Does a Woman’s Marital Surname Choice Influence Perceptions of Her Husband? An Analysis Focusing on Gender-Typed Traits and Relationship Power Dynamics
Within Western cultures, most women in heterosexual relationships adopt their husbands’ surnames after marriage. In attempting to explain the enduring nature of this practice, researchers have noted that women tend to encounter stereotypes when they break with tradition by retaining their own surnames after marriage. A complementary possibility is that stereotypes are also directed toward men whose wives violate the surname tradition. The current research provides initial insight into this possibility through three studies that were conducted in the United States and United Kingdom with undergraduate and community samples (total N = 355; 254 women and 101 men). Study 1 revealed that participants predominantly referenced expressive traits when describing a man whose wife retained her surname. Study 2 built on these findings with an experimental design. Relative to a man whose wife adhered to the surname tradition, a man whose wife retained her surname was rated as less instrumental, more expressive, and as holding less power in the relationship. In Study 3, participants high in hostile sexism were particularly likely to rate a man as lower in power when his wife retained her surname. Collectively, findings provide insight into attitudes that may help to explain the longevity of the marital surname tradition. Findings also join with prior research in revealing links between commonplace marriage traditions and gendered power dynamics.
KeywordsMarriage attitudes Sex roles Masculinity Femininity Sexism
We thank Paul Nelson for providing feedback on an earlier version of the present paper. We are grateful to Janice Yoder and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions during the review process. Desiree Melton provided assistance with coding.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This research was carried out at two institutions. The internal review boards at both institutions approved the study. All aspects of manuscript preparation aligned with the ethical standards of the American Psychological Association. My co-authors and I verify that this research is not under-review or published elsewhere.
- Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communication in western man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Boxer, D., & Gritsenko, E. (2005). Women and surnames across cultures: Reconstituting identity in marriage. Women and Language, 28, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Las Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Dion, K. L., & Cota, A. A. (1991). The Ms. stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00416.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Glick, P., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., Fiske, S. T., Blum, A. M. B., … Volpato, C. (2006). Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations. Sex Roles, 54, 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9027-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Emens, E. F. (2007). Changing name changing: Framing rules and the future of marital names. The University of Chicago Law Review, 74, 761–863.Google Scholar
- Etaugh, C. E., Bridges, J. S., Cummings-Hill, M., & Cohen, J. (1999). “Names can never hurt me?” the effects of surname use on perceptions of married women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 819–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00400.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- French Jr., J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Graham, D. A. (2015, November 11). A short history of Hillary (Rodham) (Clinton)‘s changing names: How the democratic candidate’s evolving self-identification tells a story of women in American politics. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/11/a-short-history-of-hillary-rodham-clintons-name/418029/.
- Jones, L., Mills, S., Paterson, L. L., Turner, G., & Coffey-Clover, L. (2016). Identity and naming practices in British marriage and civil partnerships. Gender and Language. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
- Leaper, C., & Friedman, C. K. (2007). The socialization of gender. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 561–587). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Pilcher, J. (2017). Names and “doing gender”: How forenames and surnames contribute to gender identities, difference, and inequalities. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
- Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shafer, E. F. (2017). Hillary Rodham versus Hillary Clinton: Consequences of surname choice in marriage. Gender Issues, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9182-5.
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Vaidyanathan, R. (2015, June 11). A new wedding trend? The men taking their wives’ names. BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-33085652.
- Valetas, M. F. (2001). The surname of married women in the European Union. Population and. Societies, 367, 1–4.Google Scholar