Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Leaders as Males?: The Role of Industry Gender Composition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Does working in a female dominated industry influence how male leaders are perceived? To investigate this question, we draw on Role Congruity Theory and suggest that industry gender composition moderates the relationship between leader gender and four different aspects of leadership effectiveness. The existing literature suggests that male leaders are likely to be perceived more effective than female leaders because leader roles largely resemble male gender roles. However, the perception of leadership effectiveness does not solely depend on the leader gender but also the context that makes the leader gender more salient. Based on the 360-degree leadership assessment data of 952 U.S. leaders and their raters (n = 8684), the current study found that as the gender composition of the industry becomes more congruent with the gender of the leader, both self- and other- leader perceptions become more favorable. In this study, industry gender composition moderated the relationship (a) between leader gender and self-ratings of leadership effectiveness dimensions as well as (b) between leader gender and other-ratings. This was particularly true when looking at perceptions of leaders’ abilities to promote adaptability in their organizations. Overall, this paper provides insight into the role of contextual factors on leadership effectiveness ratings and highlights the importance of considering industry gender composition when utilizing feedback for the purposes of leadership development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartol, K. M. (1999). Gender influences on performance evaluations. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender & work (pp. 165–178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Ayman, R. A., & Korabik, K. (2002). Discrepancies in self/subordinates’ perceptions of leadership behavior: Leader’s gender, organizational context, and leader’s self-monitoring. Group & Organizational Management, 27, 226–244. doi:10.1177/10501102027002004.

  • Biernat, M., Crandall, C. S., Young, L. V., Kobrynowicz, D., & Halpin, S. M. (1998). All that you can be: Stereotyping of self and others in a military context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 301–317. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662–669. doi:10.2307/256439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, S. F., Sauer, S. J., & Thomas-Hunt, M. C. (2009). The evolving manager stereotype: The effects of industry gender typing on performance expectations for leaders and their teams. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 419–428. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01519.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, S. L. (2002). Data analytic methods for the analysis of multilevel questions: A comparison of intraclass correlation coefficients, rwg(j), hierarchical linear modeling, within- and between analysis, and random group resampling. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 69–93. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00105-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst. (2013). Catalyst quick take: Women in U.S. management and labor force. New York: Catalyst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. B., & Hannum, K. (2006). Research update: 360-degree performance assessment. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58, 117–124. doi:10.1037/1065-9293.58.2.117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M. J., & Burke, R. J. (2004). Women in management worldwide: Facts, figures and analysis. Aldershot: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225–248. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 581–613. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1984). Bringing corporate culture to the bottom line. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 4–22. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(84)90015-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organizational Science, 6, 204–223. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.2.204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., & Neale, W. S. (1996). Denison organizational culture survey. Ann Arbor: Aviat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., Haaland, S., & Goelzer, P. (2003). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness: Is there a similar pattern around the world? Advances in Global Leadership, 3, 205–227. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2003.11.008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., Kotrba, L. M., & Castano, N. (2012). A cross-cultural perspective on leadership assessment: Comparing 360-degree feedback results from around the world. Advances in Global Leadership, 7, 199–222. doi:10.1108/S1535-1203(2012)0000007013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Chicago: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.111.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125–145. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.1.125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsesser, K., & Lever, J. (2011). Does gender bias against female leaders persist? Quantitative and qualitative data from a large-scale survey. Human Relations, 64, 1555–1578. doi:10.1177/0018726711424323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, C., & Denison, D. R. (2003). Organizational culture and effectiveness: Can an American theory be applied in Russia? Organization Science, 14, 686–706. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.686.24868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Retamero, R., & Lopez-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55, 51–61. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, M., & Tiggemann, M. (1999). Gender differences in leadership style, job stress and mental health in male- and female-dominated industries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 301–315. doi:10.1348/096317999166699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. S., Benson, P. G., & Smith, B. N. (1987). An investigation of gender bias in the job evaluation process. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 150–159. doi:10.1007/BF01014209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoss, M. A. K., Bobrowski, P., McDonagh, K. J., & Paris, N. M. (2011). How gender disparities drive imbalances in health care leadership. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 3, 59–68. doi:10.2147/JHL.S16315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, G., Isaksen, S. G., & Lauer, K. J. (1996). Testing the “glass ceiling” effect on gender differences in upper level management: The case of innovator orientation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 29–41. doi:10.1080/13594329608414837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, N. B., Vaden, A. G., & Vaden, R. E. (1975). The challenges of men in a woman’s world. Public Personnel Management, 4, 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., & Martin, R. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1591–1599. doi:10.1037/a0016539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, M. (1993). Revisiting (and resolving?) the androgyny/masculinity debate in management. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 2, 157–171. doi:10.3149/jms.0202.157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marongiu, S., & Ekehammar, B. (2000). A gender perspective on person– manager fit and managerial advancement. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 175–180. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Chen, G. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 951–966. doi:10.1037/a0028380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • North American Industry Classification System (2014). NAICS search results. Retrieved from http://www.naics.com/naics-search-results/.

  • Ortiz-Walters, R., Schneider, G. P., Sheikh, A., & Simione, K. A. (2012). The glass ceiling in public accounting. In DreamCatchers Group, LLC (Ed.), Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Proceedings (pp. 19–22). Arden, NC: DreamCatchers Group, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff, C., Atwater, L., & Feinberg, B. (2004). Understanding self-other agreement: A look at rater and ratee characteristics, context, and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 57, 333–375. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02494.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1129–1145. doi:10.1037/a0036751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pazy, A., & Oron, I. (2001). Sex proportion and performance evaluation among high-ranking military officers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 689–702. doi:10.1002/job.109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1979). The “good manager”: Masculine or androgynous? Academy of Management Journal, 22, 395–403. doi:10.2307/255597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A., & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management, 28, 177–193. doi:10.1177/014920630202800203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosette, A. S., & Tost, L. P. (2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 221–235. doi:10.1037/ a0018204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100. doi:10.1037/h0037128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (1975). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 340–344. doi:10.1037/h0076637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sczesny, S. (2003). A closer look beneath the surface: Various facets of the think-manager–think-male stereotype. Sex Roles, 49, 353–363. doi:10.1023/A:1025112204526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinar, E. H. (1975). Sexual stereotypes of occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 99–111. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(75)90037-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, J., Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Social role effects on gender stereotyping in Germany and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 52–60. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumer, H. C. (2006). Women in management: Still waiting to be full members of the club. Sex Roles, 55, 63–72. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9059-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoroughgood, C. N., Sawyer, K. B., & Hunter, S. T. (2013). Real men don’t make mistakes: Investigating the effects of leader gender, error type, and the occupational context on leader error perceptions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 31–48. doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9263-8.

  • U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2008). Employed persons by detailed industry, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat18.pdf.

  • U. S. Congress Joint Economic Committee (2010). Women and the economy 2010: 25 years of progress but challenges remain. Retrieved from http://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=2010-women-in-the-economy-series.

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013). Women in the labor force: A databook. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2012.pdf.

  • Whitelaw, P. A., & Morda, R. (2004). Leadership in the hospitality industry: Boadecia vs. Attila - bring it on! Journal of Hospitality and. Tourism Management, 11, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–267. doi:10.2307/3096961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L. (2010). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. In J. Goodman (Ed.), Global perspectives on gender and work: Readings and interpretations (pp. 195–211). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, A. H. (2009). Racializing the glass escalator reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society, 23, 5–26. doi:10.1177/0891243208323054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Denison Consulting, 121 W. Washington St. Suite 201, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA

    Ia Ko & Lindsey Kotrba

  2. Roosevelt University, 1400 N. Roosevelt Blvd. Suite 360, Schaumburg, IL, 60173, USA

    Adam Roebuck

Authors
  1. Ia Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lindsey Kotrba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adam Roebuck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ia Ko.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Gender composition (% of females) for the industries included in this study
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ko, I., Kotrba, L. & Roebuck, A. Leaders as Males?: The Role of Industry Gender Composition. Sex Roles 72, 294–307 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0462-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0462-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation