Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Ambivalent Sexism and Religiosity in Predicting Attitudes Toward Childlessness in Muslim Undergraduate Students

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to investigate the relationship between ambivalent sexism, specifically hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS), religiosity, and attitudes toward childlessness in Muslim undergraduate students. The sample consisted of 157 (79 women, 78 men) Turkish Islamic undergraduate students studying in North Cyprus, aged between 17 and 30 years-old and originating from various regions in Turkey. Participants completed measures of ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward childlessness as well as rated their level of religiosity. It was expected that due to its emphasis of traditional gender roles, benevolent sexism and high Islamic religiosity would predict negative attitudes toward childlessness in the Turkish sample. Results showed that in women, higher levels of religiosity and benevolent sexism predicted negative attitudes toward childlessness, whereas in men, benevolent sexism alone was predictive of negative attitudes toward childlessness. The results are discussed in accordance with literature on ambivalent sexism and the religion of Islam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anwar, G. (1999). Reclaiming the religious center from a Muslim perspective: Theological alternatives to religious fundamentalism. In C. W. Howland (Ed.), Religious fundamentalisms and the human rights of women (pp. 303–314). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, E. (2006). Gender and self in Islam. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. (2002). Fundamentalism. In B. Reed (Ed.), Nothing sacred: Women respond to religious fundamentalism and terror (pp. 11–22). New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2016). Parenthood as a moral imperative? Moral outrage and the stigmatization of voluntarily childfree women and men. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0606-1.

  • Ataca, B., & Sunar, D. (1999). Continuity and change in Turkish urban family life. Psychology and Developing Societies, 11, 77–90. doi:10.1177/097133369901100104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. L., Search Institute, & Vincent, S. (1980). Development and validation of the Sexist Attitudes Toward Women Stale (SATWS). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 276–291. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00962.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83, 759–789. doi:10.1353/sof.2005.0005.

  • Brinkerhoff, M. E., & Mackie, M. (1985). Religion and gender: A comparison of Canadian and American student attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 367379. doi:10.2307/352141.

  • Burn, S. M., & Busso, J. (2005). Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 412–418. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00241.x.

  • Copur, Z., & Koropeckyj-Cox, T. (2010). University students’ perceptions of childless couples and parents in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1481–1506. doi:10.1177/0192513X10361577.

  • Copur, Z., Chang, C., Denizman, I., Dogan, N., & Shehan, C. (2008, February). Comparisonof family dynamics in Turkey, Japan, & U.S.A: Gender, marriage, parenting & family values. Paper presented at the Society for Cross-Cultural Research (SCCR) conference, New Orleans.

  • Cukur, C. Ş., De Guzman, M. R. T., & Carlo, G. (2004). Religiosity, values, and horizontal and vertical individualism-collectivism: A study of Turkey, the United States, and the Philippines. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 613–634.

  • Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764.

  • Directorate of Religious Affairs. (2014). Türkiye’de dinῖ hayat araştırması [Research on religious life in Turkey]. Ankara, Turkey: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behaviour: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408.

  • Edirne, T., Ersoy, F., & Yaman, H. (2003). Mother health in Turkey. Middle East Journal of Family Medicine, 2(2). Retrieved from http://mejfm.com/journal/oct03/Mother%20health.pdf.

  • Farley, R., Steeh, C., Krysan, M., Jackson, T., & Reeves, K. (1994). Stereotypes and segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit area. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 750–780. doi:10.1086/230580.

  • Gaunt, R. (2006). Biological essentialism, gender ideologies, and role attitudes: What determines parents’ involvement in child care. Sex Roles, 55, 523–533. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9105-0.

  • Gaunt, R. (2012). ‘Blessed is he who has not made me a woman’: Ambivalent sexism and Jewish religiosity. Sex Roles, 67, 477–487. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0185-8.

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.56.2.109.

  • Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Maser, B., & López López, W. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

  • Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Castro, C. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433–441. doi:10.1023/A:1021696209949.

  • Glick, P., Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Akbas, G., Orta, I. M., & Ceylan, S. (2015). Why do women endorse honor beliefs? Ambivalent sexism and religiosity as predictors. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0550-5

  • Hortacsu, N. (1999). Transition to parenthood: The Turkish case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 325–343.

  • Hortacsu, N. (2007). Family- versus couple-initiated marriages in Turkey: Similarities and differences over the family life cycle. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 103–116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00217.x.

  • Hunsberg, B., Owusu, V., & Duck, R. (1999). Religious prejudice in Ghana and Canada: Religious fundamentalism, rightwinged authoritarianism, and attitudes toward homosexuals and women. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 181–194. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0903_2.

  • Hurriyet Daily News. (2013, January 3). Turkish PM Erdogan reiterates his call for 3 children. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-pm-erdogan-reiterates-his-call-for-three-children.aspx?pageID=238&nid=38235.

  • Inhorn, M., & van Balen, F. (2002). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Institute of Population Studies. (1993). Turkey demographic and health survey. Ankara, Turkey: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Population Studies. (2003). Turkey demographic and health survey. Ankara, Turkey: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, M. S. (1993). Reconceiving women: Separating motherhood from female identity. New York: Guilford.

  • Isik, O., & Pinarcioglu, M. M. (2006). Geographies of a silent transition: A geographically weighted regression approach to regional fertility differences in Turkey. European Journal of Population, 2, 399–421.

  • Jensen, L. C., & Jensen, J. (1993). Family values, religiosity, and gender. Psychological Reports, 73, 429–430. doi:10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.429.

  • Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1982). Sex roles, family and community in Turkey. In Ç. Kağitçıbaşi & D. Sunar (Eds.), Sex roles, value of children and fertility (pp. 151–180). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Turkish Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kağitçibaşi, Ç., & Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three-decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology, 54, 317–337. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00213.x.

  • Kirkpatrick, L. (1993). Fundamentalism, Christian orthodoxy, and intrinsic religious orientation as predictors of discriminatory attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32, 256–268. doi:10.2307/1386664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koropeckyj-Cox, T., & Pendell, G. (2007a). Attitudes about childlessness in the United States: Correlates of positive, neutral, and negative responses. Journal of Marriage and Family, 28, 1054–1082. doi:10.1177/0192513X07301940.

  • Koropeckyj-Cox, T., & Pendell, G. (2007b). The gender gap in attitudes about childlessness in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 899–915. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00420.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulakac, O., Buldukoglu, K., Yilmaz, M., & Alkan, S. (2006). An analysis of the motherhood concept in employed women in south Turkey. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 837–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, E. T. (1995). Barren in the Promised Land: Childless Americans and the pursuit of happiness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajczak, M., & Pietrzak, J. (2014). Ambivalent sexism and religion: Connected through values. Sex Roles, 70, 387–399. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0379-3.

  • Mitchell, D., & Gray, E. (2007). Declining fertility: Intentions, attitudes, and aspirations. Journal of Sociology, 43, 23–44. doi:10.1177/1440783307073933.

  • Moya, M., Glick, P., Exposito, F., De Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434. doi:10.1177/0146167207304790.

  • O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rule of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41, 673–690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, C. M. (1994). Reproductive choice in Islam: Gender and State in Iran and Tunisia. Studies in Family Planning, 25, 41–51.

  • Omran, A. R. (1992). Family planning in the legacy of Islam. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruether, R. R. (2002). The war on women. In B. Reed (Ed.), Nothing sacred: Women respond to religious fundamentalism and terror (pp. 3–10). New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press/Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, N. F. (1976). The motherhood mandate. Social Issues, 32, 143–153. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02603.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı, N. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44, 599–610. doi:10.1023/A:1012295109711.

  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2002). Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: A study of reliability and validity]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi (Journal of Turkish Psychology), 17, 47–58.

  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Yalcin, Z. S., & Glick, P. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, belief in a just world, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57(11), 889–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenker, J. G. (2000). Women’s reproductive health: Monotheistic religious perspectives. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 70, 77–86.

  • Seccombe, K. (1991). Assessing the costs and benefits of children: Gender Comparisons among childfree husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 191–202. doi:10.2307/353143.

  • Sevim, S. A. (2006). Religious tendency and gender roles: Predictors of the attitudes toward women’s work roles? Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 77–86.

  • Shafak, E. (2011, July 15). This silence hurts Turkish women. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/15/turkey-caesarian-ban-silence-hurts-womrn.

  • Sunar, D. (2002). Change and continuity in the Turkish middle class family. In E. Özdalga & R. Liljestrom (Eds.), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective (pp. 217–237). Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanturri, M. L., & Mencarini, L. (2008). Childless or childfree? Paths to voluntary childlessness in Italy. Population and Development Review, 34, 51–77. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00205.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taşdemir, N., & Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2010). The relationships between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students. Sex Roles, 62, 420–426. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9693-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, M. R. (2007). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: Evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 357–379. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2007s357.

  • Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009–1037. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01009.x.

  • Toros, A. (2002). How compatible is the Turkish population structure with European Union countries? Perceptions, Journal of International Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.sam.gov.tr/perceptions/Volume2/September-November1997/howcompatibleistheturkishpopulationstructurewitheuropeanunioncountries.pdf.

  • United Nations Children’s Emergency Fund, State Institute of Statistics. (1999). State of Turkey’s children, preliminary report. Ankara, Turkey: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooij, F. B., Van Balen, F., & Hermanns, J. M. A. (2006). Migrants and the meaning of parenthood: Involuntary childless Turkish migrants in the Netherlands. Human Reproduction, 21, 1832–1838. doi:10.1093/humrep/del046.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Eastern Mediterranean University, Mersin 10, Famagusta, North Cyprus, Turkey

    Shenel Husnu

Authors
  1. Shenel Husnu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shenel Husnu.

Ethics declarations

The work reported in this manuscript is original, has not been published elsewhere, and is not currently under review in any other journal. The directions for submission of manuscripts have been carefully read and the submission of this manuscript conforms to them all.

APA ethical standards for the treatment of samples have been adhered to.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Husnu, S. The Role of Ambivalent Sexism and Religiosity in Predicting Attitudes Toward Childlessness in Muslim Undergraduate Students. Sex Roles 75, 573–582 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0639-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0639-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation