Examining the Roles of Self-Objectification and Appearance Expectations in Young Women’s Indoor Tanning Behavior
- 98 Downloads
Indoor tanning among U.S. young women is a major public health concern that increases risk for skin cancer. Many young women engage in indoor tanning despite the risks, and prior evidence suggests that appearance-related motivations for tanning may outweigh health concerns. The present study examined appearance expectations as a mediator of the association between young women’s self-objectification and indoor tanning behavior. Emerging adult college women (n = 332, 18–19-years-old; 66.9% White) provided reports of their self-objectification (operationalized as body surveillance), appearance-related tanning expectations, body esteem, and indoor tanning behavior. Results revealed that higher levels of self-objectification were indirectly associated with women’s higher likelihood of indoor tanning. This association was mediated by positive appearance expectations for tanning. These associations appeared to be robust: The mediational model was significant whether body esteem was included as a control variable or not; whether the behavioral outcome was lifetime or past-year indoor tanning; and whether the sample included only White participants or was ethnically heterogeneous. Results suggest that young women who more frequently engage in self-objectification are more likely to engage in indoor tanning and that this association is explained in part by young women’s positive appearance-related expectations for tanning. Furthermore, the findings point to indoor tanning as an important and understudied correlate of self-objectification. A deeper understanding of women’s appearance-related motivations to tan may in turn facilitate the development of more effective interventions for this high-risk behavior, which remains troublingly common among young women in the United States.
KeywordsTanning Body image Physical appearance Objectification Psychology of women Health behavior
We would like to thank Dr. Mitch Prinstein of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for his guidance and provision of resources toward the completion of this project. This work was supported in part by funding from the National Institutes of Health (T32MH018269, University of Pittsburgh). This work was also supported by funding from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1144081, awarded to Jacqueline Nesi). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF or NIH.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This manuscript has not previously been published in whole or in part, nor is it under review elsewhere. The study conforms to APA standards on the ethical treatment of human participants. The study was approved by the institutional review board at the university where data were collected. All participants provided informed consent.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- American Psychological Association. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-summary.pdf.
- Cafri, G., Thompson, J. K., Roehrig, M., van den Berg, P., Jacobsen, P. B., & Stark, S. (2006). An investigation of appearance motives for tanning: The development and evaluation of the Physical Appearance Reasons for Tanning Scale (PARTS) and its relation to sunbathing and indoor tanning intentions. Body Image, 3(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.05.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calogero, R. M. (2011). Operationalizing self-objectification: Assessment and related methodological issues. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 23–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (Eds.). (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015a). Indoor tanning among adults in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/research/articles/adult-indoor-tanning.htm.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015b). What we know about indoor tanning among minors. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/skin/policies/what_we_know.htm.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Indoor tanning is not safe. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/skin/basic_info/indoor_tanning.htm.
- Choukas-Bradley, S., Nesi, J., Widman, L., & Higgins, M. K. (2018). Carryover of social media to young women’s offline lives: Associations with physical appearance concerns and depressive symptoms. Manuscript submitted for publication. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
- Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guy, G. P., Berkowitz, Z., Holman, D. M., & Hartman, A. M. (2015). Recent changes in the prevalence of and factors associated with frequency of indoor tanning among U.S. adults. JAMA Dermatology, 151(11), 1256–1259. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1568.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
- Hill, S. E., & Durante, K. M. (2011). Courtship, competition, and the pursuit of attractiveness: Mating goals facilitate health-related risk taking and strategic risk suppression in women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210395603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leary, M. R., & Jones, J. L. (1993). The social psychology of tanning and sunscreen use: Self-presentational motives as a predictor of health risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(17), 1390–1406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01039.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mahler, H. I. M., Kulik, J. A., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. X. (2010b). Effects of upward and downward social comparison information on the efficacy of an appearance-based sun protection intervention: A randomized, controlled experiment. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33(6), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-010-9279-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Noar, S. M., Myrick, J. G., Zeitany, A., Kelley, D., Morales-Pico, B., & Thomas, N. E. (2015). Testing a social cognitive theory-based model of indoor tanning: Implications for skin cancer prevention messages. Health Communication, 30(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Riordan, D. L., Field, A. E., Geller, A. C., Brooks, D. R., Aweh, G., Colditz, G. A., & Frazier, A. L. (2006). Frequent tanning bed use, weight concerns, and other health risk behaviors in adolescent females (United States). Cancer Causes & Control, 17(5), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-0453-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pagoto, S., Hillhouse, J., Heckman, C. J., Coups, E. J., Stapleton, J., Buller, D., … Geller, A. C. (2014). Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: Ban indoor tanning for minors. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 124–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0240-1.
- Rodgers, R. F., Wilking, C., Gottlieb, M., Daynard, R., Lovering, M., Matsumoto, A., … Franko, D. L. (2016). A qualitative study of the decision to engage in tanning behaviors among female college students. European Review of Applied Psychology, 66(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2015.11.003.
- Schaefer, L. M., Burke, N. L., Thompson, J. K., Dedrick, R. F., Heinberg, L. J., Calogero, R. M., … Swami, V. (2015). Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4). Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037917.
- Stapleton, J. L., Manne, S. L., Darabos, K., Greene, K., Ray, A. E., Turner, A. L., … Coups, E. J. (2015). Randomized controlled trial of a web-based indoor tanning intervention: Acceptability and preliminary outcomes. Health Psychology, 34, 1278–1285. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000254.
- Stapleton, J. L., Manne, S. L., Greene, K., Darabos, K., Carpenter, A., Hudson, S. V., & Coups, E. J. (2017). Sociocultural experiences, body image, and indoor tanning among young adult women. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(12), 1582–1590. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316631198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tiggemann, M., & Williams, E. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311420250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent skin cancer. Retrieved from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov.
- Wehner, M. R., Chren, M. M., Nameth, D., Choudhry, A., Gaskins, M., Nead, K. T., … Linos, E. (2014). International prevalence of indoor tanning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatology, 150(4), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6896.
- Williams, A. L., Grogan, S., Clark-Carter, D., & Buckley, E. (2013). Appearance-based interventions to reduce ultraviolet exposure and/or increase sun protection intentions and behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analyses. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18(1), 182–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02089.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar