Sex Roles

, Volume 77, Issue 9–10, pp 628–638 | Cite as

Young Women’s Reflections of Viewing a Sexual Image for the First Time

Original Article

Abstract

Women are surrounded by sexualized imagery as well as cultural narratives that dictate their sexual behavior. These diverse cultural narratives include: women are sexually passive, women should desire sex and be sexually empowered, and women are expected to navigate ambivalent societal messages regarding their sexuality. In our study, we explored how college-aged young women describe and understand their first exposure to a sexual image. This mixed methods study, guided by critical feminism, addresses how young women, reflecting on their experiences since girlhood, have navigated changing cultural standards for female sexuality in light of complex negotiations among varying expectations. We examined 445 young women’s written reflections on seeing a sexual image for the first time. Most of the women reported that this experience occurred when they were in elementary school, and at home with friends, family, or alone. We found four themes of reactions to seeing the image for the first time: unwanted, intrigued, ambivalent, and neutral. Implications for comprehensive sex education include the need for teachers, parents, and other trusted adults to provide accurate and age-appropriate knowledge and opportunities for discussion about sexuality. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.

Keywords

College students Feminism Sexual attitudes Sexual imagery Sexuality Sexualization Young women 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article. We thank Michelle Murray and anonymous reviewers for their suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Adams, M. (2009). Engendering family past: 19th-century pro-family discourse through a feminist historical lens. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 234–248). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L. T., Armstrong, E. M., & Seeley, J. L. (2014). “Good girls”: Gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 100–122. doi: 10.1177/0190272514521220.
  4. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2015). The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73, 279–291. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, L. C. (2013). Hard to get: Twenty-something women and the paradox of sexual freedom. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boone, T. L. (2015). Messages about sexuality: An ecological perspective. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society, and Learning, 15, 437–450. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2015.1036981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Budgeon, S. (2012). The contradictions of successful femininity: Third-wave feminism, postfeminism and “new” femininities. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism, and subjectivity (pp. 279–292). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  9. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Delgado-Infante, M. L., & Ofreneo, M. A. P. (2014). Maintaining a “good girl” position: Young Filipina women constructing sexual agency in first sex within Catholicism. Feminism & Psychology, 24, 390–407. doi: 10.1177/0959353514530715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emmerink, P. M. J., Vanwesenbeeck, I., van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., & ter Bogt, T. F. M. (2016). Psychosexual correlates of sexual double standard endorsement in adolescent sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 286–297. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1030720.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24, 149–166. doi: 10.1177/0891243210361475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2014). The object of one’s desire: How perceived sexual empowerment through objectification is related to sexual outcomes. Sexuality & Culture, 18, 773–788. doi: 10.1007/s12119-013-9216-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29–53. doi: 10.17763/haer.58.1.u0468k1v2n2n8242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 297–338. doi: 10.17763/haer.76.3.w5042g23122n6703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freixas, A., Luque, B., & Reina, A. (2012). Critical feminist gerontology: In the back room of research. Journal of Women & Aging, 24, 44–58. doi: 10.1080/08952841.2012.6388891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedman, T. L. (2016). Thank you for being late: An optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of accelerations. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  18. Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 35–60. doi: 10.1177/0959353507084950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halpern, C. T., & Kaestle, C. E. (2014). Sexuality in emerging adulthood. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 487–522). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, S. (2005). “I’m 15 and desperate for sex”: “Doing” and “undoing” desire in letters to a teenage magazine. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 295–313. doi: 10.1177/0959-353505054717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women’s talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 113–127. doi: 10.1348/014466603763276153s.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson, S., & Vares, T. (2012). Media “sluts”: “Tween” girls’ negotiations of postfeminist sexual subjectivities in popular culture. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism, and subjectivity (pp. 134–146). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  23. Jackson, S., & Westrupp, E. (2010). Sex, postfeminist popular culture and the pre-teen girl. Sexualities, 13, 357–376. doi: 10.1177/1363460709363135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson, S., Vares, T., & Gill, R. (2013). “the whole playboy mansion image”: Girls’ fashioning and fashioned selves within a postfeminist culture. Feminism & Psychology, 23, 143–162. doi: 10.1177/0959353511433790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joshi, S. P., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). Scripts of sexual desire and danger in US and Dutch teen girl magazines: A cross-national content analysis. Sex Roles, 64, 463–474. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9941-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Lamb, S. (2001). The secret lives of girls: What good girls really do—Sex play, aggression, and their guilt. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62, 294–306. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. D. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66, 703–712. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9995-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lamb, S., & Plocha, A. (2014). Sexuality in childhood. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 415–432). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  30. Lorde, A. (1984). Uses of the erotic: The erotic as power. In A. Lorde (Ed.), Sister outsider: Essays and speeches (pp. 53–59). Freedom: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, K. A. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Girls and boys at adolescence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Milnes, K. (2010). Challenging the sexual double standard: Constructing sexual equality narratives as a strategy of resistance. Feminism & Psychology, 20, 255–259. doi: 10.1177/0959353509351182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Sullivan, L. F., & Thompson, A. E. (2014). Sexuality in adolescence. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 433–486). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  34. Orenstein, P. (2016). Girls & sex: Navigating the complicated new landscape. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  35. Paasonen, S., Kyrola, K., Nikunen, K., & Saarenmaa, L. (2015). “We hid porn magazines in the nearby woods”: Memory-work and pornography consumption in Finland. Sexualities, 18, 394–412. doi: 10.1177/1363460714550911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peterson, Z. D. (2010). What is sexual empowerment? A multidimensional and process-oriented approach to adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. Sex Roles, 62, 307–313. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9725-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid subjectivities? Re-theorizing teen girls’ sexual cultures in an era of “sexualization”. Journal of Sociology, 47, 389–409. doi: 10.1177/1440783311420792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. (2002). After the sexual revolution: Gender politics in teen dating. Contexts, 1, 16–24. doi: 10.1525/ctx.2002.1.1.16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) (2004). Guidelines for comprehensive sexuality education: Kindergarten through 12th grade (3rd ed.). Retrieved from www.siecus.org.
  40. Smith, S. H. (2012). Scripting sexual desire: Cultural scenarios of teen girls’ sexual desire in popular films, 2000-2009. Sexuality & Culture, 16, 321–341. doi: 10.1007/s12119-012-9126-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sprague, J. (2005). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  42. Thompson, S. (1996). Going all the way: Teenage girls’ tales of sex, romance, and pregnancy. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  43. Tolman, D. L. (1994). Doing desire: Adolescent girls’ struggles for/with sexuality. Gender & Society, 8, 324–342. doi: 10.1177/089124394008003003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Tolman, D. L. (2006). In a different position: Conceptualizing female adolescent sexuality development within compulsory heterosexuality. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 112, 71–91. doi: 10.1002/cd.163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Feminist Forum, 66, 746–757. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x.Google Scholar
  47. Tolman, D. L., Anderson, S. M., & Belmonte, K. (2015). Mobilizing metaphor: Considering complexities, contradictions, and contexts in adolescent girls’ and young women’s sexual agency. Sex Roles, 73, 298–310. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trinh, S. L. (2016). “enjoy your sexuality, but do it in secret”: Exploring undergraduate women’s reports of friends’ sexual communications. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 96–107. doi: 10.1177/0361684315596914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Ward, L. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347–388. doi: 10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00013-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations