This article explores the relevance of the ethnographic study of the Internet for feminist scholars interested in families. The online world is an emerging field site for feminist scholars investigating spousal, parental, and kin relations, one that opens up new arenas of study but also requires novel methodological approaches. The proliferation of cyber-communities and computer-mediated communication has radically altered how we live, communicate, and gather, share, and produce knowledge. This is particularly true for families, as new media technologies have impacted how families form, interact, and understand themselves and the world. Web 2.0 offers the potential for new imagined communities, new forms of social and political resistance, and new identities and networks that can transcend or reinforce traditional understandings of community, nation, and family. This article begins with a critical review of relevant literature (primarily from the United States) and offers several case studies that show the relevance of cyber-ethnography to feminist researchers interested in families. As the cases illustrate, ethnographers face new methodological and ethical issues associated with cyber studies and cyber-ethnography. Given the changing media landscapes families find themselves in, scholars of gender and families are well served to think through the effects of new media on families and the methodological benefits and challenges for studying these new forms of communication.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abbasgholizadeh, M. (2014). “To do something we are unable to do in Iran”: Cyberspace, the public sphere, and the Iranian women’s movement. Signs, 39, 831–840. doi:10.1086/675722.
Adler, P., & Adler, P. (2007). The demedicalization of self-injury from psychopathology to sociological deviance. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36, 537–570. doi:10.1177/0891241607301968.
Adler, C., & Zarchin, Y. (2002). The “virtual focus group”: Using the internet to reach pregnant women on home bed rest. JOGN Nursing, 31, 418–427. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00064.x.
Alexanian, J. (2006). Publicly intimate online: Iranian web logs in southern California. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, 26, 134–145.
Anagnost, A. (2000). Scenes of misrecognition: Maternal citizenship in the age of transnational adoption. Positions, 8, 389–421.
Apple, M. W. (2011). Rightist education and godly technology: Cultural politics, gender, and the work of home schooling. REMIE - Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 1, 5–33. doi:10.4452/remie.2011.01.
Atkinson, S., & Ayers, A. (2010). The potential of the internet for alternative caring practices for health. Anthropology & Medicine, 17, 75–86. doi:10.1080/13648470903572366.
Barkun, M. (1998). Conspiracy theories as stigmatized knowledge: The basis for a new age racism? In J. Kaplan & T. Bjorgo (Eds.), Nation and race: The developing Euro-American subculture (pp. 58–72). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Battles, H. (2010). Exploring ethical and methodological issues in internet-based research with adolescents. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9, 27–39.
Beaulieu, A. (2010). From co-location to co-presence: Shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 40, 453–470. doi:10.1177/0306312709359219.
Beddows, E. (2008). The methodological issues associated with internet-based research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 6, 124–139.
Belch, M. A., Krentler, K. A., & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005). Teen internet mavens: Influence in family decision making. Journal of Business Research, 58, 569–575. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.08.005.
Bell, D. (2001). Introduction to cybercultures. London and New York: Routledge.
Berkule-Silberman, S. B., Dreyer, B. P., Huberman, H. S., Klass, P. E., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2010). Sources of parenting information in low SES mothers. Clinical Pediatrics, 49, 580–586. doi:10.1177/0009922809351092.
Best, S., & Krueger, B. (2004). ‘Internet data collection’, series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Blasco, P. (2012). ‘A wondrous adventure’: Mutuality and individuality in internet adoption narratives. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18, 330–348. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2012.01746.x.
Boonmongkon, P., Ojanen, T. T., Samakkeekarom, R., Samoh, N., Iamsilpa, R., Topananan, S., Cholratana, M., & Guadamuz, T. E. (2014). ‘She met her (boy)friend online’: Negotiating gender identity and sexuality among young Thai women in online space. Culture, Health and Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care, 15, 1162–1174. doi:10.1080/13691058.2013.809609.
Broom, A. (2005). Virtually healthy: The impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 325–345. doi:10.1177/1049732304272916.
Brown, A., & Thomas, M. E. (2014). “i just like knowing they can look at it and realize who i really am”: Recognition and the limits of girlhood agency on MySpace. Signs, 39, 949–972. doi:10.1086/675544.
Bryson, M. (2004). When Jill jacks in: Queer women and the Net. Feminist Media Studies, 4, 239–254. doi:10.1080/1468077042000309928.
Bulled, N. (2011). “You can find anything online”: Biocommunicability of cyber-health information and its impact on how the NET generation accesses health care. Human Organization, 70, 153–163.
Campbell, A. (2006). The search for authenticity: An exploration of an online skinhead newsgroup. New Media & Society, 8, 269–294. doi:10.1177/1461444806059875.
Carter, D. (2005). Living in virtual communities: An ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 148–167. doi:10.1080/13691180500146235.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 1). Madlen: Blackwell.
Chakraborty, K. (2012). Virtual mate-seeking in the urban slums of Kolkata, India. South Asian Popular Culture, 10, 197–216. doi:10.1080/14746689.2012.682871.
Chen, G. M. (2013a). Don’t call me that: A techno-feminist critique of the term “Mommy Blogger”. Mass Communication and Society, 16, 510–532. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.737888.
Chen, G. M. (2013b). Why do women bloggers use social media? Recreation and information motivations outweigh engagement motivations. New Media & Society, 17, 24–40. doi:10.1177/1461444813504269.
Clegg Smith, K. M. (2004). Electronic eavesdropping: The ethical issues involved in con-ducting a virtual ethnography. In M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues, and ethics (pp. 223–238). New York: Peter Lang.
Cohen, N. (2011). Wikipedia ponders its gender-skewed contributions. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html.
Coleman, G. (2010). Ethnographic approaches to digital media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 487–505. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104945.
Constable, N. (2000). Romance on a global stage: Pen pals, virtual ethnography, and mail order marriages. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320–334. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x.
Daniel, C. (2014). “Taming the media monster”: Teen pregnancy and the neoliberal safety (Inter)Net. Signs, 39, 973–998. doi:10.1086/675545.
De Choudhury, M., Counts, S., Horvitz, E. J., & Hoff, A. (2014, February). Characterizing and predicting postpartum depression from shared facebook data. In S. Fussell & W. Lutters (General chairs), Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 626–638). Baltimore: ACM. doi:10.1145/2531602.2531675
Deomampo, D. (2014). Consumption, community, and biosociality: Creating communities of parents through transnational surrogacy. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
Doty, J., & Dworkin, J. (2014). Parents’ of adolescents use of social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 349–355. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.012.
Dworkin, J., Connell, J., & Doty, J. (2013). A literature review of parents’ online behavior. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7. doi:10.5817/CP2013-2-2.
Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 193–203. doi:10.1023/A:1021320510186.
Farrell, D., & Petersen, J. C. (2010). The growth of internet research methods and the reluctant sociologist. Sociological Inquiry, 80, 114–125. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00318.x.
Fay, M. (2007). Mobile subjects, mobile methods: Doing virtual ethnography in a feminist online network. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8.
Ferber, A. (1998). White man falling: Race, gender, and White supremacy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Ferber, A. (2004). Introduction. In A. Ferber (Ed.), Home-grown hater: Gender and organized racism (pp. 1–17). New York: Routledge.
Ferree, M. M. (2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 420–439. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00711.x.
Gajjala, R. (2002). An interrupted postcolonial/feminist cyberethnography: Complicity and resistance in the “Cyberfield”. Feminist Media Studies, 2, 177–193. doi:10.1080/14680770220150854.
Gajjala, R., & Altman, M. (2006). Producing cyber-selves through technosatial praxis: Studying through doing. In P. Liam[uttong (Ed.), Health research in cyberspace: Methodological, practical, and personal issues. New York: Nova.
Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff, J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38, 52–84. doi:10.1177/0891241607310839.
Goodsell, T., & Williamson, O. (2008). The case of the Brick Huggers: The practice of an online community. City & Community, 7, 251–271. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2008.00260.x.
Hallett, R. E., & Barber, K. (2014). Ethnographic research in a cyber era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43, 306–330. doi:10.1177/0891241613497749.
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research, 35, 602–621. doi:10.1177/0093650208321782.
Hertz, R., & Mattes, J. (2011). Donor-shared siblings or genetic strangers new families, clans, and the internet. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 1129–1155. doi:10.1177/0192513X11404345.
Hine, C. (2009). How can qualitative internet researchers defined the boundaries of their projects? In A. N. Markham & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2005). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. doi:10.1111/j.083-6101.2005.tb00238.x.
Hughey, M. W. (2008). Virtual (Br)others and (Re)sisters authentic Black fraternity and sorority identity on the internet. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37, 528–560. doi:10.1177/0891241607309987.
Humphreys, L., & Barker, T. (2007). Modernity and the mobile phone: Exploring tensions about dating and sex in Indonesia. M/C Journal, 10(1).
Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363–379. doi:10.1023/A:1010937901821.
Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2010). Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20, 523–532. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.001.
Johnson-Hanks, J. (2007). Women on the market: Marriage, consumption, and the internet in urban Cameroon. American Ethnologist, 34, 642–658. doi:10.1525/ae.2007.34.4.642.
Kanayama, T. (2003). Ethnographic research on the experience of Japanese elderly people online. New Media & Society, 5, 267–288. doi:10.1177/1461444803005002007.
Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm: An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30, 3778–3789. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112.
Kawash, S. (2011). New directions in motherhood studies. Signs, 36, 969–1003. doi:10.1086/658637.
Kaya, L. P. (2009). Dating in a sexually segregated society: Embodied practices of online romance in Irbid, Jordan. Anthropological Quarterly, 82, 251–278. doi:10.1353/anq.0.0043.
Kendall, L. (1998). Meaning and identity in “cyberspace”: The performance of gender, class, and race online. Symbolic Interaction, 21, 129–153. doi:10.1525/si.19220.127.116.11.
Kleinman, S. (2004). Researching OURNET: A case study of a multiple methods approach. In M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues, and ethics (pp. 48–62). New York: Peter Lang.
Lee, M. (2006). What’s missing in feminist research in new information and communication technologies? Feminist Media Studies, 6, 191–210. doi:10.1080/14680770600645168.
Lloyd, S. A., Few, A. L., & Allen, K. R. (2007). Feminist theory, methods, and praxis in family studies: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 447–451. doi:10.1177/0192513X06297467.
Mamo, L. (2007). Queering reproduction: Achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mamo, L. (2013). Queering the fertility clinic. Journal of Medical Humanities, 34, 227–239. doi:10.1007/s10912-013-9210-3.
Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London: Sage Publications.
Manning, J. C. (2006). The impact of internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 13, 131–165. doi:10.1080/10720160600870711.
Markham, A. N. (2004). The internet as research context. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 358–374). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Mathy, R. M., Kerr, D. L., & Haydin, B. M. (2003). Methodological rigor and ethical considerations in Internet-mediated research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 40, 77–85. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.77.
McDaniel, B. T., Coyne, S. M., & Holmes, E. K. (2012). New mothers and media use: Associations between blogging, social networking, and maternal well-being. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16, 1509–1517. doi:10.1007/s10995-011-0918-2.
Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2005). The internet and family and acquaintance sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 10, 49–60. doi:10.1177/1077559504271917.
Mitra, A., & Cohen, E. J. (1999). Analysing the web: Directions and challenges. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp. 179–202). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Moore, L. J., & Grady, M. (2011). Putting “daddy” in the cart: Ordering sperm online. In M. Nash (Ed.), Reframing reproduction: Conceiving gendered experiences (pp. 185-201). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morrison, A. (2011). “Suffused by feeling and affect”: The intimate public of personal mommy blogging. Biography, 34, 37–55. doi:10.1353/bio.2011.0002.
Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42, 837–855. doi:10.1177/0038038508094565.
Nakamura, L. (2002). Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the internet. New York: Routledge.
Nelson, M., & Otnes, C. (2005). Exploring cross-cultural ambivalence: A netnography of intercultural wedding message boards. Journal of Business Research, 58, 89–95. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00477-0.
Nemeth, D., & Gropper, R. (2008). A cyber-ethnographic foray into GR&T internet photo blogs. Romance Studies, 18(1), 39–70. doi:10.3828/rs.2008.2.
Noonan, E. J. (2007). Adoption and the Guatemalan journey to American parenthood. Childhood, 14, 301–319. doi:10.1177/0907568207079211.
Plantin, L., & Daneback, K. (2009). Parenthood, information and support on the internet. A literature review of research on parents and professionals online. BMC Family Practice, 10, 34. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-10-34.
Ruhleder, K. (2000). The virtual ethnographer: Fieldwork in distributed electronic environments. Field Methods, 12, 3–17. doi:10.1177/1525822X0001200101.
Rybas, N., & Gajjala, R. (2007). Developing cyberethnographic research methods for understanding digitally mediated identities. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8.
Scott, D. (2002). Matchmaker, matchmaker, find me a mate: A cultural examination of a virtual community of single Mormons. Journal of Media and Religion, 1, 201–216. doi:10.1207/S15328415JMR0104_1.
Shi, L. (2014). Micro-blogs, online forums, and the birth-control policy: Social media and the politics of reproduction in China. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 38, 115–132. doi:10.1007/s11013-013-9351-x.
Statzel, R. S. (2006). The apartheid conscience: Gender, race, and re-imagining the White nation in cyberspace. Ethnic Studies Review, 29(2), 20–45.
Statzel, R. S. (2008). Cybersupremacy: The new face and form of White supremacist activism. In M. Boler (Ed.), Tactics in hard times: Practices and spaces of new media. Boston: MIT Press.
Turow, J. (2001). Family boundaries, commercialism, and the Internet: A framework for research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 73–86. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00067-8.
Walstrom, M. (2000). “You know, who’s the thinnest?”: Combating surveillance and creating safety in coping with eating disorders online. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 761–783. doi:10.1089/10949310050191755.
Walstrom, M. (2004). Ethics and engagement in communication scholarship: Analyzing public, online support groups as researcher/participant-experiencer. In E. Buchanan (Ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies (pp. 174–202). Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
Wang, R., Bianchi, S. M., & Raley, S. B. (2005). Teenagers’ internet use and family rules: A research note. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1249–1258. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00214.x.
Whitty, M., & Gavin, J. (2001). Age/sex/location: Uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 4, 623–630. doi:10.1089/109493101753235223.
Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, L. C. (2002). The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 449–467. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.08543.
Zacharias, U., & Arthurs, J. (2007). Introduction: Feminist ethnographers in digital ecologies. Feminist Media Studies, 7, 203–204. doi:10.1080/14680770701286714.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The author did not receive funding to conduct this research. The author knows of no known conflicts of interest regarding the publication of
No original new research is published in this article, rather the article involves a review of previously published literature, therefor informed consent documentation is not required.
About this article
Cite this article
Bjork-James, S. Feminist Ethnography in Cyberspace: Imagining Families in the Cloud. Sex Roles 73, 113–124 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0507-8
- New media
- Digital ecology