Touchy Subjects: Sex in the Workplace on Broadcast, Cable, and Internet Television
A content analysis of workplace sexual interactions, informed by past research on sexual harassment in televised workplaces, was conducted of 100 U.S. broadcast, cable, and Internet television programs that featured work or a workplace as a prominent setting. Although sexual interactions were relatively common, they were generally depicted in ways that did not clearly communicate harassment. Sexual talk and behavior in the workplace were generally met with either reciprocation or no response. Workplace sexual behavior was more frequent in situation comedies than in other genres of entertainment television content and more common in programs produced for distribution over the Internet than in programs produced for distribution through cable channels or broadcast networks. Results are discussed in terms of likely consequences of viewing, particularly noting that theories of media influence suggest that viewing such programming is likely to contribute to greater tolerance of sexual talk and behavior in the actual workplace.
KeywordsTelevision Sexual harassment Content analysis Sexual attitudes Quality of work life
- Aggarwal, A., & Gupta, M. (2000). Sexual harassment in the workplace (3rd ed.). Vancouver: Butterworths.Google Scholar
- Aubrey, J. S., Harrison, K., Kramer, L., & Yellin, J. (2003). Variety versus timing: Gender differences in college students’ sexual expectations as predicted by exposure to sexually oriented television. Communication Research, 30, 432–460.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2003). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. In A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E. M. Rogers, & M. Sabido (Eds.), Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 75–96). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Burkhardt, M., & Nathaniel, A. (1998). Ethics and issues in contemporary nursing. Albany: Delmar Publishers.Google Scholar
- Consumer News and Business Channel. (2009). Porn at work: Recognizing a sex addict. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.com/id/31922685.
- Farrar, K. M. (2006). Sexual intercourse on television: Do safe sex messages matter? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 635–650. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5004_4.
- Friedman, A. R. (1992). Rape and domestic violence: The experience of refugee women. Women & Therapy, 13, 65–78. doi:10.1300/J015V13N01_07.
- Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment:A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47(2), 164–177. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1995.1033.
- Gerding, A., & Signorielli, N. (2014). Gender roles in tween television programming: A content analysis of two genres. Sex Roles, 70, 43–56. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0330-z.
- Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults’ wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology, 7(4), 325–351. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0704_2.
- Jacobs, L., Claes, E., & Hooghe, M. (2015). The occupational roles of women and ethnic minorities on primetime television in Belgium: An analysis of occupational status measurements. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 498–521. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.1001908.
- Kunkel, D., Eyal, K., Finnerty, K., Biely, E., & Donnerstein, E. (2005). Sex on TV 4: A Kaiser Family Foundation report. Retrieved from KFF.org.
- Lampman, C., Rolfe-Maloney, B., David, E. J., Yan, M., McDermott, N., Winters, S., & Lathrop, R. (2002). Messages about sex in the workplace: A content analysis of primetime television. Sexuality and Culture, 6, 3–22.Google Scholar
- Levine, K. J., & Hoffner, C. A. (2006). Adolescents’ conceptions of work: What is learned from different sources during anticipatory socialization? Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 647–669. doi:10.1177/0743558406293963.
- MacKinnon, C. A. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination (No. 19). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Martino, S. C., Collins, R. L., Kanouse, D. E., Elliott, M., & Berry, S. H. (2005). Social cognitive processes mediating the relationship between exposure to television’s sexual content and adolescents’ sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 914–924. doi:10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCann, D. (2005). Sexual harassment at work: National and international responses. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
- McDonald, P. (2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00300.x.
- Montemurro, B. (2003). Not a laughing matter: Sexual harassment as ‘material’ on workplace-based situation comedies. Sex Roles, 48, 433–445. doi:10.1023/A:1023578528629.
- Osborn, J. L. (2012). When TV and marriage meet: A social exchange analysis of the impact of television viewing on marital satisfaction and commitment. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 739–757. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.618900.
- Parents Television Council. (2016). Worst show of the week. Retrieved from http://w2.parentstv.com/.
- Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1699–1712.Google Scholar
- Pryor, J. B. (1995). The phenomenology of sexual harassment: Why does sexual behavior bother people in the workplace? Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 47, 160–168.Google Scholar
- Rubinstein, M. (1987). The dignity of women at work: Report on the problem of sexual harassment in the member states of the European community. Brussels: Publication Office of the European Community.Google Scholar
- Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd.
- Signorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition and respect: A content analysis of prime-time television characters across three decades. Sex Roles, 40, 527–544.Google Scholar
- Snyder, J. A., Scherer, H. L., & Fisher, B. S. (2012). Social organization and social ties: Their effects on sexual harassment victimization in the workplace. Work, 42, 137–150.Google Scholar
- Taco Bell. (2007). Restaurant orientation handbook. Retrieved from tacoonline.yum.com.
- Taylor, L. D. (2012). Cads and dads on screen: Do film representations of partner scarcity affect partner trait preferences? Communication Research, 39, 523–542. doi:10.1177/00936502111405647.
- Television Academy. (2015). Emmy award nominees and winners. Retrieved from www.emmys.com.
- Till, F. (1980). Sexual harassment: A report on the sexual harassment of students. Washington: National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs.Google Scholar
- U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1990). Policy guidance on employer liability under title VII for sexual favoritism. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/sexualfavor.html.
- Vault.com. (2014). Love is in the air: Vault’s 2014 office romance survey. Retrieved from http://www.vault.com.
- Waldeck, N. E. (2009). The relationship between television exposure and individual work expectations: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 208–234. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00436.x.
- Walmart. (2016). Walmart: Global statement of ethics. Retrieved from www.walmartethics.com.
- Williams, C. L., Giuffre, P. A., & Dellinger, K. (1999). Sexuality in the workplace: Organizational control, sexual harassment, and the pursuit of pleasure. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 73–93.Google Scholar