Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 74, Issue 9–10, pp 399–410 | Cite as

Gender-Typed Play and Social Abilities in Boys and Girls: Are They Related?

  • Rebecca Y. Hei Li
  • Wang Ivy WongEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

In the present study, we tested whether children’s play with feminine toys is related to social abilities in which girls typically excel. We measured gender-typed toy play, empathy, and comforting skill in 80 Grade 1 children (about 6 years-old) in Hong Kong, China. Toy play was assessed with a standard observational paradigm; empathy, with the Empathy Quotient-Child Questionnaire; and comforting skill, with an infant-cry paradigm requiring the generation of comforting strategies. As predicted, boys and girls differed in their preferences for play with masculine and feminine toys, but not for gender-neutral toys. Importantly, toy play was related to comforting skill. Girls scored higher on the comforting task, and girls who played more with feminine toys and boys who played more with gender-neutral toys generated more comforting strategies. Regression and mediational analyses also suggested a stronger role of gender-typed play on comforting than the other way round. Contrary to hypothesis, there was no gender difference in empathy, and no relationship between empathy and toy play. These results extend previous understandings of the link between play and development and suggest that early gender-typed experiences may have long-term consequences for the development of some social skills.

Keywords

Gender differences Gender-typed play Toys Gender socialization Social skills 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted in partial satisfaction for a postgraduate thesis in Psychology by the first author. The authors thank Terry Kit-fong Au for her comments on an earlier version of this manuscript

References

  1. Alexander, G. M., Wilcox, T., & Woods, R. (2009). Sex differences in infants’ visual interest in toys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 427–433. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9430-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwall, N., Johansson, D., & Hansen, S. (2010). The gender difference in gaze-cueing: Associations with empathizing and systemizing. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 729–732. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Autism Research Centre, University of Cambridge. (2015). Empathy/Systemizing Quotient (EQ-SQ) (Child) - Traditional Chinese. Retrieved from http://www.autismresearchcentre.com/arc_tests
  4. Auyeung, B., Wheelwright, S., Allison, C., Atkinson, M., Samarawickrema, N., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). The children’s Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient: Sex differences in typical development and in autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1509–1521. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0772-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344. doi: 10.1007/BF00287729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175. doi: 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berenbaum, S. A., & Hines, M. (1992). Early androgens are related to childhood sex-typed toy preferences. Psychological Science, 3, 203–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00028.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blakemore, J. E. O., & Centers, R. E. (2005). Characteristics of boys’ and girls’ toys. Sex Roles, 53, 619–633. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-7729-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Block, J. H. (1983). Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures. Child Development, 54, 1335–1354. doi: 10.2307/1129799.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Burleson, B. R. (1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1578–1588. doi: 10.2307/1130086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caldera, Y. M., & Sciaraffa, M. A. (1998). Parent-toddler play with feminine toys: Are all dolls the same? Sex Roles, 39, 657–668. doi: 10.1023/A:1018851932580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldera, Y. M., Huston, A. C., & O’Brien, M. (1989). Social interactions and play patterns of parents and toddlers with feminine, masculine, and neutral toys. Child Development, 60, 70–76. doi: 10.2307/1131072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Caprara, G. V., Barbanelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11, 302–306. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 269–309. doi: 10.1080/07370000802177177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Catherine, N. L. A., & Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2011). Children’s perceptions and comforting strategies to infant crying: Relations to age, sex, and empathy-related responding. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 524–551. doi: 10.1348/026151010X521475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chapman, E., Baron-Cohen, S., Auyeung, B., Knick- Meyer, R., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Fetal testosterone and empathy: Evidence from the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test. Social Neuroscience, 1, 135–148. doi: 10.1080/17470910600992239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, E. S. L., & Rao, N. (2011). Gender socialization in Chinese kindergartens: Teachers’ contributions. Sex Roles, 64, 103–116. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9873-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheng, H. (1997). “Holding up half of the sky”? A sociocultural comparison of gender-role portrayals in Chinese and US advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 16, 295–319. doi: 10.1111/j.0265-0487.1997.00063.pp.x.Google Scholar
  21. Cherney, I. D., & Dempsey, J. (2010). Young children’s classification, stereotyping and play behaviour for gender neutral and ambiguous toys. Educational Psychology, 30, 651–669. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2010.498416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cherney, I. D., & London, K. (2006). Gender-linked differences in the toys, television shows, computer games, and outdoor activities of 5- to 13-year-old children. Sex Roles, 54, 717–726. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9037-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Connor, J. M., Schackman, M., & Serbin, L. A. (1978). Sex-related differences in response to practice on a visual-spatial test and generalization to a related test. Child Development, 49, 24–29. doi: 10.2307/1128588.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Coyle, E. F., & Liben, L. S. (in press). Affecting girls’ activity and job interests through play: The moderating roles of personal gender salience and game characteristics. Child Development. Advanced online publication. doi:  10.1111/cdev.12463
  26. Dadds, M. R., Hunter, K., Hawes, D. J., Frost, A. D. J., Vassallo, S., Bunn, P., & El Masry, Y. (2008). A measure of cognitive and affective empathy in children using parent ratings. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 39, 111–122. doi: 10.1007/s10578-007-0075-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Deming, D. K. (2015). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series 21473. doi:  10.3386/w21473. Retrieved from http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/ddeming/files/deming_socialskills_august2015.pdf
  28. Denier, C. A., & Serbin, L. A. (1978). Play with male-preferred toys: Effects on visual-spatial performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  29. Doescher, S. M., & Sugawara, A. I. (1990). Sex role flexibility and prosocial behavior among preschool children. Sex Roles, 22, 111–123. doi: 10.1007/BF00288158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 91–119. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Giunta, L. D. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues Policy Review, 4, 143–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x.Empathy-related.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Fabes, R. A., Eisenberg, N., Karbon, M., Troyer, D., & Switzer, G. (1994). The relations of children’s emotion regulation to their vicarious emotional responses and comforting behaviors. Child Development, 65, 1678–1693. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00842.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Flannegan, D. (1996). Mothers’ and kindergartners’ talk about interpersonal relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42, 519–536.Google Scholar
  35. Flannegan, D., & Perese, S. (1998). Emotional references in mother-daughter and mother-son dyads’ conversations about school. Sex Roles, 39, 353–367. doi: 10.1023/A:1018866908472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fung, A., & Ma, E. (2000). Formal vs. informal use of television and sex-role stereotyping in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 42, 57–81. doi: 10.1023/A:1007032227501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Geng, Y., Xia, D., & Qin, B. (2012). The Basic Empathy Scale: A Chinese validation of a measure of empathy in adolescents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 43, 499–510. doi: 10.1007/s10578-011-0278-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Golan, O., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hill, J. (2006). The Cambridge Mindreading (CAM) face-voice battery: Testing complex emotion recognition in adults with and without Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 169–183. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0057-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Golombok, S., Rust, J., Zervoulis, K., Golding, J., & Hines, M. (2012). Continuity in sex-typed behavior from preschool to adolescence: A longitudinal population study of boys and girls aged 3–13 years. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 591–597. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9784-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Green, V. A., Bigler, R., & Catherwood, D. (2004). The variability and flexibility of gender-typed toy play: A close look at children’s behavioral responses to counterstereotypic models. Sex Roles, 78, 371–386. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000049227.05170.aa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Groen, Y., Fuermaier, A. B. M., Den Heijer, A. E., Tucha, O., & Althaus, M. (2015). The empathy and systemizing quotient: The psychometric properties of the Dutch version and a review of the cross-cultural stability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 2848–2864.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Guan, R., Jin, L., & Qian, M. (2012). Validation of the empathy quotient-short form among Chinese healthcare professionals. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 75–84. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2012.40.1.75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hellendoorn, J., & Harinck, F. J. H. (1997). War toy play and aggression in Dutch kindergarten children. Social Development, 6, 340–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.1997.tb00110.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hines, M. (2010). Sex-related variation in human behavior and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 448–456. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109. doi: 10.1177/0146167201276007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jirout, J. J., & Newcombe, N. S. (2015). Building blocks for developing social skills: Evidence from a large, representative U. S. sample. Psychological Science, 26, 302–310. doi: 10.1177/0956797614563338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 589–611. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kahlenberg, S. M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2010). Sex differences in chimpanzees’ use of sticks as play objects resemble those of children. Current Biology, 20, R1067–R1068. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kim, J., & Lee, S. J. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Empathy Quotient Scale. Psychiatry Investigation, 7, 24–30. doi: 10.4306/pi.2010.7.1.24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Kirkland, R. A., Peterson, E., Baker, C. A., Miller, S., & Pulos, S. (2013). Meta-analysis reveals adult female superiority in “Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test.”. North American Journal of Psychology, 15, 121–146. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00292.Google Scholar
  54. Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34, 911–924. doi: 10.1017/S0033291703001624.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee, J. F. K., & Collins, P. (2008). Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks—Some past and current practices. Sex Roles, 59, 127–137. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9414-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex differences in spatial skills. Psychological Science, 16, 841–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01623.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Liebenau, K. L. (1995). The impact of toy type on girls’ subsequent aggressive, cooperative, and nurturant behaviors. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 56, 2900.Google Scholar
  58. Lillard, A. S., Lerner, M. D., Hopkins, E. J., Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Palmquist, C. M. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children’s development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1–34. doi: 10.1037/a0029321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lin, C. Y. C., & Fu, V. R. (1990). A comparison of child‐rearing practices among Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian‐American parents. Child Development, 61, 429–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02789.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498. doi: 10.2307/1130467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Liss, M. B. (1983). Social and cognitive skills: Sex roles and children’s play. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  62. Lobel, T. E., Bar-David, E., Gruber, R., Lau, S., & Bar-Tal, Y. (2000). Gender schema and social judgments: A developmental study of children from Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 43, 19–42. doi: 10.1023/A:1007035611440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Louie, J. Y., Oh, B. J., & Lau, A. S. (2013). Cultural differences in the links between parental control and children’s emotional expressivity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19, 424–434. doi: 10.1037/a0032820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Maestripieri, D., & Pelka, S. (2002). Sex differences in interest in infants across the lifespan. Human Nature, 13, 327–344. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1018-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424–453. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Muncer, S. J., & Ling, J. (2006). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1111–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Park, S., Cho, S. C., Cho, I. H., Kim, B. N., Kim, J. W., Shin, M. S., & Yoo, H. J. (2012). Sex differences in children with autism spectrum disorders compared with their unaffected siblings and typically developing children. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 861–870. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pasterski, V. L., Geffner, M. E., Brain, C., Hindmarsh, P., Brook, C., & Hines, M. (2005). Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of masculine play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development, 76, 264–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00843.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Perneger, T. V. (1998). What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316, 1236–1238. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Rothman, K. J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1, 43–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year of life. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 7–15. doi: 10.1080/01650250042000078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Servin, A., Bohlin, G., & Berlin, L. (1999). Sex differences in 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year‐olds’ toy‐choice in a structured play‐session. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 43–48. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00096.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Sharp, C. (2008). Theory of mind and conduct problems in children: Deficits in reading the “emotion of the eyes.”. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 1149–1158. doi: 10.1080/02699930701667586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sprafkin, C., Serbin, L. A., Denier, C., & Connor, J. M. (1983). Sex-differentiated play: Cognitive consequences and early interventions. In M. B. Liss (Ed.), Social and cognitive skills: Sex roles and children’s play (pp. 167–192). New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  77. Suzuki, A., Hoshino, T., & Shigemasu, K. (2006). Measuring individual differences in sensitivities to basic emotions in faces. Cognition, 99, 327–353. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A metal-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.117.2.250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Wakabayashi, A. (2013). Individual differences in empathizing and systemizing in Japanese children: Psychometric properties of the children’s versions of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and Systemizing Quotient (SQ). Japanese Psychological Research, 55, 12–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00537.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Watson, M. W., & Peng, Y. (1992). The relation between toy gun play and children’s aggressive behavior. Early Education and Development, 3, 370–389. doi: 10.1207/s15566935eed0304_7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weisgram, E. S., Fulcher, M., & Dinella, L. M. (2014). Pink gives girls permission: Exploring the role of explicit gender labels and gender-typed colors on preschool children’s toy preferences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 401–409. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wong, W. I., & Hines, M. (2015). Effects of gender color-coding on toddlers’ gender-typical toy play. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1233–1242. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0400-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Yu, L., Winter, S., & Xie, D. (2010). The Child Play Behavior and Activity Questionnaire: A parent-report measure of childhood gender-related behavior in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 807–815. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9403-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Zahn-Waxler, C., Friedman, S. L., & Cummings, E. M. (1983). Children’s emotions and behaviors in response to infants’ cries. Child Development, 54, 1522–1528. doi: 10.2307/1129815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Shrout, P. E., Bornstein, M. H., & Greulich, F. K. (2009). The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for gender-typed play. Developmental Psychology, 45, 688–701. doi: 10.1037/a0014053.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations