Despite growing attention to gay and lesbian concerns, today’s current sex education curriculum in schools and families is still centered upon heterosexuality. Those studies that examine family sex communication and school-based sex education commonly reflect and take place within a heterosexual context as well, which largely ignores the perspective of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. This study situates non-heterosexual individuals at the center of the sex education discussion. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 10 self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) young adults between the ages of 19–25, this study explores what these individuals learn when it comes to sex education in school and in the home. The findings show that LGB young adults experience sex education, whether at home, school, or through their own searching, that is heterosexually centered, revolves around sex as being dangerous, and is often lacking the most basic health and behavior information. Findings from my study indicate the importance of providing sexual information that covers a wide range of sexual orientations and behaviors as it benefits all teens, especially those who are not heterosexual. Implications for parents and schools regarding sex education are discussed in addition to limitations and directions for future research.
Heteronormativity LGB youth Sex education Family sex communication Inequality Qualitative research
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
I do not have any potential conflicts of interest in regards to this research, authorship, etc.
I did not receive any financial funding/support for this research.
I did conduct research with human participants, but I received proper IRB approval from my institution before collecting my data. I also reminded participants of their rights and received verbal consent before proceeding with the interview.
Beaty, L. A. (1999). Identity development of homosexual youth and parental and familial influences on the coming out process. Adolescence, 34(135), 597–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Boushka, B. (2006). Homosexuality should be discussed in high schools. In K. R. Wells (Ed.), Teenage sexuality: Opposing viewpoints (pp. 183–192). Detroit, MI: Greenhaven Press.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Clawson, C. L., & Reese-Weber, M. (2003). The amount and timing of parent-adolescent sexual communication as predictors of late adolescent sexual risk-taking behaviors. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 256–265. doi:10.1080/00224490309552190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. L., Angera, J. J., & Latty, C. R. (2008). College aged females’ perceptions of their fathers as sexuality educators. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 2, 81–90.Google Scholar
Elia, J. P., & Eliason, M. J. (2010). Dangerous omissions: Abstinence-only-until-marriage school- based sexuality education and the betrayal of LGBTQ youth. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 5, 17–35. doi:10.1080/15546121003748848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillmore, M. R., Archibald, M. E., Morrison, D. M., Wilsdon, A., Wells, E. A., Hoppe, M. J., et al. (2002). Teen sexual behavior: Applicability of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(4), 885–897. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00885.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Allen, K. R. (2013). LGBT-parent families: Innovations in research and implications for practice. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hust, S. J., Brown, J. D., & L’Engle, K. L. (2008). Boys will be boys and girls better be prepared: An analysis of the rare sexual health messages in young adolescents’ media. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 3–23. doi:10.1080/15205430701668139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J. M. (2002). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. L., & Best, A. L. (2012). Radical normals: The moral career of straight parents as public advocates for their gay children. Symbolic Interaction, 35(3), 321–339. doi:10.1002/symb.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaSala, M. (2010). Coming out, coming home: Helping families adjust to a gay and lesbian child. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Majumdar, D. (2005). Explaining adolescent sexual risks by race and ethnicity: Importance of individual, familial, and extra-familial factors. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 31(1), 19–37.Google Scholar
Mitchell, V. (1998). The birds, the bees.. . and the sperm banks: How lesbian mothers talk with their children about sex and reproduction. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(3), 400–409. doi:10.1037/h0080349.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. R. (2011). Invisible families: Gay identities, relationships, and motherhood among Black women. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pingel, E. S., Thomas, L., Harmell, C., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2013). Creating comprehensive, youth centered, culturally appropriate sex education: What do young gay, bisexual, and questioning men want? Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 10, 293–301. doi:10.1007/s13178-013-0134-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalet, A. T. (2011). Not under my roof: Parents, teens, and the culture of sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swauger, M. (2009). No kids allowed!!!: How IRB ethics undermine qualitative researchers from achieving socially responsible ethical standards. Race, Gender & Class, 16(1–2), 63–81.Google Scholar
Walker, J. L. (2001). A qualitative study of parents experiences of providing sex education for their children: The implications for health education. Health Education Journal, 60(2), 132–146. doi:10.1177/001789690106000205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, J. (2015). Too hot to handle: A global history of sex education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar