Sex Roles

, Volume 73, Issue 3–4, pp 174–186 | Cite as

Constructing a Feminist Reorganization of the Heterosexual Breadwinner/Caregiver Family Model: College Students’ Plans for their Own Future Families

  • Megan FulcherEmail author
  • Lisa M. Dinella
  • Erica S. Weisgram
Original Article


Although feminist scholars have been criticizing the breadwinner-caregiver model of family division of labor for decades (Ferree 1990, 2010; Friedan 1963) and women are earning a substantial portion of families’ income (Wang et al. 2013) change in family care has been slow. Families are a cultural system that may serve to constrain parents’ behaviors by gender. Although most women are employed, they are also responsible for a bulk of the housework, an examination of men’s behavior can reveal how changes can occur in the breadwinner-caregiver model. Drawing on the social-cognitive theory (Bussey and Bandura 1999), it was hypothesized that when men and women in emerging adulthood remember their parents sharing childcare and paid labor more equitably, they would also be planning for a future where men were involved in childcare. Participants were 586 college students from Southern, Midwestern, and Northeastern regions of the United States. They responded to surveys measuring parental division of labor during childhood, along with their own plans for their future families, and feelings of competence for such tasks. Interestingly, men who remembered their fathers caring for them reported feeling more competence in childcare tasks themselves. Results indicated that college men and women are able to construct family roles that do not adhere to the breadwinner-caregiver model when their parents modeled a less traditional division of labor in their childhoods.


Division of labor Gender roles Parents Emerging adulthood 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

The research reported on in the manuscript, “Constructing a Feminist Reorganization of the Heterosexual Breadwinner/Caregiver Family Model: College Students’ Plans for their Own Future Families” complies with ethical standards for research as directed by the American Psychological Association. The project was approved individually by the Institutional Review Boards of Washington and Lee University, Monmouth University, and the University of Wisconsin, Steven’s Point. Participants gave informed consent before participating in data collection.


  1. Adamsons, K., & Buehler, C. (2007). Mothering versus fathering versus parenting: Measurement equivalence in parenting measures. Parenting: Science and Practice, 7, 271–303. doi: 10.1080/15295190701498686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi: 10.1037//0003-06X.55.5.469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, N., & Lee, C. (2008). Young Australian women’s aspirations for work, marriage and family: ‘I guess I am just another person who wants it all’. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 589–596. doi: 10.1177/1359105308090931.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, B., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–206. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard, J. (1981). The good-provider role: Its rise and fall. American Psychologist, 36, 1–12. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belkin, L. (2003, October 26). The opt-out revolution. New York Times. Retrieved from
  7. Blaisure, K. R., & Allen, K. R. (1995). Feminists and the ideology and practice of marital equality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 5–19. doi: 10.2307/353812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boushey, H. (2007, June 9). Mommies opting out of work: A myth that won’t die. Retrieved from
  9. Brady, J. (1972). Why I want a wife. In S. Barnet, M. Berman, W. Burto, & M. Stubbs (Eds.), Literature for composition (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  10. Bridges, J. S., & Etaugh, C. (1996). Black and white college women’s maternal employment outcome expectations and their desired timing of maternal employment. Sex Roles, 35, 543–562. doi: 10.1007/BF01548252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronte-Tinkew, J., Carrano, J., Horowitz, A., & Kinukawa, A. (2008). Involvement among resident fathers and links to infant cognitive outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 1211–1244. doi: 10.1177/0192513X08318145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budig, M. J., & Hodges, M. J. (2014). Statistical models and empirical evidence for differences in the motherhood penalty across the earnings distribution. American Sociological Review, 79, 358–364. doi: 10.1177/0003122414523616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlson, D., Kacmar, K., & Williams, L. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheung, F. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2010). Women at the top: Powerful leaders define success as work and family in a culture of gender. American Psychologist, 65, 182–193. doi: 10.1037/a0017309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, P. (2014). Family diversity is the new normal. Council on Contemporary Families. Retrieved from
  17. Connolly, S., & Gregory, M. (2005). Part-time work- A trap for women’s careers? An analysis of the roles of heterogeneity and state dependence. University of Oxford Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, pp. 1471–0498.Google Scholar
  18. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338. doi: 10.1086/511799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (1990). Becoming a family: Research and intervention. In I. E. Sigel & G. H. Brody (Eds.), Methods of family research: Biographies of research projects, Vol. 1: Normal families (pp. 1–51). Hillsdale: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. de Mendonça, J. S., Cossette, L., Strayer, F. F., & Gravel, F. (2011). Mother-child and father-child interactional synchrony in dyadic and triadic interactions. Sex Roles, 64, 132–142. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9875-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Downey, D. B., Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W., & Dufur, M. J. (1998). Sex of parent and children’s well-being in single-parent households. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 878–893. doi: 10.2307/353631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feldman, R., Bamberger, E., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2013). Parent-specific reciprocity from infancy to adolescence shapes children’s social competence and dialogical skills. Attachment & Human Development, 15, 407–423. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2013.782650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fernàndez-Kranz, D., & Rodriguez-Planas, N. (2011). Unintended effects of a family-friendly law in a segmented labor market. Discussion Paper Series (5709), Institute for the Study of Labor, IZAGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferree, M. M. (2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 420–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00711.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 866–884. doi: 10.2307/353307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fetterolf, J. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2011). Do young women expect gender equality in their future lives? An answer from a possible selves experiment. Sex Roles, 65, 83–93. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9981-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fox, G. L., & Murry, V. M. (2000). Gender and families: Feminist perspectives and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1160–1172. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01160.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: W. W. Norton Company.Google Scholar
  29. Friedman, S. R., & Weissbrod, C. S. (2005). Work and family commitment and decision-making status among emerging adults. Sex Roles, 53, 317–325. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-6755-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fulcher, M., & Coyle, E. F. (2011). Breadwinner and caregiver: A cross-sectional analysis of children’s and emerging adults’ visions of their future family roles. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 330–346. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02026.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fulcher, M., Sutfin, E. L., & Patterson, C. J. (2008). Individual differences in gender development: Associations with parental sexual orientation, attitudes, and division of labor. Sex Roles, 58, 330–341. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9348-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaunt, R. (2005). The role of value priorities in paternal and maternal involvement in child care. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 643–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00159.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Geiger, B. (1996). Fathers as primary caregivers. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gerson, K. (2009). Changing lives, resistant institutions: A new generation negotiates gender, work, and family change. Sociological Forum, 24, 735–753. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01134.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Halpern, D. F. (2005). Psychology at the intersection of work and family: Recommendations for employers, working families, and policymakers. American Psychologist, 60, 397–409. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.397.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Harrington, B., Van Deusen, F., & Humberd, B. (2011). The new dad: Caring, committed, and conflicted. Boston: Boston College Center for Work & Family.Google Scholar
  37. Helms-Erikson, H., Tanner, J. L., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2000). Do women’s provider-role attitudes moderate the links between work and family? Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 658–670. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.14.4.658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hochschild, A. R. (2005). Love and gold. In L. Ricciutelli, A. Miles, & M. McFadden (Eds.), Feminist politics, activism and vision: Local and global challenges (pp. 34–46). London & Toronto: Zed/Innana: Books.Google Scholar
  39. Hodges, M. J., & Budig, M. J. (2010). Who gets the daddy bonus?: Organizational hegemonic masculinity and the impact of fatherhood on earnings. Gender and Society, 24, 717–745. doi: 10.1177/0891243210386729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoffnung, M. (2004). Wanting it all: Career, marriage, and motherhood during college-educated women’s 20s. Sex Roles, 50, 711–723. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000027572.57049.ff.USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hood, J. C. (1986). The provider role: Its meaning and measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 349–359. doi: 10.2307/352402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jacobs, J. E., Chhin, C. S., & Bleeker, M. M. (2006). Enduring links: Parents’ expectations and their young children’s gender-typed occupational choices. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 395–407. doi: 10.1080/13803610600765851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jaramillo-Sierra, A. J., & Allen, K. A. (2013). Who pays after the first date? Young men’s discourses of the male-provider role. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 14, 389–399. doi: 10.1037/a0030603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaufman, G. (2005). Gender role attitudes and college students’ work and family expectations. Gender Issues, 2, 58–71. doi: 10.1007/s12147-005-0015-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kroska, A. (2003). Investigating gender differences in the meaning of household chores and child care. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 456–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00456.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lamb, M. E. (2012). Mothers, fathers, families and circumstances: Factors affecting children’s adjustment. Applied Developmental Science, 16, 98–111. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2012.667344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lease, S. H. (2003). Testing a model of men’s nontraditional occupational choices. The Career Development Quarterly, 51, 244–258. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2003.tb00605.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lee, Y. S., & Waite, L. J. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ time spent on housework: A comparison of measures. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 328–336. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00119.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu, W. M. (2002). The social class-related experiences of men: Integrating theory and practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 355–360. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.33.4.355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Livingston, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Emotional responses to work-family conflict: An examination of gender role orientation among working men and women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 207–216. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Looker, E. D., & Magee, P. A. (2000). Gender and work: The occupational expectations of young women and men in the 1990s. Gender Issues, 18, 74–88. doi: 10.1007/s12147-000-0012-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mack-Canty, C., & Wright, S. (2004). Family values as practiced by feminist parents: Bridging third-wave feminism and family pluralism. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 851–880. doi: 10.1177/0192513X03261337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Magill-Evans, J., Harrison, M. J., Benzies, K., Gierl, M., & Kimak, C. (2007). Effects of parenting education on first-time fathers’ skills in interactions with their infants. Fathering, 5, 42–57. doi: 10.3149/fth.0501.42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mahaffy, K. A., & Ward, S. K. (2002). The gendering of adolescents’ childbearing and educational plans: Reciprocal effects and the influence of social context. Sex Roles, 46, 403–417. doi: 10.1023/A:1020413630553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Manlove, E., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2002). Caring for infant daughters and sons in dual-earner households: Maternal reports of father involvement in weekday time and tasks. Infant and Child Development, 11, 305–320. doi: 10.1002/icd.260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mannino, C. A., & Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Changing the division of household labor: A negotiated process between partners. Sex Roles, 56, 309–324. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9181-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meteyer, K., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2010). Father involvement among working-class, dual-earner couples. Fathering, 8, 379–403. doi: 10.3149/fth.0803.379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Neblett, N. G., & Cortina, K. S. (2006). Adolescents’ thoughts about parents’ jobs and their importance for adolescents’ future orientation. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 795–811. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.11.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Netemeyer, R., Boles, J., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400–410. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Orrange, R. M. (2002). Aspiring law and business professionals’ orientations to work and family life. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 287–317. doi: 10.1177/0192513X02023002006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Patnaik, A. (2014). Reserving time for daddy: The short and long-run consequences of fathers’ quotas (Working paper series). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2475970.
  62. Rehel, E. M. (2014). When dad stays home too: Paternity leave, gender, and parenting. Gender & Society, 28, 110–132. doi: 10.1177/0891243213503900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Riggio, H. R., & Desrochers, S. J. (2006). Maternal employment: Relations with young adults’ work and family expectations and self-efficacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1328–1353. doi: 10.1177/0002764206286558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schindler, H. S. (2010). The importance of parenting and financial contributions in promoting fathers’ psychological health. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 318–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00702.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smithson, J., Lewis, S., Cooper, C., & Dyer, J. (2004). Flexible working and the gender pay gap in the accountancy profession. Work, Employment and Society, 18, 115–135. doi: 10.1177/0950017004040765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual siblings. Sex Roles, 52, 561–575. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-3725-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stanik, C. E., & Bryant, C. M. (2012). Marital quality of newlywed African American couples: Implications of egalitarian gender role dynamics. Sex Roles, 66, 256–267. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0117-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stone, L., & McKee, N. P. (2000). Gendered futures: Student visions of career and family on a college campus. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 31, 67–89. doi: 10.1525/aeq.2000.31.1.67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 845–871. doi: 10.2307/353201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011, March 24). Employment characteristics of families summary. Retrieved from
  72. Wall, G. (2007). How involved is involved fathering? An exploration of the contemporary culture of fatherhood. Gender & Society, 21, 508–527. doi: 10.1177/0891243207304973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wang, W., Parker, K., & Taylor, P. (2013). Breadwinner moms: Mothers are the sole or primary provider in four-in-ten households with children; Public conflicted about the growing trend. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from
  74. Weisgram, E. S., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2010). Gender, values, and occupational interests among children, adolescents, and adults. Child Development, 81, 778–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01433.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Weisgram, E. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2007). Effects of learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls’ attitudes toward and interest in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 262–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00369.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weisgram, E. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2006). Girls and science careers: The role of altruistic values and attitudes about scientific tasks. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 326–348. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2006.04.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan Fulcher
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lisa M. Dinella
    • 2
  • Erica S. Weisgram
    • 3
  1. 1.Washington and Lee UniversityLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Monmouth UniversityWest Long BranchUSA
  3. 3.University of Wisconsin- Stevens PointStevens PointUSA

Personalised recommendations