Skip to main content
Log in

Restoring Threatened Masculinity: The Appeal of Sexist and Anti-Gay Humor

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose that men scoring higher in precarious manhood beliefs (PMB) express amusement with sexist and anti-gay humor (but not other forms of humor) in response to masculinity threat in order to reaffirm their masculinity. Accordingly, Experiment 1 (166 heterosexual men in the United States recruited through Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk) supported the hypothesis that men higher in PMB express greater amusement with sexist and anti-gay jokes after experiencing a threat to their masculinity but not in the absence of masculinity threat. Also, the significant positive relationship between PMB and amusement following a masculinity threat was unique to the sexist and anti-gay jokes; it did not emerge for anti-Muslim and neutral jokes. Experiment 2 (221 heterosexual men in the United States recruited through Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk) extended the findings of Experiment 1, supporting the hypothesis that, following a masculinity threat, men higher in PMB express amusement with sexist and anti-gay humor because they believe it reaffirms their masculinity. Thus, our findings suggest that sexist and anti-gay humor serve a self-affirming function for men who possess higher PMB in situations that threaten one’s masculinity. By uncovering a novel psychological function of sexist and anti-gay humor in social settings, we hope the present research will lead to better understandings of the kinds of situations that foster its occurrence and ultimately to strategies for preventing it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, J. R., Bippus, A. M., & McGaughey, K. J. (2015). Gender disparaging jokes: An investigation of sexist-nonstereotypical jokes on funniness, typicality, and the moderating role of ingroup identification. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 28(2), 311–326. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1131583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelone, D. J., Hirschman, R., Suniga, S., Armey, M., & Armelie, A. (2005). The influence of peer interactions on sexually oriented joke telling. Sex Roles, 52(3–4), 187–199. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1294-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attardo, S. (1993). Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 537–558. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(93)90111-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, K. (1994). To be PC or not to be? A social psychological inquiry into political correctness. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). Measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bill, B., & Naus, P. (1992). The role of humor in the interpretation of sexist incidents. Sex Roles, 27, 645–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J., Prewitt-Freilino, J., & Taylor, J. (2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 552–565. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourhis, R. Y., Gadfield, N. J., Giles, H., & Tajfel, H. (1977). Context and ethnic humour in intergroup relations. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), It’s a funny thing, humor (pp. 261–265). Elmsford: Pergamon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, D., Plant, E. A., Ratcliff, J., Zielaskowski, K., & Boerner, P. (2013). Concern over the misidentification of sexual orientation: Social contagion and the avoidance of sexual minorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 941–960. doi:10.1037/a0034145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, J., & Plant, E. A. (2016). Judged by the company you keep? Exposure to nonprejudiced norms reduces concerns about being misidentified as gay/lesbian. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1164–1176. doi:10.1177/0146167216652858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770 .

  • Dahl, J. L., Vescio, T. K., & Weaver, K. S. (2015). How threats to masculinity sequentially cause public discomfort, anger and ideological dominance over women. Social Psychology, 46(4), 242–254. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M. A., & Ford, T. E. (2008). Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 21(3), 283–312. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T. E. (2000). Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1094–1107. doi:10.1177/01461672002611006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T. E., Boxer, C., Armstrong, J., & Edel, J. (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice- releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159–170. doi:10.1177/0146167207310022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T. E., Woodzicka, J. A., Triplett, S. R., Kochersberger, A. O., & Holden, C. J. (2014). Not all groups are equal: Differential vulnerability of social groups to the prejudice-releasing effects of disparagement humor. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17(2), 178–199. doi:10.1177/1368430213502558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.70.3.491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Gangl, C., Gibb, S., Klumpner, S., & Weinberg, E. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: More negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles, 57, 55–59. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9195-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govorun, O., Fuegen, K., & Payne, B. K. (2006). Stereotypes focus defensive projection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(6), 781–793. doi:10.1177/0146167205285556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A., & Ford, T. E. (2013). The role of social context in the interpretation of sexist humor. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 26(2), 277–293. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D., & Isbell, L. M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men’s and women’s reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 341–350. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E., & Bjorn, L. (1986). Women’s responses to sexual harassment: An analysis of sociocultural, organizational, and personal resource models. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 814–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper] . Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.

  • Hemmasi, M., Graf, L. A., & Russ, G. S. (1994). Gender related jokes in the workplace: Sexual humor or sexual harassment? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1114–1128. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb02376.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., & MacInnis, C. C. (2016). Derogating humor as a delegitimization strategy in intergroup contexts. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2, 63–74. doi:10.1037/tps0000052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husband, C. (1977). The mass media and the functions of ethnic humor in a racist society. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), It's a funny thing, humor (pp. 267–272). Oxford: Pergamon. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-021376-7.50051-6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jaschik, S. (2016, February 29). When a joke isn’t funny: Online group of scholars of planning and geography divided over one professor’s sexist humor – And how others reacted to it. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/02/29/sexist-joke-leads-debate-and-118-resignations-academic-listserv-planning-and. Accessed 15 July 2016.

  • Johnson, A. M. (1990). The “only joking” defense: Attribution bias or impression management? Psychological Reports, 67, 1051–1056. doi:10.2466/PR0.67.7.1051-1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalish, R., & Kimmel, M. (2010). Suicide by mass murder: Masculinity, aggrieved entitlement, and rampage school shootings. Health Sociological Review, 19, 451–464. doi:10.5172/hesr.2010.19.4.451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehily, M. J., & Nayak, A. (1997). Lads and laughter: Humor and the production of heterosexual hierarchies. Gender and Education, 9, 69–87. doi:10.1080/09540259721466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeper, K., Sanchez, D., & Himmelstein, M. (2014). Heterosexual men’s confrontation of sexual prejudice: The role of precarious manhood. Sex Roles, 70, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0306-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. (2011). Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm as a framework. American Psychology, 66(8), 765–776. doi:10.1037/a0025034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mailer, N. (1966). Cannibals and Christians. New York: The Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, R. K., Ford, T. E., & Woodzicka, J. A. (2016). What did he mean by that? Humor decreases attributions of sexism and confrontation of sexist jokes. Sex Roles, 75, 272–284. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0605-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montemurro, B. (2003). Not a laughing matter sexual harassment as “material” on workplace-based situation comedies. Sex Roles, 48(9–10), 443–445. doi:10.1023/A:1023578528629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montemurro, B., & Benfield, J. A. (2015). Hung out to dry: Use and consequences of disparagement humor on American idol. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 28(2), 229–252. doi:10.1515/humor-2015-0022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netchaeva, E., Kouchaki, M., & Sheppard, D. (2015). A man’s (precarious) place: Men’s experienced threat and self-assertive reactions to female superiors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(9), 1247–1259. doi:10.1177/0146167215593491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B. (1995). The phenomenology of sexual harassment: Why does sexual behavior bother people in the workplace? Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 47, 160–168. doi:10.1037/1061-4087.47.3.160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebler, F., Sabelus, S., & Bohner, G. (2008). A refined computer harassment paradigm: Validation, and test of hypotheses about target characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(1), 22–35. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00404.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomae, M., & Pina, A. (2015). Sexist humour and social identity: The role of sexist humour in men’s ingroup cohesion, sexual harassment, rape proclivity and victim blame. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 28(2), 187–204. doi:10.1515/humor-2015-0023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. A., & Esses, V. M. (2004). Individual differences in reactions to sexist humor. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 89–100. doi:10.1177/1368430204039975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339. doi:10.1037/a0012453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, K., & Vescio, T. (2015). The justification of social inequality in response to masculinity threats. Sex Roles, 72, 521–535. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0484-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, F. W., Barron III, W. L., & Willis, A. C. (1980). Disparagement humor: Dispositions and resolutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 701–709. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (1983). Disparagement humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research: Basic issues (Vol. 1, pp. 85–107). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1996). A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp. 93–116). New York: Wiley & Sons (Original work published 1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma C. O’Connor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Connor, E.C., Ford, T.E. & Banos, N.C. Restoring Threatened Masculinity: The Appeal of Sexist and Anti-Gay Humor. Sex Roles 77, 567–580 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0761-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0761-z

Keywords

Navigation