Mathematics—a Critical Filter for STEM-Related Career Choices? A Longitudinal Examination among Australian and U.S. Adolescents
Although women have made progress in entering scientific careers in biology, they remain underrepresented in mathematically intensive fields such as physics. We investigated whether gender differences in mathematics motivation and socialisers’ perceptions impacted choices for diverse STEM careers of varying mathematical intensity. Drawing on expectancy-value theory, we tested structural equation models in which adolescents’ preferred careers related to each of physics, biology, chemistry, and mathematics were predicted by prior mathematical performance, motivations, and mothers’ perceptions. We explored potential differences in gendered processes of influence using multigroup models. Samples were 331 Australian adolescents followed from 9th to 11th grade in 1998 and 277 U.S. adolescents from 9th to 12th grade in 2009–10. In both samples female adolescents preferred biological careers more than males did; male adolescents preferred physics-related careers and also mathematical careers in the Australian sample. Mothers’ perceptions were important to female and male adolescents’ mathematics motivations; gendered motivations were more evident in the Australian sample. Mathematics interest played the strongest role in male adolescents’ preferred careers, whereas actual or perceived mathematical achievements were most important for females, demonstrating the impacts of mathematical motivations on preferences for diverse STEM careers.
KeywordsGender STEM Mathematics Critical filter Career choice Expectancy-value theory High school
The STEPS Study (www.stepsstudy.org) was supported by Australian Research Council Discovery grant DP110100472 and ARF awarded to Watt. The U.S. study was supported by the National Science Foundation DRL 0814750 to Hyde and Harackiewicz; and the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Award #R305B090009 to the University of Wisconsin—Madison. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the U.S. Department of Education or the National Science Foundation; we thank Dan Lamanna, Maria Mens, Stefan Slater, and Ryan Svoboda for assistance with career coding; and Carlie Allison and Corinne Boldt for assistance with data collection.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
We attest that all work conforms with Australian and U.S. required ethical bodies and procedures.
Helen M. G. Watt, Janet S. Hyde, Jennifer Petersen, Zoe A. Morris, Christopher S. Rozek & Judith M. Harackiewicz
- Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Sage University papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07–136. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modelling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Australian Government Department of Education and Training. (2014). UCube higher education data. Retrieved from http://highereducationstatistics.education.gov.au/. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- Chhin, C. S., Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2008). Gender-typed occupational choices: The long-term impact of parents’ beliefs and expectations. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes (pp. 215–234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnson, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902–918. doi: 10.1037/a0025199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dobson, I. R. (2012). Unhealthy science? University natural and physical sciences 2002 to 2009/10. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Unhealthy-Science-Report-Ian-R-Dobson.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (2013). Gender and STEM: Opting in versus dropping out. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 2–3. Retrieved from http://www.vhto.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/publicaties/Gender_and_STEM_Opting_in_versus_dropping_out.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- Eccles, J. S., & Vida, M. (2003, April). Predicting mathematics-related career aspirations and choices. Paper presented at the Society for Research in child development (SRCD) biennial conference, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
- Eccles, (. P.). J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., Harold, R. D., Yoon, K. S., Abreton, A., & Freedman-Doan, C. (1993a). Parents and gender-role socialization during the middle childhood and adolescent years. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society, Claremont symposium on applied social psychology, 6 (pp. 59–83). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575. doi: 10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105–122. doi: 10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016a). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 745–765. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000075.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. Retrieved from https://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lazarides, R., & Ittel, A. (2013). Mathematics interest and achievement: What role do perceived parent and teacher support play? A longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 207–231. Retrieved fromhttp://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/viewFile/301/526. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, C. C. (2011, July 13). Girl power wins at Google’s first science fair. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/science/19google.html. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- National Center for O*NET Development. (2011). O*NET products at work. Retrieved from https://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/paw/Products_at_Work.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- National Science Foundation. (2016). Doctorate recipients by sex and subfield. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsf16300/data-tables.cfm. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2013). Snapshot report – degree attainment. Retrieved from https://nscresearchcenter.org/snapshotreport-degreeattainment3/. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- Osipow, S. H., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1996). Theories of career development (4th ed). London: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Sells, L. W. (1980). Mathematics: The invisible filter. Engineering Education, 70, 340–341.Google Scholar
- Shih, M. J., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ho, G. C. (2012). Stereotype boost: Positive outcomes from the activation of positive stereotypes. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 141–156). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- STEPS. (2016). STEPS: Study of Transitions and Educational Pathways. Retrieved from http://www.stepsstudy.org/. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (1998). O*NET: The occupational information network. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- United States Census Bureau. (2006). State and county quickfacts. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/55000.html. Accessed 26 August 2016.
- Watt, H. M. G. (2002). Gendered achievement-related choices and behaviours in mathematics and English: The nature and influence of self-, task- and value perceptions (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
- Watt, H. M. G. (2008). What motivates females and males to pursue sex-stereotyped careers? In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 87–113). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/11706-003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watt, H. M. G. (2016). Gender and motivation. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 320–339). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Watt, H. M. G., Shapka, J. D., Morris, Z. A., Durik, A. M., Keating, D. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: A comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1594–1611. doi: 10.1037/a0027838.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wigfield, A. (1993). Why should I learn this? Adolescents’ achievement values for different activities. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 8, pp. 99–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar