Cultures of honor, such as Turkey, prioritize defending individual and family reputations, but in gender-specific ways (Nisbett and Cohen 1996). Men maintain honor via reputations for toughness, aggression, control over women, and avenging insults. Women maintain honor through obedience to men, sexual modesty, and religious piety. Honor beliefs support women’s subordination, justifying violence against them (Sev’er and Yurdakul, Violence against Women, 7, 964–998, 2001) and therefore should be challenged. Understanding honor beliefs’ ideological correlates may inform such efforts. We hypothesized that benevolent sexism, a subjectively favorable system-justifying ideology, would more strongly, positively predict Turkish women’s (versus men’s) honor beliefs; whereas hostile sexism, which is openly antagonistic toward women, would more strongly, positively predict Turkish men’s (versus women’s) honor beliefs. Additionally, due to justifications for gender inequality embedded in Islamic religious teachings, we expected Islamic religiosity to positively predict honor beliefs for both genders. A convenience sample of Turkish undergraduates (313 women and 122 men) in Ankara completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, Religious Orientation Scale, and Honor Endorsement Index. Regression analyses revealed that benevolent (but not hostile) sexism positively predicted women’s honor beliefs, whereas hostile (but not benevolent) sexism positively predicted men’s honor beliefs. Islamic religiosity positively predicted honor beliefs for both genders, but (unexpectedly) did so more strongly for men than women. We suggest that combating benevolent sexism and promoting feminist interpretations of Islamic religiosity may help to empower Turkish women to challenge honor beliefs.
Culture of honor Hostile sexism Benevolent sexism Religious Orientation Muslim sample Turkish sample
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
The research complied with APA ethical standards and was reviewed and approved by an IRB prior to conducting the research. The manuscript has not been submitted to any other journal.
Anwar, G. (1999). Reclaiming the religious center from a Muslim perspective: Theological alternatives to religious fundamentalism. In C. W. Howland (Ed.), Religious fundamentalisms and the human rights of women (pp. 303–314). New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anwar, E. (2006). Gender and self in Islam. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castillo, L. G., Perez, F. V., Castillo, R., & Ghosheh, M. R. (2010). Construction and initial validation of the Marianismo Beliefs Scale. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 23, 163–175. doi:10.1080/09515071003776036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceylan, S., & Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2012).Violence against women in honor cultures. Manuscript prepared for publication.Google Scholar
Cirhinlioğlu, F. G. (2010). Dini yönelimler ve önyargı [Religious orientations and prejudice]. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi [International Journal of Human Sciences], 7, 1366–1384.Google Scholar
Cotterill, S., Sidanius, J., Bhardwaj, A., & Kumar, V. (2014). Ideological support for the Indian caste system: Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Karma. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2, 98–116. doi:10.5964/jspp.v2i1.171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldner, Y. (2000). “Honor” murders – Why the perps get off easy. Middle East Quarterly, 7, 41–50.Google Scholar
Furseth, I., & Repstad, P. (2006). An introduction to the sociology of religion: Classical and contemporary perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrahms, D., Masser, B., … López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775. doi:10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.523.
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Castro, Y. R. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433–441. doi:10.1023/A:1021696209949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., … Wells, R. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728. doi:10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2063.
Hassan, R. (1999). Feminism in Islam. In S. Young & K. Young (Eds.), Feminism and world religions (pp. 248–78). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi:10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36. doi:10.1002/ejsp.127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1683.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Hood, R. W. (1990). Intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation: The boon or bane of contemporary psychology of religion? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 442–462. doi:10.2307/1387311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korteweg, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2009). Islam, gender, and immigrant integration: Boundary drawing in discourses on honor killing in the Netherlands and Germany. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32, 218–238. doi:10.1080/01419870802065218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, L., & Melville, C. (2013). “Every inch a king”. Kings and kingship in the ancient and medieval worlds. In L. Mitchell & C. Melville (Eds.), Every inch a king: Comparative studies on kings and kingship in the ancient and medieval worlds (pp. 1–21). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Moxnes, H. (1996). Honor and shame. In R. L. Rohrbaugh (Ed.), The social sciences and new testament interpretation (pp. 19–40). Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sakallı Uğurlu, N., & Akbaş, G. (2013). “Honor” and “honor violence against women” in honor cultures: Social psychological explanations. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 16(32), 76–91.Google Scholar
Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2002). Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ölçeği: Geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışması [Ambivalent sexism inventory: A study of reliability and validity]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi [Journal of Turkish Psychology], 17, 47–58.Google Scholar
Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743–754. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9306-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tezcan, M. (1999). Ülkemizde aile içi tore ya da namus cinayetleri [Honor killings in families in Turkey]. In T. C. Başbakanlık Kadının (Ed.), Statüsü ve Sorunları Genel Müdürlüğü (pp. 21–27). Ankara: T. C. Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü ve Sorunları Genel Müdürlüğü.Google Scholar
Vandello, J. A., Cohen, D., Grandon, R., & Franiuk, R. (2009). Stand by your man: Indirect cultural prescriptions for honorable violence and feminine loyalty in Canada, Chile and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 81–114. doi:10.1177/0022022108326194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wadud, A. (2006). Inside the gender jihad: Women’s reform in Islam. Oxford: Oneworld Publication.Google Scholar