Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 77, Issue 9–10, pp 615–627 | Cite as

“If There’s One Benefit, You’re not Going to Get Pregnant”: the Sexual Miseducation of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Individuals

Original Article

Abstract

Despite growing attention to gay and lesbian concerns, today’s current sex education curriculum in schools and families is still centered upon heterosexuality. Those studies that examine family sex communication and school-based sex education commonly reflect and take place within a heterosexual context as well, which largely ignores the perspective of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. This study situates non-heterosexual individuals at the center of the sex education discussion. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 10 self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) young adults between the ages of 19–25, this study explores what these individuals learn when it comes to sex education in school and in the home. The findings show that LGB young adults experience sex education, whether at home, school, or through their own searching, that is heterosexually centered, revolves around sex as being dangerous, and is often lacking the most basic health and behavior information. Findings from my study indicate the importance of providing sexual information that covers a wide range of sexual orientations and behaviors as it benefits all teens, especially those who are not heterosexual. Implications for parents and schools regarding sex education are discussed in addition to limitations and directions for future research.

Keywords

Heteronormativity LGB youth Sex education Family sex communication Inequality Qualitative research 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

I do not have any potential conflicts of interest in regards to this research, authorship, etc.

Funding

I did not receive any financial funding/support for this research.

Ethical Approval

I did conduct research with human participants, but I received proper IRB approval from my institution before collecting my data. I also reminded participants of their rights and received verbal consent before proceeding with the interview.

Supplementary material

11199_2017_749_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Angera, J. J., Brookins-Fisher, J., & Inungu, J. N. (2008). An investigation of parent/child communication about sexuality. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 3(2), 165–181. doi: 10.1080/15546120802104401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaty, L. A. (1999). Identity development of homosexual youth and parental and familial influences on the coming out process. Adolescence, 34(135), 597–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boushka, B. (2006). Homosexuality should be discussed in high schools. In K. R. Wells (Ed.), Teenage sexuality: Opposing viewpoints (pp. 183–192). Detroit, MI: Greenhaven Press.Google Scholar
  4. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Clawson, C. L., & Reese-Weber, M. (2003). The amount and timing of parent-adolescent sexual communication as predictors of late adolescent sexual risk-taking behaviors. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 256–265. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, C. L., Angera, J. J., & Latty, C. R. (2008). College aged females’ perceptions of their fathers as sexuality educators. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 2, 81–90.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, C., & Elliott, S. (2009). Beyond the birds and the bees: Learning inequality through sexuality education. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 4, 83–102. doi: 10.1080/15546120903001332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elia, J. P., & Eliason, M. J. (2010). Dangerous omissions: Abstinence-only-until-marriage school- based sexuality education and the betrayal of LGBTQ youth. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 5, 17–35. doi: 10.1080/15546121003748848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott, S. (2010). Parents’ constructions of teen sexuality: Sex panics, contradictory discourses, and social inequality. Symbolic Interaction, 33(2), 191–212. doi: 10.1525/si.2010.33.2.191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott, S. (2012). Not my kid: What parents believe about the sex lives of their teenagers. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Elliott, S. (2014). Who’s to blame?: Constructing the responsible sexual agent in neoliberal sex education. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 11, 211–224. doi: 10.1007/s13178-014-0158-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epstein, M., & Ward, M. L. (2008). Always use protection: Communication boys receive about sex from parents, peers, and the media. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 113–126. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9187-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fields, J. (2001). Normal queers: Straight parents respond to their children’s coming out. Symbolic Interaction, 24(2), 165–187. doi: 10.1525/si.2001.24.2.165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gillmore, M. R., Archibald, M. E., Morrison, D. M., Wilsdon, A., Wells, E. A., Hoppe, M. J., et al. (2002). Teen sexual behavior: Applicability of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(4), 885–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00885.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldberg, A. E., & Allen, K. R. (2013). LGBT-parent families: Innovations in research and implications for practice. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gowen, L. K., & Winges-Yanez, N. (2014). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning youths’ perspectives of inclusive school-based sexuality education. Journal of Sex Research, 51(7), 788–800. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.806648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Green, S. K., & Sollie, D. L. (1989). Long-term effects of a church-based sex education program on adolescent communication. Family Relations, 38(2), 152–156. doi: 10.2307/583668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guttmacher Institute. (2016). State policies in brief: Sex and HIV education. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/spibs/spib_se.pdf.
  19. Hust, S. J., Brown, J. D., & L’Engle, K. L. (2008). Boys will be boys and girls better be prepared: An analysis of the rare sexual health messages in young adolescents’ media. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 3–23. doi: 10.1080/15205430701668139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irvine, J. M. (2002). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, J. L., & Best, A. L. (2012). Radical normals: The moral career of straight parents as public advocates for their gay children. Symbolic Interaction, 35(3), 321–339. doi: 10.1002/symb.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kapinus, C. A., & Gorman, B. K. (2004). Closeness with parents and perceived consequences of pregnancy among male and female adolescents. The Sociological Quarterly, 45(4), 691–717. doi: 10.1525/tsq.2004.45.4.691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kennedy, C., & Covell, K. (2009). Violating the rights of the child through inadequate sexual health education. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 17, 143–154. doi: 10.1163/092755608x278939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LaSala, M. (2010). Coming out, coming home: Helping families adjust to a gay and lesbian child. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Majumdar, D. (2005). Explaining adolescent sexual risks by race and ethnicity: Importance of individual, familial, and extra-familial factors. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 31(1), 19–37.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, K. (2009). Normalizing heterosexuality: Mothers’ assumptions, talk, and strategies with young children. American Sociological Review, 74, 190–207. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McNeill, T. (2013). Sex education and the promotion of heteronormativity. Sexualities, 16(7), 826–846. doi: 10.1177/1363460713497216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, B. C. (2002). Family influences on adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 39(1), 22–26. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchell, V. (1998). The birds, the bees.. . and the sperm banks: How lesbian mothers talk with their children about sex and reproduction. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(3), 400–409. doi: 10.1037/h0080349.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore, M. R. (2011). Invisible families: Gay identities, relationships, and motherhood among Black women. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Newcomer, S. F., & Udry, J. R. (1985). Parent-child communication and adolescent sexual behavior. Family Planning Perspectives, 17(4), 169–174. doi: 10.2307/2135242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pingel, E. S., Thomas, L., Harmell, C., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2013). Creating comprehensive, youth centered, culturally appropriate sex education: What do young gay, bisexual, and questioning men want? Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 10, 293–301. doi: 10.1007/s13178-013-0134-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schalet, A. T. (2011). Not under my roof: Parents, teens, and the culture of sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Solebello, N., & Elliott, S. (2011). We want them to be as heterosexual as possible: Fathers talk about their children’s sexuality. Gender and Society, 25(3), 293–315. doi: 10.1177/0891243211403926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Swauger, M. (2009). No kids allowed!!!: How IRB ethics undermine qualitative researchers from achieving socially responsible ethical standards. Race, Gender & Class, 16(1–2), 63–81.Google Scholar
  36. Walker, J. L. (2001). A qualitative study of parents experiences of providing sex education for their children: The implications for health education. Health Education Journal, 60(2), 132–146. doi: 10.1177/001789690106000205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zimmerman, J. (2015). Too hot to handle: A global history of sex education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations