Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 77, Issue 9–10, pp 639–652 | Cite as

From Orgasms to Spanking: A Content Analysis of the Agentic and Objectifying Sexual Scripts in Feminist, for Women, and Mainstream Pornography

  • Niki Fritz
  • Bryant Paul
Original Article

Abstract

Historically, pro- versus anti-pornography debates have been positioned around the concepts of sexual objectification versus sexual agency—arguing that pornography, especially Mainstream content, results in objectification of women versus arguing that pornography, especially Feminist pornography or erotica, depicts and can lead to female sexual empowerment. To date, however, no one has examined the content of Mainstream compared to Feminist pornography. The present content analysis of 300 pornographic scenes compares categories of internet pornography aimed at women (including Feminist and For Women) to Mainstream pornography, examining indicators of both sexual objectification (including stripping, cumshots, aggression, genital focus, and gaping) and agency (including self-touch, orgasm, and directing and initiating sex). Results suggest that Mainstream pornography contains significantly more depictions of female objectification than both Feminist and For Women content. There is an objectification gender gap between men and women in all categories, which is significantly wider in Mainstream content than in pornography aimed at women. Focusing on empowerment, queer Feminist pornography contained significantly more indicators of female sexual agency than both For Women and Mainstream categories, although primarily heterosexual Feminist pornography did not. Findings suggest that different categories of pornography provide women with different scripts related to sexual objectification, agency, and gender dynamics, which may impact sexual behavior.

Keywords

Pornography Feminist pornography Erotica Sexual objectification Sexual agency Sexual aggression Sexual scripts Social cognitive theory Scripting theory 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

There are no known potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise. This project did not receive outside funding.

This research did not involve human participants and therefore no IRB approval or informed consent was necessary.

References

  1. Allen, M., D'alessio, D., & Brezgel, K. (1995). A meta-analysis summarizing the effects of pornography II aggression after exposure. Human Communication Research, 22(2), 258–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubrey, J. S. (2007). Does television exposure influence college-aged women's sexual self-concept? Media Psychology, 10(2), 157–181. doi: 10.1080/15213260701375561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc..Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 289–300. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101.
  6. Bridges, A. J., Wosnitzer, R., Scharrer, E., Sun, C., & Liberman, R. (2010). Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos: A content analysis update. Violence Against Women, 16(10), 1065–1085. doi: 10.1177/1077801210382866.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Corsianos, M. (2007). Mainstream pornography and “women”: Questioning sexual agency. Critical Sociology, 33(5–6), 863–885. doi: 10.1163/156916307X230359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CrashPad Series. (2014, November 19). CrashPad Series. Retrieved from www.crashpadseries.com.
  9. Cross Validated. (2017, February 20). McNemar tests. Retrieved from http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mcnemar-test.
  10. Curtin, N., Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment, and agency. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23(1), 48–62. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2010.524694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deutsch, A. R., Hoffman, L., & Wilcox, B. L. (2014). Sexual self-concept: Testing a hypothetical model for men and women. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 932–945. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.805315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dines, G. (2010). Pornland: How porn has hijacked our sexuality. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dodson, B. (2013). Porn wars. In T. Taormino, C. Penley, C. Shimizu, & M. Miller-Young (Eds.), The feminist porn book: The politics of producing pleasure (pp. 23–31). New York: Feminist Press at CUNY.Google Scholar
  14. Donnerstein, E. (1980). Pornography and violence against women: Experimental studies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 347(1), 277–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb21278.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Duberman, A. (2014). Women prefer gay porn to 'female-friendly' straight porn, says survey. In Huffington post women Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/01/pornhub-study-women_n_5888960.html.Google Scholar
  16. Dworkin, A. (1989). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  17. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Good For Her. (2014, September 15). Good for Her Feminist Porn Awards. Retrieved from http://www.feministpornawards.com/porn/.
  19. Hald, G. M. (2006). Gender differences in pornography consumption among young heterosexual Danish adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(5), 577–585. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9064-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hald, G. M., Kuyper, L., Adam, P. C., & de Wit, J. B. (2013a). Does viewing explain doing? Assessing the association between sexually explicit materials use and sexual behaviors in a large sample of Dutch adolescents and young adults. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(12), 2986–2995. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hald, G. M., Malamuth, N. N., & Lange, T. (2013b). Pornography and sexist attitudes among heterosexuals. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 638–660. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen, R. (2007). Getting off: Pornography and the end of masculinity. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jensen, R., Dines, G., & Russo, A. (1998). Pornography: The production and consumption of inequality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Klaassen, M. J., & Peter, J. (2014). Gender (in) equality in internet pornography: A content analysis of popular pornographic internet videos. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(7), 721–735. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2014.976781.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Linz, D., Donnerstein, E., & Penrod, S. (1984). The effects of multiple exposures to filmed violence against women. Journal of Communication, 34(3), 130–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02180.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lust Cinema. (2014, November 4). Lust Cinema. Retrieved from www.lustcinema.com.
  27. MacKinnon, C. A. (1983). Not a moral issue. Yale Law and Policy Review, 2, 321. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/stable/40239168.
  28. MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Sexuality, pornography, and method: Pleasure under patriarchy. Ethics, 99(2), 314–346. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/stable/2381437.
  29. Malamuth, N. M., & Donnerstein, E. I. (1984). Pornography and sexual aggression. Virginia: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Malamuth, N. M., & Spinner, B. (1980). A longitudinal content analysis of sexual violence in the best-selling erotic magazines. Journal of Sex Research, 16(3), 226–237. doi: 10.1080/00224498009551079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 11(1), 26–91. doi: 10.1080/10532528.2000.10559784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Malamuth, N. M., Hald, G. M., & Koss, M. (2012). Pornography, individual differences in risk and men’s acceptance of violence against women in a representative sample. Sex Roles, 66(7–8), 427–439. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0082-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malik, C., & Wojdynski, B. W. (2014). Boys earn, girls buy: Depictions of materialism on US children's branded-entertainment websites. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 404–422. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2013.852986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKee, A. (2005). The objectification of women in mainstream pornographic videos in Australia. The Journal of Sex Research, 42(4), 277–290. doi: 10.1080/00224490509552283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Milburn, M. A., Mather, R., & Conrad, S. D. (2000). The effects of viewing R-rated movie scenes that objectify women on perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles, 43(9–10), 645–664. doi: 10.1023/A:1007152507914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Monk-Turner, E., & Purcell, H. C. (1999). Sexual violence in pornography: How prevalent is it? Gender Issues, 17(2), 58–67. doi: 10.1007/s12147-999-0015-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paasonen, S., Nikunen, K., & Saarenmaa, L. (2007). Pornification: Sex and sexuality in media culture. Oxford/New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  38. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles, 56(5–6), 381–395. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). The influence of sexually explicit internet material and peers on stereotypical beliefs about women's sexual roles: Similarities and differences between adolescents and adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(9), 511–517. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pornhub. (2014, November 15). Pornhub. Retrieved from www.pornhub.com.
  41. Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258–284. doi: 10.1080/00909889909365539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rumelt, L. (2011). I did it for science: Female-friendly porn. In The nerve Retrieved from http://www.nerve.com/love-sex/i-did-it-for-science/i-did-it-for-science-female-friendly-porn.Google Scholar
  43. Shim, J. W., & Paul, B. M. (2014). The role of anonymity in the effects of inadvertent exposure to online pornography among young adult males. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(5), 823–834. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.5.823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. SimilarWeb. (2014, September 1). SimilarWeb. Retreived from https://www.similarweb.com/website/pornhub.com.
  45. Steinem, G. (1980). Erotica and pornography: A clear and present difference. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography (pp. 35–39). New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  46. Sun, C., Bridges, A., Wosnitzer, R., Scharrer, E., & Liberman, R. (2008). A comparison of male and female directors in popular pornography: What happens when women are at the helm? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(3), 312–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00439.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taormino, T. (Producer and Director). (2009). “Switch” from Tristan Taormino’s Rough Sex [motion picture]. United States: Vivid Entertainment.Google Scholar
  48. Taormino, T. (2013). Calling the shots: Feminist porn in principle and practice. The feminist porn book: The politics of producing pleasure (pp. 255–264). New York: Feminist Press at CUNY.Google Scholar
  49. Taormino, T., Penley, C., Shimizu, C., & Miller-Young, M. (2013). The feminist porn book: The politics of producing pleasure. New York: Feminist Press at CUNY.Google Scholar
  50. Tylka, T. L., & Van Diest, A. M. K. (2014). You looking at her “hot” body may not be “cool” for me integrating male partners’ pornography use into objectification theory for women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(1), 67–84. doi: 10.1177/0361684314521784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vega, C., & Pryzgoda, D. (2012, February 2). James Deen: Wholesome-looking, boy-next-door is porn's hottest star. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/james-deen-wholesome-boy-door-porns-hottest-star/story?id=15499092.
  52. Wright, P. J. (2011). 14 mass media effects on youth sexual behavior assessing the claim for causality. Communication Yearbook, 35, 343–385. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2011.11679121.Google Scholar
  53. Wright, P. J. (2012). Show me the data! Empirical support for the “centerfold syndrome.” Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13(2), 180–198. doi: 10.1037/a0023783.
  54. Wright, P. J., & Funk, M. (2014). Pornography consumption and opposition to affirmative action for women: A prospective study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(2), 208–221. doi: 10.1177/0361684313498853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wright, P. J., & Randall, A. K. (2014). Pornography consumption, education, and support for same-sex marriage among adult US males. Communication Research, 41(5), 665–689. doi: 10.1177/0093650212471558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright, P. J., Bae, S., & Funk, M. (2013). United States women and pornography through four decades: Exposure, attitudes, behaviors, individual differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(7), 1131–1144. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0116-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright, P. J., Arroyo, A., & Bae, S. (2015). An experimental analysis of young women's attitude toward the male gaze following exposure to centerfold images of varying explicitness. Communication Reports, 28(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2014.915048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wylde, D. (2011). My interview with Tristan Taormino [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://dodsonandross.com/blogs/danny-wylde/2011/03/my-interview-tristan-taormino.
  59. Zhou, Y., & Paul, B. (2016). Lotus blossom or dragon lady: A content analysis of “Asian women” online pornography. Sexuality & Culture, 20(4), 1083–1100. doi: 10.1007/s12119-016-9375-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Media SchoolIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.The Media SchoolIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations