Sex Roles

, Volume 78, Issue 7–8, pp 515–527 | Cite as

More than a Media Moment: The Influence of Televised Storylines on Viewers’ Attitudes toward Transgender People and Policies

  • Traci K. Gillig
  • Erica L. Rosenthal
  • Sheila T. Murphy
  • Kate Langrall Folb
Original Article


Numerous studies have demonstrated the power of entertainment narratives to influence attitudes and behaviors; fewer have examined the effects of TV portrayals on attitudes toward marginalized groups. The present study is among the first to explore how entertainment narratives depicting transgender individuals influence viewers’ attitudes toward transgender people and related policies. The study examines the impact of exposure to a TV storyline on Royal Pains (USA Network) and cumulative effects of viewing other TV series featuring transgender individuals. An online survey of 488 U.S. viewers of Royal Pains was conducted (391 had seen the relevant episode). ANCOVAs revealed exposure to both the Royal Pains’ storyline and other storylines portraying transgender individuals were associated with more supportive attitudes toward transgender people and policies. Mediation models revealed that for viewers of the Royal Pains’ storyline, the relationships between political ideology and attitudes toward transgender people and policies were mediated by identification with the main characters and the emotion of hope. Disgust mediated viewers’ attitudes toward transgender people, but not policies. Post hoc analyses revealed that exposure to transgender narratives reduced the influence of viewers’ political ideology on their attitudes. The attitudes of more conservative viewers became increasingly positive as they saw more media portrayals of transgender individuals. These findings highlight the potential for entertainment narratives to influence attitudes toward marginalized groups, and they demonstrate the importance of emotion in the context of divisive topics. Social, political, and public health implications are discussed.


Transgender Entertainment Attitudes Media representations TV Narrative persuasion Hope Disgust 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Southern California and did not receive organizational funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Supplementary material

11199_2017_816_MOESM1_ESM.docx (294 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 294 kb)


  1. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartusiask, L., Wendt, J., & Mathie, M. (2015, March 13). Transgender teens face new struggles, options. Huffington post. Retrieved from
  3. Billard, T. J. (2016). Writing in the margins: Mainstream news media representations of transgenderism. International Journal of Communication, 10(26), 4193–4218.Google Scholar
  4. Bissinger, B. (2015, June 25). Caitlyn Jenner: The full story. Vanity Fair. Retrieved from:
  5. Braddock, K., & Horgan, J. (2016). Towards a guide for constructing and disseminating counternarratives to reduce support for terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(5), 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, V. (2004). The hope process and social inclusion. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592(1), 128–151. doi: 10.1177/0002716203262096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broockman, D., & Kalla, J. (2016). Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing. Science, 352(6282), 220–224. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (2006). Audience identification with media characters. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 183–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Courville, S., & Piper, N. (2004). Harnessing hope through NGO activism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592(1), 39–61. doi: 10.1177/0002716203261940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27(4), 461–495. doi: 10.1177/009365000027004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doan, L., Loehr, A., & Miller, L. R. (2014). Formal rights and informal privileges for same-sex couples: Evidence from a national survey experiment. American Sociological Review, 79(6), 1172–1195. doi: 10.1177/0003122414555886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. eMarketer. (2016, May 24). Even during TV time, digital devices play prominent role. Retrieved on from
  15. Fisher, W. R. (1985). The narrative paradigm: An elaboration. Communications Monographs, 52(4), 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, W. R. (1987). Technical logic, rhetorical logic, and narrative rationality. Argumentation, 1(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gillig, T. K., & Murphy, S. T. (2016). Fostering support for LGBTQ youth?: The effects of a gay adolescent media portrayal on young viewers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3823–3850.Google Scholar
  21. GLAAD. (2015). Where we are on TV report. Retrieved from
  22. GLAAD. (2016a). Where we are on TV report. Retrieved from
  23. GLAAD. (2016b). List of award recipients: 27th annual GLAAD media awards Waldorf Astoria New York, May 14, 2016. Retrieved from
  24. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind's eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Grossman, A. H., & D'Augelli, A. R. (2006). Transgender youth: Invisible and vulnerable. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(1), 111–128. doi: 10.1300/J082v51n01_06.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Herek, G. M. (1984). Beyond" homophobia": A social psychological perspective on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 10(1–2), 1–21. doi: 10.1300/J082v10n01_01.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Herek, G. M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(1), 40–66. doi: 10.1086/338409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30(3), 239–244. doi: 10.1080/00224499309551707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill, D. B., & Willoughby, B. L. (2005). The development and validation of the genderism and transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53(7–8), 531–544. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-7140-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18(8), 691–698. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9(3), 435. doi: 10.1037/a0015960.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Izard, C. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kellaway, M. (2015, June 8). Trans teen Nicole Maines's acting debut in Royal Pains has an important message. Retrieved from
  36. Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., & Hinyard, L. J. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221–235. doi: 10.1007/BF02879904.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kwon, P., & Hugelshofer, D. S. (2010). The protective role of hope for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals facing a hostile workplace climate. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 14(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1080/19359700903408914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Hope: An emotion and a vital coping resource against despair. Social Research, 66(2), 653–678.Google Scholar
  40. Lenchewski, A., Rogers, J. P., & Flint, C. (2015a). IMDB. Retrieved from
  41. Lenchewski, A. (Writer), Rogers, J. P. (Writer), & Flint, C. (Writer). (2015b). The prince of nucleotides. In Kwatinetz, J. (Executive Producer), Royal pains. Universal City, CA: Universal Cable Productions.Google Scholar
  42. Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Moran, M. B., & Patnoe-Woodley, P. (2011). Involved, transported, or emotional? Exploring the determinants of change in knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in entertainment-education. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 407–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01554.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nabi, R. L. (2002). The theoretical versus the lay meaning of disgust: Implications for emotion research. Cognition & Emotion, 16(5), 695–703. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., & Porticella, N. (2011). Attributions of responsibility for obesity: Narrative communication reduces reactive counterarguing among liberals. Human Communication Research, 37(3), 295–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01409.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of US adults. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 738–753. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought. The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oatley, K. (2002). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 39–69). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  49. Oliver, M. B., Dillard, J. P., Bae, K., & Tamul, D. J. (2012). The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paluck, E. L. (2009). What's in a norm? Sources and processes of norm change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 594–600. doi: 10.1037/a0014688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–781. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Prestin, A. (2013). The pursuit of hopefulness: Operationalizing hope in entertainment media narratives. Media Psychology, 16(3), 318–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M [superscript 2]: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from:
  54. Scheller, A., & Love, C. (2016). Transgender people are more visible than ever, but it’s still legal to discriminate against them in most states. Huffington Post. Retrieved from
  55. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92–115. doi: 10.1080/0363775052000342544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shapiro, T. R. (2015, July 1). Justice Dept. sides with transgender student, says bathroom policy is illegal. Washington Post. Retrieved from
  57. Shen, F., & Han, J. (2014). Effectiveness of entertainment education in communicating health information: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(6), 605–616. doi: 10.1080/01292986.2014.927895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment—Education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x.Google Scholar
  59. Slater, M. D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56(2), 235–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00017.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Steinmetz, K. (2014, May 29). The transgender tipping point. Time. Retrieved from
  62. Steinmetz, K. (2015, August 17). Why transgender people are being murdered at a historic rate. Time. Retrieved from
  63. Stuart, J. (2016). Disgust: An emotional component of conservative attitudes toward transgender individuals. College of William & Mary undergraduate honors theses. Retrieved from
  64. Tartaglione, N. (2015, June 24). Caitlyn Jenner’s E! Series titled “I am Cait” and will premiere July 26 – Update. Deadline. Retrieved from:
  65. Taylor, T. (2015, December 29). Why 2015 was the year of trans visibility. Vogue. Retrieved from
  66. Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Transforming “apathy into movement”: The role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 310–333. doi: 10.1177/1088868309343290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. TiVo. (2015). Distracted, but still watching: TiVo survey finds 99 percent of viewers are multitasking while watching TV. Marketwired. Retrieved from:
  68. Tomkins, S. (1963). Affect, imagery, consciousness: Vol. II. The negative affects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. TV By The Numbers. (2009, August 28). Royal Pains ends season with 5.9 million, most-watched first season show on USA ever. Retrieved from
  70. TV By the Numbers. (2015, June 25). Tuesday cable ratings: ‘Deadliest Catch’ wins night, ‘Pretty Little Liars’, ‘Rizzoli & Isles’, ‘Real Housewives of NY’, ‘Tyrant’, ‘Another Period’, & More. Retrieved from
  71. Walch, S. E., Sinkkanen, K. A., Swain, E. M., Francisco, J., Breaux, C. A., & Sjoberg, M. D. (2012). Using intergroup contact theory to reduce stigma against transgender individuals: Impact of a transgender speaker panel presentation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(10), 2583–2605. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00955.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walter, N., Demetriades, S. Z., Kelly, R., & Gillig, T. K. (2016). Je Suis Charlie? The framing of ingroup transgression and the attribution of responsibility for the Charlie Hebdo Attack. International Journal of Communication, 10(19), 3956–3974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Traci K. Gillig
    • 1
  • Erica L. Rosenthal
    • 2
  • Sheila T. Murphy
    • 1
  • Kate Langrall Folb
    • 2
  1. 1.Annenberg School for Communication and JournalismUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Hollywood, Health & SocietyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations