The Madonna-Whore Dichotomy (MWD) denotes polarized perceptions of women in general as either “good,” chaste, and pure Madonnas or as “bad,” promiscuous, and seductive whores. Whereas prior theories focused on unresolved sexual complexes or evolved psychological tendencies, feminist theory suggests the MWD stems from a desire to reinforce patriarchy. Surveying 108 heterosexual Israeli men revealed a positive association between MWD endorsement and patriarchy-enhancing ideology as assessed by Social Dominance Orientation (preference for hierarchical social structures), Gender-Specific System Justification (desire to maintain the existing gender system), and sexist attitudes (Benevolent and Hostile Sexism, Sexual Objectification of Women, and Sexual Double Standards). In addition, MWD endorsement negatively predicted men’s romantic relationship satisfaction. These findings support the feminist notion that patriarchal arrangements have negative implications for the well-being of men as well as women. Specifically, the MWD not only links to attitudes that restrict women’s autonomy, but also impairs men’s most intimate relationships with women. Increased awareness of motives underlying the MWD and its psychological costs can help practice professionals (e.g., couple therapists), as well as the general public, to foster more satisfying heterosexual relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Aubrey, J. S., Hopper, K. M., & Mbure, W. G. (2011). Check that body! The effects of sexually objectifying music videos on college men's sexual beliefs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.597469.
Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.
Becker, J. C., & Swim, J. K. (2012). Reducing endorsement of benevolent and modern sexist beliefs: Differential effects of addressing harm versus pervasiveness of benevolent sexism. Social Psychology, 43, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000091.
Berdychevsky, L., Poria, Y., & Uriely, N. (2013). Sexual behavior in women's tourist experiences: Motivations, behaviors, and meanings. Tourism Management, 35, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.06.011.
Birnbaum, G. E. (2007). Attachment orientations, sexual functioning, and relationship satisfaction in a community sample of women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507072576.
Birnbaum, G. E., & Gillath, O. (2006). Measuring subgoals of the sexual behavioral system: What is sex good for? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 675–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506065992.
Birnbaum, G. E., & Laser-Brandt, D. (2002). Gender differences in the experience of heterosexual intercourse. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 143–158.
Bordini, G. S., & Sperb, T. M. (2013). Sexual double standard: A review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality and Culture, 17, 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9163-0.
Bornstein, R. F. (2005). Reconnecting psychoanalysis to mainstream psychology: Challenges and opportunities. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 22, 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9722.214.171.1243.
Brescoll, V. L., Uhlmann, E. L., & Newman, G. E. (2013). The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034701.
Brown, M. A. (2011). Learning from service: The effect of helping on helpers' social dominance orientation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 850–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00738.x.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.
Butzer, B., & Campbell, L. (2008). Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Personal Relationships, 15, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00189.x.
Byers, E. S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552264.
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & Vander Weele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 10135–10140. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222447110.
Calogero, R. M. (2013). Objects don't object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women's social activism. Psychological Science, 24, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452574.
Camerino, D. C. (c. 1400). The Madonna of humility with the temptation of Eve [Painting]. Retrieved from http://www.clevelandart.org/art/1916.795.
Campbell, A. (2006). Feminism and evolutionary psychology. In J. H. Barkow (Ed.), Missing the revolution: Darwinism for social scientists (pp. 63–99). New York: Oxford University Press.
Chapleau, K. M., & Oswald, D. L. (2014). A system justification view of sexual violence: Legitimizing gender inequality and reduced moral outrage are connected to greater rape myth acceptance. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 15, 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2014.867573.
Chodoff, P. (1966). A critique of Freud's theory of infantile sexuality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 123, 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.123.5.507.
Cochran, S. V., & Rabinowitz, F. E. (2003). Gender-sensitive recommendations for assessment and treatment of depression in men. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.2.132.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Conrad, B. K. (2006). Neo-institutionalism, social movements, and the cultural reproduction of a mentalité: Promise keepers reconstruct the Madonna/whore complex. The Sociological Quarterly, 47, 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00047.x.
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163.
Curran, P. (2004). Development of a new measure of men's objectification of women: Factor structure test retest validity. Retrieved from psychology honors projects, digital commons @ Illinois Wesleyan university. http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/psych_honproj/13.
De Beauvoir, S. (1949). Le deuxième sexe [The second sex]. Paris: Gallimard.
Delany, S. (2007). Writing woman: Sex, class and literature, medieval and modern. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Dunlop, A. (2002). Flesh and the feminine: Early-renaissance images of the Madonna with eve at her feet. Oxford Art Journal, 25, 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/25.2.127.
Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. London: The Women's Press Limited.
Enloe, C. H. (1983). Does khaki become you? The militarization of women's lives. London: Pluto Press.
Erb, C. (1993). The Madonna's reproduction(s): Miéville, Godard, and the figure of Mary. Journal of Film and Video, 45, 40–56.
Faludi, S. (2009). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Fassinger, R. E., & Arseneau, J. R. (2008). Diverse women's sexualities. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 484–508). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Fausto-Sterling, A., Gowaty, P. A., & Zuk, M. (1997). Evolutionary psychology and Darwinian feminism. Feminist Studies, 23, 403–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178406.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Forbes, J. S. (1996). Disciplining women in contemporary discourses of sexuality. Journal of Gender Studies, 5, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.1996.9960641.
Fowers, A. F., & Fowers, B. J. (2010). Social dominance and sexual self-schema as moderators of sexist reactions to female subtypes. Sex Roles, 62, 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9607-7.
Freud, S. (1905). Drei abhandlungen zur sexualtheorie [three essays on the theory of sexuality]. Berlin: Leipzig und Wien.
Freud, S. (1912). Über die allgemeinste erniedrigung des liebeslebens [the most prevalent form of degradation in erotic life]. Jahrbuch für Psychoanalytische und Psychopathologische Forschungen, 4, 40–50.
Frith, H. (2009). Sexual scripts, sexual refusals, and rape. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 99–122). Devon: Willan.
Frith, H., & Kitzinger, C. (2001). Reformulating sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory and Psychology, 11, 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301112004.
Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3126.96.36.1992.
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.521.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414832.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., … Lopez, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2063.
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., … Wells, R. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.113.
Gottschall, J., Allison, E., De Rosa, J., & Klockeman, K. (2006). Can literary study be scientific? Results of an empirical search for the virgin/whore dichotomy. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 7, 1–17.
Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.
Greene, K., & Faulkner, S. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53, 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6.
Hammond, M. D., & Overall, N. C. (2013). Men's hostile sexism and biased perceptions of intimate partners: Fostering dissatisfaction and negative behavior in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1585–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499026.
Hanisch, C. (1969). The personal is political. Retrieved from http://www.carolhanisch.org/CHwritings/PIP.html.
Hartmann, U. (2009). Sigmund Freud and his impact on our understanding of male sexual dysfunction. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 2332–2339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01332.x.
Haxell, N. A. (2000). "Ces dames du cirque": A taxonomy of male desire in nineteenth-century French literature and art. MLN, 115, 783–800. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/22644/summary. Accessed 5 Sep 2016.
Heiman, J. R., Long, J. S., Smith, S. N., Fisher, W. A., Sand, M. S., & Rosen, R. C. (2011). Sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife and older couples in five countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9703-3.
Hoffman, I. Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to "scientific" legitimacy: The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57, 1043–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065109343925.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Infanger, M., Rudman, L. A., & Sczesny, S. (2014). Sex as a source of power? Backlash against self-sexualizing women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214558312.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550362.
Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the west. London: Routledge.
Jones, S. L., & Hostler, H. R. (2002). Sexual script theory: An integrative exploration of the possibilities and limits of sexual self-definition. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 30, 120–130.
Josephs, L. (2006). The impulse to infidelity and oedipal splitting. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1516/5A5V-WLPB-4HJ3-329J.
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1688.
Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-6827-z.
Kane, E. W., & Schippers, M. (1996). Men's and women's beliefs about gender and sexuality. Gender and Society, 10, 650–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124396010005009.
Kaplan, H. S. (1988). Intimacy disorders and sexual panic states. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 14, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926238808403902.
Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1243.
Kravetz, S., Drory, Y., & Shaked, A. (1999). The Israeli Sexual Behavior Inventory (ISBI): Scale construction and preliminary validation. Sexuality and Disability, 17, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021420300693.
Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., Glasser, D. B., Kang, J. H., Wang, T., Levinson, B., … Gingell, C. (2006). A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: Findings from the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-9005-3.
Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1998). Interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction questionnaire. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Baureman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Sexuality related measures: A compendium (2nd ed., pp. 514–519). Thousand Oaks: Gage.
Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? Political Psychology, 20, 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00138.
Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.
Macdonald, M. (1995). Representing women: Myths of femininity in the popular media. New York: St. Martin's Press Inc..
MacKinnon, C. A. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
McClelland, G. H. (2002). Nasty data: Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 393–411). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moor, A. (2010). She dresses to attract, he perceives seduction: A gender gap in attribution of intent to women's revealing style of dress and its relation to blaming the victims of sexual violence. Journal of International Women's Studies, 11, 115–127.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & McCoy, M. L. (1991). Double standard/double bind: The sexual double-standard and women's communication about sex. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00420.x.
Munford, R. (2007). Wake up and smell the lipgloss. In S. Gillis, G. Howie, & R. Munford (Eds.), Third wave feminism (pp. 266–279). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593664_20.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Papp, L. M., Danielewicz, J., & Cayemberg, C. (2012). "Are we Facebook official?" implications of dating partners' Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0291.
Passini, S., & Morselli, D. (2016). Blatant domination and subtle exclusion: The mediation of moral inclusion on the relationship between social dominance orientation and prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.022.
Paul, J. (2013). Madonna and whore: The many faces of Penelope in Camerini's Ulysses. In K. P. Nikoloutsos (Ed.), Ancient Greek women in film (pp. 139–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678921.003.0007.
Pomeroy, S. B. (1975). Goddesses, whores, wives, and slaves: Women in classical antiquity. New York: Schocken.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable relevant to social roles and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1991.
Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 485–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000099274002.
Reiss, I. L. (1960). Premarital sexual standards in America. New York: The Free Press.
Reiss, I. L. (1964). The scaling of premarital sexual permissiveness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/349726.
Rollero, C., Glick, P., & Tartaglia, S. (2014). Psychometric properties of short versions of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory and Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21, 149–159.
Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the "political economy" of sex. In E. Lewin (Ed.), Feminist anthropology: A reader (pp. 87–106). New York: Monthly Review Press.
Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1022.
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2007). The interpersonal power of feminism: Is feminism good for romantic relationships? Sex Roles, 57, 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9319-9.
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008.
Rudman, L. A., Fetterolf, J. C., & Sanchez, D. T. (2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212472375.
Rust, J., & Golombok, S. (1985). The Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 63–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1985.tb01314.x.
Sanchez, D. T., Crocker, J., & Boike, K. R. (2005). Doing gender in the bedroom: Investing in gender norms and the sexual experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1445–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205277333.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147.
Segal, L. (2007). Slow motion: Changing masculinities, changing men (3rd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582521.
Sev'er, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2001). Culture of honor, culture of change: A feminist analysis of honor killings in rural Turkey. Violence Against Women, 7, 964–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182866.
Sharoni, S. (1992). Every woman is an occupied territory: The politics of militarism and sexism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Journal of Gender Studies, 1, 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.1992.9960512.
Shnabel, N., Bar-Anan, Y., Kende, A., Bareket, O., & Lazar, Y. (2016a). Help to perpetuate traditional gender roles: Benevolent sexism increases engagement in dependency-oriented cross-gender helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000037.
Shnabel, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Levin, Z. (2016b). But it's my right! Framing effects on support for empowering policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.007.
Shook, N. J., Hopkins, P. D., & Koech, J. M. (2016). The effect of intergroup contact on secondary group attitudes and social dominance orientation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215572266.
Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x.
Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294745.
Silverstein, J. L. (1998). Countertransference in marital therapy for infidelity. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 24, 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926239808403964.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. J. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219.
Sprecher, S. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552141.
Sprecher, S. (2011). Premarital Sexual Permissiveness Scale. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (3rd ed., pp. 511–512). New York: Routledge.
Sprecher, S. (2013). Attachment style and sexual permissiveness: The moderating role of gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 428–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.005.
Sprecher, S., & Cate, R. M. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235–256). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sprecher, S., & Hatfield, E. (1996). Premarital sexual standards among US college students: Comparison with Russian and Japanese students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438165.
Sprecher, S., McKinney, K., Walsh, R., & Anderson, C. (1988). A revision of the Reiss premarital sexual permissiveness scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 821–828. https://doi.org/10.2307/352650.
Stevens, E. P. (1973). Marianismo: The other face of machismo in Latin America. In A. Pescatello (Ed.), Female and male in Latin America (pp. 89–101). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut!: Growing up female with a bad reputation. New York: Harper Collins.
Tanzer, D. (1985). Real men don't eat strong women: The virgin-Madonna-whore complex updated. The Journal of Psychohistory, 12, 487–495.
Tavris, C., & Wade, C. (1984). The longest war: Sex differences in perspective. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Taylor, L. D. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal sexual television content and perceived realism on attitudes and beliefs. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552266.
Tolman, D. L., & Tolman, D. L. (2009). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Travis, C. B., & White, J. W. (Eds.). (2000). Sexuality, society, and feminism. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10345-000.
Tropp, L. (2006). “Faking a sonogram”: Representations of motherhood on Sex and the City. The Journal of Popular Culture, 39, 861–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2006.00309.x.
United Nations Development Programme. (2016). Human Development Report 2016. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/HDR2016_EN_Overview_Web.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2017.
Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20413.
Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453.
Welldon, E. V. (1992). Mother, Madonna, whore: The idealization and denigration of motherhood. London, UK: Karnac Books.
Welles, C. E. (2005). Breaking the silence surrounding female adolescent sexual desire. Women & Therapy, 28, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015v28n02_03.
Weston, R., & Gore, P. A., Jr. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345.
Winter, D. D. N. (2002). (En)gendering sustainable development. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 79–95). Norwell: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_5.
Wolf, N. (1997). Promiscuities: The secret struggle for womanhood. New York: Random House.
Wright, R. (2010). The moral animal: Why we are, the way we are: The new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Knopf.
Wright, P. J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2013). Activating the centerfold syndrome: Recency of exposure, sexual explicitness, past exposure to objectifying media. Communication Research, 42, 864–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213509668.
Young, C. (1993). New Madonna/whore syndrome: Feminism, sexuality, and sexual harassment. New York Law School Law Review, 38, 257–288.
The research was conducted in compliance with APA’s ethical standards in the treatment of human participants, which includes providing informed consent and a full debriefing. The study was approved by Tel-Aviv University Institutional Review Board.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Bareket, O., Kahalon, R., Shnabel, N. et al. The Madonna-Whore Dichotomy: Men Who Perceive Women's Nurturance and Sexuality as Mutually Exclusive Endorse Patriarchy and Show Lower Relationship Satisfaction. Sex Roles 79, 519–532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0895-7
- Madonna-whore dichotomy
- Social dominance orientation
- Gender-specific system justification
- Gender attitudes
- Relationship satisfaction