Sex Roles

, Volume 71, Issue 9–10, pp 283–295 | Cite as

The Effect of Social Network Site Use on Appearance Investment and Desire for Cosmetic Surgery Among Adolescent Boys and Girls

  • Dian A. de Vries
  • Jochen Peter
  • Peter Nikken
  • Hanneke de Graaf
Original Article

Abstract

Although adolescents frequently use social network sites, little is known about whether the highly visual and self-presentation-centered character of such sites affects body-related outcomes such as investment in appearance and appearance-changing strategies. Due to gender differences in appearance pressures and appearance ideals, these effects of social network sites on body-related outcomes may differ between boys and girls. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate the relationships between social network site use, appearance investment, and desire for cosmetic surgery among adolescents and to compare the experiences of boys and girls. We used data from a two-wave panel study among 604 Dutch adolescents (aged 11–18). Structural equation modeling showed that social network site use positively predicted adolescents’ desire to undergo cosmetic surgery indirectly through increased appearance investment. The relationships found between social network site use, investment in appearance, and cosmetic surgery desire applied to boys and girls and were not moderated by gender.

Keywords

Social network sites Gender Adolescents Body image Appearance pressures Appearance-changing strategies Cosmetic surgery Plastic surgery Objectification Social media 

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2012). 2011 Plastic surgery statistics report: Cosmetic surgery age distribution. Retrieved from http://www.plasticsurgery.org/News-and-Resources/2011-Statistics-.html
  2. Ata, R. N., Ludden, A. B., & Lally, M. M. (2007). The effects of gender and family, friend, and media influences on eating behaviors and body image during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 1024–1037. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9159-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubrey, J. S. (2006). Effects of sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year panel study. Journal of Communication, 56, 366–386. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00024.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, T. A., Cash, T. F., & Mikulka, P. J. (1990). Attitudinal body-image assessment: Factor analysis of the body-self relations questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 135–144. doi:10.1080/00223891.1990.9674053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Calogero, R., Pina, A., Park, L., & Rahemtulla, Z. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63, 32–41. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9759-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cash, T. F. (1994). The multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire. Unpublished test manual. Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion University.Google Scholar
  8. Cash, T. F., Melnyk, S. E., & Hrabosky, J. I. (2004). The assessment of body image investment: An extensive revision of the appearance schemas inventory. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 305–316. doi:10.1002/eat.10264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2012). Kerncijfers [Key figures]. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/cijfers/kerncijfers/default.htm
  10. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cudeck, R. (1991). Comments on “Using causal models to estimate indirect effects”. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 260–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  12. Daniel, S., & Bridges, S. K. (2010). The drive for muscularity in men: Media influences and objectification theory. Body Image, 7, 32–38. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.08.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frederick, D. A., Peplau, L. A., & Lever, J. (2006). The swimsuit issue: Correlates of body image in a sample of 52,677 heterosexual adults. Body Image, 3, 413–419. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frederick, D. A., Lever, J., & Peplau, L. A. (2007a). Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: Views of men and women across the lifespan. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120, 1407–1415. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000279375.26157.64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frederick, D. A., Forbes, G. B., Grigorian, K. E., & Jarcho, J. M. (2007b). The UCLA body project I: Gender and ethnic differences in self-objectification and body satisfaction among 2,206 undergraduates. Sex Roles, 57, 317–327. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9251-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frederick, D. A., Buchanan, G. M., Sadehgi-Azar, L., Peplau, L. A., Haselton, M. G., Berezovskaya, A., & Lipinski, R. E. (2007c). Desiring the muscular ideal: Men’s body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 103–117. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.8.2.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Towards understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furnham, A., Swami, V., & Shah, K. (2006). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 443–454. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gentile, B., Twenge, J. M., Freeman, E. C., & Campbell, W. K. (2012). The effect of social networking websites on positive self-views: An experimental investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1929–1933. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1991). Interpreting and estimating indirect effects assuming time lags really matter. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 243–259). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  22. Gray, P. B., & Frederick, D. A. (2012). Body image and body type preferences in St. Kitts, Caribbean: A cross-cultural comparison with US samples regarding attitudes towards muscularity, body fat, and breast size. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 631–655. doi:10.1348/000712601162257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison, K. (2003). Television viewers’ ideal body proportions: The case of the curvaceously thin woman. Sex Roles, 48, 255–264. doi:10.1023/A:1022825421647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson-King, D., & Brooks, K. D. (2009). Materialism, sociocultural appearance messages and paternal attitudes predict college women’s attitudes about cosmetic surgery. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 133–142. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01480.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herbozo, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). Development and validation of the verbal commentary on physical appearance scale: Considering both positive and negative commentary. Body Image, 3, 335–344. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.10.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity/femininity as a dimension of culture. In G. Hofstede et al. (Eds.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimensions of national cultures (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, D. C., & Crawford, J. K. (2006). The peer appearance culture during adolescence: Gender and body mass variations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 243–255. doi:10.1007/s10964-005-9006-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knauss, C., Paxton, S. J., & Alsaker, F. D. (2008). Body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys and girls: Objectified body consciousness, internalization of the media body ideal and perceived pressure from media. Sex Roles, 59, 633–643. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9474-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lamarche, L., & Gammage, K. L. (2012). Predicting exercise and eating behaviors from appearance evaluation and two types of investment. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 1, 145–157. doi:10.1037/a0026892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawler, M., & Nixon, E. (2011). Body dissatisfaction among adolescent boys and girls: The effects of body mass, peer appearance culture and internalization of appearance ideals. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 59–71. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9500-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://web.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf.Google Scholar
  32. Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2009). Everybody knows that mass media are/are not [pick one] a cause of eating disorders: A critical review of evidence for a causal link between media, negative body image, and disordered eating in females. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 9–42. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mabe, A. G., Forney, K. J., & Keel, P. K. (2014). Do you “like” my photo? Facebook use maintains eating disorder risk. International Journal of Eating Disorders. doi:10.1002/eat.22254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 446–458. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCabe, M., & Ricciardelli, L. (2001). Parent, peer and media influences on body image and strategies to both increase and decrease body size among adolescent boys and girls. Adolescence, 36, 225–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McCabe, M. P., & Ricciardelli, L. A. (2003). Sociocultural influences on body image and body changes among adolescent boys and girls. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 5–26. doi:10.1080/00224540309598428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCabe, M. P., Ricciardelli, L. A., & Banfield, S. (2001). Body image, strategies to change muscles and weight, and puberty: Do they impact on positive and negative affect among adolescent boys and girls? Eating Behaviors, 2, 129–149. doi:10.1016/S1471-0153(01)00025-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mijn Kind Online. (2009). Krabbels en respect plz. Hyves en kinderen [Comments and respect plz. Hyves and children]. Retrieved from http://www.mijnkindonline.nl/uploads/Krabbels%20en%20Respect%20plz%20_-%29.pdf
  40. Moradi, B. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theories and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63, 138–148. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9824-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newcom Research & Consultancy. (2012). Social media gebruik in Nederland 2012 [Social media use in the Netherlands 2012]. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/newcomresearch/newcom-research-consultancy-gebruik-social-media-nl-mei-2012
  43. Papp, I., Urbán, R., Czeglédi, E., Babusa, B., & Túry, F. (2013). Testing the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance among Hungarian adolescents. Body Image, 10, 232–242. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.12.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2011). His biceps become him: A test of objectification theory’s application to drive for muscularity and propensity for steroid use in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 246–256. doi:10.1037/a0021398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pearl, A., & Weston, J. (2003). Attitudes of adolescents about cosmetic surgery. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 50, 628–630. doi:10.1097/01.SAP.0000054365.54173.95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pope, H. G., Gruber, A. J., Mangweth, B., Bureau, B., deCol, C., Jouvent, R., & Hudson, J. I. (2000). Body image perception among men in three countries. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1297–1301. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ringrose, J. (2011). Are you sexy, flirty or a slut? Exploring “sexualization” and how teen girls perform/negotiate digital sexual identity on social networking sites. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity (pp. 99–116). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  49. Rui, J., & Stefanone, M. A. (2013). Strategic self-presentation online: A cross-cultural study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 110–118. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sarwer, D. B., Cash, T. F., Magee, L., Williams, E. F., Thompson, J. K., Roehrig, M., & Romanofski, M. (2005). Female college students and cosmetic surgery: An investigation of experiences, attitudes, and body image. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 115, 931–938. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000153204.37065.D3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sarwer, D. B., Infield, A. L., & Crerand, C. E. (2009). Plastic surgery for children and adolescents. In L. Smolak & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Body image, eating disorders, and obesity in youth: Assessment, prevention, and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 303–325). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  52. Seidman, G., & Miller, O. S. (2013). Effects of gender and physical attractiveness on visual attention to Facebook profiles. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16, 20–24. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shroff, H., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance: A replication with adolescent girls. Body Image, 3, 17–23. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.10.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Siibak, A. (2009). Constructing the self through the photo selection - visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3, 1–9. Retrieved from http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009061501&article=1.Google Scholar
  55. Siibak, A. (2010). Constructing masculinity on a social networking site. Young, 18, 403–425. doi:10.1177/1103308810018004031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Slevec, J., & Tiggemann, M. (2010). Attitudes toward cosmetic surgery in middle-aged women: Body image, aging anxiety, and the media. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 65–74. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01542.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. SPOT. (2012). Tijdbestedingsonderzoek 2012 [Pastime research 2012] . Retrieved from http://www.spot.nl/docs/tijdsbestedingsonderzoek-2012/boekje-alles-over-tijd-2012.pdf?sfvrsn=0
  58. Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Swami, V., Frederick, D. A., Aavik, T., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Anderson, D., & Shashidharan, S. (2010). The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results of the International Body Project I. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 309–325. doi:10.1177/0146167209359702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thompson, J. K. (2004). The (mis)measurement of body image: Ten strategies to improve assessment for applied and research purposes. Body Image, 1, 7–14. doi:10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00004-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2013). NetGirls: The Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 46, 630–633. doi:10.1002/eat.22141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 584–590. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 62, 869–887. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01667.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. von Soest, T., Kvalem, I. L., Skolleborg, K. C., & Roald, H. E. (2006). Psychosocial factors predicting the motivation to undergo cosmetic surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 117, 51–62. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000194902.89912.f1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wang, S. S., Moon, S. I., Kwon, K. H., Evans, C. A., & Stefanone, M. A. (2010). Face-off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 226–234. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White, J., & Halliwell, E. (2010). Examination of a sociocultural model of excessive exercise among male and female adolescents. Body Image, 7, 227–233. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.02.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Woertman, L., & van den Brink, F. (2008). Tevreden met het uiterlijk, maar de perfectie lokt [Satisfied with appearance but perfection lures]. Psychologie & Gezondheid, 36, 262–271. doi:10.1007/BF03077514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Woertman, L., & Van den Brink, F. (2009). Welke spiegel vormt mijn lichaamsbeeld? [Which mirror does my body image form?]. Tijdschrift voor de Seksuologie, 33, 141–147. Retrieved from http://www.tijdschriftvoorseksuologie.nl/archief/tvs2009-02/tvs%20editie%2033-2%20woertman.pdf.Google Scholar
  69. Zuckerman, D., & Abraham, A. (2008). Teenagers and cosmetic surgery: Focus on breast augmentation and liposuction. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 318–324. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dian A. de Vries
    • 1
  • Jochen Peter
    • 1
  • Peter Nikken
    • 2
  • Hanneke de Graaf
    • 3
  1. 1.Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.The Netherlands Youth InstituteUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Rutgers WPFUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations