The Effects of Gender Neuroessentialism on Transprejudice: An Experimental Study
- 902 Downloads
This experimental study examined the impacts of gender neuroessentialism on stereotyping and prejudice against transgender people. We randomly assigned 132 Chinese, mostly heterosexual college students to read one of three fictitious articles in which the first article explained sex differences in personality and social behavior by neurological factors (biological determinist), a second article questioned this deterministic claim (interactionist), and a third article was unrelated to gender (neutral baseline). The biological determinist condition aimed to foster essentialist beliefs by priming the deterministic ways that the brain relates to personality and behavior, whereas the interactionist condition highlighted the interactive roles of the brain and environments on people’s personality and behavior. We found that participants in the biological determinist condition showed more negative stereotypes and stronger prejudicial attitudes toward transgender people compared with participants in the interactionist condition and those in the control condition. There were no significant differences in transprejudice between the interactionist and control conditions. The present study represents one of the few studies that examined the connection between gender essentialism and transprejudice. The findings suggest that essentialist claims that ground the male/female binary in biology may lead to more transprejudice.
KeywordsTransgender Prejudice Gender essentialism Neuroessentialism Biological determinism
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All participants of the present study consented to take part on a voluntary basis. After completing all measures, participants were debriefed to check for suspicions about the aims of the study. We used process debriefing (Ross et al. 1975) to discuss the goals and design of the study. Participants were presented with the alternative versions of the text and were encouraged to consider its plausibility. Participants were thanked and dismissed.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Campbell, A. (1971). White attitudes toward Black people. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Davidson, M., & Czopp, A. M. (2014). Too close for comfort: The moderating role of essentialism in transgender bias. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
- Esses, V. M., Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1994). The role of mood in the expression of intergroup stereotypes. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 77–101). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Haslam, N. (1998). Natural kinds, human kinds and essentialism. Social Research, 65, 291–314.Google Scholar
- Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2004). Essentialism and entitativity: Structure of beliefs about the ontology of social categories. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M., Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception (pp. 61–78). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Hettinger, V. (2014). Reconceptualizing the roAustinle of essentialism in attitudes towards gays and lesbians: The intersection of gender and sexual orientation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, FL.Google Scholar
- Jayaratne, T. E., Ybarra, O., Sheldon, J. P., Brown, T. N., Feldbaum, M., Pfeffer, C. A., & Petty, E. M. (2006). White Americans’ genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward blacks and gay men and lesbians. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 77–94. doi: 10.1177/1368430206059863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- King, M. E. (2008). Transprejudice in Hong Kong: Chinese attitudes towards transgenderism and transgender civil rights. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1999). Some consequences of a belief in group essence: The category divide hypothesis. In D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 213–236). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Reiner, P. B. (2011). The rise of neuroessentialism. In J. Illes & B. Sahakian (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Neuroethics (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Weisberg, D. S., Taylor, J. C., & Hopkins, E. J. (2015). Deconstructing the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(5), 429–441.Google Scholar
- Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20–50). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar