Sex Roles

, Volume 72, Issue 7–8, pp 349–362 | Cite as

Women’s Work? Predictors of Young Men’s Aspirations for Entering Traditionally Female-dominated Occupations

  • Jessica Halliday Hardie
Original Article


The purpose of this study was to extend Gottfredson’s (1981) theory of circumscription and compromise by examining how gender role attitudes, peers, educational aspirations, family background, race/ethnicity, and labor market factors predict the degree to which young men aspired toward more (or less) female-dominated occupations. Two waves of data from male respondents to the National Study of Youth and Religion (NSYR), a nationally representative dataset of U.S. teens, were analyzed (N = 1,157). Most independent variables were obtained from the first wave of data, conducted in 2002 to 2003, when the young men were between the ages of 13 and 17. Occupational aspirations were obtained from the second wave, conducted in 2005, when the young men were ages 16 to 21. Two methodological approaches were utilized. A logistic regression predicted the odds of male respondents aspiring to a female-dominated occupation compared to a male-dominated occupation. An ordinary least squares regression predicted the percentage of current jobholders who were female in the respondents’ aspired occupations. Findings revealed that the proportion of one’s friends who were female, parental educational attainment, and the projected growth of an occupation were positively correlated with aspiring toward female-dominated occupations and the percent femaleness of those occupations. The median income of an occupation was negatively associated with aspiring toward female-dominated occupations and the percent femaleness of those occupations. Educational aspirations, holding conservative gender role attitudes, and being Black were associated with the percent of female job incumbents but not the likelihood of aspiring to a female-dominated occupation.


Gender Aspirations Masculinity Occupations Sex segregation 


  1. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Bagilhole, B., & Cross, S. (2006). ‘It never struck me as female’: Investigating men’s entry into female-dominated occupations. Journal of Gender Studies, 15, 35–48. doi: 10.1080/09589230500486900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird, C. L. (2008). The importance of community context for young women’s occupational aspirations. Sex Roles, 58, 208–221. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9268-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baird, C. L. (2012). Going against the flow: A longitudinal study of the effects of cognitive skills and gender beliefs on occupational aspirations and outcomes. Sociological Forum, 27, 986–1009. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01365.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228. doi: 10.1093/sf/79.1.191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bielby, W. T., & Baron, J. N. (1986). Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 759–799. doi: 10.1086/228350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bird, S. R. (1996). Welcome to the men’s club: Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender and Society, 10, 120–132. doi: 10.1177/089124396010002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). Changes in the labor supply behavior of married women: 1920–2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 393–438. doi: 10.1086/513416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 223–243. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchmann, C., & Dalton, B. (2002). Interpersonal influences and educational aspirations in 12 countries: The importance of institutional context. Sociology of Education, 75, 99–122. doi: 10.2307/3090287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 319–337. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cochran, D. B., Wang, E. W., Stevenson, S. J., Johnson, L. E., & Crews, C. (2010). Adolescent occupational aspirations: Test of Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise. The Career Development Quarterly, 59, 412–427. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2011.tb00968.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. doi: 10.1086/228943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–730. doi: 10.1086/321299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69, 93–113. doi: 10.1177/000312240406900106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338. doi: 10.1086/511799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cuddeback, G., Wilson, E., Orme, J. G., & Combs-Orme, T. (2004). Detecting and statistically correcting sample selection bias. Journal of Social Service Research, 30, 19–33. doi: 10.1300/J079v30n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cunningham, M. (2001). The influence of parental attitudes and behaviors on children’s attitude toward gender and household labor in early adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 111–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00111.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Danziger, S., & Ratner, D. (2010). Labor market outcomes and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20, 133–158. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0041.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Leeuw, E., & de Heer, W. (2002). Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison. In R. Groves, D. Dillman, J. Eltinge, & R. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (Chapter 3). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. DiDonato, L., & Strough, J. (2013). Do college students’ gender-typed attitudes about occupations predict their real-world decisions? Sex Roles, 68, 536–549. doi: 10.1007/s11199-013-0275-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eccles, J. S., Vida, M. N., & Barber, B. (2004). The relation of early adolescents’ college plans and both academic ability and task-value beliefs to subsequent college enrollment. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 63–77. doi: 10.1177/0272431603260919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. England, P. (2011). Reassessing the uneven gender revolution and its slowdown. Gender and Society, 25, 113–123. doi: 10.1177/0891243210391461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frome, P. M., Alfeld, C. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (2006). Why don’t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 12, 359–372. doi: 10.1080/13803610600765786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gauchat, G., Kelly, M., & Wallace, M. (2012). Occupational gender segregation, globalization, and gender earnings inequality in U.S. metropolitan areas. Gender and Society, 26, 718–747. doi: 10.1177/089124321245364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glick, P. (1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25, 351–378. doi: 10.1007/BF00289761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545–579. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. In D. Brown & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 85–148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Gottfredson, L. S., & Becker, H. J. (1981). A challenge to vocational psychology: How important are aspirations in determining male career development? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 121–137. doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(81)90001-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hannah, J. S. (1989). The relationship of socioeconomic status and gender to the occupational choices of grade 12 students. The Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 161–178. doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(89)90012-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hardie, J. (2010). How aspirations are formed and challenged in the transition to adulthood and implications for adult well-being. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertation and Theses. (Accession Order No. 201023294).Google Scholar
  35. Hegewisch, A., Liepmann, H., Hayes, J., & Hartmann, H. (2010). Separate and not equal? Gender segregation in the labor market and the gender wage gap. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Retrieved from
  36. Helwig, A. A. (2008). From childhood to adulthood: A 15-year longitudinal career development study. The Career Development Quarterly, 57, 38–50. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2008.tb00164.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jodl, K. M., Michael, A., Malanchuk, O., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. (2001). Parents’ roles in shaping early adolescents’ occupational aspirations. Child Development, 72, 1247–1265. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Junk, K. E., & Armstrong, P. I. (2010). Stability of career aspirations: A longitudinal test of Gottfredson’s theory. Journal of Career Development, 37, 579–598. doi: 10.1177/0894845309350921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kopesky, J. W., Veach, P. M., Lian, F., & LeRoy, B. S. (2011). Where are the males? Gender differences in undergraduates’ interest in and perceptions of the genetic counseling profession. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20, 341–354. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9365-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lapour, A. S., & Heppner, M. J. (2009). Social class privilege and adolescent women’s perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 477–494. doi: 10.1037/a0017268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lemay, M. (2009). Understanding the mechanisms of panel attrition. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertation and Theses. (Accession Order No. 201047618).Google Scholar
  43. Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67, i–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Majors, R., & Billson, J. (1992). Cool pose: The dilemmas of Black manhood in America. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  45. Martin, P. Y. (2003). “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender and Society, 17, 342–366. doi: 10.1177/0891243203017003002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morgan, S. L., Gelbgiser, D., & Weeden, K. A. (2013). Feeding the pipeline: Gender, occupational plans, and college major selection. Social Science Research, 42, 989–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morris, E. (2012). Learning the hard way: Masculinity, place, and the gender gap in education. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Nayak, A. (2003). ‘Boyz to men’: Masculinities, schooling and labour transitions in de-industrial times. Educational Review, 55, 147–159. doi: 10.1080/0013191032000072191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oh, T., & Lewis, L. J. (2005). Consideration of genetic counseling as a career: Implications for diversifying the genetic counseling field. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 71–81. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-1501-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Patten, E., & Parker, K. (2012). A gender reversal on career aspirations: Young women now top young men in valuing a high-paying career. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from
  52. Pearce, L. D., & Hardie, J. H. (2012). Religion’s role in the development of girls’ occupational aspirations. In G. Trommsdorff & X. Chen (Eds.), Values, religion, and culture in adolescent development (pp. 271–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Powers, R. S., & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (2004). Occupational aspirations, gender, and educational attainment. Sociological Spectrum, 24, 601–622. doi: 10.1080/02732170490448784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender and Society, 23, 145–160. doi: 10.1177/0891243208330313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robb, N., Dunkley, L., Boynton, P., & Greenhalgh, T. (2007). Looking for a better future: Identity construction in socio-economically deprived 16-year olds considering a career in medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 738–754. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ross, M. B. (1998). In search of Black men’s masculinities. Feminist Studies, 24, 599–626. doi: 10.2307/3178582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  58. Şahin, A., Song, J., & Hobijn, B. (2009). The unemployment gender gap during the current recession. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 16, 1–7. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1582525.Google Scholar
  59. Simpson, R. (2004). Masculinity at work: The experiences of men in female dominated occupations. Work, Employment and Society, 18, 349–368. doi: 10.1177/09500172004042773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smiler, A. P., & Gelman, S. A. (2008). Determinants of gender essentialism in college students. Sex Roles, 58, 864–874. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9402-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, C., & Denton, M. L. (2005). Soul searching: The religious and spiritual lives of American teenagers. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2013). Digest of education statistics 2012 (NCES 2014–015). National center for education statistics, institute of education sciences. Washington: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  63. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Stainback, K., Taylor, T., Zimmer, C., Robinson, C., & McTague, T. (2006). Documenting desegregation: Segregation in American workplaces by race, ethnicity, and sex, 1966–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 565–588. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Women in the labor force: A databook (Report 996). Retrieved from
  65. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2010). Women-owned businesses in the 21st Century. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce’s Economics and Statistics Administration.Google Scholar
  66. U.S. Department of Defense. (2010). Demographics 2010: Profile of the military community. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense. Retrieved from
  67. Ueno, K., & McWilliams, S. (2010). Gender-typed behaviors and school adjustment. Sex Roles, 63, 580–591. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9839-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilbourn, M. P., & Key, D. W. (2010). Henry the nurse is a doctor too: Implicitly examining children’s gender stereotypes for male and female occupational roles. Sex Roles, 62, 670–683. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9773-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams, L. S., & Villemez, W. J. (1993). Seekers and finders: Male entry and exit in female-dominated jobs. In C. L. Williams (Ed.), Doing women’s work: Men in nontraditional occupations (pp. 64–90). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yoder, J. D. (1994). Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige, and occupational gender-typing on tokenism processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 150–159. doi: 10.2307/2786708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyHunter CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations