Abstract
As revealed through the papers in the current issue, the impact of Sandra Bem’s interrogation and analysis of the process and impact of gender categorization is discussed. An important consequence of Bem’s work has been to bring invisible but pervasive processes of gender categorization into focus, and then to use that new visibility to drive social change. Themes that emerge in these papers building on Bem’s work include more nuanced approaches to identity, investigation of the role of immediate social context in the performance of gender, attention to gender development, and exploration of measurement issues. The papers raise a number of new questions for future research on gender categories and gendered identities. It is noted that the widespread use of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) over more than 40 years provides a window on changing attitudes with respect to femininity, masculinity, and androgyny.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.
Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643. doi:10.1037/h0077098.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bem, S. L. (1998). An unconventional family. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb01290.x.
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1976). Training the woman to know her place: The power of a nonconscious ideology. In S. Cox (Ed.), Female psychology: The emerging self (pp. 180–190). Chicago, IL: SRA Associates.
Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48–54. doi:10.1037/h0078640.
Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2009). Warmth, competence, and ambivalent sexism: Vertical assault and collateral damage. In M. Barreto, M. K. Ryan, & M. T. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 73–96). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11863-004.
Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An under examined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 343–370. doi:10.1177/1088868314564789.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369.
Deaux, K., Kite, M. E., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Clustering and gender schemata: An uncertain link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 387–397. doi:10.1177/0146167285114005.
Donnelly, K., & Twenge, J. M. (2016). Masculine and feminine traits on the Bem Sex Role Inventory, 1993–2012: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0625-y. Advance online publication.
Freedman, S. A., & Lips, H. M. (1996). A response latency investigation of the gender schema. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 41–53.
Golden, C. R., & McHugh, M. C. (2016). Sandra Bem: Challenging constructions of gender and sex. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing … or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly. doi:10.1177/0361684316634081. Advance online publication.
Hort, B. E., Fagot, B. I., & Leinbach, M. D. (1990). Are people’s notions of maleness more stereotypically framed than their notions of femaleness? Sex Roles, 23, 197–212. doi:10.1007/BF00289866.
Keener, E., & Mehta, C. (Eds.). (2016). The past, present, and future of masculinity, femininity and gender: Honoring feminist scholar Sandra L. Bem (1944–2014). [Special issue]. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.
Keener, E., & Strough, J. (2016). Having and doing gender: young adults’ expressions of gender in conflicts with friends and romantic partners. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0644-8. Advance online publication.
Le Guin, U. K. (1969). The left hand of darkness. New York: Random House.
Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2015). Understanding and undermining the development of gender dichotomies: The legacy of Sandra Lipsitz Bem. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0519-4. Advance online publication.
Martin, C. L., Cook, R. E., & Andrews, N. C. Z. (2016). Reviving androgyny: A modern day perspective on flexibility of gender identity and behavior. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0602-5. Advance online publication.
Mehta, C. M., & Dementieva, Y. (2016). The contextual specificity of gender: Femininity and masculinity in college students’ same-and other-gender peer contexts. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0632-z. Advance online publication.
Menon, M. (2016). Multidimensional gender identity and gender-typed relationship styles in adolescence. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0589-y. Advance online publication.
Reigeluth, C. S., & Addis, M. E. (2016). Adolescent boys’ experiences with policing of masculinity: Forms, functions, and consequences. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17, 74–83. doi:10.1037/a0039342.
Spence, J. T. (1983). Comment on Lubinski, Tellegen, and Butcher’s “Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 440–446. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.440.
Spence, J. T. (1991). Do the BSRI and the PAQ measure the same or different concepts? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 141–165. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00483.x.
Starr, C. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2016). Sandra Bem’s gender schema theory after 34 years: A review of its reach and impact. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0591-4. Advance online publication.
West, T. V., Heilman, M. E., Gullett, L., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Magee, J. C. (2012). Building blocks of bias: Gender composition predicts male and female group members’ evaluations of each other and the group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1209–1212. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
I have complied with all relevant ethical standards in the preparation of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lips, H.M. Sandra Bem: Naming the Impact of Gendered Categories and Identities. Sex Roles 76, 627–632 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0664-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0664-4