Recent debate over integrating women into U.S. military combat units presents an opportunity to examine the gender identities and experiences of women in the military. Here, we examine the context-dependent prominence of intersecting identities including work role and gender ascribed to female soldiers in Special Operations. Using a mixed methods approach, based on 28 focus groups with 198 soldiers and a survey conducted with 1701 men and 214 women, we argue that female soldiers’ experiences refute their male colleagues’ assumptions regarding their ability to serve in combat units. The experience of identity in the workplace is different for men and women because women experience fluidity in their identity depending on with whom they are interacting and where interactions occur, whereas men experience and understand gender identity as a fixed, static trait. Although women experience the fluidity of their gender identity based on context, their male colleagues remain oblivious to the contextual nature of gender identity while also maintaining their authority in policing the boundaries of gender in the military context. Our research adds nuance to literature on identity, demonstrating the fluctuating nature of ascribed identity, which shines light on the socially constructed, artificial barriers to women’s ascension in the workplace.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Acker, J. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565–569. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2075528.
Ahmed, A. (2011). Belonging out of context: The intersection of place, networks and ethnic identity among retired British migrants living in the Costa Blanca. Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 5(2), 2–19. Retrieved from http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/22803.
Alison, M. (2004). Women as agents of political violence: Gendering security. Security Dialogue, 35(4), 447–463. doi:10.1177/0967010604049522.
Anthias, F. (2002). Where do I belong? Narrating collective identity and translocational positionality. Ethnicities, 2(4), 491–514. doi:10.1177/1468796802020040301.
Anthias, F. (2008). Thinking through the lens of translocational positionality: An intersectionality frame for understanding identity and belonging. Translocations: Migration and Social Change, 4(1), 5–20. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10552/3331.
Anthias, F. (2012). Transnational mobilities, migration research and intersectionality. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2(2), 102–110. doi:10.2478/v10202-011-0032-y.
Bose, C. E. (2012). Intersectionality and global gender inequality. Gender & Society, 26(1), 67–72. doi:10.1177/0891243211426722.
Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society, 14(3), 418–434. doi:10.1177/08912430001400300.
Burrelli, D. F. (2013). Women in combat: Issues for Congress. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service.
Calas, M. B., Ou, H., & Smircich, L. (2013). “Woman” on the move: Mobile subjectivities after intersectionality. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 32(8), 708–731. doi:10.1108/EDI-05-2012-0037.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Press.
Cohn, C. (2000). ‘How can she claim equal rights when she doesn’t have to do as many push up as I do?’ The framing of men’s opposition to women’s equality in the military. Men & Masculinities, 3(2), 131–151. doi:10.1177/1097184X00003002001.
Courdileone, K. A. (2005). Manhood and American political culture in the cold war. New York: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Los Angeles: Sage.
Devilbiss, M. C. (1990). Women and military service: A history, Analysis, and overview of key issues. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a229958.pdf.
Duncanson, C. (2009). Forces for good? Narratives of military masculinity in peacekeeping operations. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11(1), 63–80. doi:10.1080/14616740802567808.
Elshtain, J. B. (1987). Women & war. New York: Basic Books.
Enloe, C. (1983). Does khaki become you? The militarisation of women’s lives. London: Pluto Press.
Feitz, L., & Nagel, J. (2008). The militarization of gender and sexuality in the Iraq War. In H. Carreiras & G. Kummel (Eds.), Women in the military and in armed conflict (pp. 201–225). New York: Springer.
Ferree, M. M. (2011). The discursive politics of feminist intersectionality. In H. Lutz, M. Vivar, & L. Supik (Eds.), Framing intersectionality: Debates on a multi-faceted concept in gender studies (pp. 55–65). New York: Routledge.
Goldstein, J. S. (2001). War and gender: How gender shapes the war system and vice versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herbert, M. S. (2000). Camouflage isn’t only for combat: Gender, sexuality, and women in the military. New York: NYU Press.
Herrera, G. (2013). Gender and international migration: Contributions and cross-fertilizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 471–489. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145446.
Hesse-Biber, S. (2016). Qualitative or mixed methods research inquiry approaches: Some loose guidelines for publishing in Sex Roles. Sex Roles, 74(1), 6–9. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0568-8.
Holm, J. (1992). Women in the military: An unfinished revolution. Novato: Presidio Press.
Ifekwunigwe, J. O. (2016). The difference that transnational and intersectional black feminisms make: A commentary on Tripp. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(2), 335–340. doi:10.1080/21565503.2015.1127830.
Kennan, J. O. (2008). The DoD combat exclusion policy: Time for a change? In M. M. Putko & D. V. Johnson (Eds.), Women in Combat Compendium (pp. 21–25). Washington, DC: Strategic Studies Institute. Retrieved from http://wiisglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Women-in-Combat-Compendium1.pdf.
Kimmel, M. (2000). Saving the males: The sociological implications of the Virginia military institute and the citadel. Gender & Society, 14(4), 494–516. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/190299.
Morden, B. J. (1990). The women’s Army corps, 1945–1978. Washington, DC: Center of Military History, United States Army.
Nantais, C., & Lee, M. F. (1999). Women in the United States military: Protectors or protected? The case of prisoner of war Melissa Rathbun-Nealy. Journal of Gender Studies, 8(2), 181–191. doi:10.1080/095892399102698.
Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15. doi:10.1057/fr.2008.4.
Parashar, S. (2009). Feminist international relations and women militants: Case studies from Sri Lanka and Kashmir. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(2), 235–256. doi:10.1080/09557570902877968.
Patten, E., & Parker, K. (2011). Women in the US military: Growing share, distinctive profile. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from file:///Users/s522p292/Downloads/women-in-the-military.pdf.
Purkayastha, B. (2010). Interrogating intersectionality: Contemporary globalisation and racialised gendering in the lives of highly educated south Asian Americans and their children. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(1), 29–47. doi:10.1080/07256860903477696.
Santangelo, S. (2014, March 28). Fourteen women have tried, and failed, the Marines’ Infantry Officer Course: Here’s why. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/fourteen-women-have-tried-and-failed-the-marines-infantry-officer-course-heres-why/2014/03/28/24a83ea0-b145-11e3-a49e-76adc9210f19_story.html.
Sasson-Levy, O. (2003). Feminism and military gender practices: Israeli women soldiers in ‘masculine’ roles. Sociological Inquiry, 73(3), 440–465. doi:10.1111/1475-682X.00064.
Sasson-Levy, O., & Amram-Katz, S. (2007). Gender integration in Israeli officer training: Degendering and regendering the military. Signs, 33(1), 105–133. doi:10.1086/518262.
Sheppard, C. (2007). Women in combat. Carlisle Barracks: Army War College.
Skaine, R. (1999). Women at war: Gender issues of Americans in combat. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc..
Stack-O’Connor, A. (2007). Lions, tiger, and freedom birds: How and why Liberation Tigers of Tamil employs women. Terrorism and Political Violence, 19(1), 43–63. doi:10.1080/09546550601054642.
Washington Times. (2005, July 11). Iraq lacks women trained in security. Washington Times. Retrieved from http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050711-122346-9856r.htm.
This research was funded by the Army Research Institute, ARO Contract W911NF-11-1-0035, through the Office of Graduate Military Programs at the University of Kansas, Co-investigators were Alesha Doan, Donald Haider-Markel, and Shannon Portillo; and The Women’s Foundation of Greater Kansas City, Co-Investigators Shannon Portillo and Alesha Doan. The authors’ names are listed alphabetically for this manuscript. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. We also greatly appreciate the guidance provided from the editorially team, particularly Dr. Yoder.
Alesha Doan, Shannon Portillo and Don Haider-Markel received approval to conduct the focus groups and surveys presented in this project from the Human Subjects Committee University of Kansas, Lawrence Campus. The approval number is HSCL #00,000,262.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doan, A.E., Portillo, S. Not a Woman, but a Soldier: Exploring Identity through Translocational Positionality. Sex Roles 76, 236–249 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0661-7
- Gender identity
- Gender fluidity
- Translocational positionality