In the United States, men are more likely to pursue math-intense STEM courses and careers than women. This investigation explored whether positivity bias in the degree to which people overestimate their past performance contributes to this gender gap. To find out, two studies were conducted with undergraduate college students in the Southern United States. In Study 1, participants (n = 122) completed a math test and estimated the percent they had solved. They then were given feedback and completed a second math test and estimation. Men overestimated their performance more than women, judging they had done better on the test than they actually had. This gender difference was not present after feedback. Further, women, but not men, who reported a more positive previous experience with math were more likely to overestimate their performance. In Study 2, participants (n = 184) completed a math test and estimated the percent they had solved. They also reported their interest in pursuing math courses and careers. Again, men overestimated their performance more than women. This greater overestimation of performance in men accounted for their greater intent to pursue math fields compared to women. The findings suggest that gender gaps in STEM fields are not necessarily the result of women underestimating their abilities, but rather may be due to men overestimating their abilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002.
Amelink, C. T., & Creamer, E. G. (2010). Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 81–92. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01044.x.
American Association of University Women (AAUW). (2008). Women and girls in STEM. Washington, DC: Author.
Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 181–185. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00196.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–206. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00273.
Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960–970. doi:10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1990.
Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157–172. doi:10.1177/0146167297232005.
Blalock, S. J., DeVellis, B. M., Afifi, R. A., & Sandler, R. S. (1990). Risk perceptions and participation in colorectal cancer screening. Health Psychology, 9, 792–806. doi:10.1037/0278-6188.8.131.522.
Byrne, B. M. (1988a). Measuring adolescent self-concept: Factorial validity and equivalency of the SDQ III across gender. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 361–375. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2303_5.
Byrne, B. M. (1988b). The self description questionnaire III: Testing for equivalent factorial valididty across ability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 397–406. doi:10.1177/0013164488482012.
Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474–481. doi:10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.2064.
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239.
Cooper, S. E., & Robinson, D. A. G. (1991). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy beliefs to mathematics anxiety and performance. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24, 4–11.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.608.
Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x.
Educational Testing Service. (2007). Scholastic Aptitude Test.
Ehrlinger, J., & Dunning, D. (2003). How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 5–17. doi:10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.11.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127. doi:10.1037/a0018053.
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 17–28. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004.
Hackett, G. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 47–56. doi:10.1037/0022-018.104.22.168.
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in Public Interest, 8, 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Hilton, J. L., & von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 47, 237–271. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.237.
Kimball, M. M., & Gray, V. A. (1982). Feedback and performance expectancies in an academic setting. Sex Roles, 8, 999–1007. doi:10.1007/BF00290024.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
Lane, K. A., Goh, J. X., & Driver-Linn, E. (2012). Implicit science stereotypes mediate the relationship between gender and academic participation. Sex Roles, 66, 220–234. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z.
Lenney, E. (1977). Women’s self-confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1–13. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.1.1.
Lin, Y. C., Lin, C. H., & Raghubir, P. (2003). Avoiding anxiety, being in denial, or simply stroking self-esteem: Why self-positivity? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 464–477. doi:10.2139/ssrn.410561.
Major, B., Spencer, S., Schmader, T., Wolfe, C., & Crocker, J. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 34–50. doi:10.1177/0146167298241003.
Marsh, H. W. (1992). SDQ III. Campbelltown: University of Western Sydney, Publication Unit.
Marsh, H. W., & O’Neill, R. (1984). Self description questionnaire III: The construct validity and multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153–174. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb00227.x.
Marsh, H. W., Barnes, J., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Self-other agreement on multidimensional self-concept ratings: Factor analysis and multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1360–1377. doi:10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1240.
Marsh, H. W., Richards, G., & Barnes, J. (1986). Multidimensional self-concepts: The effect of participation in an outward bound program. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 195–204. doi:10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.199.
Martin, P. Y. (2001). “Mobilizing masculinities”: Women’s experiences of men at work. Organization, 8, 587–618. doi:10.1177/135050840184003.
Martin, P. Y. (2003). “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17, 342–366. doi:10.1177/0891243203017003002.
Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711–747. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711.
Miller, G. E. (2004). Frontier masculinity in the oil industry: The experience of women engineers. Gender, Work & Organization, 11, 47–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00220.x.
Mura, R. (1987). Sex related differences in expectations of success in undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 15–24. doi:10.2307/749533.
Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x.
National Science Foundation. (2008). Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/.
Nielsen, I. L., & Moore, K. A. (2003). Psychometric data on the mathematics self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 128–138. doi:10.1177/0013164402239321.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101–115. doi:10.1037/1089-26188.8.131.52.
Pajares, F. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294–315). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–904. doi:10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2060.
Rinn, A. N., & Cunningham, L. G. (2008). Using self-concept instruments with high-ability college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 232–242. doi:10.1177/0016986208319458.
Sainz, M., & Eccles, J. (2012). Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 486–499. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.005.
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.
Segerstrom, S. C., Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M. E., & Fahey, J. L. (1998). Optimism is associated with mood, coping, and immune change in response to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1646–1655. doi:10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.116.
Seymour, E. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79, 437–473. doi:10.1002/sce.3730790406.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp. 1998.1373.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1687.
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0.
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193.
Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213–226. doi:10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124.
Vispoel, W. P. (1996). The development and validation of the Arts Self-Perception Inventory for adults. Educational and Psychological Measurment, 56, 719–735. doi:10.1177/0013164496056004013.
Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (1995). Resistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions. Health Psychology, 14, 132–140. doi:10.1037/0278-6126.96.36.199.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The authors declare no conflict of interest. All participants provided informed consent prior to the reported studies. Documentation of informed consent has been maintained for all participants.
About this article
Cite this article
Bench, S.W., Lench, H.C., Liew, J. et al. Gender Gaps in Overestimation of Math Performance. Sex Roles 72, 536–546 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0486-9
- Gender differences
- Positivity bias