“Clean and Fresh”: Understanding Women’s use of Vaginal Hygiene Products

Abstract

We explore Canadian women’s use of vaginal hygiene products including feminine washes, douches, sprays, deodorants, wipes, and powders. Vaginal hygiene products in North America are part of a two billion dollar industry, which focuses on cleanliness and freshness in their advertising toward women. In interviewing women who were currently using or had previously used vaginal hygiene products, we found that vaginal cleanliness and freshness were also frequently brought up as reasons for using these products. Using an inductive thematic analysis informed by Braun and Clarke (2013) we explore how attaining a clean-and-fresh vagina has become a subjective physical need for the participants in our study. In a society where female genitalia are constructed as unclean, we argue the marketing of vaginal hygiene products contributes to the problematization of women’s genitalia by suggesting women need to use these products to attain an ideal (i.e., clean and fresh) vagina. The reliance on vaginal hygiene products reported by participants in attaining sensations of vaginal cleanliness and freshness raises concerns in the context of medical literature suggesting adverse health risks that may result from using some of these products. Potential risks include bacterial vaginosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and a higher susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections, among others. We believe that companies that advertise these products as beneficial for vaginal health and hygiene can be perceived as not just misinforming women but also profiting from products that are harmful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Albert, A. Y. K., Chaban, B., Wagner, E. C., Schellenberg, J. J., Links, M. G., Schalkwyk, J., et al. (2015). A study of the vaginal microbiome in healthy Canadian women utilizing e Gardnerella subgroup community state types. PloS One, 10, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135620.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartky, S. L. (1988). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In I. Diamond & L. Quinby (Eds.), Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance (pp. 61–86). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baxter, A. (2015). Faux activism in recent female-empowering advertising. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 6, 48–58. Retrieved from https://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=1133.

  4. Beckmann, C. R. B., Ling, F. W., Barzansky, B. M., Herbert, W. N. P., Laube, D. W., & Smith, R. P. (2010). Obstetrics and gynaecology (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bobel, C. (2010). New blood: Third-wave feminism and the politics of menstruation. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bocking, A. D. (2015). Pregnancy and the vaginal microbiome. University of Toronto Medical Journal, 92(3), 9–10. Retrieved from http://utmj.org/index.php/UTMJ/article/view/1677/1372.

  7. Boesveld, S. (2016, August 14). Douching is dangerous and more common than you think. Retrieved from http://www.chatelaine.com/health/stop-douching/.

  8. Bordo, S. R. (1986). The body and the reproduction of femininity: A feminist reappropriation of Foucault. In A. M. Jaggar & S. R. Bordo (Eds.), Gender/body/power: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (pp. 13–33). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bordo, S. R. (2003). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western cultures, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Braun, V., & Kitzinger, C. (2001). The perfectible vagina: Size matters. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care, 3, 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050152484704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Braun, V., & Tiefer, L. (2010). The “designer vagina” and the pathologisation of female genital diversity: Interventions for change. Radical Psychology, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol8-1/brauntiefer.html.

  13. Braun, V., & Wilkinson, S. (2001). Socio-cultural representations of the vagina. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 19, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830020032374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Braun, V., Tricklebank, G., & Clarke, V. (2013). “It shouldn’t stick out from your bikini at the beach”: Meaning, gender, and hairy/hairless body. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313492950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brewis, A. (2011). Obesity: Cultural and biocultural perspectives. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Calogero, R. M., & Thompson, K. J. (2010). Gender and body image. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology: Gender research in social and applied psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 153–186). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Caplan, P. J., & Caplan, J. B. (2016). Thinking critically about research on sex and gender (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chrisler, J. (2011). Leaks, lumps, and lines: Stigma and women’s bodies. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310397698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clarke, L. H. (2011). Facing age: Women growing older in anti-aging culture. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cokal, S. (2007). Clean porn: The visual aesthetics of hygiene, hot sex, and hair removal. In A. C. Hall & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Pop-porn: Pornography in American culture (pp. 137–154). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cottrell, B. H. (2010). An updated review of evidence to discourage douching. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 35, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0b013e3181cae9da.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Crann, S., Jenkins, A., Money, D., & O’Doherty, K. (2017). Women’s genital body work: Health, hygiene and beauty practices in the production of idealized female genitalia. Feminism & Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517711964.

  24. Davis, K. (2009). Revisiting feminist debates on cosmetic surgery: Some reflections on suffering agency and embodied difference. In M. Jones & C. J. Heyes (Eds.), Cosmetic surgery: A feminist primer (pp. 35–48). Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dewing, S., & Foster, D. (2007). Men’s body related practices and meanings of masculinity. Psychology in Society, 35, 38–52. Retrieved from http://www.pins.org.za/pins/pins35/pins35_article06_Dewing_Foster.pdf.

  26. deWit, S. C., & Kumagai, C. K. (2014). Medical-surgical nursing: Concepts and practice (2nd ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ekpenyong, C. E., Daniel, N. E., & Akpan, E. E. (2014). Vaginal douching behavior among young adult women and the perceived adverse health effects. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, 6, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPHE2014.0622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fahs, B. (2014). Genital panics: Constructing the vagina in women’s qualitative narratives about pubic hair, menstrual sex, and vaginal self-image. Body Image, 11, 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fashemi, B., Delaney, M. L., Onderdonk, A. B., & Fichorova, R. N. (2013). Effects of feminine hygiene products on the vaginal mucosal biome. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 24, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3402/mehd.v24i0.19703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferranti, M. (2010). From birth control to that “fresh feeling”: A historical perspective on feminine hygiene in medicine and media. Women & Health, 49, 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630240903496069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fudge, M. C., & Byers, S. (2016). “I have a nice gross vagina”: Understanding young women’s genital self-perceptions. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1155200.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gimlin, D. L. (2002). Body work: Beauty and self-image in American culture. Berkeley: University California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gorton, K., & Garde-Hansen, J. (2013). From old media where to new media troll: The online negotiation of Madonna’s aging body. Feminist Media Studies, 13, 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.678370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gosse, M. (2015). In pursuit of the “designer vagina” (unpublished master’s thesis). Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

  35. Grossman, S. (2013, October 27). SNL wants to sell you a pumpkin spice douche. Retrieved from http://entertainment.time.com/2013/10/27/snl-wants-to-sell-you-a-pumpkin-spice-douche/.

  36. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2007). The practice of feminist in-depth interviewing. In S. N. Hesse-Biger & P. L. Leavy (Eds.), Feminist research practice: A primer (pp. 111–148). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hickey, R. J. (2012). Understanding vaginal microbiome complexity from an ecological perspective. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 160, 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2012.02.008.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Johnston-Robledo, J., & Chrisler, J. C. (2011). The menstrual mark: Menstruation as stigma. Sex Roles, 68, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0052-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnston-Robledo, J., & Stubbs, M. L. (2013). Positioning periods: Menstruation in social context: An introduction to a special issue. Sex Roles, 68, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0206-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kama, A., & Barak-Brandes, S. (2013). Taming the shame: Policing excretions and body fluids in advertisements for hygiene products. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 16, 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413491719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li, A., & Braun, V. (2016). Pubic hair and its removal: A practice beyond the personal. Feminism & Psychology, 23(3), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353516680233.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liao, L. M. (2003). Learning to assist women born with atypical genitalia: Journey through ignorance, taboo and dilemma. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 21, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264683031000154971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Martino, J. L., & Vermund, S. H. (2002). Vaginal douching: Evidence for risks or benefits to women’s health. Epidemiologic Reviews, 24, 109–124. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567125/.

  46. McDougall, L. (2013). Towards a clean slit: How medicine and notions of normality are shaping female genital aesthetics. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 15, 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.780639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McKee, M. D., Baquero, M., Anderson, M. R., Alvarez, A., & Karasz, A. (2009). Vaginal douching among Latinas: Practices and meaning. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 13, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0327-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Moran, C., & Lee, C. (2016). Everyone wants a vagina that looks less like a vagina: Australian women’s views on dissatisfaction with genital appearance. Journal of Health Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316637588.

  49. Morgan, K. P. (1991). Woman and the knife: Cosmetic surgery and the colonization of women’s bodies. Hypatia, 6, 25–53. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3809838.

  50. Nicole, W. (2014). A question for women’s health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.122-A70 Retrieved from https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a70/.

  51. Northrup, C. (2010). Women’s bodies, women’s wisdom. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ogbe, E., & Leye, E. (2015). Vaginal practices across cultures: Expressions of gender inequalities? In C. Longman & T. Bradley (Eds.), Interrogating harmful cultural practices (pp. 139–152). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Oppliger, P. (2008). Girls gone skank: The sexualisation of girls in American culture. Jefferson: McFarland and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Overend, A. (2011). Leaky bodies and the gendering of candida experiences. Women’s Health and Urban Life, 10, 94–113. Retrieved from http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~womenshealth/womenshealth/Home.html.

  55. Perloff, R. M. (2014). Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles, 71, 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199- 014-0384-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Piety, T. R. (2009). Onslaught: Commercial speech and gender inequality. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 60, 47–93. Retrieved from http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol60/iss1/4/.

  57. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Querna, K. (2008). Designer vaginas. Journal of Student Social Work, 6, 57–67. Retrieved from https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:156503.

  59. Reid, G. (2016). Cervicovaginal microbiomes-threats and possibilities. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 27, 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2016.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Reid, G., Kumar, H., Khan, A. I., Rautava, S., Tobin, J., & Salminen, S. (2016). The case in favour of probiotics before, during and after pregnancy: Insights from the first 1,500 days. Beneficial Microbes, 7, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2015.0140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Roberts, T. A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women’s self- objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471- 6402.2004.00119.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rodrigues, S. (2012). From vaginal exception to exceptional vagina: The biopolitics of female genital cosmetic surgery. Sexualities, 15, 778–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rosenblatt, K. A., Weiss, N. S., Cushing-Haugen, K. L., Wicklund, K. G., & Rossing, M. A. (2011). Genital powder exposure and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Causes, & Control, 22, 737–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-011-9746-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ruth, L., & Marston, C. (2016). Oral sex, young people, and gendered narratives of reciprocity. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 776–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1117564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Schick, V. R., Rima, B. N., & Calabrese, S. K. (2011). Evulvalution: The portrayal of women's external genitalia and physique across time and the current Barbie doll ideals. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903308404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Seidman, S., Fischer, N., & Meeks, C. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of new sexuality studies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Shildrick, M. (2015). Leady bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Terry, G., & Braun, V. (2011). To let hair be, or to not let hair be? Gender and body hair removal practices in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Body Image, 10, 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Urla, J., & Swedlund, A. (1995). The anthropology of Barbie: Unsettling ideals of the feminine body in popular culture. In J. Terry & J. Urla (Eds.), Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture (pp. 277–313). Bloomington: Indian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ussher, J. (1989). The psychology of the female body. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  71. van Amsterdam, N. (2014). Othering the ‘leaky body’. An autoethnographic story about expressing breast milk in the workplace. Culture and Organization, 21, 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2014.887081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Walsh, A. (1996). Forever fresh: Lost in the land of feminine hygiene. Utne Reader. Retrieved from http://www.utne.com/lens/bms/18bmsfresh.html.

  73. Wershler, L. (2011, August 2). Summer’s Eve campaign targets wrong body part. (Web log comment). Retrieved from http://www.menstruationresearch.org/2011/08/02/summers-eve-campaign-targets-wrong-body-part/.

  74. Wical, C. (2006). Matter out of place: Reading dirty women. M/C Journal, 9. Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0610/10-wical.php.

  75. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yanikkerem, E., & Yasayan, A. (2016). Vaginal douching practice: Frequency, associated factors and relationship with vulvovaginal symptoms. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 66, 387–392. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27122262.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the VOGUE research team for valuable input on this project. We also thank our undergraduate research assistants, with a special thank-you to Jessica Gibson, who helped with conducting, transcribing and coding the interviews and members of the Discourse, Science, and Publics research group for their valuable comments on an earlier version of our paper. We also thank the editor and three reviewers for helpful comments for the development of this article.

The present study was funded by the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) and Genome British Columbia.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kieran C. O’Doherty.

Ethics declarations

This research was approved by the University of Guelph Research Ethics Board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jenkins, A.L., Crann, S.E., Money, D.M. et al. “Clean and Fresh”: Understanding Women’s use of Vaginal Hygiene Products. Sex Roles 78, 697–709 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0824-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Health
  • Qualitative research
  • Feminism
  • Hygiene
  • Marketing
  • Female genitalia
  • Vagina