Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 77, Issue 9–10, pp 653–662 | Cite as

Personality across Sexual Identity and Gender in a National Probability Sample in New Zealand

  • Lara M. Greaves
  • Fiona Kate Barlow
  • Yanshu Huang
  • Samantha Stronge
  • Chris G. Sibley
Original Article

Abstract

Preliminary evidence in online and convenience samples has shown small but significant personality differences across sexual identity and gender over a number of personality traits. The idea that gender intersects with sexual identity to affect personality has been formalized into two hypotheses: the gender inversion hypothesis (that lesbians and heterosexual men, as well as gay men and heterosexual women, have indistinguishable mean scores on personality traits) and the gender shift hypothesis (that gay men’s and lesbians’ personality scores fall somewhere between those of heterosexual women and men). We investigate personality differences in self-identified sexual identity across and within gender in a large, national probability sample in New Zealand (N = 14,230). There was support for the gender inversion hypothesis on some traits; lesbians (relative to heterosexual women) had similar conscientiousness scores to those of heterosexual men, and gay men (relative to heterosexual men) scored similar to heterosexual women in agreeableness and emotional stability. Our work highlights the importance of taking an intersectional approach to simultaneously consider gender and sexual identity when it comes to understanding personality.

Keywords

Sexual identity Personality Gender Gender inversion Gender shift 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Lara Greaves was supported by a University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship during the preparation of this manuscript. This research was supported by a Templeton World Charity Foundation Grant (ID: 0077). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

As per the NZAVS data access statement, a copy of the anonymous data reported in each NZAVS publication is available from CS.

References

  1. Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 327–353. doi: 10.1002/per.417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294907.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. doi: 10.1080/00223890902935878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, J., Salmond, C., & Crampton, P. (2014). NZDep2013 index of deprivation. University of Otago Wellington: Department of Public Health. Retrieved from http://www.otago.ac.nz/wellington/otago069936.pdf.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation: A conceptual analysis and quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 43–55. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bem, D. J. (2000). Exotic becomes erotic: Interpreting the biological correlates of sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29(6), 531–548. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography, 37, 139–154. doi: 10.2307/2648117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bostwick, W. B., Boyd, C. J., Hughes, T. L., & McCabe, S. E. (2010). Dimensions of sexual orientation and the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 100(3), 468–475. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2008.152942.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa Jr., P., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322–331. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. doi: 10.2307/1229039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). New York: Taylor & Francis. doi: 10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, H. (1915). Studies in the psychology of sex: Inversion theory (3rd ed.) Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, L., & Ames, M. A. (1987). Neurohormonal functioning and sexual orientation: A theory of homosexuality–heterosexuality. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 233–258. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.101.2.233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eskin, M., Kaynak-Demir, H., & Demir, S. (2005). Same-sex sexual orientation, childhood sexual abuse, and suicidal behavior in university students in Turkey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 185–195. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-1796-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Freud, S. (1953). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. In J. Strachey (Ed. and trans.) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7, pp. 136–148). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1905).Google Scholar
  17. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), 141–165.Google Scholar
  18. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Greaves, L. M. (2014). Statistical standard for coding sexual orientation. NZAVS Technical Documents, e20. Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/nzavs/NZAVSTechnicalDocuments/NZAVS-Technical-Documents-e20-Sexual-Orientation-Statistical-Standard.xlsx.
  21. Greaves, L. M., Barlow, F. K., Lee, C., Matika, C., Wang, W., Lindsay, C., et al. (2016). The diversity and prevalence of sexual orientation self-labels in a New Zealand national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0857-5.Google Scholar
  22. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herek, G. M. (2016). The social psychology of sexual prejudice. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed., pp. 355–384). New York: Psychology Press. doi: 10.4324/9781841697772.Google Scholar
  24. Herek, G. M., & McLemore, K. A. (2013). Sexual prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 309–333. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan, A. A., Jacobson, K. C., Gardner, C. O., Prescott, C. A., & Kendler, K. S. (2005). Personality and comorbidity of common psychiatric disorders. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186(3), 190–196. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.3.190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lippa, R. A. (2005). Sexual orientation and personality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16(1), 119–153. doi: 10.1080/10532528.2005.10559831.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lippa, R. A. (2008). Sex differences and sexual orientation differences in personality: Findings from the BBC internet survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(1), 173–187. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9267-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.5.509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Milojev, P., Osborne, D., Greaves, L. M., Barlow, F. K., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). The mini-IPIP6: Tiny yet highly stable markers of big-six personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 936–944. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ormel, J., Oldehinkel, A. J., & Vollebergh, W. (2004). Vulnerability before, during, and after a major depressive episode: A 3-wave population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(10), 990–996. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.10.990.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rahman, Q., & Wilson, G. D. (2003). Born gay? The psychobiology of human sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(8), 1337–1382. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00140-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosario, M., & Scrimshaw, E. W. (2014). Theories and etiologies of sexual orientation. In D. L. Tolman, L. M. Diamond, J. A. Bauermeister, H. G. William, J. G. Pfaus, & L. M. Ward (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 555–596). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14193-018.Google Scholar
  33. Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Temperament, development, and personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 207–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00505.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Savin-Williams, R. C. (2006). Who's gay? Does it matter? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(1), 40–44. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00403.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Ream, G. (2007). Prevalence and stability of sexual orientation components during adolescence and young adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 385–394. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9088-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Satherley, N., Milojev, P., Greaves, L. M., Huang, Y., Osborne, D., Bulbulia, J., et al. (2015). Demographic and psychological predictors of panel attrition: Evidence from the New Zealand attitudes and values study. PloS One, 10(3), e0121950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121950.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in big five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 168–182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sibley, C. G. (2012). The mini-IPIP6: Item response theory analysis of a short measure of the big-six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 4, 21–31.Google Scholar
  39. Sibley, C. G. (2015a). Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. NZAVS Technical Documents, e01. Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/nzavs/NZAVSTechnicalDocuments/NZAVS-Technical-Documents-e01-Sampling-Procedure-and-Sample-Details.pdf.
  40. Sibley, C. G. (2015b). Procedures for estimating post-stratification NZAVS sample weights. NZAVS Technical Documents, e08. Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/nzavs/NZAVSTechnicalDocuments/NZAVS-Technical-Documents-e08-Procedures-for-Estimating-Sample-Weights.pdf.
  41. Sibley, C. G., Luyten, N., Purnomo, M., Mobberley, A., Wootton, L. W., Hammond, M. D., et al. (2011). The mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the big-six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 4, 142–159.Google Scholar
  42. Sibley, C. G., & Pirie, D. J. (2013). Personality in New Zealand: Scale norms and demographic differences in the mini-IPIP6. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 42, 13–30. Retrieved from http://www.psychology.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/Full-Journal1.pdf#page=12.Google Scholar
  43. Wells, J. E., McGee, M. A., & Beautrais, A. L. (2011). Multiple aspects of sexual orientation: Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates in a New Zealand national survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 155–168. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9636-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wichstrøm, L., & Hegna, K. (2003). Sexual orientation and suicide attempt: A longitudinal study of the general Norwegian adolescent population. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 144–151. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.1.144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Zheng, L., Lippa, R. A., & Zheng, Y. (2011). Sex and sexual orientation differences in personality in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(3), 533–541. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9700-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lara M. Greaves
    • 1
  • Fiona Kate Barlow
    • 2
  • Yanshu Huang
    • 1
  • Samantha Stronge
    • 1
  • Chris G. Sibley
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of PsychologyThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations