Skip to main content

Gender, Fear, and Public Places: How Negative Encounters with Strangers Harm Women

Abstract

Research repeatedly shows that women are frequent targets of sexual harassment in public, ranging from catcalls to sexual assault. However, we know very little about the impacts of less obviously gendered rude behavior. Using nationally representative survey data from Australia (N = 1621), we investigated gender differences in the experience of generic public incivilities such as tailgating, pushing in crowded spaces, and yelling or cursing. We employed a series of logistic regression models to assess the relationship between gender and stranger incivility and to adjust for key demographic and event attributes. Results demonstrated that women were significantly more likely to report recent experiences of public incivility than were men and that women were significantly more likely to report negative impacts on their emotional well-being, particularly when the rude stranger was a man. Findings also showed that women were significantly more likely than were men to report limiting their use of public places as a result of experiencing public incivility. Much like sexual harassment, generic forms of uncivil behavior exact a gender-specific tax on women’s access to public places, compromising women’s capacity to fully engage in the public sphere. Implications for research and policy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit-for-tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471. doi:10.2307/259136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ayers, M. M., Friedman, C. K., & Leaper, C. (2009). Individual and situational factors related to young women’s likelihood of confronting sexism in their everyday lives. Sex Roles, 61, 449–460. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9635-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin, W. (1983). Charles Baudelaire: A lyric poet in the era of high capitalism. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bittman, M., & Wacjman, J. (2000). The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces, 79, 165–189. doi:10.1093/sf/79.1.165.

  5. Bowman, C. G. (1993). Street harassment and the informal ghettoization of women. Harvard Law Review, 106, 517–580. doi:10.2307/1341656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brinkman, B. G., & Rickard, K. M. (2009). College students’ descriptions of everyday gender prejudice. Sex Roles, 61, 461–475. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9643-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cobbina, J. E., Miller, J., & Brunson, R. K. (2008). Gender, neighbourhood danger and risk avoidance strategies among urban African-American youths. Criminology, 46, 673–709. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00122.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, J., & Langer, G. (2006). Poll: Rudeness in America, 2006: It’s the #@%! Cell phones. ABC news. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/2020/US/story?id=1574155.

  9. Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 55–75. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.27745097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davetian, B. (2009). Civility: A cultural history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Day, K. (1999). Strangers in the night: Women's fear of sexual assault on urban college campuses. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 16, 289–312. Retreived from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43030512.

  12. Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  13. El Tiempo (2014). Vagon exclusivo para mujeres en TransMilenio llega a Suba [Dedicated coach for women in TransMilenio reach Suba]. Retrieved from http://www.eltiemp.com/archivo/documento/CMS-13798527.

  14. Fairchild, K., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338–357. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gardner, C. B. (1995). Passing by: Gender and public places. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grazian, D. (2008). On the make: The hustle of urban nightlife. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hartmann, D., Gerteis, J., & Edgell, P. (2003). American Mosaic Project Survey. ICPSR28821-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2010–12-16. doi:10.3886/ICPSR28821.v1.

  20. Hollaback. (2014). Research. Retrieved from http://www.ihollaback.org/research.

  21. Hyers, L. L., Swim, J. K., & Mallet, R. M. (2006). The personal is political: Using daily diaries to examine everyday prejudice-related experiences. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Emergent methods in social science research (pp. 313–336). New York, NY: Sage.

  22. Kearl, H. (2014). Unsafe and harassed in public spaces: A national street harassment report. Stop street harassment. Retrieved from http://www.stopstreetharassment.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/2014-National-SSH-Street-Harassment-Report.pdf.

  23. Kennedy, P. (1992). A guide to econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kissling, E. A. (1991). Street harassment: The language of sexual terrorism. Discourse & Society, 2, 451–460. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42888749.

  25. Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility with sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 483–496. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lofland, L. (1973). A world of strangers. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Macmillan, R., Nierobisz, A., & Welsh, S. (2000). Experiencing the streets: Harassment and perceptions of safety among women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 306–322. doi:10.1177/0022427800037003003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2004). Working in a context of hostility toward women: Implications for employees well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9, 107–122. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.9.2.107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Montgomery, K., Kane, K., & Vance, C. M. (2004). Accounting for differences in norms of respect: A study of assessments of incivility through the lenses of race and gender. Group and Organization Management, 29, 248–268. doi:10.1177/1059601103252105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nielson, L. B. (2000). Situating legal consciousness: Experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment. Law & Society Review, 34, 1055–1090. doi:10.2307/3115131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 123–137. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00019-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Phillips, T., & Smith, P. (2003). Everyday incivility: Towards a benchmark. The Sociological Review, 51, 85–108. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roberts, J., Hodgson, R., & Dolan, P. (2011). It’s driving her mad: Gender differences in the effects of commuting on psychological health. Journal of Health Economics, 30, 1064–1076. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Royston, P. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update of ice.” Stata Journal, 5, 527–536. Retrieved from http://apps.webofknowledge.com/.

  35. Schmidt, P. (2010). Chief targets of student incivility are female and young professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Chief-Targets-of-Student/65396/.

  36. Schutz, A. (1973). Collected papers. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Smith, P., Phillips, T. L., & King, R. D. (2010). Incivility: The rude stranger in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. StataCorp. (2014). Multiple Imputation in Stata 12. Retrieved from http://www.stata.com/stata12/multiple-imputation.

  39. Umberson, D., Anderson, K., Glick, J., & Shapiro, A. (1998). Domestic violence, personal control, and gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 442–452. doi:10.2307/353860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Valentine, G. (1989). The geography of women’s fear. Area, 21, 385–390. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20000063.

  41. van Kesteren, J. P., Mayhew, P., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2001). Criminal victimization in seventeen industrialised countries: Key findings from the 2000 International Crime Victims Survey. The Hague, Netherlands: The Netherlands Ministry of Justice, Research and Documentation Center.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Christopher Wildeman, Rene Almeling, the participants of the Center for Research on Inequalities and the Life Course Workshop at Yale University, and anonymous reviewers for very thoughtful comments on this work. Any errors are our own. Previous versions of this paper were presented at the University of Vienna’s Marie Jahoda Summer School on Public Spaces in Transition, Vienna, July 2014, and at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, New York City, February 2015.

The data used here come from a survey funded by the Australian Research Council [Australian Research Council Discovery Grant Number DP0208637].

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Bastomski.

Ethics declarations

All analyses for this study were conducted using secondary data. The data used were drawn from the 2005 Everyday Life Incivility in Australia Survey (ELIAS), which was funded by the Australian Research Council [Australian Research Council Discovery Grant Number DP0208637].

Details about the ELIAS study are documented in the following book: Smith et al. (2010). Incivility: The rude stranger in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Conflict of Interest

The study authors, Sara Bastomski and Philip Smith, certify that they have no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, related to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bastomski, S., Smith, P. Gender, Fear, and Public Places: How Negative Encounters with Strangers Harm Women. Sex Roles 76, 73–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0654-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gender differences
  • Incivility
  • Uncivil incidents
  • Rude behavior
  • Street harassment
  • Victimization