Abstract
Previous research has shown a male bias in the media. This study tests this statement by examining how the pronouns She and He are used in a news media context. More specifically, the study tests whether He occurs more often and in more positive semantic contexts than She, as well as whether She is associated with more stereotypically and essential labels than He is. Latent semantic analysis (LSA) was applied to 400 000 Reuters’ news messages, written in English, published in 1996–1997. LSA is a completely data-driven method, extracting statistics of words from how they are used throughout a corpus. As such, no human coders are involved in the assessment of how pronouns occur in their contexts. The results showed that He pronouns were about 9 times more frequent than She pronouns. In addition, the semantic contexts of He were more positive than the contexts of She. Moreover, words associated with She-contexts included more words denoting gender, and were more homogeneous than the words associated with He-contexts. Altogether, these results indicate that men are represented as the norm in these media. Since these news messages are distributed on a daily basis all over the world, in printed newspapers, and on the internet, it seems likely that this presentation maintains, and reinforces prevalent gender stereotypes, hence contributing to gender inequities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, C. L. (2004). The influence of reporter gender on source selection in newspaper stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 139–154. doi:10.1177/107769900408100110.
Armstrong, C. L. (2006). Story genre influences whether women are sources. Newspaper Research Journal, 27, 66–81.
Benesch, C. (2012). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in news consumption. Journal of Media Economics, 25, 147–167. doi:10.1080/08997764.2012.700976.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: The NIMH center for the study of emotion and attention, University of Florida.
Bruckmüller, S., Hegarty, P., & Abele, A. E. (2012). Framing gender differences: Linguistic normativity affects perceptions of power and gender stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 210–218. doi:10.1002/ejsp.858.
Campbell, R. S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003). The secret life of pronouns: Flexibility in writing style and physical health. Psychological Science, 14, 60–65. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01419.
Carnaghi, A., Maass, A., Gresta, S., Bianchi, M., Cadinu, M., & Arcuri, L. (2008). Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 839–859. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.839.
Center for American Woman and Politics. (2012). Fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective12.pdf
Collins, R. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64, 290–298. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5.
David, D. L., Yiming, Y., Tony, G. R., & Fan, L. (2004). RCV1: A new benchmark collection for text categorization research. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5, 361–397.
Desmond, R., & Danilewicz, A. (2010). Women are on, but not in, the news: Gender roles in local television news. Sex Roles, 62, 822–829. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9686-5.
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001.
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 1–35. doi:10.1080/14792779543000002.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735.
Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte-Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple-regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305–323. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90002-0.
Foltz, W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285–307. doi:10.1080/01638539809545029.
Freedman, E., Fico, F., & Love, B. (2007). Male and female sources in newspaper coverage of male and female candidates in US Senate Races in 2004. Journal of Women Politics & Policy, 29, 57–76. doi:10.1300/J501v29n01_04.
Garcia, D., & Sikstrom, S. (2013). A collective theory of Happiness: Words related to the word “Happiness” in Swedish online newspapers. Cyberpsycholology, Behavior and Social Networking, 469–472 doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0535.
Geschke, D., Sassenberg, K., Ruhrmann, G., & Sommer, D. (2010). Effects of linguistic abstractness in the mass media: How newspaper articles shape readers’ attitudes toward migrants. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories Methods and Applications, 22, 99–104. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000014.
Graf, S., Bilewicz, M., Finell, E., & Geschke, D. (2012). Nouns cut slices: Effects of linguistic forms on intergroup bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 62–83. doi:10.1177/0261927x12463209.
Gustafsson Sendén, M., Lindholm, T., & Sikstrom, S. (2014a). Biases in news media as reflected by personal pronouns in evaluative contexts. Social Psychology, 45, 103–111.
Gustafsson Sendén, M., Lindholm, T., & Sikstrom, S. (2014b). Selection bias in choice of words: Evaluations of “I” and “We” differ between contexts, but “They” are always worse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 49–67. doi:10.1177/0261927X13495856.
Hegarty, P., & Buechel, C. (2006). Androcentric reporting of gender differences in APA journals: 1965–2004. Review of General Psychology, 10, 377–389. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.377.
Hegarty, P., & Pratto, F. (2001). The effects of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 723–735. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.5.723.
Inter-parliamentary Union (2010). Is parliament open to women? An appraisal. Retrieved from http://www.ipu.org/english/surveys.htm
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory - Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.136.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Karlsson, K., Sikström, S., & Willander, J. (2013). The semantic representation of event information depends on the cue modality: An instance of meaning-based retrieval. PLoS ONE, 8, e73378. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073378.
Koivula, N. (1999). Gender stereotyping in televised media sport coverage. Sex Roles, 41, 589–604. doi:10.1023/a:1018899522353.
Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning and representing verbal meaning: The latent semantic analysis theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 161–164. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10836862.
Landauer, T. K. (1999). Latent semantic analysis: A theory of the psychology of language and mind. Discourse Processes, 27, 303–310. doi:10.1080/01638539909545065.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211.
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284. doi:10.1080/01638539809545028.
Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lauzen, M. M., Dozier, D. M., & Horan, N. (2008). Constructing gender stereotypes through social roles in prime-time television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 200–214. doi:10.1080/08838150801991971.
Lenton, A., Sedikides, C., & Bruder, M. (2009). A latent semantic analysis of gender stereotype-consistency and narrowness in American English. Sex Roles, 60, 269–278. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9534-z.
Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193–211. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.193.
Lämsä, A., & Tiensuu, T. (2002). Representations of the woman leader in Finnish business media articles. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11, 363–374. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00296.
Maass, A., Suitner, C., & Merkel, A. (2013). Does political correctness make (social) sense? In J. P. Forgas, O. Vincze, & J. László (Eds.), Social Cognition and communication (pp. 331–346). New York: Psychology Press.
Matud, M. P., Rodríguez, C., & Espinosa, I. (2011). Gender in Spanish daily newspapers. Sex Roles, 64, 253–264. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9874-3.
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376.
Miller, D. T., Taylor, B., & Buck, M. L. (1991). Gender gaps: Who needs to be explained? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 5–12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.5.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2011). Content analysis—A methodological primer for gender research. Sex Roles, 64, 276–289. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9893-0.
Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041.
Picard, R. R., & Cook, R. D. (1984). Cross-validation of regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 575–583. doi:10.2307/2288403.
Pitts, M. J., & Nussbaum, J. F. (2006). Integrating the past and paving the future - Examining current trends and extending boundaries of language and social psychology research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 197–202. doi:10.1177/0261927x06289421.
Reuters handbook of journalism. (2014). Writing: Discriminatory language. Retrieved from http://handbook.reuters.com/?title=W#discriminatory_language
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637–655. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00233.
Rose, T., Stevenson, M., & Whitehead, M. (2002). The Reuters Corpus Volume 1 - from yesterday's news to tomorrow's language resources. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
Rudy, R. M., Popova, L., & Linz, D. G. (2010). The context of current content analysis of gender roles: An introduction to a special issue. Sex Roles, 62, 705–720. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9807-1.
Rudy, R. M., Popova, L., & Linz, D. G. (2011). Contributions to the content analysis of gender roles: An introduction to a special issue. Sex Roles, 64, 151–159. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9937-0.
Schwartz, J. (2011). Whose voices are heard? Gender, sexual orientation, and newspaper sources. Sex Roles, 64, 265–275. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9825-z.
Signorielli, N., & Kahlenberg, S. (2001). Television's world of work in the nineties. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 4–22. doi:10.1207/S15506878jobem4501_2.
Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social Communication (pp. 163–187). New York: Psychology Press.
Tepper, S. J. (2000). Fiction reading in America: Explaining the gender gap. Poetics, 27, 255–275. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00003-6.
Catalyst, T. (2013). Statistical overview of women in the workplace.
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Gentile, B. (2012). Male and female pronoun use in US books reflects women's status, 1900–2008. Sex Roles, 67, 488–493. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0194-7.
UN (2009). Is parliament open to women? An appraisal conference for chairpersons and members of parliamentary bodies dealing with gender equality. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
Whomakesthenews (2010). Who makes the news? The global media monitoring project. Retrieved from http://www.whomakesthenews.org
Zoch, L. M., & Turk, J. V. (1998). Women making news: Gender as a variable in source selection and use. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 762–775. doi:10.1177/107769909807500410.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grants to the author from the Alhströms and Terserus foundation and from the foundation in memory of Lars Hierta.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gustafsson Sendén, M., Sikström, S. & Lindholm, T. “She” and “He” in News Media Messages: Pronoun Use Reflects Gender Biases in Semantic Contexts. Sex Roles 72, 40–49 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0437-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0437-x