Abstract
Janet Taylor Spence was a gender pioneer in her career as an academic psychologist and an important contributor to the psychological study of gender roles. That is, she both blazed a path for women in academia and contributed to our scientific understanding of the factors that produce and shape such paths. In this piece, I address both these aspects of her life and work. I begin by briefly highlighting Spence’s groundbreaking posts in academia and her influence on my own academic career. With respect to her research, I identify five aspects of Spence’s work that were innovative and made important, lasting contributions to theoretical and empirical approaches to understanding gender in the United States. I first describe Spence’s commitment to challenging the ideological beliefs about gender held by laypeople and scientists alike by engaging in empirical tests of commonly held beliefs. I next review Spence’s argument that within-individual variability of gender-typing of the self is normative rather than unusual. Third, I describe Spence’s beliefs about the relation between gender-typing of the self and gender-typing of others, and fourth, I describe Spence’s work concerning the mechanisms that support self-perceived femininity and masculinity. In the fifth and final section, I highlight Spence’s treatment of environmental contributions to gender role development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babladelis, G., Deaux, K., Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1983). Sex-related attitudes and personal characteristics in the United States. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598308247465.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.
Bigler, R. S. (1995). The role of classification skill in moderating environmental influences on children's gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development, 66, 1072–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00923.x.
Bigler, R. S. (2016, August). Is categorization by sex inevitable? Practices that establish sex as a salient social category. In J. S. Hyde (Chair), Rethinking sex: The future of sex and gender in psychology. Symposium conducted at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Denver, Colorado.
Bigler, R. S., & Leaper, C. (2015). Gendered language: Psychological principles, evolving practices, and inclusive policies. Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600452.
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1990). The role of attitudes and intervention in gender-schematic processing. Child Development, 61, 1440–1452. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130754.
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006). A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 34, pp. 39–89). San Diego: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(06)80004-2.
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children's social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.x.
Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender development. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Cardozier, V. R. (1993). Colleges and universities in world war II. West Port: Praeger.
Colley, T. (1959). The nature and origin of psychological sexual identity. Psychological Review, 66, 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039796.
Deaux, K. (2017). Remembering Janet Spence (1923–2015). Sex Roles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0834-z.
Foss, D. (2017). Janet Taylor Spence: A model role model. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0840-1.
Gilbert, D., & Buckner, C. (2017). Paving the way: The distinctive mentoring style of Janet Taylor Spence. Sex Roles. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0839-7.
Hilliard, L. J., & Liben, L. S. (2010). Differing levels of gender salience in preschool classrooms: Effects on children’s gender attitudes and intergroup bias. Child Development, 81, 1787–1798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01510.x.
Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.) & P. H. Mussen (series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development (Vol. 4, pp. 387–486). New York: Wiley.
Hutt, C. (1973). Males & females. Baltimore: Penguin.
Joel, D. (2016). Captured in terminology: Sex, sex categories, and sex differences. Feminism & Psychology, 26, 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353516645367.
Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., Wexler, N., Gaber, O., Stein, Y., et al. (2015). Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 15468–15473. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509654112.
Lamb, L., Bigler, R. S., Liben, L. S., & Green, V. A. (2009). Teaching children to confront peers’ sexist remarks: Implications for theories of gender development and educational practice. Sex Roles, 61, 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9634-4.
Langlois, J. H., & Down, A. C. (1980). Mothers, fathers, and peers are agents of sex-typed play behaviors in young children. Child Development, 51, 1237–1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1980.tb02675.x.
Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x.
Langlois, J. H., & Stephan, C. (1977). The effects of physical attractiveness and ethnicity on children’s behavioral attributions and peer preferences. Child Development, 48, 1694–1698. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.1.153.
Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., & Rieser-Danner, L. A. (1990). Infants’ differential social responses to attractive and unattractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 26, 153–159.
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390.
Liben, L. S. (2015). Probability values and human values in evaluating single-sex education. Sex Roles, 72, 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0438-9.
Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2), i-183.
Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.6.903.
Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903–933. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.6.903.
National Institutes of Health. (2004). Notification of scientific review action. Rockville, MD.
Pahlke, E., Bigler, R. S., & Martin, C. L. (2014). Can fostering children’s ability to challenge sexism improve critical analysis, internalization, and enactment of inclusive, egalitarian peer relationships? Journal of Social Issues, 70, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12050.
Psychological Medicine. (1981). Review of the book Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents, by J. T. Spence and R. L. Helmreich. Psychological Medicine, 11, 208.
Schein, S. S., & Langlois, J. H. (2015). Unattractive infant faces elicit negative affect from adults. Infant Behavior & Development, 38, 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.009.
Spence, J. T. (1988). Janet Taylor Spence. In A. N. O'Connell & N. F. Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 191–203). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 1-97). New York: Academic Press.
Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multi-factorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624-635.
Spence, J. T. (2011). Off with the old, on with the new. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414826.
Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01021.x.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1972). Who likes competent women? Competence, sex-role congruence of interest, and subjects’ attitudes toward women as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1972.tb01272.x.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Spence, K. W., & Spence, J. T. (1964). Relation of eyelid conditioning to manifest anxiety, extraversion, and rigidity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 144–149.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1973). The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43–44 (Ms. 617).
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relations to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076857.
Weisgram, E. S. (2016). The cognitive construction of gender stereotypes: Evidence for the dual pathways model of gender differentiation. Sex Roles, 75, 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0624-z.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bigler, R.S. Blazing and Illuminating a Trail: The Career and Scholarship of Janet Taylor Spence. Sex Roles 77, 734–742 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0837-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0837-9