In many Western public primary school systems, the gender composition of the principals is more heterogenic than that of the teachers, but research on the effect of gender on social psychological processes related to school leadership is scarce. The present work aims to address this lacuna by exploring the effects of principal-teacher gender similarity in the Israeli public primary school system, where most teachers are women, on teachers’ trust in their principals and on organizational commitment. Data from 594 female public primary teachers working with male and female principals were analyzed. The results show that when the principal and teacher are of the same gender, both affective and cognitive trust in the principal are higher. Moderation analysis indicated that female teachers’ affective trust in male principals increases with relational duration. A second moderation effect that was found indicated that gender similarity and cognitive trust in principal have a negative interactive effect on teachers’ continued commitment to school, countering the positive effect of gender similarity on commitment. The results and their implications are discussed, and future research is recommended.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Allan, J. (1994). Anomaly as exemplar: The meanings of role-modeling for men elementary teachers. Dubuque: Tri-College Department of Education, Loras College.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252–276. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043.
Alvesson, M. (1998). Gender relations and identity at work: A case study of masculinities and femininities in an advertising agency. Human Relations, 51(8), 969–1005. doi:10.1177/001872679805100801.
Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 1–14. doi:10.2307/2392596.
Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2008). What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 235–249. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.235.
Avery, D. R., Wang, M., Volpone, S. D., & Zhou, L. (2013). Different strokes for different folks: The impact of sex dissimilarity in the empowerment-performance relationship. Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 757–784. doi:10.1111/peps.12032.
Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65(3), 157–170. doi:10.1037/a0018806.
Barkol, R. (2005). Management of a school as a second career: The case of (retired) IDF officers- from command to management in the education system. In I. Kupferberg & E. Olshtain (Eds.), Discourse in education (pp. 306–331). Tel Aviv: The Mofet Institute. (Hebrew).
Barnett, J. H., & Karson, M. J. (1989). Managers, values, and executive decisions: An exploration of the role of gender, career stage, organizational level, function, and the importance of ethics, relationships and results in managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(10), 747–771. doi:10.1007/BF0038377.
Barty, K., Thomson, P., Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2005). Unpacking the issues: Researching the shortage of school principals in two states in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 1–18. doi:10.1007/BF03216824.
Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of a leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538–1567. doi:10.2307/257068.
Berkovich, I. (2014). Neo-liberal governance and the “new professionalism” of Israeli principals. Comparative Education Review, 58(3), 428–456. doi:10.1086/676403.
Blackmore, J. (1996). Doing “emotional labour” in the education market place: Stories from the field of women in management. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 17(3), 337–349. doi:10.1080/0159630960170304.
Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1992). Leading and managing: Effects of context, culture, and gender. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 314–329. doi:10.1177/0013161X92028003005.
Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Carter, M. Z., Mossholder, K. W., Feild, H. S., & Armenakis, A. A. (2014). Transformational leadership, interactional justice, and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of racial and gender dissimilarity between supervisors and subordinates. Group & Organization Management, 39(6), 691–719. doi:10.1177/1059601114551605.
Chusmir, L. H. (1990). Men who make nontraditional career choices. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69(1), 11–16. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb01446.x.
Cross, S., & Bagilhole, B. (2002). Girls’ jobs for the boys? Men, masculinity and non-traditional occupations. Gender, Work and Organization, 9(2), 204–226. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00156.
DeRue, D. S., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Stability and change in person-team and person-role fit over time: The effects of growth satisfaction, performance, and general self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1242–1253. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1242.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611.
Duck, S. W. (1977). The study of acquaintance. Farnborough: Saxon House.
Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Johnson, B. T. (1992). Gender and leadership style among school principals: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 76–102. doi:10.1177/0013161X92028001004.
Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474–493. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0046.
Foley, S., Linnehan, F., Greenhaus, J. H., & Weer, C. H. (2006). The impact of gender similarity, racial similarity, and work culture on family-supportive supervision. Group & Organization Management, 31(4), 420–441. doi:10.1177/1059601106286884.
Forrester, G. (2005). All in a day’s work: Primary teachers “performing” and “caring.” Gender and Education, 17(3), 271–287. doi:10.1080/09540250500145114.
Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools can't improve without it. New York: Teachers College Press.
Goldberg, C. B., Riordan, C., & Schaffer, B. S. (2010). Does social identity theory underlie relational demography? A test of the moderating effects of uncertainty reduction and status enhancement on similarity effects. Human Relations, 63(7), 903–926. doi:10.1177/0018726709347158.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. doi:10.2307/2092623.
Guillaume, C., & Pochic, S. (2009). What would you sacrifice? Access to top management and the work–life balance. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(1), 14–36. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00354.x.
Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005.
Handford, V., & Leithwood, K. (2013). Why teachers trust school leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 194–212. doi:10.1108/09578231311304706.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107. doi:10.2307/256901.
Hoffman, R. M., & Borders, L. D. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(1), 39–55. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2001-06272-004.
Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools. In W. K. Hoy & M. F. DiPaola (Eds.), Essential ideas for the reform of American schools (pp. 87–114). Greenwich: Information Age.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers’ organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 565–575. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.08.006.
IISL. (2012). School principals: Situation report and future trends. Jerusalem: Israel Institute for School Leadership [In Hebrew].
Islam, G., & Zyphur, M. J. (2008). Concepts and directions in critical industrial/organizational psychology. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical Psychology: An Introduction (2nd ed., pp. 110–135). London: Sage Publications.
Johnson, R. E., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2010). “Who I am depends on how fairly I’m treated”: Effects of justice on self-identity and regulatory focus: Justice and motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(12), 3020–3058. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00691.x.
Kelan, E. K. (2010). Gender logic and (un)doing gender at work. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(2), 174–194. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00459.x.
Klein, U. (1999). “Our best boys”: The gendered nature of civil-military relations in Israel. Men and Masculinities, 2(1), 47–65. doi:10.1177/1097184X99002001004.
Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 319–333. doi:10.1002/job.4030160404.
Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Cioci, M. (1993). Teachers and principals: Gender-related perceptions of leadership and power in secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 153–180. doi:10.3102/01623737015002153.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. doi:10.1080/15700760500244769.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662–674. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.662.
Lowenthal, M. F., & Haven, C. (1968). Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 20–30. doi:10.2307/2092237.
Martin, P. Y. (2003). “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17(3), 342–366. doi:10.1177/0891243203017003002.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. doi:10.2307/256727.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..
Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2002). Socialization and trust in work groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5(3), 185–201. doi:10.1177/1368430202005003001.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1.
Moye, M. J., Henkin, A. B., & Egley, R. J. (2005). Teacher-principal relationships: Exploring linkages between empowerment and interpersonal trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(3), 260–277. doi:10.1108/09578230510594796.
NCES. (2013a). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2011–12 schools and staffing survey. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
NCES. (2013b). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school principals in the United States: Results from the 2011–12 schools and staffing survey. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
O'Conor, L. (2015, February 11). Where are all the female headteachers? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com.
Oplatka, I. (2001). ‘I changed my management style’: The cross-gender transition of women headteachers in mid-career. School Leadership & Management, 21(2), 219–233. doi:10.1080/13632430120054781.
Papa Jr., F., & Baxter, I. A. (2005). Dispelling the myths and confirming the truths of the imminent shortage of principals: The case of New York State. Planning and Changing, 36(3/4), 217–234. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ737684.
Paton, G. (2013, February 5). Teaching in primary schools ‘still seen as a woman’s job.’ The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk.
Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237–249. doi:10.1080/001318800440579.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603–609. doi:10.1037/h0037335.
Price, H. E. (2012). Principal–teacher interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39–85. doi:10.1177/0013161X11417126 .
Rogers, W. S. (2003). Social psychology: Experimental and critical approaches. Maiddenhead: Open University Press.
Sacco, J. M., Scheu, C. R., Ryan, A. M., & Schmitt, N. (2003). An investigation of race and sex similarity effects in interviews: A multilevel approach to relational demography. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 852–865. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.852.
Sanchez-Hucles, J. V., & Davis, D. D. (2010). Women and women of color in leadership: Complexity, identity, and intersectionality. American Psychologist, 65(3), 171–181. doi:10.1037/a0017459.
Schneider, A. (2004). Transforming retired military officers into school principals in Israel (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester, Leicester, England.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). The gender gap in research in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 324–337. doi:10.1177/0013161X89025004002.
Sheldon, M. E. (1971). Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 143–150. doi:10.2307/2391824.
Simpson, R. (2004). Masculinity at work: The experiences of men in female dominated occupations. Work, Employment and Society, 18(2), 349–368. doi:10.1177/09500172004042773.
Smithson, J., & Stokoe, E. H. (2005). Discourses of work-life balance: Negotiating “genderblind” terms in organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(2), 147–168. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00267.x.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46–56. doi:10.2307/2391745.
Stokes, J. P., & Wilson, D. G. (1984). The inventory of socially supportive behaviors: Dimensionality, prediction, and gender differences. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12(1), 53–69. doi:10.1007/BF00896928.
Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, W. K. (1988). The context of trust: Teachers and the principal. The High School Journal, 72(1), 17–24. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40364817?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Tarter, C. J., Bliss, J. R., & Hoy, W. K. (1989). School characteristics and faculty trust in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(3), 294–308. doi:10.1177/0013161X89025003005.
Tetrick, L. E., & Farkas, A. J. (1988). A longitudinal examination of the dimensionality and stability of the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(3), 723–735. doi:10.1177/0013164488483021.
The World Bank. (2017, July 12). Primary education, teachers (% female), 2014: Israel. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.TCHR.FE.ZS?locations=IL.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matter: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Turban, D. B., Dougherty, T. W., & Lee, F. K. (2002). Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: The moderating role of relationship duration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 240–262. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1855.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Hoboken: Blackwell.
Valmer, T. (2012, July 25). 15 minutes and you got the job: This is how school principals are choose. YNET. (Hebrew). Retrieved from http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4259494,00.html.
Vaux, A. (1985). Variations in social support associated with gender, ethnicity, and age. Journal of Social Issues, 41(1), 89–110. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01118.x.
Vecchio, R. P., & Bullis, R. C. (2001). Moderators of the influence of supervisor–subordinate similarity on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 884–896. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.884.
Vinkenburg, C. J., van Engen, M. L., Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion? The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.003.
Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321502.
Williams, T. R. (2001). Unrecognized exodus, unaccepted accountability: The looming shortage of principals and vice principals in Ontario public school boards. Toronto: Ontario Principals' Council.
Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. (2009). Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 143–154. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.009.
Yonah, Y. (2005). Israel as a multicultural democracy: Challenges and obstacles. Israel Affairs, 11(1), 95–116. doi:10.1080/1353712042000324472.
Zeinabadi, H. (2014). Principal-teacher high-quality exchange indicators and student achievement: Testing a model. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(3), 404–420. doi:10.1108/JEA-05-2012-0056.
Zeinabadi, H., & Salehi, K. (2011). Role of procedural justice, trust, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) of teachers: Proposing a modified social exchange model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1472–1481. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.387.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
About this article
Cite this article
Berkovich, I. Effects of Principal-Teacher Gender Similarity on Teacher’s Trust and Organizational Commitment. Sex Roles 78, 561–572 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0814-3
- Gender similarity
- Organizational commitment
- Trust in leader