Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reviving Androgyny: A Modern Day Perspective on Flexibility of Gender Identity and Behavior

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bem’s conceptualization of psychological androgyny introduced a new way of thinking in which crossing gender boundaries was seen as an adaptive form of flexibility that promoted better psychological adjustment. However, the research linking androgyny and adjustment was mixed, and unfortunately, flexibility was not adequately measured and was seldom investigated. Because of the failure to assess flexibility, the underlying issue remains unresolved—is flexibility healthy or not? In the first section, we review Bem’s original idea of psychological androgyny and then describe how assessing capabilities and functional flexibility more closely match the original idea of flexibility than do earlier measures. The second section describes research from the United States that illustrates new ways to measure gender identity and explains how these studies might help resolve the link between identity and adjustment. Specifically, we discuss research on “identity androgyny” in which judgments of gender identity involve considering how the self relates to both genders. This dual-identity approach provides a nuanced view of the identity–adjustment link by suggesting that identifying with one’s own gender is important for mental health but identifying with the other gender provides additional social benefits and may relate to flexibility. Next, we describe research that used a dynamical system approach and methods to assess children’s behavioral flexibility and how it relates to adjustment. By carefully revisiting the issue of flexibility associated with androgyny, our intention is to provide a convincing case that the idea of androgyny has potential to motivate new research on gender development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolph, K. E., Vereijken, B., & Shrout, P. E. (2003). What changes in infant walking and why. Child Development, 74, 475–497. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.7402011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alpert-Gillis, L. J., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Gender and sex-role influences on children’s self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 97–114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00762.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antill, J. K., & Cunningham, J. D. (1979). Self-esteem as a function of masculinity in both sexes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 783–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D. (1990). Sex, gender, and the individual. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 486–525). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aube, J., Norcliffe, H., Craig, J., & Koestner, R. (1995). Gender characteristics and adjustment-related outcomes: Questioning the masculinity model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 284–295. doi:10.1177/0146167295213009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassoff, E. S., & Glass, G. V. (1982). The relationship between sex roles and mental health: A meta-analysis of twenty-six studies. Counseling Psychologist, 10, 105–112. doi:10.1177/0011000082104019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychology androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643. doi:10.1037/h0077098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48–54. doi:10.1037/h0078640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, R. S., Jones, L. C., & Lobliner, D. B. (1997). Social categorization and the formation of intergroup attitudes in children. Child Development, 68, 530–543. doi:10.2307/1131676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, P. R., Yunger, J. L., & Perry, D. G. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 49, 95–109. doi:10.1023/A:1024423012063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407. doi:10.1037/h0035334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiDonato, M. D., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2011). The benefits and drawbacks of gender typing: How different dimensions are related to psychological adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 457–463. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9620-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiDonato, M. D., Martin, C. L., Hessler, E. E., Amazeen, P. G., Hanish, L. D., & Fabes, R. A. (2012). Gender consistency and flexibility: Using dynamics to understand the relation between gender and adjustment. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 16, 159–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiDonato, M. D., England, D. E., Martin, C. L., & Amazeen, P. G. (2013). Dynamic analyses for developmental science: A primer for intrigued scientists. Human Development, 56, 59–75. doi:10.1159/000342936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagot, B. I., & Patterson, G. R. (1969). An in vivo analysis of reinforcing contingencies for sex-role behaviors in the preschool child. Developmental Psychology, 1, 563–568. doi:10.1037/h0027965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, S. (1981). Why is cross-sex-role behavior more approved for girls than boys? A status characteristic approach. Sex Roles, 7, 289–300. doi:10.1007/BF00287543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. A. (1981). Toward mental health: The benefits of psychological androgyny. Professional Psychology, 12, 29–38. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.12.1.29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, A. L. (1996). Non-linear dynamics for clinicians: Chaos theory, fractals, and complexity at the bedside. The Lancet, 347, 1312–1314. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90948-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1952). Identifying psychological femininity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 12, 427–439. doi:10.1177/001316445201200309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P., & Guilford, R. B. (1936). Personality factors S, E, and M and their measurement. Journal of Psychology, 2, 109–127. doi:10.1080/00223980.1936.9917446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halim, M. L., Ruble, D. N., & Amodio, D. M. (2011). From pink frilly dresses to “one of the boys”: A social-cognitive analysis of gender identity development and gender bias. Social and Personality Compass, 5, 933–949. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00399.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex typing. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 387–467). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. G. (1976). Androgyny as a model of mental health for women: From theory to therapy. In A. G. Kalan & J. P. Bean (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes: Readings toward a psychology of andrognyny (pp. 353–362). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. G. (1979). Clarifying the concept of androgyny: Implications for therapy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3, 223–230. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1979.tb00539.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kello, C. T., Beltz, B. C., Holden, J. G., & Van Orden, G. C. (2007). The emergent coordination of cognitive function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 551–568. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A., & Worell, J. (1977). New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1101–1115. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.45.6.1101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., & Shaunghnessy, P. (2000). Patterns of working alliance development: A typology of client’s working alliance ratings. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 362–371. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.47.3.362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., & Downs, A. C. (1980). Mothers, fathers, and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behaviors in young children. Child Development, 51, 1237–1247. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1980.tb02675.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York, NY: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesczczynski, J. P., & Strough, J. (2008). The contextual specificity of masculinity and femininity in early adolescence. Social Development, 17, 719–736. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation. In W. Overton (Ed.), Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (Vol. 67 no. 2, pp. vii-147). Boston, MA: Blackwell.

  • Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Monto, S., Rytsala, H., Suominen, K., Isometsa, E., & Kahkonen, S. (2005). Breakdown of long-range temporal correlations in theta oscillations in patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10131–10137. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3244-05.2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimensions: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256–1269. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., & Butcher, J. N. (1983). Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as separate concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 428–439. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Dinella, L. (2012). Congruence between gender stereotypes and activity preferences in self-identified tomboys and non-tomboys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 599–610. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9786-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134. doi:10.2307/1129498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., Andrews, N. C. Z., England, D., Zosuls, K., & Ruble, D. N. (2016). A dual identity approach for conceptualizing and measuring children’s gender identity. Child Development.

  • Master, A., & Walton, G. M. (2013). Minimal groups increase young children’s motivation and learning on group-relevant tasks. Child Development, 84, 737–751. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01867.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, C. M. (2015). Gender in context: Considering variability in Wood and Eagly’s traditions of gender identity. Sex Roles, 73, 490–496. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0535-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. L., Omens, R. S., & Delvadia, R. (1991). Dimensions of social competence: Personality and coping style correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 955–964. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90185-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. F., Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., & Hanish, L. (2013). Bringing the cognitive and social together: How gender detectives and gender enforcers shape children’s gender development. In M. R. Banaji & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world (pp. 306–313). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199890712.001.0001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Osofsky, J. D., & Osofsky, H. J. (1972). Androgyny as a life style. Family Coordinator, 21, 411–419. doi:10.2307/582684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L. (1987). The structure of personality capabilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 354–365. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L. (1988). Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 88–101. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, J., & Strough, J. (2003). The effects of same-sex and other-sex contexts on masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 48, 421–432. doi:10.1037/t00748-000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612–624. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rebecca, M., Hefner, R., & Oleshansky, B. (1976). A model of sex-role transcendence. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 197–206. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02607.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., & Montemayor, R. (1994). The relationship between gender role orientation and perceived self-competency in male and female adolescents. Sex Roles, 31, 579–595. doi:10.1007/BF01544281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedney, M. A. (1989). Conceptual and methodological sources of controversies about androgyny. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Representations: Social constructions of gender (pp. 126–144). Amityville, NY: Baywood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. J., Noll, J. A., & Bryant, J. B. (1999). The effects of social context on gender self-concept. Sex Roles, 40, 499–512. doi:10.1037/t00748-000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1983). Comment on Lubinski, Tellegen, and Butcher’s “masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 440–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Hall, S. K. (1996). Children’s gender-related self-perceptions, activity preferences, and occupational stereotypes: A test of three models of gender constructs. Sex Roles, 35, 659–691. doi:10.1007/BF01544086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The personal attribute questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity and femininity. Journal of Supplemental Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43 (Ms. No. 617).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39. doi:10.1037/h0076857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–365. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., & Lubinski, D. (1983). Some methodological comments on labels, traits, interactions, and types in the study of “femininity” and “masculinity”: Reply to Spence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 258–312). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. K. (1975). Gender labels and early sex role development. Child Development, 46, 339–347. doi:10.2307/1128126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, P. T., & Van der Velde, M. E. G. (2005). Relationships of functional flexibility with individual and work factors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 111–129. doi:10.1007/s10869-005-6994-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 331–350. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, R., & Ashmore, R. D. (1993). The multifaceted self: Androgyny reassessed by open-ended self-descriptions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 278–287. doi:10.2307/2786664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. (1966). An abilities conception of personality: Some implications for personality measurement. American Psychologist, 21, 132–138. doi:10.1037/h0023298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, G. M., Cohen, G. L., Cwir, D., & Spencer, S. J. (2012). Mere belonging: The power of social connections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 513–532. doi:10.1037/a0025731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. A. (2000). Models and measurement of psychological androgyny: A cross-cultural extension of theory and research. Sex Roles, 43, 529–552. doi:10.1023/A:1007171500798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1991). Doing gender. In J. Lorber & S. A. Farrell (Eds.), The social construction of gender (pp. 13–37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1985). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 12, 207–225. doi:10.1007/BF00288048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willerman, L., Turner, R. G., & Peterson, M. (1976). A comparison of the predictive validity of typical and maximal personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 482–492. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(76)90063-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles, 73, 461–473. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0480-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunger, J. L., Carver, P. R., & Perry, D. G. (2004). Does gender identity influence children’s psychological well-being? Developmental Psychology, 40, 572–582. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S. J., Gilbert, J. A., Thor, K. K., & Mumford, M. D. (1991). Self-monitoring and 360-degree ratings. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 449–473. doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(98)90011-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Shrout, P. E., Bornstein, M. H., & Greulich, F. K. (2009). The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for sex-typed play. Developmental Psychology, 45, 688–701. doi:10.1037/a0014053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported in part by funds from the National Institute of Child Health and Development (1-R01-HD45816), awarded to the first author, and by the T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics as part of the Challenged Child Project. Additional support was provided for Naomi Andrews from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, PO Box 873701, Tempe, AZ, 85287-3701, USA

    Carol Lynn Martin, Rachel E. Cook & Naomi C. Z. Andrews

Authors
  1. Carol Lynn Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rachel E. Cook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naomi C. Z. Andrews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Lynn Martin.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The research that was reported here received IRB approval and was conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the American Psychological Association. All authors have agreed to the content of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

None of the coauthors have any potential conflicts of interest concerning this work.

Informed Consent

Participants in the research gave informed consent to be involved in the research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, C.L., Cook, R.E. & Andrews, N.C.Z. Reviving Androgyny: A Modern Day Perspective on Flexibility of Gender Identity and Behavior. Sex Roles 76, 592–603 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0602-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0602-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation