Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 77, Issue 3–4, pp 141–154 | Cite as

Intersectional Masculinities and Gendered Political Consciousness: How Do Race, Ethnicity and Sexuality Shape Men’s Awareness of Gender Inequality and Support for Gender Activism?

  • Catherine E. Harnois
Original Article

Abstract

Gendered political consciousness refers to having an awareness of gender inequality, viewing this inequality as illegitimate, and supporting collective efforts to bring about greater gender equality. The present study draws from social psychology, theories of masculinities, and intersectionality to assess the factors associated with men’s political consciousness of gender. Multivariate regression analyses of data from the U.S.-based 2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study (N = 598) (American National Election American National Election Study 2012) highlights how social statuses of race/ethnicity and sexuality—along with beliefs about racial/ethnic and sexuality-based inequalities—correlate with men’s awareness of gender inequality and support for women fighting for greater gender equality. Results show that Non-Hispanic Black men and married men are significantly more likely than are non-Hispanic White men and unmarried men to see high levels of gender inequality. Men who see high levels of racial/ethnic and sexuality-based inequalities are also significantly more likely to perceive high levels of gender inequality. Bivariate analyses show that Non-Hispanic Black men, as well as men who see high levels of other inequalities, are also more likely than are other men to support women fighting for greater gender equality, but in multivariate regression models these effects are eclipsed by political ideology—the single best predictor of men’s support for women fighting for gender equality. Results underscore the need to differentiate awareness of gender inequality and support for efforts to challenge gender inequality, and they highlight the potential of intersectionality for conceptualizing men’s gendered political consciousness.

Keywords

Gendered political consciousness Intersectionality Masculinity Social psychology Identity Race Gender Sexuality Sex role attitudes 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of Wake Forest University.

Conflict of Interest

The author has no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. American National Election Study. (2012). Preliminary Release Documentation for ANES 2010-2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study. Retrieved from http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/2010_2012EGSS/ANES_EGSS4_Preliminary_Release_Documentation.pdf.
  2. Baca Zinn, M., & Thornton Dill, B. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331. doi: 10.2307/3178416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banaszak, L., & Plutzer, E. (1993). The social bases of feminism in the European community. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 29–53. doi: 10.1086/269353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, J. C., & Swim, J. K. (2011). Seeing the unseen attention to daily encounters with sexism as way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 227–242. doi: 10.1177/0361684310397509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, J. (2006). History matters. Patriarchy and the challenge of feminism. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blee, K. M., & Tickamyer, A. R. (1995). Racial differences in men's attitudes about women's gender roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 21–30. doi: 10.2307/353813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolzendahl, C., & Myers, D. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998. Social Forces, 83, 759–90. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bridges, T. S. (2010). Men just weren’t made to do this: Performances of drag at ‘Walk a Mile in Her Shoes’ marches. Gender & Society, 24, 5–30. doi: 10.1177/0891243209356924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2003). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burn, S. M., Aboud, R., & Moyles, C. (2000). The relationship between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles, 42, 1081–1089. doi: 10.1023/A:1007044802798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciabattari, T. (2001). Changes in men’s conservative gender ideologies: Cohort and period influences. Gender & Society, 15, 574–591. doi: 10.1177/089124301015004005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clayton, S. D., & Crosby, F. J. (1992). Justice, gender, and affirmative action. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180. doi: 10.1037/a0014564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Collins, P. H. (2004). Black sexual politics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Conover, P. J., & Sapiro, V. (1993). Gender, feminist consciousness, and war. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1079–1099. doi: 10.2307/2111544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–99. doi: 10.2307/1229039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Curtin, N., Stewart, A. J., & Cole, E. R. (2015). Challenging the status quo: The role of intersectional awareness in activism for social change and pro-social intergroup attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 512–529. doi: 10.1177/0361684315580439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis, N. J., & Robinson, R. V. (1991). Men's and women's consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. American Sociological Review, 56, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DeBell, M., Wilson, C., Segura, G., Jackman, S., & Hutchings, V. (2011). Methodology report and user’s guide for the ANES 2010-2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study. Palo Alto, CA, and Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  27. Drury, B. J., & Kaiser, C. R. (2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 637–652. doi: 10.1111/josi.12083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feagin, J. R. (1991). The continuing significance of race: Antiblack discrimination in public places. American Sociological Review, 56, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferree, M. M., & Hess, B. B. (2000). Controversy and coalition: The new feminist movement across four decades of change. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  30. Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: Coming of age in a new era of gender, work and family. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gurin, P. (1985). Women’s gender consciousness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 143–163. doi: 10.1086/268911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gurin, P., & Townsend, A. (1986). Properties of gender identity and their implications for gender consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 139–148. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00712.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gurin, P., Miller, A. H., & Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamilton, L., Geist, C., & Powell, B. (2011). Marital name change as a window into gender attitudes. Gender & Society, 25, 145–175. doi: 10.1177/0891243211398653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harnois, C. E. (2010). Race, gender, and the Black women’s standpoint. Sociological Forum, 25, 68–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01157.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harnois, C. E. (2013). Feminist measures in survey research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harnois, C. E. (2015). Race, ethnicity, sexuality, and women’s political consciousness of gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 365–386. doi: 10.1177/0190272515607844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henderson-King, D. H., & Stewart, A. J. (1994). Women or feminists? Assessing women’s group consciousness. Sex Roles, 31, 505–516. doi: 10.1007/BF01544276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hershey, M. R. (1978). Racial differences in sex-role identities and sex stereotyping: Evidence against a common assumption. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 583–596.Google Scholar
  41. Holter, Ø. G. (2014). ‘What’s in it for men?’: Old question, new data. Men and Masculinities, 17, 515–548. doi: 10.1177/1097184X14558237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huddy, L., Neely, F. K., & Lafay, M. R. (2000). Trends: Support for the women's movement. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 309–350. doi: 10.1086/317991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hunter, A. G., & Sellers, S. (1998). Feminist attitudes among African American women and men. Gender & Society, 12, 81–99. doi: 10.1177/089124398012001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Iyer, A., & Ryan, M. K. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and in-group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 791–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01625.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kane, E. W. (2000). Racial and ethnic variations in gender-related attitudes. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kimmel, M. S. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  47. King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs, 14, 42–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Landrine, H., & Klonoff, E. A. (1997). Discrimination against women: Prevalence, consequences, remedies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Mansbridge, J., & Morris, A. D. (2001). Oppositional consciousness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Messner, M. A. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  51. Messner, M. A., & Greenberg, M. A. (2015). Some men: Feminist allies and the movement to end violence against women. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller, A. L., & Borgida, E. (2016). The separate spheres model of gendered inequality. PLoS One, 1, e0147315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pampel, F. (2011). Cohort changes in the socio-demographic determinants of gender egalitarianism. Social Forces, 89, 961–982. doi: 10.1353/sof.2011.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. Plummer, K. (Ed.). (1981). The making of the modern homosexual. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Powell, B., Bolzendahl, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L. C. (2010). Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Ransford, H. E., & Miller, J. (1983). Race, sex and feminist outlooks. American Sociological Review, 48, 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reingold, B., & Foust, H. (1998). Exploring the determinants of feminist consciousness in the United States. Women & Politics, 19, 19–48. doi: 10.1300/J014v19n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ricciardelli, R., Maier, K., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2015). Strategic masculinities: Vulnerabilities, risk and the production of prison masculinities. Theoretical Criminology, 19, 491–513. doi: 10.1177/1362480614565849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531. doi: 10.1177/0891243204265269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roscigno, V. J. (2007). The face of discrimination. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  62. Schnittker, J., Freese, J., & Powell, B. (2003). Who are feminists and what do they believe?: The role of generations. American Sociological Review, 68, 607–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Simien, E. (2006). Black feminist voices in politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  65. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219–220. doi: 10.3758/BF03329252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White, A. M., Potgieter, C. A., Stube, M. J., Fisher, S., & Umana, E. (1997). An African-centered, Black feminist approach to understanding attitudes that counter social dominance. Journal of Black Psychology, 23, 398–420. doi: 10.1177/00957984970234007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations