Does Parenthood Change Attitudes to Fathering? Evidence from Australia and Britain
- 680 Downloads
A wealth of research has established that the transition to parenthood can shift men’s and women’s attitudes to motherhood. We add to this knowledge base by examining how attitudes to fatherhood change across the transition to parenthood. This is important within a historical period in which definitions of what it means to be a good father are changing to emphasise hands-on involvement in childcare, yet there has been little institutional change to support this. Our empirical analyses rely on long-running, panel data from Britain and Australia, and fixed-effect panel regression models. We find that attitudes to fatherhood change significantly after the birth of a first child. For most of the measures considered, parenthood results in men’s attitudes to fatherhood becoming comparatively more egalitarian than women’s. While both Australian and British men become more enthusiastic towards being involved in the care and upbringing of their children after experiencing parenthood, Australian women become less likely to agree that fathers should do so. These findings provide a partial explanation for why couples engage in more traditional gender divisions of labour after parenthood. They suggest that men’s involvement in childcare is not only constrained at the institutional and employment levels, but also by their female partners becoming more reluctant to support an active fathering role. More broadly, our research adds to growing evidence demonstrating that first births are an important life-course marker, and parenthood has the capacity to shift how men and women perceive their familial roles and their broader roles in society.
KeywordsGender attitudes Fatherhood Parenthood Longitudinal Australia Britain
The present research was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (project number CE140100027) and the European Research Council under the European Union's 7th Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement n. 263651. This paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to either DSS or the Melbourne Institute.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
The authors confirm that the manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
Francisco Perales and Janeen Baxter are supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (project number CE140100027).
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Australian Government. (2015). Paid parental leave: Dad and partner pay. Minister’s foreword. Retrieved from https://www.dss.gov.au/our-responsibilities/families-and-children/programs-services/paid-parental-leave-scheme/paid-parental-leave-dad-and-partner-pay.
- Australian Human Rights Commission. (2014). Supporting working parents: Pregnancy and return to work national review – report. Retrieved from https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/sex-discrimination.
- Bengtson, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (2009). The life course perspective applied to families over time. In W. J. Doherty, P. G. Boss, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 469–504). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Berrington, A., Hu, Y. J., Smith, P. W. F., & Sturgis, P. (2008). A graphical chain model for reciprocal relationships between women's gender role attitudes and labour force participation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series a-Statistics in Society, 171, 89–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00510.x.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man. Fatherhood, housework and gender equity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cooke, L. P., & Baxter, J. (2010). “Families” in international context: Comparing institutional effects across western societies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 516–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00716.x.
- Edin, K., & Nelson, T. J. (2013). Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Elder Jr., G. H. (1995). The life course paradigm: Social change and individual development. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder Jr., & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 101–139). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Esping-Andersen, G. (2013). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Featherstone, B. (2009). Contemporary fathering: Theory, policy and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gerson, K. (1993). No man’s land: Men’s changing commitments to work and family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Jarallah, Y., Perales, F., & Baxter, J. (2016). Parenthood and men’s and women’s gender-role attitudes: Does child’s gender matter? LCC Working Papers, 2016–2012. Retrieved from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:390471.
- Kan, M. Y., & Gershuny, J. (2010). Gender segregation and bargaining in domestic labour: Evidence from longitudinal time-use data. In J. Scott, R. Crompton, & C. Lyonette (Eds.), Gender inequalities in the 21st century: New barriers and continuing constraints (pp. 153–173). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Morgan, D. H. J. (2004). Men in families and households. In J. Scott, J. Treas, & M. Richards (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the sociology of families (pp. 306–321). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2016). Family database: Key characteristics of parental leave systems. Retrieved fromhttp://www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm.
- Statistisches Bundesamt. (2015). Rund 80% der Väter in Elternzeit beziehen Elterngeld für 2 Monate [Roughly 80% of fathers take parental leave for 2 months]. Pressemitteilung Nr. 109 vom 25.03.2015. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2015/03/PD15_109_22922.html.
- Summerfield, M., Freidin, S., Hahn, M., Ittak, P., Li, N., Macalalad, N., et al. (2012). HILDA user manual - release 11. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Taylor, M. F., Brice, J., Buck, N., & Prentice-Lane, E. (2010). British household panel survey user manual volume A: Introduction, technical report and appendices. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar