Professors’ Behaviors and Attributes that Promote U.S. Women’s Success in Male-Dominated Academic Majors: Results from a Mixed Methods Study
- 147 Downloads
High rates of attrition of women from male-dominated academic majors may stem from both individual-level personal attributes (e.g., lower confidence in skills; Sax et al. 2015) and non-supportive environmental factors (e.g., chilly climate; Blickenstaff 2005; Hill et al. 2010). Grounded in social cognitive career theory (Lent et al. 1994), the present study utilized a mixed methods approach to identify faculty behaviors and attributes that support women in male-dominated majors and help to prevent attrition. In Study 1, data from eight focus groups involving 23 senior women in male-dominated majors at a mid-sized U.S. Midwestern university were coded to identify common themes exploring why certain professors’ behaviors/attributes are useful to women in male-dominated majors. Results indicated that professors’ behaviors led to learning experiences that helped women create personal connections within departments and provided them with department or career-related information as well as opportunities to gauge/demonstrate their skills to combat the idea that they fit the incompetent-woman stereotype. In Study 2, survey data (n = 65) examined professors’ support, academic advising time, and percentage of female faculty within a department as buffers against the negative effects of sexism on women’s academic achievement, physical health, and social belongingness. Sexist events in the department were associated with women’s reduced sense of belonging, but academic advising time served as a buffer of this association. Overall, our results indicated that proximal environments are important and that professors’ behaviors that support women without singling them out were most helpful.
KeywordsWomen in male-dominated majors Professor behaviors Career development Sexism Women’s achievement Mixed methods
The authors thank Alex Di Iorio, Katie Matthews, Jenna Stroup, Kendal Franz, Savannah Guimond, Cassie Aker, and Michele Owen for their help with survey testing, data collection, and transcription.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
There are no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animals Rights
Human participants were included in the study. Research was approved by the University’s IRB prior to data collection.
Slightly different informed consents were used for senior, juniors, and sophomores (see below).
- Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsay, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435–447. Retrieved from http://www.midss.org/content/inventory-socially-supportive-behaviors-issb-long-and-short-form.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Byrne, E. M. (1993). Women and science: The snark syndrome. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- Gadzella, B. M., & Baloglu, M. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency of the student-life stress inventory. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28, 84–94. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-76696355/confirmatory-factor-analysis-and-internal-consistency.Google Scholar
- Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0272431693013001002.
- Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Hegewisch, A., Liepmann, H., Hayes, J., & Hartmann, H. (2010). Separate and not equal? Gender segregation in the labor market and the gender wage gap. Institute for Women’s Policy Research Briefing Paper IWPR C377. Retrieved from www.iwpr.org.
- Hill, C., Corbett, C., & Rose, A. S. (2010). Why so few women? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 255–311). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, H., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B. R., Gloster, C. S., et al. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for women and students at historically Black universities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 84–92. doi: 10.1037/0022-0220.127.116.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- Morse, J. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook for qualitative research (pp. 220–235). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Bachelor’s, master’s, and doctor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by sex of student and discipline division: 2013–14. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_318.30.asp?current=yes.
- Pavalko, E. K., Mossakowski, K. N., & Hamilton, V. J. (2003). Does perceived discrimination affect health? Longitudinal relationships between work discrimination and women’s physical and emotional health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(3), 18–33. doi: 10.2307/1519813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez, D., & Awad, G. H. (2016). Ethnic group differences in racial identity attitudes, perceived discrimination and mental health outcomes in African American, black Caribbean and Latino Caribbean college students. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health, 9(1), 31–43. doi: 10.1080/17542863.2015.1081955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sax, L. J., Kanny, M. A., Riggers-Piehl, T. A., Whang, H., & Paluson, L. N. (2015). “But I’m not good at math”: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 56, 813–842. doi: 10.1007/s11162-015-9375-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356–367. doi: 10.1037/1076-8918.104.22.1686.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walton, G. M., Logel, C., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 468–485. doi: 10.1037/a0037461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar