Unbuttoned: The Interaction Between Provocativeness of Female Work Attire and Occupational Status
- 2.2k Downloads
Gender-biased standards in United Kingdom (UK) workplaces continue to exist. Women experience gender discrimination in judgements of competence, even by other women. Clothing cues can subtly influence professional perceptions of women. The aim of this study was to investigate how minor manipulations to female office clothing affect the judgements of competence of them by other UK females and to examine whether such effects differ with occupational status. One group of female university students (n = 54) and one group of employed females (n = 90), all from London and the East of England, rated images of faceless female targets, on a global competence measure derived from six competence ratings (of intelligence, confidence, trustworthiness, responsibility, authority, and organisation). The dress style was conservative but varied slightly by skirt length and the number of buttons unfastened on a blouse. The female targets were ascribed different occupational roles, varying by status (high – senior manager, or low - receptionist). Participants viewed the images for a maximum of 5 s before rating them. Overall participants rated the senior manager less favourably when her clothing was more provocative, but more favourably when dressed more conservatively (longer skirt, buttoned up blouse). This interaction between clothing and status was not present for the receptionist. Employed participants also rated females lower than did student participants. We conclude that even subtle changes to clothing style can contribute towards negative impressions of the competence of women who hold higher status positions in a UK cultural context.
KeywordsFemale workplace attire Occupational status Gender bias Female perceptions UK gender beliefs Competence
- Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., & Harnish, R. J. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 108–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00304.x.
- Barnard, M. (2002). Fashion as communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Biernat, M., & Fuegen, K. (2001). Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision-making. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 707–724. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00237.
- Biernat, M., Tocci, M. J., & Williams, J. C. (2012). The language of performance evaluations: Gender-based shifts in content and consistency of judgement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 186–192. doi: 10.1177/1948550611415693.
- Brase, G. L., & Richmond, J. (2004). The white–coat effect: Physician attire and perceived authority, friendliness, and attractiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2469–2481. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01987.x.
- Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2001). Gender, hierarchy and leadership: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 629–636. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00232.
- Caven, V., Lawley, S., & Baker, J. (2013). Performance, gender and sexualised work: Beyond management control, beyond legislation? A case study of work in a recruitment company. Equality Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 32, 475–490. doi: 10.1108/EDI-08-2011-0051.
- Chiao, J. Y., Bowman, N. E., & Gill, H. (2008). The political gender gap: Gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior. PloS One, 3(10), e3666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003666.
- Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. A., & House, D. M. (2011). Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype: Modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PloS One, 6(10), e25656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025656.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pine, K. J. (2014). Mind what you wear: The psychology of fashion [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.co.uk.
- Rake, K., & Lewis, R. (2009). Just below the surface: Gender stereotyping, the silent barrier to equality in the modern workplace? A Fawcett society think piece for the gender equality forum. London: Gender Equality Forum.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The attitudes toward women scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 667–668.Google Scholar
- Williams, J., Foley, B., & Newton, B. (2013). Research into under-representation, by gender and ethnicity, in apprenticeships. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.Google Scholar