Not a Woman, but a Soldier: Exploring Identity through Translocational Positionality
- 1.5k Downloads
Recent debate over integrating women into U.S. military combat units presents an opportunity to examine the gender identities and experiences of women in the military. Here, we examine the context-dependent prominence of intersecting identities including work role and gender ascribed to female soldiers in Special Operations. Using a mixed methods approach, based on 28 focus groups with 198 soldiers and a survey conducted with 1701 men and 214 women, we argue that female soldiers’ experiences refute their male colleagues’ assumptions regarding their ability to serve in combat units. The experience of identity in the workplace is different for men and women because women experience fluidity in their identity depending on with whom they are interacting and where interactions occur, whereas men experience and understand gender identity as a fixed, static trait. Although women experience the fluidity of their gender identity based on context, their male colleagues remain oblivious to the contextual nature of gender identity while also maintaining their authority in policing the boundaries of gender in the military context. Our research adds nuance to literature on identity, demonstrating the fluctuating nature of ascribed identity, which shines light on the socially constructed, artificial barriers to women’s ascension in the workplace.
KeywordsGender identity Workplace Integration Sexism Gender fluidity Military Translocational positionality
This research was funded by the Army Research Institute, ARO Contract W911NF-11-1-0035, through the Office of Graduate Military Programs at the University of Kansas, Co-investigators were Alesha Doan, Donald Haider-Markel, and Shannon Portillo; and The Women’s Foundation of Greater Kansas City, Co-Investigators Shannon Portillo and Alesha Doan. The authors’ names are listed alphabetically for this manuscript. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. We also greatly appreciate the guidance provided from the editorially team, particularly Dr. Yoder.
- Burrelli, D. F. (2013). Women in combat: Issues for Congress. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Press.Google Scholar
- Courdileone, K. A. (2005). Manhood and American political culture in the cold war. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Devilbiss, M. C. (1990). Women and military service: A history, Analysis, and overview of key issues. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a229958.pdf.
- Elshtain, J. B. (1987). Women & war. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Enloe, C. (1983). Does khaki become you? The militarisation of women’s lives. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- Ferree, M. M. (2011). The discursive politics of feminist intersectionality. In H. Lutz, M. Vivar, & L. Supik (Eds.), Framing intersectionality: Debates on a multi-faceted concept in gender studies (pp. 55–65). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, J. S. (2001). War and gender: How gender shapes the war system and vice versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Herbert, M. S. (2000). Camouflage isn’t only for combat: Gender, sexuality, and women in the military. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Holm, J. (1992). Women in the military: An unfinished revolution. Novato: Presidio Press.Google Scholar
- Kennan, J. O. (2008). The DoD combat exclusion policy: Time for a change? In M. M. Putko & D. V. Johnson (Eds.), Women in Combat Compendium (pp. 21–25). Washington, DC: Strategic Studies Institute. Retrieved from http://wiisglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Women-in-Combat-Compendium1.pdf.Google Scholar
- Morden, B. J. (1990). The women’s Army corps, 1945–1978. Washington, DC: Center of Military History, United States Army.Google Scholar
- Patten, E., & Parker, K. (2011). Women in the US military: Growing share, distinctive profile. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from file:///Users/s522p292/Downloads/women-in-the-military.pdf.Google Scholar
- Santangelo, S. (2014, March 28). Fourteen women have tried, and failed, the Marines’ Infantry Officer Course: Here’s why. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/fourteen-women-have-tried-and-failed-the-marines-infantry-officer-course-heres-why/2014/03/28/24a83ea0-b145-11e3-a49e-76adc9210f19_story.html.
- Sheppard, C. (2007). Women in combat. Carlisle Barracks: Army War College.Google Scholar
- Skaine, R. (1999). Women at war: Gender issues of Americans in combat. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc..Google Scholar
- Washington Times. (2005, July 11). Iraq lacks women trained in security. Washington Times. Retrieved from http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050711-122346-9856r.htm.