Sex Roles

, Volume 76, Issue 5–6, pp 276–289 | Cite as

Doing Gender Online: New Mothers’ Psychological Characteristics, Facebook Use, and Depressive Symptoms

  • Sarah J. Schoppe-SullivanEmail author
  • Jill E. Yavorsky
  • Mitchell K. Bartholomew
  • Jason M. Sullivan
  • Meghan A. Lee
  • Claire M. Kamp Dush
  • Michael Glassman
Original Article


Online social networking sites, such as Facebook, have provided a new platform for individuals to produce and reproduce gender through social interactions. New mothers, in particular, may use Facebook to practice behaviors that align with their mothering identity and meet broader societal expectations, or in other words, to “do motherhood.” Given that Facebook use may undermine well-being, it is important to understand the individual differences underlying new mothers’ experiences with Facebook during the stressful first months of parenthood. Using survey data from a sample of 127 new mothers with Facebook accounts residing in the U.S. Midwest, we addressed two key questions: (a) Are individual differences in new mothers’ psychological characteristics associated with their use and experiences of Facebook? and (b) Are new mothers’ psychological characteristics associated with greater risk for depressive symptoms via their use and experiences of Facebook? Regression analyses revealed that mothers who were more concerned with external validation of their identities as mothers and those who believed that society holds them to excessively high standards for parenting engaged in more frequent Facebook activity and also reported stronger emotional reactions to Facebook commentary. Moreover, mothers who were more concerned with external validation were more likely to have featured their child in their Facebook profile picture. Mediation analyses indicated that mothers who were more prone to seeking external validation for their mothering identity and perfectionistic about parenting experienced increases in depressive symptoms indirectly via greater Facebook activity.


Doing gender Transition to parenthood Online social networking Perfectionism Motherhood 



We sincerely thank the many graduate and undergraduate students, who recruited for, as well as collected, entered, and coded the data of the New Parents Project, along with the families who participated in the research. The New Parents Project was funded by the National Science Foundation (CAREER 0746548, Schoppe-Sullivan), with additional support from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; 1K01HD056238, Kamp Dush), and Ohio State University’s Institute for Population Research (NICHD R24HD058484) and Human Development and Family Science program.


  1. Allen, S. M., Hawkins, A. J. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers’ beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 199–212. Retrieved from
  2. Artwick, C. G. (2014). News sourcing and gender on Twitter. Journalism, 15(8), 1111–1127. doi: 10.1177/1464884913505030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartholomew, M. K., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Glassman, M., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Sullivan, J. M. (2012). New parents’ Facebook use at the transition to parenthood. Family Relations, 61, 455–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00708.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child Development, 55, 83–96. doi: 10.2307/1129836.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Belsky, J., & Pensky, E. (1988). Marital change across the transition to parenthood. Marriage & Family Review, 12(3–4), 133–156. doi: 10.1300/J002v12n03_08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759–789. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonomi, A. E., Kernic, M. A., Anderson, M. L., Cannon, E. A., & Slesnick, N. (2008). Use of brief tools to measure depressive symptoms in women with a history of intimate partner violence. Nursing Research, 57(3), 150–156. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000319497.44499.b7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner, P. S., Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2014). The causal ordering of prominence and salience in identity theory: An empirical examination. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(3), 231–252. doi: 10.1177/0190272513518337.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, B., Welser, H. T., Hogan, B., & Titsworth, S. (2011). Socioeconomic status updates: Family SES and emergent social capital in college student Facebook networks. Information, Communication and Society, 14(4), 529–549. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.562221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Casale, S., Fioravanti, G., Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2014). From socially prescribed perfectionism to problematic use of internet communicative services: The mediating roles of perceived social support and the fear of negative evaluation. Addictive Behaviors, 39(12), 1816–1822. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.06.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chase, S. E., & Rogers, M. F. (2001). Mothers and children: Feminist analyses and personal narratives. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, R. W. (2000). The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cotter, D., Hermsen, & Vanneman, R. (2011). The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 259–289. doi: 10.1086/658853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Douglas, S. J., & Michaels, M. W. (2004). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined women. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Facebook Newsroom. (2016). Company info. Retrieved from
  18. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Green, E., & Singleton, C. (2013). ‘Gendering the digital’: The impact of gender and technology perspectives on the sociological imagination. In K. Orton-Johnson & N. Prior (Eds.), Digital sociology: Critical perspectives (pp. 105–124). New York: Palgrave MacMillian.Google Scholar
  20. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Henderson, A., Harmon, S., & Newman, H. (2015). The price mothers pay, even when they are not buying it: Mental health consequences of idealized motherhood. Sex Roles. Advanced online publication.. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0534-5.Google Scholar
  23. Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 456–470. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffman, C. D., & Moon, M. (1999). Women’s characteristics and gender role attitudes: Support for father involvement with children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160, 411–418. doi: 10.1080/00221329909595554.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hollander, J. A. (2013). “I demand more of people” Accountability, interaction, and gender change. Gender and Society, 27(1), 5–29. doi: 10.1177/0891243212464301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Junco, R. (2013). Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 626–631. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., & Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e69841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069841.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Race, class and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lehmann, I. S., & Konstam, V. (2011). Growing up perfect: Perfectionism, problematic Internet use, and career indecision in emerging adults. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89, 155–162. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00073.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lueptow, L. B., Garovich-Szabo, L., & Lueptow, M. B. (2001). Social change and the persistence of sex typing: 1974–1997. Social Forces, 80(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1353/sof.2001.0077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacDonald, C. L. (1998). Manufacturing motherhood: The shadow work of nannies and au pairs. Qualitative Sociology, 21(1), 25–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1022119309086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall, T. C., Lefringhausen, K., & Ferenczi, N. (2015). The Big Five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDaniel, B. T., Coyne, S. M., & Holmes, E. K. (2012). New mothers and media use: Associations between blogging, social networking, and maternal well-being. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16(7), 1509–1517. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0918-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McQuillan, J., Greil, A. L., Shreffler, K. M., & Tichenor, V. (2008). The importance of motherhood among women in the contemporary United States. Gender and Society, 22(4), 477–496. doi: 10.1177/0891243208319359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nentwich, J. C., & Kelan, E. K. (2014). Towards a topology of “doing gender”: An analysis of empirical research and its challenges. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(2), 121–134. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nomaguchi, K. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2003). Costs and rewards of children: The effects of becoming a parent on adults’ lives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 356–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00356.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annul Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paulson, J. F., & Bazemore, S. D. (2010). Prenatal and postpartum depression in fathers and its association with maternal depression: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 303(19), 1961–1969. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 683–700. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00380.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sanchez, D. T., & Crocker, J. (2005). How investment in gender ideals affects well-being: The role of external contingencies of self-worth. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 63–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00169.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36(1), 85–102. doi: 10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402–407. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Snell, W. E., Overbey, G. A., & Brewer, A. L. (2005). Parenting perfectionism and the parenting role. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 613–624. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(1), 44–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01021.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stryker, S. (1959). Symbolic interaction as an approach to family research. Marriage and Family Living, 21(2), 111–119. Retrieved from
  49. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park: Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  50. Sturman, E. D., Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Rudolph, S. G. (2009). Dimensions of perfectionism and self-worth contingencies in depression. Journal of Rational-Emotive Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, 27, 213–231. doi: 10.1007/s10942-007-0079-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220. doi: 10.1177/174569161244290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe‐Sullivan, S. J. (2015). The production of inequality: The gender division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 662–679. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12189.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah J. Schoppe-Sullivan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jill E. Yavorsky
    • 2
  • Mitchell K. Bartholomew
    • 3
  • Jason M. Sullivan
    • 4
  • Meghan A. Lee
    • 1
  • Claire M. Kamp Dush
    • 1
  • Michael Glassman
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Human SciencesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Office of Institutional Research and PlanningThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  5. 5.Department of Educational StudiesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations