Women’s sexual desire, agency, and activity have long been stigmatized. In contemporary times, however, adult novelty parties, or gatherings where women can learn about and purchase sex toys or other sensual aids in a group setting, are widespread. The current pervasiveness of novelty parties may be indicative of greater acceptance of women’s sexuality in contemporary Western society. The goal of the present study is to determine whether young people are more accepting of women’s sexuality and desire via their evaluations of women who attend novelty parties relative to more traditional kitchen product parties. In two experiments, U.S. college students read either a novelty party catalog or a kitchen party catalog, and they evaluated hypothetical female attendees of their respective party catalog type across ten total domains. In Experiment 1 (n = 205), novelty party attendees were rated as more vivacious, less traditional, and more insecure than were kitchen party attendees. In Experiment 2 (n = 211), women were harsher than men on novelty party attendees compared to kitchen party attendees in most domains, and men rated novelty party attendees as more masculine than kitchen party attendees, whereas women rated novelty party attendees as less masculine and feminine than kitchen party attendees. Applied and social implications of the present results are discussed, highlighting ways to improve perceptions of women’s sexual desires and pleasure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462. doi:10.1177/0003122412445802.
Asencio, M. (2009). Migrant Puerto Rican lesbians negotiating gender, sexuality, and ethnonationality. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 21, 1–23.
Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203. doi:10.1037/1089-26126.96.36.199.
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2.
Bell, L. C. (2013). Hard to get: Twenty-something women and the paradox of sexual freedom. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Boomsma, A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (part 1) (pp. 149–173). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Bury, L., Bruch, S. A., Barbery, X. M., & Pimentel, F. G. (2012). Hidden realities: What women do when they want to terminate an unwanted pregnancy in Bolivia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 118, 4–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.05.003.
Carver, P. R., Yunger, J. L., & Perry, D. G. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 49, 95–109. doi:10.1023/A:1024423012063.
Comella, L. (2008). It’s sexy. It’s big business. And it’s not just for men. Contexts, 7, 61–63. doi:10.1525/ctx.2008.7.3.61.
Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Valentine, B. A. (2011). Women, men, and the bedroom: Methodological and conceptual insights that narrow, reframe, and eliminate gender differences in sexuality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 296–300. doi:10.1177/0963721411418467.
Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., & Moors, A. C. (2013). Backlash from the bedroom stigma mediates gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 392–407. doi:10.1177/0361684312467169.
Coulmont, B., & Hubbard, P. (2010). Consuming sex: Socio-legal shifts in the space and place of sex shops. Journal of Law and Society, 37, 189–209.
Coward, R. (1985). Female desires: How they are sought, bought and packaged. New York: Grove Press.
Curtis, D. (2004). Commodities and sexual subjectivities: A look at capitalism and its desires. Cultural Anthropology, 19, 95–121. doi:10.1525/ctx.2008.7.3.61.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 458–476). Thousand Oaks: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446249222.n49.
Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 17, 451–463. doi:10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.521.
Fahs, B., & Swank, E. (2013). Adventures with the “plastic man”: Sex toys, compulsory heterosexuality, and the politics of women’s sexual pleasure. Sexuality and Culture, 17, 666–685. doi:10.1007/s12119-013-9167-4.
Fetterolf, J. C., & Sanchez, D. T. (2015). The costs and benefits of perceived sexual agency for men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 961–970. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0408-x.
Giddens, A. (2013). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Glover, R. (2010). Can’t buy a thrill: Substantive due process, equal protection, and criminalizing sex toys. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100, 555–598.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood double binds and flawed options. Gender and Society, 23, 589–616. doi:10.1177/0891243209345829.
Harrison, L. A., & Secarea, A. M. (2010). College students’ attitudes toward the sexualization of professional women athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33, 403–426.
Jackson, S. (2005). ‘Dear Girlfriend...’: Constructions of sexual health problems and sexual identities in letters to a teenage magazine. Sexualities, 8, 282–305. doi:10.1177/1363460705049577.
Kaestle, C. E., & Allen, K. R. (2011). The role of masturbation in healthy sexual development: Perceptions of young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 983–994. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9722-0.
Lando-King, E., McRee, A. L., Gower, A. L., Shlafer, R. J., McMorris, B. J., Pettingell, S., & Sieving, R. E. (2015). Relationships between social-emotional intelligence and sexual risk behaviors in adolescent girls. The Journal of Sex Research, 52, 835–840. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.976782.
Lindemann, D. J. (2006). Pathology full circle: A history of anti-vibrator legislation in the United States. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 15, 326–346.
Malina, D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). It’s business doing pleasure with you: Sh! A women’s sex shop case. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 15, 352–360. doi:10.1108/02634509710367926.
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5.
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2007). The impact of social interaction on the sexual double standard. Social Influence, 2, 29–54. doi:10.1080/15534510601154413.
McCaughey, M., & French, C. (2001). Women’s sex-toy parties: Technology, orgasm, and commodification. Sexuality and Culture, 5, 77–96. doi:10.1007/s12119-001-1031-2.
Milton, G. (2016). U.S. Patent No. 9,237,983. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Montemurro, B. (2003). Not a laughing matter: Sexual harassment as “material” on workplace-based situation comedies. Sex Roles, 48, 433–445. doi:10.1023/A:1023578528629.
Montemurro, B. (2014). Deserving desire: Women’s stories of sexual evolution. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Montemurro, B., & Gillen, M. M. (2013). How clothes make the woman immoral: Impressions given off by sexualized clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 31, 167–181. doi:10.1177/0887302X13493128.
Morris, J. F., Balsam, K. F., & Rothblum, E. D. (2002). Lesbian and bisexual mothers and nonmothers: Demographics and the coming-out process. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 144–156. doi:10.1037/0893-3184.108.40.206.
Mosher, D. L., & Tompkins, S. E. (1988). Scripting the macho man: Hyper masculine socialization and enculturation. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 60–84. doi:10.1080/00224498809551445.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Scardino, T. J. (1985). What will he think? Men’s impressions of women who initiate dates and achieve academically. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 560–569. doi:10.1037/0022-0220.127.116.110.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences insexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504.
Prinstein, M. J., Meade, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Adolescent oral sex, peer popularity, and perceptions of best friends’ sexual behavior. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 243–249. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsg012.
Rohlinger, D. A. (2002). Eroticizing men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles, 46, 61–74. doi:10.1023/A:1016575909173.
Rudman, L. A., Fetterolf, J. C., & Sanchez, D. T. (2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 250–263. doi:10.1177/0146167212472375.
Sakaluk, J. K., Todd, L. M., Milhausen, R., Lachowsky, N. J., & Undergraduate Research Group in Sexuality (URGiS). (2014). Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualization and measurement. The Journal of Sex Research, 51, 516–531. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.745473.
Sanchez, D. T., & Crocker, J. (2005). How investment in gender ideals affects well-being: The role of external contingencies of self-worth. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 63–77. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00169.x.
Schwartz, P., & Rutter, V. (1998). The gender of sexuality. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sheeran, P., Spears, R., Abraham, S. S., & Abrams, D. (1996). Religiosity, gender, and the double standard. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 130, 23–33. doi:10.1080/00223980.1996.9914985.
Takiff, H. A., Sanchez, D. T., & Stewart, T. L. (2001). What’s in a name? The status implications of students’ terms of address for male and female professors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 134–144. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00015.
Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1173–1181. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2.
Travis, C. B., & White, J. W. (2000). Sexuality, society, and feminism. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10345-000.
Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Wells, B. E. (2015). Changes in American adults’ sexual behavior and attitudes, 1972–2012. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2273–2285. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0540-2.
Vaes, J., Paladino, P., & Puvia, E. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 774–785. doi:10.1002/ejsp.824.
Waskul, D. D., Vannini, P., & Wiesen, D. (2007). Women and their clitoris: Personal discovery, signification, and use. Symbolic Interaction, 30, 151–174. doi:10.1525/si.2007.30.2.151.
Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13, 496–502. doi:10.1177/1066480705278729.
Zaikman, Y., & Marks, M. J. (2014). Ambivalent sexism and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 71, 333–344.
My coauthors and I hereby declare that the research represented in this paper was approved by the psychology department IRB and conducted according to APA ethical standards, and that the manuscript itself and data contained therein are original and have not been submitted for consideration elsewhere.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Marks, M.J., Wosick, K. Exploring College Men’s and Women’s Attitudes about Women’s Sexuality and Pleasure via their Perceptions of Female Novelty Party Attendees. Sex Roles 77, 550–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0737-z
- Sex toy party
- women’s sexuality
- Sexual desire
- Gender differences
- Novelty party
- Gender norms
- Women’s sexual agency