Emerging Adults’ Expectations and Preferences for Gender Role Arrangements in Long-Term Heterosexual Relationships
- 1.8k Downloads
Using vignettes as a data collection tool, the main purpose of this randomized, mixed-method study was to examine U.S. emerging adults’ (N = 451) expectations and preferences for five different gender role relationship (GRR) types: (a) male-head/female-complement, (b) male-senior/female-junior partner, (c) partner-equal, (d) female-senior/male-junior partner, and (e) female-head/male-complement. Respondents’ perceptions about their personal satisfaction if they were in such GRRs in the future also were examined, as were their perceptions of the effects of marital status and parental status of couples in the various GRR vignettes. Married couples were projected to have greater satisfaction than cohabiting couples, but couples with and without children were viewed similarly. Quantitative results suggest that emerging adults project egalitarian GRRs to be the most satisfying relationship type. Projected couple satisfaction and anticipated personal satisfaction were not dependent on couples’ marital or parental status. Qualitative results generally supported the quantitative findings, in that dual-career couple relationships were projected to be the most satisfying. Educators as well as premarital and marriage counselors may be able to use this information to help emerging adults consider and prepare for future relationships. Work/family policymakers also could use this information to tailor workplace and social policies to better reflect emerging adults’ views about GRRs in their future relationships.
KeywordsGender roles Relationship satisfaction Romantic relationships Work & family Emerging adults Mixed research methods
- Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Budd, R. (1967). Content analysis of communications. New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
- Forste, R., & Fox, K. (2012). Household labor, gender roles, and family satisfaction: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 613–631. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23267837.
- Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: Coming of age in a new era of gender, work, and family. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, P. Y., Mosher, W. D., & Chandra, A. (2010). Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics, 23(28), 1–45. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_028.pdf.
- Huston, T. L., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1986). When the honeymoon’s over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In R. Gilmore & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 109–132). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Scanzoni, J. (1995). Contemporary families and relationships: Reinventing responsibility. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Scanzoni, L. D., & Scanzoni, J. (1988). Men, women, and change: A sociology of marriage and family (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Scanzoni, J., Polonko, K., Teachman, J., & Thompson, L. (1989). The sexual bond: Rethinking families and close relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer marriage: How love between equals really works. New York: The Free press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Current Population Survey, 2008 Annual Social and Economic Supplement. Table FG8. Married couple family groups with children under 15 by stay-at-home status of both spouses: 2008. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/cps2008.html.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Current Population Survey, 2014 Annual Social and Economic Supplement. Table FG8. Married couple family groups with children under 15 by stay-at-home status of both spouses: 2014. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/cps2014FG.html.
- Wallen, J. (2002). Work and family programs and economic equality. In J. Wallen (Ed.), Balancing work and family: The role of the workplace (pp. 119–129). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar