Sex Roles

, Volume 77, Issue 9–10, pp 593–603 | Cite as

Treating Objects like Women: The Impact of Terror Management and Objectification on the Perception of Women’s Faces

  • Christina Roylance
  • Clay Routledge
  • Benjamin Balas
Original Article

Abstract

There is a modern trend whereby women’s beauty and attractiveness tends towards the artificial, which appears to be an extreme manifestation of objectification culture. Research suggests that sexual objectification has the ability to alter the way we perceive women. Objectification occurs, in part, because women’s bodies pose a unique existential threat, and objectifying women is believed to mitigate concerns about mortality because it transforms women into something inanimate and thus less mortal. We therefore hypothesized that priming death concerns should impact object-person recognition of women. In the present study we recruited 177 undergraduate students from a U.S. Midwestern university to participate in exchange for course credit. We utilized face-morphing techniques to create a series of images representing a continuum of artificial-to-real faces, and after being exposed to a death reminder (as opposed to a pain reminder comparison condition), we asked participants to rate the extent to which the image appeared artificial. Results suggested that death awareness biases people towards reporting artificial female (but not male) faces as real. Existential concerns about death have an impact on perceptual assessments of women, specifically women who have been turned into literal objects. Future research directions, limitations of the current study, and implications for improving women’s health and well-being with this added knowledge about objectification are discussed.

Keywords

Objectification Terror management Perception Health Sexism Social psychology Women and gender studies Implicit attitudes Gender equality 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in the reported studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the American Psychological Association Ethics Code.

Funding

The research reported was not funded by a grant.

Conflict of Interest

Authors have no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

In addition, informed consent was obtained from all participants in the reported study and all participants were fully debriefed after they participated in the study.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: Author Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization_report_summary.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2017). 2014 Plastic Surgery Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics?sub=2014+Plastic+Surgery+Statistics#section-title.
  3. Bahadur, N. (2014, January 21). Dove “real beauty” campaign turns 10: How a brand tried to change the conversation about female beauty. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/21/dove-real-beauty-campaign-turns-10_n_4575940.html.
  4. Balas, B., & Horski, J. (2012). You can take the eyes out of the doll, but. Perception, 41, 361–364. doi: 10.1068/p7166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartky, S. (1990). Feminism and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. de Beauvoir, S. (1989). The second sex, (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf (Original work published in 1952).Google Scholar
  7. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, P., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S., & Klein, O. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434748.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 155–195. doi: 10.1177/1088868309352321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. (2011). Objectification theory: An introduction. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 3–21). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12304-001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540–551. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Citrin, L. B., Roberts, T., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Objectification theory and emotions: A feminist psychological perspective on gendered affect. In L. Z. Tiedens, C. W. Leach, L. Z. Tiedens, & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 203–223). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511819568.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, C. R., Goldenberg, J. L., Arndt, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2007). Mother’s milk: An existential perspective on negative reactions to breast-feeding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 110–122. doi: 10.1177/0146167206294202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox, C. R., Cooper, D. P., Vess, M., Arndt, J., Goldenberg, J. L., & Routledge, C. (2009). Bronze is beautiful but pale can be pretty: The effects of appearance standards and mortality salience on sun-tanning outcomes. Health Psychology, 28, 746–752. doi: 10.1037/a0016388.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldenberg, J. L. (2012). A body of terror: Denial of death and the creaturely body. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Meaning, mortality, and choice: The social psychology of existential concerns (pp. 93–110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldenberg, J. L. (2013). Immortal objects: The objectification of women as terror management. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and (de)humanization: 60th Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 73–95). New York: Springer Science + Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldenberg, J. L., & Roberts, T. (2004). The beauty within the beast: An existential perspective on the objectification and condemnation of women. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 71–85). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  19. Goldenberg, J. L., & Roberts, T. (2011). The birthmark: An existential account of the objectification of women. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 77–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12304-004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldenberg, J. L., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (2000). Fleeing the body: A terror management perspective on the problem of human corporeality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 200–218. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldenberg, J. L., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Kluck, B., & Cornwell, R. (2001). I am not an animal: Mortality salience, disgust, and the denial of human creatureliness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 427–435. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldenberg, J. L., Hart, J., Pyszczynski, T., Warnica, G. M., Landau, M., & Thomas, L. (2006). Ambivalence toward the body: Death, neuroticism, and the flight from physical sensation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1264–1277. doi: 10.1177/0146167206289505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-9564-5_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61–139). San Diego: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60016-7.Google Scholar
  25. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259. doi: 10.2307/1416950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kosloff, S., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Gershuny, B., Routledge, C., et al. (2006). Fatal distraction: The impact of mortality salience on dissociative responses to 9/11 and subsequent anxiety sensitivity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 349–356. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2804_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landau, M. J., & Greenberg, J. (2006). Play it safe or go for the gold? A terror management perspective on self-enhancement and self-protective motives in risky decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1633–1645. doi: 10.1177/0146167206292017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709–717.Google Scholar
  30. Loughnan, S., Pina, A., Vasquez, E. A., & Puvia, E. (2013). Sexual objectification increases rape victim blame and decreases perceived suffering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 455–461. doi: 10.1177/0361684313485718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Menzel, J. E., & Levine, M. P. (2011). Embodying experiences and the promotion of positive body image: The example of competitive athletics. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 163–186). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12304-008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morris, K. L., & Goldenberg, J. (2015). Objects become her: The role of mortality salience on men’s attraction to literally objectified women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 69–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris, K. L., Goldenberg, J. L., & Heflick, N. A. (2014). Trio of terror (pregnancy, menstruation, and breastfeeding): An existential function of literal self-objectification among women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 181–198. doi: 10.1037/a0036493.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Neill, K. (2016, April 1). Man builds ‘Scarlett Johansson’ robots from scratch to ‘fulfill childhood dream’—and it’s scarily lifelike. Retrieved from http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/man-builds-scarlet-johansson-robot-7667715.
  36. Off Our Chests. (2012). FAQ: The Truth In Advertising Act (H.R. 4445). Retrieved from http://www.feelmorebetter.com/.
  37. Paladino, M., Leyens, J., Rodriguez, R., Rodriguez, A., Gaunt, R., & Demoulin, S. (2002). Differential association of uniquely and non uniquely human emotions with the ingroup and the outgroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 105–117. doi: 10.1177/1368430202005002539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles, 56, 381–395. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reichart, T., & Carpenter, C. (2004). An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983 to 2003. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 823–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roberts, T., Goldenberg, J. L., Power, C., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). ‘Feminine protection’: The effects of menstruation on attitudes towards women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 131–139. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 681–690. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.681.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rubin, L. R., Nemeroff, C. J., & Russo, N. F. (2004). Exploring feminist women’s body consciousness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 27–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00120.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2004). The cultural animal: Twenty years of terror management theory and research. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 13–34). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Szymanski, D. M., & Henning, S. L. (2007). The role of self-objectification in women’s depression: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 56, 45–53. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9147-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tiggemann, M. (2013). Objectification theory: Of relevance for eating disorder researchers and clinicians? Clinical Psychologist, 17, 35–45. doi: 10.1111/cp.12010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311. doi: 10.1348/0144665031752925.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuana, N. (1993). The less noble sex: Scientific, religious, and philosophical conceptions of women’s nature. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tylka, T. L., & Augustus-Horvath, C. L. (2011). Fighting self-objectification in prevention and intervention contexts. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 187–214). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12304-009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vaes, J., Paladino, P., & Puvia, E. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 774–785. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vagianos, A. (2013, November 27). Survey proves we still really need to talk about photoshop. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/27/photoshop-survey-women_n_4350263.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Roylance
    • 1
  • Clay Routledge
    • 1
  • Benjamin Balas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations