Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 77, Issue 1–2, pp 30–45 | Cite as

The Best Is Yet to Come? Attitudes Toward Gender Roles Among Adolescents in 36 Countries

Original Article

Abstract

In the present article, we look at attitudes toward gender roles among young women and men in 36 countries with different levels of societal gender inequality. By applying multilevel models to data from the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2009, the study contributes to our understanding of gender inequality by showing that (a) both young women and young men (in 8th grade; Mage = 14.39 years) display more gender-egalitarian attitudes in countries with higher levels of societal gender equality; (b) young women in all countries have more egalitarian attitudes toward gender roles than young men do, but (c) the gender gap in attitudes is more evident in more egalitarian contexts; and (d) a higher level of maternal education is associated with more gender-egalitarian attitudes among young women. In contrast, no statistically significant association emerges between maternal employment and young men’s attitudes. Overall, the findings suggest that adolescents in different contexts are influenced by the dominant societal discourse on gender inequality, which they interiorize and display through their own attitudes toward gender roles. However, the findings also indicate that young women are more responsive to external cues than young men are. This result, coupled with the fact that young men in egalitarian contexts have not adopted gender-egalitarian attitudes to the same extent as young women, is concerning because it suggests a slowdown in the achievement of societal gender equality that is still far from being reached.

Keywords

Adolescents Gender equality Attitudes toward gender roles Parental education International civic and citizenship education study 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Human Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

11199_2016_698_MOESM1_ESM.docx (33 kb)
ESM (DOCX 33 kb)

References

  1. Antill, J. K., Cunningham, J. D., & Cotton, S. (2003). Gender-role attitudes in middle childhood: In what ways do parents influence their children? Australian Journal of Psychology, 55, 148–153. doi: 10.1080/0004953042000298602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banaszak, L., & Plutzer, E. (1993). Contextual determinants of feminist attitudes: National and subnational influences in Western Europe. American Political Science Review, 87, 147–157. doi: 10.2307/2938962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Baxter, J., & Kane, E. W. (1995). Dependence and independence: A cross-national analysis of gender inequality and gender attitudes. Gender and Society, 2, 193–215. doi: 10.1177/089124395009002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beere, C. A. (1990). Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beere, C. A., King, D. W., Beere, D. B., & King, L. (1984). The sex-role egalitarianism scale: A measure of attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Sex Roles, 10, 563–576. doi: 10.1007/BF00287265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergh, J. (2006). Gender attitudes and modernization processes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 5–23. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edl004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bettio, F., Plantenga, J., & Smith, M. (2013). Gender and the European labour market. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83, 759–790. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bose, C. E. (2015). Patterns of global gender inequalities and regional gender regimes. Gender and Society, 29, 767–791. doi: 10.1177/0891243215607849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burt, K. B., & Scott, J. (2002). Parent and adolescent gender role attitudes in 1990s Great Britain. Sex Roles, 46, 239–245. doi: 10.1023/A:1019919331967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cassidy, M. L., & Warren, B. O. (1996). Family employment status and gender role attitudes: A comparison of women and men college graduates. Gender and Society, 10, 312–329. doi: 10.1177/089124396010003007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Constantin, A., & Voicu, M. (2015). Attitudes towards gender roles in cross-cultural surveys: Content validity and cross-cultural measurement invariance. Social Indicators Research, 123, 733–751. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0758-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooke, L. P. (2014). Gendered parenthood penalties and premiums across the earnings distribution in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 30, 360–372. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcu044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Council of the European Union (2011, March 7). Council conclusions on the European Pact for gender equality for the period 2011-2020. 3073th Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting, Brussels.Google Scholar
  17. Crouter, A. C., Whiteman, S. D., McHale, S. M., & Osgood, D. W. (2007). Development of gender attitude traditionality across middle childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 78, 911–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01040.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dotti Sani, G. M. (2014). Men’s employment hours and time on domestic chores in European countries. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 1023–1047. doi: 10.1177/0192513X14522245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farré, L., & Vella, F. (2013). The intergenerational transmission of gender role attitudes and its implications for female labour force participation. Economica, 80, 219–247. doi: 10.1111/ecca.12008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884. doi: 10.2307/353307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fortin, N. M. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21, 416–438. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/gri024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014). Violence against women: An EU-wide survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  23. Freedom House (2016, October 15). Freedom in the world. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/
  24. Galambos, N. L., Almeida, D. M., & Petersen, A. C. (1990). Masculinity, femininity, and sex role attitudes in early adolescence: Exploring gender intensification. Child Development, 61, 1905–1014. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb03574.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., de Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21, 1–56. doi: 10.1016/0049-089X(92)90017-B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4, 301–332. doi: 10.1007/BF00206983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffman, L. W., & Kloska, D. D. (1995). Parents’ gender-based attitudes toward marital roles and child rearing: Development and validation of new measures. Sex Roles, 32, 273–295. doi: 10.1007/BF01544598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inglehart, R. D. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Inglehart, R. D., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnston, D. W., Schurer, S., & Shields, M. A. (2014). Maternal gender role attitudes, human capital investment, and labour supply of sons and daughters. Oxford Economic Papers-New Series, 66, 631–659. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpt039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krook, M. L. (2010). Women’s representation in parliament: A qualitative comparative analysis. Political Studies, 56, 886–908. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00833.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kunovich, R. M., & Kunovich, S. (2008). Gender dependence and attitudes toward the distribution of household labor: A comparative and multilevel analysis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49, 395–427. doi: 10.1177/0020715208097787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Larsen, K. S., & Long, E. (1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: Traditional or egalitarian? Sex Roles, 19, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00292459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lück, D. (2006). Cross-national comparison of gender role attitudes and their impact on women’s life course. In H.-P. Blossfeld & H. Hofmeister (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty, and women’ careers (pp. 405–432). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Marks, J. L., Lam, C. B., & McHale, S. M. (2009). Family patterns of gender role attitudes. Sex Roles, 61, 221–234. doi: 10.2307/352640.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. McDonald, P. (2013). Societal foundations for explaining low fertility: Gender equity. Demographic Research, 28, 981–994. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Tucker, C. J. (1999). Family context and gender role socialization in middle childhood: Comparing girls to boys and sisters to brothers. Child Development, 70, 990–1004. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes. A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00097.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. National Statistics Bureau Taiwan. (2016, October 15). Key figures for calculating composite Gender Equality Index. Retrieved from http://eng.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=25280&ctNode=6032&mp=5.
  41. OECD (2016). OECD family database. Gender differences in employment outcomes. Paris: OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).Google Scholar
  42. Powell, B., & Carr Steelman, L. (1982). Testing an undertested comparison: Maternal effects on sons’ and daughters’ attitudes toward women in the labor force. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 349–355. doi: 10.2307/1389292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rhodebeck, L. A. (1996). The structure of men’s and women’s feminist orientations: Feminist identity and feminist opinion. Gender and Society, 10, 386–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).Google Scholar
  46. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., & Fraillon, J. (2011). ICCS 2009 technical report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).Google Scholar
  47. Schutz Lee, K., Tufis, P. A., & Alwin, D. F. (2010). Separate spheres or increasing equality? Changing gender beliefs in postwar Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 184–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00691.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, M., Akram-Lodhi, A. H., & Bettio, F. (2013). Do we have a case for gender equality? In F. Bettio, J. Plantenga, & M. Smith (Eds.), Gender and the European labour market (pp. 13–35). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. I. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  50. Thornton, A. (2001). The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography, 38, 449–465. doi: 10.1353/dem.2001.0039.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Thornton, A., Alwin, D. F., & Camburn, D. (1983). Causes and consequences of sex-role attitudes and attitude change. American Sociological Review, 48, 211–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–244. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. UN Women. (2016). Facts and figures: Economic empowerment. Retrieved from http://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/economic-empowerment/facts-and-figures.
  54. UNDP. (2010). Human development report 2010. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. United Nations. (2010). Commission on the status of women. Report on the Fifty-fourth session. Economic and Social Council Official Records, 2010, Supplement No. 7. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  56. Van der Meer, T. W. G., te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2010). Influential cases in multilevel modeling: A methodological comment. American Sociological Review, 75, 173–178. doi: 10.1177/0003122409359166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilensky, H. L. (2002). Rich democracies: Political economy, public policy, and performance. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  58. Zuo, J., & Tang, S. (2000). Breadwinner status and gender ideologies of men and women regarding family roles. Sociological Perspectives, 43, 29–43. doi: 10.2307/1389781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Collegio Carlo AlbertoMoncalieriItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Humanities and Social SciencesScuola Normale SuperiorePisaItaly

Personalised recommendations