Intersectional Masculinities and Gendered Political Consciousness: How Do Race, Ethnicity and Sexuality Shape Men’s Awareness of Gender Inequality and Support for Gender Activism?
- 2.4k Downloads
Gendered political consciousness refers to having an awareness of gender inequality, viewing this inequality as illegitimate, and supporting collective efforts to bring about greater gender equality. The present study draws from social psychology, theories of masculinities, and intersectionality to assess the factors associated with men’s political consciousness of gender. Multivariate regression analyses of data from the U.S.-based 2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study (N = 598) (American National Election American National Election Study 2012) highlights how social statuses of race/ethnicity and sexuality—along with beliefs about racial/ethnic and sexuality-based inequalities—correlate with men’s awareness of gender inequality and support for women fighting for greater gender equality. Results show that Non-Hispanic Black men and married men are significantly more likely than are non-Hispanic White men and unmarried men to see high levels of gender inequality. Men who see high levels of racial/ethnic and sexuality-based inequalities are also significantly more likely to perceive high levels of gender inequality. Bivariate analyses show that Non-Hispanic Black men, as well as men who see high levels of other inequalities, are also more likely than are other men to support women fighting for greater gender equality, but in multivariate regression models these effects are eclipsed by political ideology—the single best predictor of men’s support for women fighting for gender equality. Results underscore the need to differentiate awareness of gender inequality and support for efforts to challenge gender inequality, and they highlight the potential of intersectionality for conceptualizing men’s gendered political consciousness.
KeywordsGendered political consciousness Intersectionality Masculinity Social psychology Identity Race Gender Sexuality Sex role attitudes
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of Wake Forest University.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no potential conflicts of interest.
- American National Election Study. (2012). Preliminary Release Documentation for ANES 2010-2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study. Retrieved from http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/2010_2012EGSS/ANES_EGSS4_Preliminary_Release_Documentation.pdf.
- Bennett, J. (2006). History matters. Patriarchy and the challenge of feminism. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
- Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Clayton, S. D., & Crosby, F. J. (1992). Justice, gender, and affirmative action. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- DeBell, M., Wilson, C., Segura, G., Jackman, S., & Hutchings, V. (2011). Methodology report and user’s guide for the ANES 2010-2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study. Palo Alto, CA, and Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Ferree, M. M., & Hess, B. B. (2000). Controversy and coalition: The new feminist movement across four decades of change. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: Coming of age in a new era of gender, work and family. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hershey, M. R. (1978). Racial differences in sex-role identities and sex stereotyping: Evidence against a common assumption. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 583–596.Google Scholar
- Iyer, A., & Ryan, M. K. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and in-group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 791–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01625.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kimmel, M. S. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Landrine, H., & Klonoff, E. A. (1997). Discrimination against women: Prevalence, consequences, remedies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Mansbridge, J., & Morris, A. D. (2001). Oppositional consciousness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Messner, M. A. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Plummer, K. (Ed.). (1981). The making of the modern homosexual. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Powell, B., Bolzendahl, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L. C. (2010). Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Roscigno, V. J. (2007). The face of discrimination. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Simien, E. (2006). Black feminist voices in politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar