Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 78, Issue 11–12, pp 744–759 | Cite as

Relative Earnings and Depressive Symptoms among Working Parents: Gender Differences in the Effect of Relative Income on Depressive Symptoms

  • Karen Z. KramerEmail author
  • Sunjin Pak
Original Article

Abstract

The relationship between income and psychological well-being is well established. Yet, most of this research is conducted at the individual level without taking into account the role played by relative earnings at the couple level. In the present study we estimate the effect of share of family income on depressive symptoms of individuals. Specifically, we examine whether within-person change in the share of family income has differential effects on the level of depressive symptoms of mothers and fathers. Using data from the U.S. National Longitudinal Surveys of Youth (NLSY79), we follow the same individuals over 4 years and analyze their data using a cross-lagged structural equation model. Controlling for net income, we find that an increase in one’s share of family income is related to an increased level of depressive symptoms among mothers and a decreased level of depressive symptoms among fathers. When looking at a subsample of stay-at-home parents, we find that a change from providing some share of the family income to stay-at-home parent status over time is related to higher level of depressive symptoms among fathers but not mothers. Furthermore, we find that egalitarian gender ideology moderates this relationship for mothers but not for fathers. We discuss potential implications of our findings to the work-family and gender literature and to counselors and therapists who specialize in treating depression.

Keywords

Depression Depressive symptoms Gender ideology Parents Relative earnings Share of family income 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 232659. We would like to thank Deborah Ostrovsky for her helpful review and comments.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This paper and its authors fully comply with the ethical standards set forth by the University of Illinois and Sex Roles.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest and the research utilizes publicly available data.

Supplementary material

11199_2017_848_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139–158.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Angrave, D., & Charlwood, A. (2015). What is the relationship between long working hours, over-employment, under-employment and the subjective well-being of workers? Longitudinal evidence from the UK. Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 68, 1491–1515.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714559752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1086–1120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, M. P., Greenstein, T. N., & Lang, M. M. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1137–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00206.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2675569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91, 55–63.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214.  https://doi.org/10.1086/378341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourne, H. (2006). Gender ideology, depression, and marital quality in working-class, dual-earner couples across the transition to parenthood (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
  10. Boustan, L. P., & Collins, W. J. (2014). The origin and persistence of Black-White differences in women’s labor force participation. In L. Platt Boustan, C. Frydman, & R. A. Margo (Eds.), Human capital in history: The American record (pp. 205–240). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brayfield, A. (1995). Juggling jobs and kids: The impact of employment schedules on fathers' caring for children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 321–332.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brennan, R. T., Barnett, R. C., & Gareis, K. C. (2001). When she earns more than he does: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 168–182.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00168.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brewster, K. L., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 477–487.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00477.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.  https://doi.org/10.1086/230577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chesley, N. (2011). Stay-at-home fathers and breadwinning mothers: Gender, couple dynamics, and social change. Gender and Society, 25, 642–664.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211417433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chesley, N. (2016). What does it mean to be a “breadwinner” mother? Journal of Family Issues. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16676857.
  17. Chesley, N., & Flood, S. (2017). Signs of change? At-home and breadwinner parents' housework and child-care time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 511–534.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chesley, N., & Moen, P. (2006). When workers care: Dual-earner couples' caregiving strategies, benefit use, and psychological well-being. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1248–1269.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629511410922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cinamon, R. G., & Rich, Y. (2002). Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work–family conflict. Sex Roles, 47, 531–541.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022021804846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohn, D., Livingston, G., & Wang, W. (2014). After decades of decline, a rise in stay-at-home mothers. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/04/08/after-decades-of-decline-a-rise-in-stay-at-home-mothers/.
  21. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208–1233.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooke, L. P. (2006). “Doing” gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 442–472.  https://doi.org/10.1086/506417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Corrigall, E. A., & Konrad, A. M. (2007). Gender role attitudes and careers: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles, 56, 847–855.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9242-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cotter, D., Hermsen, J. M., & Vanneman, R. (2011). The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 259–289.  https://doi.org/10.1086/658853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Damaske, S. (2011). For the family? How class and gender shape women's work. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Damaske, S., & Frech, A. (2016). Women’s work pathways across the life course. Demography, 53, 365–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0464-z.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Damaske, S., Smyth, J. M., & Zawadzki, M. J. (2014). Has work replaced home as a haven? Re-examining Arlie Hochschild’s time bind proposition with objective stress data. Social Science & Medicine, 115, 130–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2013). Why study housework? Cleaning as a window into power in couples. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 63–71.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Henau, J., & Himmelweit, S. (2013). Unpacking within-household gender differences in partners' subjective benefits from household income. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 611–624.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dereuddre, R., Missinne, S., Buffel, V., & Bracke, P. (2014). Gender specific effects of financial and housework contributions on depression: A multi-actor study among three household types in Belgium. Health Sociology Review, 23, 78–90.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2014.11081963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dillaway, H., & Paré, E. (2008). Locating mothers how cultural debates about stay-at-home versus working mothers define women and home. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2006). Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography, 43, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07310309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Distefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20), 1–11.Google Scholar
  34. Doucet, A. (2004). "It's almost like I have a job, but I don't get paid": Fathers at home reconfiguring work, care, and masculinity. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 2, 277–303.  https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0203.277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Doucet, A. (2015). Parental responsibilities: Dilemmas of measurement and gender equality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 224–242.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution uneven and stalled. Gender and Society, 24, 149–166.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. England, P. (2011). Reassessing the uneven gender revolution and its slowdown. Gender and Society, 25, 113–123.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210391461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fischer, J., & Anderson, V. N. (2012). Gender role attitudes and characteristics of stay-at-home and employed fathers. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 16–31.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frech, A., & Damaske, S. (2012). The relationships between mothers’ work pathways and physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53, 396–412.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512453929.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Furdyna, H. E., Tucker, M. B., & James, A. D. (2008). Relative spousal earnings and marital happiness among African American and White women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 332–344.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00485.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. García-Manglano, J. (2015). Opting out and leaning in: The life course employment profiles of early baby boom women in the United States. Demography, 52, 1961–1993.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0438-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Gjerdingen, D., McGovern, P., Bekker, M., Lundberg, U., & Willemsen, T. (2001). Women's work roles and their impact on health, well-being, and career: Comparisons between the United States, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Women & Health, 31, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v31n04_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goldberg, A. E., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2004). Division of labor and working-class women's well-being across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 225–236.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.225.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 322–335.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00322.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gupta, S. (2006). Her money, her time: Women’s earnings and their housework hours. Social Science Research, 35, 975–999.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gupta, S. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 399–417.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00373.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hakim, C. (2002). Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women's differentiated labor market careers. Work and Occupations, 29, 428–459.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888402029004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Higgins, C., Duxbury, L., & Lee, C. (1994). Impact of life-cycle stage and gender on the ability to balance work and family responsibilities. Family Relations, 43, 144–150.  https://doi.org/10.2307/585316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parent and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  51. Hofferth, S. L., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 295–308.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00295.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.  https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.3.4.424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hudson, D. B., Elek, S. M., & Fleck, M. O. (2001). First-time mothers’ and fathers’ transition to parenthood: Infant care self-efficacy, parenting satisfaction, and infant sex. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 24, 31–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/014608601300035580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Johnston, D., & Swanson, D. (2003). Invisible mothers: A content analysis of motherhood ideologies and myths in magazines. Sex Roles, 49, 21–33.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023905518500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Johnston, D., & Swanson, D. (2004). Moms hating moms: The internalization of mother war rhetoric. Sex Roles, 51, 497–510.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-5460-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jones, B. (2012). Women who opt out: The debate over working mothers and work-family balance. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kaukinen, C. (2004). Status compatibility, physical violence, and emotional abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 452–471.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00031.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Keene, O. N. (1995). The log transformation is special. Statistics in Medicine, 14, 811–819.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780140810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kendler, K. S., & Prescott, C. A. (1999). A population-based twin study of lifetime major depression in men and women. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 39–44.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.56.1.39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R., ... Wang, P.S. (2003). The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA, 289, 3095–3105.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.23.3095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Killewald, A., & Gough, M. (2010). Money isn’t everything: Wives’ earnings and housework time. Social Science Research, 39, 987–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.005.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Klein, M. H., Hyde, J. S., Essex, M. J., & Clark, R. (1998). Maternity leave, role quality, work involvement, and mental health one year after delivery. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 239–266.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00153.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kleiner, S., & Pavalko, E. K. (2010). Clocking in: The organization of work time and health in the United States. Social Forces, 88, 1463–1486.  https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kluwer, E. S. (2011). Psychological perspectives on gender deviance neutralization. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 14–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00075.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kramer, K. Z., & Kramer, A. (2016). At-home father families in the United States: Gender ideology, human capital, and unemployment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 1315–1331.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kramer, K. Z., Kelly, E. L., & McCulloch, J. B. (2015). Stay-at-home fathers: Definition and characteristics based on 34 years of CPS data. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 1651–1673.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13502479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lam, C. B., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2012). The division of household labor: Longitudinal changes and within-couple variation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 944–952.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01007.x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lang, J., Bliese, P. D., Lang, J. W., & Adler, A. B. (2011). Work gets unfair for the depressed: Cross-lagged relations between organizational justice perceptions and depressive symptoms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 602–618.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lee, C. Y. S., Lee, J., & August, G. J. (2011). Financial stress, parental depressive symptoms, parenting practices, and children's externalizing problem behaviors: Underlying processes. Family Relations, 60, 476–490.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00656.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Legerski, E. M., & Cornwall, M. (2010). Working-class job loss, gender, and the negotiation of household labor. Gender and Society, 24, 447–474.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210374600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Levine, B. E. (2007). Surviving America's depression epidemic: How to find morale, energy, and community in a world gone crazy. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  72. Livingston, G. (2014a). Growing number of dads home with kids. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/06/05/growing-number-of-dads-home-with-the-kids/#fn-19605-3.
  73. Livingston, B. A. (2014b). Bargaining behind the scenes spousal negotiation, labor, and work–family burnout. Journal of Management, 40, 949–977.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311428355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Martikainen, P., Adda, J., Ferrie, J. E., Smith, G. D., & Marmot, M. (2003). Effects of income and wealth on GHQ depression and poor self-rated health in white collar women and men in the Whitehall II study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57, 718–723.  https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH.49.1.48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Martin, L. A., Neighbors, H. W., & Griffith, D. M. (2013). The experience of symptoms of depression in men vs women: Analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 1100–1106.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Maynard, M. T., Luciano, M. M., D’Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Dean, M. D. (2014). Modeling time-lagged reciprocal psychological empowerment–performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1244–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. McKee-Ryan, F., Song, Z., Wanberg, C. R., & Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 53–76.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Morrissey, T. W., & Warner, M. E. (2009). Employer-supported child care: Who participates? Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1340–1348.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00672.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. NLS. (2016). NLS annotated bibliography. Retrieved from https://www.nlsinfo.org/bibliography/search/cohort=NLSY79.
  80. NLSY79. (2016). Retention & reasons for noninterview. Retrieved from https://www.nlsinfo.org/content/cohorts/nlsy79/intro-to-the-sample/retention-reasons-noninterview .
  81. Nock, S. L. (2001). The marriages of equally dependent spouses. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 755–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nordenmark, M. (2004). Does gender ideology explain differences between countries regarding the involvement of women and of men in paid and unpaid work? International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 233–243.  https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022006005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Perry-Jenkins, M., Seery, B., & Crouter, A. C. (1992). Linkages between women’s provider-role attitudes, psychological well-being, and family relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 311–329.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00257.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Poortman, A. R., & Van der Lippe, T. (2009). Attitudes toward housework and child care and the gendered division of labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 526–541.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00617.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Potuchek, J. L. (1992). Employed wives’ orientations to breadwinning: A gender theory analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 548–558.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Raley, S. B., Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How dual are dual-income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 11–28.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00230.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Raley, S., Bianchi, S. M., & Wang, W. (2012). When do fathers care? Mothers’ economic contribution and fathers’ involvement in child care. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1422–1459.  https://doi.org/10.1086/663354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218–235.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2657301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rochlen, A. B., McKelley, R. A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2010). Stay-at-home fathers' reasons for entering the role and stigma experiences: A preliminary report. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 279–285.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rogers, S. J., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). Changes in wives' income: Effects on marital happiness, psychological well-being, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 458–472.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00458.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rosenzweig, M. H., & Amsterdam, J. D. (1992). Serious depression. JAMA, 267, 2960–2960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender and Society, 11, 747–772.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124397011006003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sanderson, S., & Thompson, V. L. S. (2002). Factors associated with perceived paternal involvement in childrearing. Sex Roles, 46, 99–111.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016569526920. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sayer, L. C., & Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Women's economic independence and the probability of divorce: A review and reexamination. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 906–943.  https://doi.org/10.1177/019251300021007005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Schneider, D. (2012). Gender deviance and household work: The role of occupation. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1029–1072.  https://doi.org/10.1086/662649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Schnittker, J. (2007). Working more and feeling better: Women’s health, employment, and family life, 1974-2004. American Sociological Review, 72, 221–238.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Shows, C., & Gerstel, N. (2009). Fathering, class, and gender: A comparison on physicians and emergency medical technicians. Gender and Society, 23, 161–187.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209333872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Simister, J. (2013). Is men's share of housework reduced by 'gender deviance neutralization'? Evidence from seven countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 44, 311–325.  https://doi.org/10.2307/23644604. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Simon, R. W. (2014). Twenty years of the sociology of mental health: The continued significance of gender and marital status for emotional well-being. In R. J. Johnson, J. R. Turner, & B. G. Link (Eds.), Sociology of Mental Health (pp. 21–51). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  102. Sullivan, O. (2011a). An end to gender display through the performance of housework? A review and reassessment of the quantitative literature using insights from the qualitative literature. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3(1), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00074.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sullivan, O. (2011b). Gender deviance neutralization through housework: Where does it fit in the bigger picture? Response to England, Kluwer, and Risman. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3(1), 27–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00078.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sussman, D., & Bonnell, S. (2006). Wives as primary breadwinners. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 18, 20–27 Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/index-eng.htm.Google Scholar
  105. Teachman, J. (2010). Wives’ economic resources and risk of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1305–1323.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10370108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Thébaud, S. (2010). Masculinity, bargaining, and breadwinning understanding men’s housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender and Society, 24, 330–354.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210369105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. United States Census Bureau. (2016). Poverty thresholds. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-thresholds.html.
  109. Van de Velde, S., Bracke, P., & Levecque, K. (2010). Gender differences in depression in 23 European countries: Cross-national variation in the gender gap in depression. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 305–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wang, W., Parker, K., & Taylor, P. (2013). Breadwinner moms. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2013/05/Breadwinner_moms_final.pdf.
  111. Warr, P., & Parry, G. (1982). Paid employment and women's psychological well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 498–516.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 577–594.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Winslow-Bowe, S. (2006). The persistence of wives’ income advantage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 824–842.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00298.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. World Health Organization. (2017). Depression. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs369/en/.
  115. Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2015). The production of inequality: The gender division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 662–679.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12189.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Zimmerman, F. J., & Katon, A. (2005). Socioeconomic status, depression disparities, and financial strain: what lies behind the income-depression relationship? Health Economics, 14, 1197–1215.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.School of Labor and Employment RelationsUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations