Sex Roles

, Volume 78, Issue 7–8, pp 501–514 | Cite as

Rape Myths and Hookup Culture: An Exploratory Study of U.S. College Students' Perceptions

  • Timothy T. Reling
  • Michael S. Barton
  • Sarah Becker
  • Matthew A. Valasik
Original Article


The present study provides the first known systematic examination of the association of hookup culture endorsement and rape myth acceptance. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to test the primary hypothesis that hookup culture endorsement would be the primary predictor of rape myth acceptance levels among a sample of 422 U.S. college students. Findings indicated the existence of a complex relationship in which rape myth acceptance increases or decreases based upon the form of hookup culture endorsement examined. Beliefs that hookups are harmless and elevate social status increased rape myth acceptance, whereas beliefs that hookups express sexual freedom decreased rape myth acceptance. Furthermore, results supported the hypothesis that hookup culture endorsement was the largest predictor of rape myth acceptance. Consistent with previous studies, the predictive power of gender and religiosity in determining levels of rape myth acceptance were shown to be significant. When controlling for levels of hookup culture endorsement, the explanatory power of these variables decreased, and hookup culture endorsement had the largest effect upon rape myth acceptance levels.


Rape myths Hookup culture Gender 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

There were no potential conflicts of interest regarding this research. All subjects had the option to decline participation in the study. To mitigate psychological harm, subjects were administered a list of local mental health services to contact should the need have arisen.

Supplementary material

11199_2017_813_MOESM1_ESM.docx (28 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 28 kb)


  1. Ahrens, C. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 31–34. doi: 10.1177/088626001016012002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2014). “It goes hand in hand with the parties”: Race, class, and residence in college student negotiations of hooking up. Sociological Perspectives, 57, 102–123. doi: 10.1177/0731121413516608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aosved, A. C., & Long, P. J. (2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55, 481–492. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & Sweeney, B. (2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53, 483–499. doi: 10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. (2012). Accounting for women's orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462. doi: 10.1177/0003122412445802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aubrey, J., & Smith, S. (2011). Development and validation of the endorsement of the Hookup Culture Index. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 435–448. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.637246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barone, R. P., Wolgemuth, J. R., & Linder, C. (2007). Preventing sexual assault through engaging college men. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 585–594. doi: 10.1353/csd.2007.0045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartoli, A. M., & Clark, M. D. (2006). The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students. Sexuality and Culture, 10, 54–80. doi: 10.1007/s12119-006-1026-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker, S., & Tinkler, J. (2015). "Me getting plastered and her provoking my eyes": Young people’s attribution of blame for sexual aggression in public drinking spaces. Feminist Criminology, 10, 235–258. doi: 10.1177/1557085114541142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beichner, D., & Spohn, C. (2012). Modeling the effects of victim behavior and moral character on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault case. Violence and Victims, 27, 3–24. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.1.3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernston, M. A., & Hoffman, K. L. (2014). College as context: Influences on interpersonal sexuality scripts. Sexuality and Culture, 18, 149–165. doi: 10.1007/s12119-013-9180-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bleecker, E. T., & Murnen, S. K. (2005). Fraternity membership, the display of degrading sexual images of women, and rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 53, 487–493. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-7136-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Buchwald, E., Fletcher, P., & Roth, M. (Eds.). (2005). Transforming a rape culture (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.Google Scholar
  15. Burdette, A. M., Ellison, C. G., Hill, T. D., & Glenn, N. (2009). Hooking up at college: Does religion make a difference? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 535–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.38.2.217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Butler, J. (2013). Sexual subjects: Hooking up in the age of postfeminism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Sociology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  18. Carmody, D. C., & Washington, L. M. (2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 424–436. doi: 10.1177/088626001016005003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ching, C. L., & Burke, S. (1999). An assessment of college students' attitudes and empathy toward rape. College Student Journal, 33(4), 573–583.Google Scholar
  20. Clay-Warner, J., & Burt, C. H. (2005). Rape reporting after reforms have times really changed? Violence Against Women, 11, 150–176. doi: 10.1177/1077801204271566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261–1293. doi: 10.1086/230638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cochran, S. D., Mays, V. M., & Leung, L. (1991). Sexual practices of heterosexual Asian-American adults: Implications for risk of HIV infection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 381–391. doi: 10.1007/BF01542618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Currier, D. M. (2013). Strategic ambiguity protecting emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity. Gender and Society, 27, 704–727. doi: 10.1177/0891243213493960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. L. (2007). How to stop harassment: Professional construction of legal compliance in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1203–1243. doi: 10.1086/508788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Du Mont, J., Miller, K., & Myhr, T. L. (2003). The role of "real rape" and "real victim" stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466–486. doi: 10.1177/1077801202250960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. (2007). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today's college campuses. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The gendered society reader (pp. 531–547). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Estrich, S. (1986). Rape. Yale Law Journal, 95, 1087–1184. doi: 10.2307/796522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feild, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.2.156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feldman, S. S., Turner, R. A., & Araujo, K. (1999). Interpersonal context as an influence on sexual timetables of youths: Gender and ethnic effects. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 25–52. doi: 10.1207/s15327795jra0901_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Finlay, B. (1985). Right to life vs. the right to die: Some correlates of euthanasia attitudes. Sociology and Social Research, 69, 548–560.Google Scholar
  31. Flores, S. A., & Hartlaub, M. G. (1998). Reducing rape myth acceptance in male college students: A meta analysis of intervention studies. Journal of College Student Development, 39, 438–448.Google Scholar
  32. Foubert, J. D. (2000). The longitudinal effects of a rape-prevention program on fraternity men's attitudes, behavioral intent, and behavior. Journal of American College Health, 48, 158–163. doi: 10.1080/07448480009595691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Foubert, J. D., & Newberry, J. T. (2006). Effects of two versions of an empathy-based rape prevention program on fraternity men's survivor empathy, attitudes, and behavioral intent to commit rape or sexual assault. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 133–148. doi: 10.1353/csd.2006.0016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Foubert, J. D., Garner, D. N., & Thaxter, P. J. (2006). An exploration of fraternity culture: Implications for programs to address alcohol-related sexual assault. College Student Journal, 40, 361–373.Google Scholar
  35. Franiuk, R., Seefelt, J., & Vandello, J. (2008). Prevalence of rape myths in headlines and their effects on attitudes toward rape. Sex Roles, 58, 790–801. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9372-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Freitas, D. (2008). Sex and the soul: Juggling sexuality, spirituality, romance, and religion on America's college campuses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Freymeyer, R. H. (1997). Rape myths and religiosity. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 473–489. doi: 10.1080/02732173.1997.9982179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, R. T. (1986). Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15, 63–75. doi: 10.1007/BF00287532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gilmartin-Zena, P. (1988). Gender differences in students' attitudes toward rape. Sociological Focus, 21, 279–292. doi: 10.1080/00380237.1988.10570526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right. New York: Institute for American Values.Google Scholar
  41. Graham, K., Bernards, S., Osgood, D. W., Abbey, A., Perks, M., Flynn, A., Dumas, T., & Wells, S. (2014). ‘Blurred lines?’ Sexual aggression and barroom culture. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 38, 1416–1424. doi: 10.1111/acer.12356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gray, N. B., Palileo, G. J., & Johnson, G. D. (1993). Explaining rape victim blame: A test of attribution theory. Sociological Spectrum, 13, 377–392. doi: 10.1080/02732173.1993.9982040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood double binds and flawed options. Gender and Society, 23, 589–616. doi: 10.1177/0891243209345829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Herold, E. S., & Mewhinney, D. K. (1993). Gender differences in casual sex in aids prevention: A survey of dating bars. Journal of Sex Research, 15, 502–516. doi: 10.1080/00224499309551676.Google Scholar
  45. Hertzog, J., & Yeilding, R. (2009). College women's rape awareness and use of commonly advocated risk reduction strategies. College Student Journal, 43, 59–73.Google Scholar
  46. Hoffman, P. B., & Hardyman, P. L. (1986). Crime seriousness scales: Public perception and feedback to criminal justice policymaker. Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 413–431. doi: 10.1016/0047-2352(86)90109-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about 'hooking up': The influence of college student social networks on non-relationship sex. Health Communication, 27, 205–216. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.575540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hyman, C., & Handal, P. J. (2006). Definitions and evaluation of religion and spirituality items by religious professionals: A pilot study. Journal of Religion and Health, 45(2), 264–282. doi: 10.1007/s10943-006-9015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 517–523. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.700739.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kalish, R. (2013). Masculinities and hooking up: Sexual decision-making at college. Culture, Society and Masculinities, 5, 147–165. doi: 10.3149/CSM.0502.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kalof, L. (1993). Rape-supportive attitudes and sexual victimization experiences of sorority and nonsorority women. Sex Roles, 29, 767–780. doi: 10.1007/BF00289217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kennedy, A. M., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2002). Asian and non-Asian attitudes toward rape, sexual harassment, and sexuality. Sex Roles, 46, 227–238. doi: 10.1023/A:1020145815129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  54. Klaw, E. L., Lonsway, K. A., Berg, D. R., Waldo, C. R., Kothari, C., Mazurek, C. J., et al. (2005). Challenging rape culture. Women and Therapy, 28, 47–63. doi: 10.1300/J015v28n02_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee, J., Pomeroy, E. C., Yoo, S., & Rheinboldt, K. T. (2005). Attitudes toward rape: A comparison between Asian and caucasian college students. Violence Against Women, 11, 177–196. doi: 10.1177/1077801204271663.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths in review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00469.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. LSU Division of Strategic Communications. (2015). Fall facts 2015. Louisiana State University, Office of Budget and Planning, Baton Rouge. Retrieved from
  58. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications of cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin, P. Y., & Hummer, R. A. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender and Society, 3, 457–473. doi: 10.1177/089124389003004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McMahon, S. (2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59, 3–11. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.483715.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. McMahon, S., & Farmer, G. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35, 71–81. doi: 10.1093/swr/35.2.71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Melanson, P. K. (1999). Belief in male rape myths: A test of two competing theories (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A & I. (NQ31935).Google Scholar
  63. Monto, M. A., & Carey, A. G. (2014). A new standard of sexual behavior? Are claims associated with the "hookup culture" supported by general social survey data? Journal of Sex Research, 51, 605–615. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2014.906031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. National Sexual Violence Resource Center (NSVRC). (2015). Statistics about sexual violence. Retrieved from
  65. Nielsen, L. B. (2000). Situating legal consciousness: Experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment. Law and Society Review, 34, 1055–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nielsen, L. B. (2006). License to harass: Law, hierarchy, and offensive public speech. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Owen, J. J., Rhodes, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). 'Hooking up' among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Page, A. D. (2008). Gateway to reform? Policy implications of police officers' attitudes towards rape. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 44–58. doi: 10.1007/s12103-007-9024-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of "casual" sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students' hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 19, 639–661. doi: 10.1177/0265407502195006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). Hook-ups': Characteristics and correlates of college students' spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi: 10.1080/00224490009552023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Payne, D., Lonsway, K., & Fitzgerald, L. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structures and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Phillips, N. D. (2016). Beyond blurred lines: Rape culture in popular media. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. Reid, J. A., Elliott, S., & Webber, G. R. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender and Society, 25, 545–568. doi: 10.1177/0891243211418642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Robinson, D. T., Gibson-Beverly, G., & Schwartz, J. P. (2004). Sorority and fraternity membership and religious behaviors: Relation to gender attitudes. Sex Roles, 50, 871–877. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000029104.87813.d5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ronen, S. (2010). Grinding on the dance floor gendered scripts and sexualized dancing at college parties. Gender and Society, 24, 355–377. doi: 10.1177/0891243210369894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rupp, L. J., Taylor, V., Regey-Messalem, S., Fogarty, A., & England, P. (2013). Queer women in the hookup scene: Beyond the closet? Gender and Society, 28, 212–235. doi: 10.1177/0891243213510782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sable, M. R., Danis, F., Mauzy, D. L., & Gallagher, S. K. (2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: Perspectives of college students. Journal of American College Health, 55, 157–162. doi: 10.3200/JACH.55.3.157-162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sapp, M., Farrell Jr., W. C., Johnson Jr., J. H., & Hitchcock, K. (1999). Attitudes toward rape among African American male and female college students. Journal of Couseling and Development, 77, 204–208. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02441.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schwartz, M. D., DeKeseredy, W. S., Tait, D., & Alvi, S. (2001). Male peer support and a feminist routine activities theory: Understanding sexual assault on the college campus. Justice Quarterly, 18, 623–649. doi: 10.1080/07418820100095041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scott-Sheldon, L. A., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2008). Health behavior and college students: Does greek affiliation matter? Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 61–70. doi: 10.1007/s10865-007-9136-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1985). “Riding the bull at Gilley’s”: Convicted rapists describe the rewards of rape. Social Problems, 32, 251–263. doi: 10.2307/800685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2012). Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample: Differences between police officers with and without special training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 642–661. doi: 10.1177/0093854811434696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stinson, R. D. (2010). Hooking up in young adulthood: A review of factors influecing the sexual behavior of college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 24, 98–115. doi: 10.1080/87568220903558596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sweeney, B. (2014a). Masculine status, sexual performance, and the sexual stigmatization of Women. Symbolic Interaction, 37(3), 369–390. doi: 10.1002/symb.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sweeney, B. (2014b). To sexually perform or protect: Masculine identity construction and perceptions of women’s sexuality on a university campus in the midwestern USA. Gender, Place and Culture, 21, 1108–1124. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2013.817968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tinkler, J. E. (2008). “People are too quick to take offense”: The effects of legal information and beliefs on definitions of sexual harassment. Law and Social Inquiry, 33, 417–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tinkler, J. E., Becker, S., & Clayton, K. A. (2016). “Kind of natural, kind of wrong”: Young people’s beliefs about the morality, legality, and normalcy of sexual aggression in public drinking settings. Law and Social Inquiry. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12235.
  88. Uecker, J. E. (2008). Religion, pledging, and the premarital sexual behavior of married young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 728–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00517.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vonderhaar, R. L., & Carmody, D. C. (2015). There are no "innocent victims": The influence of just world beliefs and prior victimization of rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1615–1632. doi: 10.1177/0886260514549196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Wade, L. (2017). American hookup: The new culture of sex on campus. New York: W.W. Norton & Co..Google Scholar
  91. Ward, C. A. (1995). Attitudes toward rape: Feminist and social psychological perspectives. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  92. Ward, S. K., Chapman, K., Cohn, E., White, S., & Williams, K. (1991). Acquaintance rape and the college social scene. Family Relations, 40, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weinberg, M. S., & Williams, C. J. (1988). Black sexuality: A test of two theories. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 197–218. doi: 10.1080/00224498809551455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wilkins, A. C. (2012). Stigma and status interracial intimacy and intersectional identities among Black college men. Gender and Society, 26, 165–189. doi: 10.1177/0891243211434613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilson, L. C., & Miller, K. E. (2016). Meta-analysis of the prevalence of unacknowledged rape. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 17, 149–159. doi: 10.1177/1524838015576391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wylie, L., & Forest, J. (1992). Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism and prejudice. Psychological Reports, 7, 1291–1298. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3f.1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zullig, K. J., Ward, R. M., & Horne, T. (2006). The association between perceived spirituality, religiosity, and life satisfaction: The mediating role of self-rated health. Social Indicators Research, 79, 225–274. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-4127-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy T. Reling
    • 1
  • Michael S. Barton
    • 1
  • Sarah Becker
    • 1
  • Matthew A. Valasik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations