745–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Konik, J., & Cortina, L. M. (2008). Policing gender at work: Intersections of harassment based on sex and sexuality. Social Justice Research, 21, 313–337.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0074-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Labuski, C., & Keo-Meier, C. (2015). The (mis) measure of trans. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2, 13–33.  https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2848868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lapierre, L. M., Spector, P. E., & Leck, J. D. (2005). Sexual versus nonsexual workplace aggression and victims’ overall job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 155–169.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Leskinen, E. A., Cortina, L. M., & Kabat, D. B. (2011). Gender harassment: Broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1), 25–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9241-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 483–496.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Loy, P. H., & Stewart, L. P. (1984). The extent and effects of the sexual harassment of working women. Sociological Focus, 17, 31–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.1984.10570460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McDonald, P. (2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00300.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McFadden, C. (2015). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender careers and human resource development: A systematic literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 14(2), 125–162.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314549456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mellon, R. C. (2013). On the motivation of quid pro quo sexual harassment in men: Relation to masculine gender role stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2287–2296.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mitchell, K. J., Yabarra, M. L., & Korchmaros, J. D. (2014). Sexual harassment among adolescents of different sexual orientations and gender identities. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38, 280–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Monteith, M. J., Arthur, S. A., & Flynn, S. M. (2010). Self-regulation and bias. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 493–507). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Munson, L. J., Hulin, C., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Longitudinal analysis of dispositional influences and sexual harassment: Effects on job and psychological outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 53(1), 21–46.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00192.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nagoshi, J. L., Brzuzy, S., & Terrell, H. (2012). Perceptions of gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation among transgender individuals. Feminism and Psychology, 22, 405–422.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353512461929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of US adults. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 738–753.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Paludi, C. A., & Paludi, M. (2003). Academic and workplace sexual harassment: A handbook of cultural, social science, management, and legal perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  57. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pryor, J. B. (1985). The lay person's understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 13(5–6), 273–286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pryor, J. B., & Day, J. D. (1988). Interpretations of sexual harassment: An attributional analysis. Sex Roles, 18(7–8), 405–417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Two sides of the same coin: Gender harassment and heterosexist harassment in LGBQ work lives. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 378–391.  https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000087.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ragins, B. R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2001). Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1244–1261.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D. H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 914–922.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Runtz, M. G., & O'Donnell, C. W. (2003). Students’ perceptions of sexual harassment: Is it harassment only if the offender is a man and the victim is a woman? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(5), 963–982.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01934.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Serano, J. (2013). Excluded: Making feminist and queer movements more inclusive. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  66. Settles, I. H., Buchanan, N. T., & Colar, B. K. (2012). The impact of race and rank on the sexual harassment of black and white men in the military. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 13, 256–263.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shechory Bitton, M., & Ben Shaul, D. (2013). Perceptions and attitudes to sexual harassment: An examination of sex differences and the sex composition of the harasser–target dyad. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2136–2145.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Silverschanz, P., Cortina, L. M., Konik, J., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Slurs, snubs, and queer jokes: Incidence and impact of heterosexist harassment in academia. Sex Roles, 58, 179–191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9329-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smirles, K. E. (2004). Attributions of responsibility in cases of sexual harassment: The person and the situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 342–365.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02551.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sojo, V. E., Wood, R. E., & Genat, A. E. (2016). Harmful workplace experiences and women’s occupational well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 10–40.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315599346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tangri, S. S., & Hayes, S. M. (1997). Theories of sexual harassment. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 112–128). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  72. Taylor, E. A., Hardin, R., & Rode, C. R. (2017). Contrapower harassment in the sport management classroom. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 00, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2017.1378113.Google Scholar
  73. Thomann, D. A., & Wiener, R. L. (1987). Physical and psychological causality as determinants of culpability in sexual harassment cases. Sex Roles, 17(9–10), 573–591.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2004). Issues of merit. Retrieved from http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=255805&version=256094&application=ACROBAT
  75. van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Waldo, C. R., Berdahl, J. L., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1998). Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 59–79.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025776705629.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Weitzman, L. J. (1979). Sex role socialization: A focus on women. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  78. Wilkerson, J. M. (1999). The impact of job level and prior training on sexual harassment labeling and remedy choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(8), 1605–1623.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02044.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, C. W., Brown, R. S., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Price, J. R. (1995). An attributional (causal dimensional) analysis of perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(13), 1169–1183.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02612.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60, 127–247.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00067.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheila T. Brassel
    • 1
  • Isis H. Settles
    • 2
  • NiCole T. Buchanan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Department of Afroamerican and African StudiesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations