Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intersectional Masculinities and Gendered Political Consciousness: How Do Race, Ethnicity and Sexuality Shape Men’s Awareness of Gender Inequality and Support for Gender Activism?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gendered political consciousness refers to having an awareness of gender inequality, viewing this inequality as illegitimate, and supporting collective efforts to bring about greater gender equality. The present study draws from social psychology, theories of masculinities, and intersectionality to assess the factors associated with men’s political consciousness of gender. Multivariate regression analyses of data from the U.S.-based 2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study (N = 598) (American National Election American National Election Study 2012) highlights how social statuses of race/ethnicity and sexuality—along with beliefs about racial/ethnic and sexuality-based inequalities—correlate with men’s awareness of gender inequality and support for women fighting for greater gender equality. Results show that Non-Hispanic Black men and married men are significantly more likely than are non-Hispanic White men and unmarried men to see high levels of gender inequality. Men who see high levels of racial/ethnic and sexuality-based inequalities are also significantly more likely to perceive high levels of gender inequality. Bivariate analyses show that Non-Hispanic Black men, as well as men who see high levels of other inequalities, are also more likely than are other men to support women fighting for greater gender equality, but in multivariate regression models these effects are eclipsed by political ideology—the single best predictor of men’s support for women fighting for gender equality. Results underscore the need to differentiate awareness of gender inequality and support for efforts to challenge gender inequality, and they highlight the potential of intersectionality for conceptualizing men’s gendered political consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American National Election Study. (2012). Preliminary Release Documentation for ANES 2010-2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study. Retrieved from http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/2010_2012EGSS/ANES_EGSS4_Preliminary_Release_Documentation.pdf.

  • Baca Zinn, M., & Thornton Dill, B. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331. doi:10.2307/3178416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banaszak, L., & Plutzer, E. (1993). The social bases of feminism in the European community. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 29–53. doi:10.1086/269353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. C., & Swim, J. K. (2011). Seeing the unseen attention to daily encounters with sexism as way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 227–242. doi:10.1177/0361684310397509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2006). History matters. Patriarchy and the challenge of feminism. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blee, K. M., & Tickamyer, A. R. (1995). Racial differences in men's attitudes about women's gender roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 21–30. doi:10.2307/353813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolzendahl, C., & Myers, D. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998. Social Forces, 83, 759–90. doi:10.1353/sof.2005.0005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, T. S. (2010). Men just weren’t made to do this: Performances of drag at ‘Walk a Mile in Her Shoes’ marches. Gender & Society, 24, 5–30. doi:10.1177/0891243209356924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2003). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burn, S. M., Aboud, R., & Moyles, C. (2000). The relationship between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles, 42, 1081–1089. doi:10.1023/A:1007044802798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciabattari, T. (2001). Changes in men’s conservative gender ideologies: Cohort and period influences. Gender & Society, 15, 574–591. doi:10.1177/089124301015004005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S. D., & Crosby, F. J. (1992). Justice, gender, and affirmative action. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180. doi:10.1037/a0014564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2004). Black sexual politics. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, P. J., & Sapiro, V. (1993). Gender, feminist consciousness, and war. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1079–1099. doi:10.2307/2111544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–99. doi:10.2307/1229039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, N., Stewart, A. J., & Cole, E. R. (2015). Challenging the status quo: The role of intersectional awareness in activism for social change and pro-social intergroup attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 512–529. doi:10.1177/0361684315580439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N. J., & Robinson, R. V. (1991). Men's and women's consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. American Sociological Review, 56, 72–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBell, M., Wilson, C., Segura, G., Jackman, S., & Hutchings, V. (2011). Methodology report and user’s guide for the ANES 2010-2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study. Palo Alto, CA, and Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and the University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, B. J., & Kaiser, C. R. (2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 637–652. doi:10.1111/josi.12083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J. R. (1991). The continuing significance of race: Antiblack discrimination in public places. American Sociological Review, 56, 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M., & Hess, B. B. (2000). Controversy and coalition: The new feminist movement across four decades of change. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: Coming of age in a new era of gender, work and family. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P. (1985). Women’s gender consciousness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 143–163. doi:10.1086/268911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P., & Townsend, A. (1986). Properties of gender identity and their implications for gender consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 139–148. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00712.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P., Miller, A. H., & Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L., Geist, C., & Powell, B. (2011). Marital name change as a window into gender attitudes. Gender & Society, 25, 145–175. doi:10.1177/0891243211398653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnois, C. E. (2010). Race, gender, and the Black women’s standpoint. Sociological Forum, 25, 68–85. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01157.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnois, C. E. (2013). Feminist measures in survey research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harnois, C. E. (2015). Race, ethnicity, sexuality, and women’s political consciousness of gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 365–386. doi:10.1177/0190272515607844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-King, D. H., & Stewart, A. J. (1994). Women or feminists? Assessing women’s group consciousness. Sex Roles, 31, 505–516. doi:10.1007/BF01544276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, M. R. (1978). Racial differences in sex-role identities and sex stereotyping: Evidence against a common assumption. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 583–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holter, Ø. G. (2014). ‘What’s in it for men?’: Old question, new data. Men and Masculinities, 17, 515–548. doi:10.1177/1097184X14558237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, L., Neely, F. K., & Lafay, M. R. (2000). Trends: Support for the women's movement. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 309–350. doi:10.1086/317991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. G., & Sellers, S. (1998). Feminist attitudes among African American women and men. Gender & Society, 12, 81–99. doi:10.1177/089124398012001005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, A., & Ryan, M. K. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and in-group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 791–814. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01625.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. W. (2000). Racial and ethnic variations in gender-related attitudes. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs, 14, 42–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landrine, H., & Klonoff, E. A. (1997). Discrimination against women: Prevalence, consequences, remedies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J., & Morris, A. D. (2001). Oppositional consciousness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. A. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. A., & Greenberg, M. A. (2015). Some men: Feminist allies and the movement to end violence against women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. L., & Borgida, E. (2016). The separate spheres model of gendered inequality. PLoS One, 1, e0147315. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampel, F. (2011). Cohort changes in the socio-demographic determinants of gender egalitarianism. Social Forces, 89, 961–982. doi:10.1353/sof.2011.0011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (Ed.). (1981). The making of the modern homosexual. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B., Bolzendahl, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L. C. (2010). Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransford, H. E., & Miller, J. (1983). Race, sex and feminist outlooks. American Sociological Review, 48, 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, B., & Foust, H. (1998). Exploring the determinants of feminist consciousness in the United States. Women & Politics, 19, 19–48. doi:10.1300/J014v19n03_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardelli, R., Maier, K., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2015). Strategic masculinities: Vulnerabilities, risk and the production of prison masculinities. Theoretical Criminology, 19, 491–513. doi:10.1177/1362480614565849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531. doi:10.1177/0891243204265269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscigno, V. J. (2007). The face of discrimination. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnittker, J., Freese, J., & Powell, B. (2003). Who are feminists and what do they believe?: The role of generations. American Sociological Review, 68, 607–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simien, E. (2006). Black feminist voices in politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219–220. doi:10.3758/BF03329252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, A. M., Potgieter, C. A., Stube, M. J., Fisher, S., & Umana, E. (1997). An African-centered, Black feminist approach to understanding attitudes that counter social dominance. Journal of Black Psychology, 23, 398–420. doi:10.1177/00957984970234007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, 27109, USA

    Catherine E. Harnois

Authors
  1. Catherine E. Harnois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine E. Harnois.

Ethics declarations

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of Wake Forest University.

Conflict of Interest

The author has no potential conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harnois, C.E. Intersectional Masculinities and Gendered Political Consciousness: How Do Race, Ethnicity and Sexuality Shape Men’s Awareness of Gender Inequality and Support for Gender Activism?. Sex Roles 77, 141–154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0702-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0702-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation