The number of United States public schools offering single-sex education for girls has increased dramatically in the past decade. Rationales for all-girls schools are diverse and grounded in differing gender ideologies. We examined reasoning about all-girls schools among school stakeholders (i.e., individuals affected by single-sex schools, including students, parents, and teachers) in the Southwestern United States. Specifically, middle school students attending all-girls (n = 398) and coeducational (n = 191) schools, mothers of middle school students attending all-girls (n = 217) and coeducational (n = 64) schools, and teachers employed at all-girls (n = 18) and coeducational (n = 97) middle schools rated the veracity of multiple rationales for girls-only schools. Specifically, we examined rationales for single-sex schooling related to gender differences in learning, gender differences in interests, girls’ ingroup preference, and gender discrimination. Endorsement of rationales differed across participant role (student, parent, teacher) and school type (single-sex, coeducational). Overall, stakeholders affiliated with an all-girls school were more supportive of each rationale than stakeholders affiliated with coeducational schools. Teachers affiliated with the single-sex school strongly endorsed gender differences in learning as a rationale for single-sex schooling. Endorsement of rationales did not vary across participant gender. The implications of these findings for educational policy and the interpretation of research on single-sex schooling are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
American Association of University Women. (1992). The AAUW report: How schools shortchange girls. Washington DC: The AAUW Educational Foundation.
Anderson, P. (2013, February 6). District drops all-girls courses. La Cross Tribune. Retrieved from http://lacrossetribune.com/news/local/district-drops-all-girls-courses/article_fed421fc-7019-11e2-aa9b-0019bb2963f4.html
Arthur, A. E., Bigler, R. S., Liben, L. S., Gelman, S. A., & Ruble, D. N. (2008). Gender stereotyping and prejudice in young children: A developmental intergroup perspective. In S. R. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 66–86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnett, R., & Rivers, C. (2004). Same difference: How gender myths are hurting our relationships, our children, and our jobs. New York: Basic Books.
Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310, 819–823. doi:10.1126/science.1115455.
Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228–235. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.030.003.
Bigler, R. S. (1995). The role of classification skill in moderating environmental influences on children's gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development, 66, 1072–1087. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00923.x.
Bigler, R. S., & Eliot, L. (2011, October 31). The feminist case against single-sex schools. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2011/10/the_single_sex_school_myth_an_overwhelming_body_of_research_show.html
Bigler, R. S., & Signorella, M. (2011). Single-sex education: New perspectives and evidence on a continuing controversy. Sex Roles, 65, 659–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0046-x.
Bigler, R. S., Hayes, A. R., & Liben, L. S. (2014). Analysis and evaluation of the rationales for single-sex schooling. In L. S. Liben, & R. S. Bigler (Eds.) J. Benson (Series Ed.), The role of gender in educational contexts and outcomes, Vol. 47. Advances in child development and behavior. San Diego: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.05.002
Bostrom, M. (2000). Education, gender and race: A review of current public opinion. Retrieved from http://www.buildinitiative.org/files/EducationGenderandRace.pdf
Brown, C. S. (2013). Legal issues surrounding single-sex schools in the U.S.: Trends, court cases, and conflicting laws. Sex Roles, 69, 356–362. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0001-x.
Brown, C. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2004). Children’s perceptions of gender discrimination. Developmental Psychology, 40, 714–726. doi:10.1037/0012-1618.104.22.1684.
Brown, C. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2005). Children’s perceptions of discrimination: A developmental model. Child Development, 76, 533–553. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00862.x.
Carinci, S., & Wong, P. L. (2009). Does gender matter? An exploratory study of perspectives across genders, age and education. International Review of Education, 55, 523–540. doi:10.1007/s11159-009-9141-4.
Coleman, J. M., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2008). Beyond nature and nurture: The influence of lay gender theories on self-stereotyping. Self and Identity, 7, 34–53. doi:10.1080/15298860600980185.
Corbett, C., Hill, C., & St. Rose, A. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED501320.pdf.
Dell’Antonia, K. J. (2011). Would you send your daughter to an all-girls preschool? Retrieved from http://www.doublex.com/blog/xxfactor/would-you-send-your-daughter-all-girls-preschool
Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.3.145.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 340–357. doi:10.1177/1745691613484767.
Eibach, R. P., & Ehrlinger, J. (2010). Reference points in men’s and women’s judgments of progress toward gender equality. Sex Roles, 63, 882–893. doi:10.1007/s1199-010-9846-7.
Eliot, L. (2013). Single-sex education and the brain. Sex Roles, 69, 363–381. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0037-y.
Fabes, R. A., Pahlke, E., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2013). Gender-segregated schooling and gender stereotyping. Educational Studies, 39, 315–319. doi:10.1080/03055698.2012.760442.
Feldman Barrett, L., & Swim, J. K. (1998). Appraisals of prejudice and discrimination. In J. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 12–37). San Diego: Academic.
Fine, C. (2010). From scanner to sound bite: Issues in interpreting and reporting sex difference in the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 280–283. doi:10.1177/0963721410383248.
Geist, E. A., & King, M. (2008). Different, not better: Gender differences in mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35, 43–52.
Glasser, H. M. (2011). Hierarchical deficiencies: Constructed differences between adolescent boys and girls in a public school single-sex program in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27, 377–400. doi:10.1177/0743558411409933.
Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2010). Boys and girls learn differently! A guide for teachers and parents. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Gurian, M., Henley, P., & Trueman, T. (2001). Boys and girls learn differently!: A guide for teachers and parents. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J., Liben, L. S., & Martin, C. L. (2011). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333, 1706–1707. doi:10.1126/science.1205031.
Hanlon, H. W., Thatcher, R. W., & Cline, M. J. (1999). Gender differences in the development of EEG coherence in normal children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 16, 479–506. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn1603_27.
Harris, M. B. (1986). Coeducation and sex roles. Australian Journal of Education, 30, 117–131.
Hayes, A. R., Pahlke, E. E., & Bigler, R. S. (2011). The efficacy of single-sex education: Testing for selection and peer quality effects. Sex Roles, 65, 693–703. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9903-2.
Hilliard, L. J., & Liben, L. S. (2010). Differing levels of gender salience in preschool classrooms: Effects on children's gender attitudes and intergroup bias. Child Development, 81, 1787–1798. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01510.x.
Hoffmann, M. L., & Powlishta, K. K. (2001). Gender segregation in childhood: A test of the interaction style theory. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 298–313. doi:10.1080/00221320109597485.
Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495. doi:10.1126/science.1160364.
Jackson, J. (2010). “Dangerous presumptions”: How single-sex schooling reifies false notions of sex, gender, and sexuality. Gender and Education, 22, 227–238. doi:10.1080/09540250903359452.
James, A. N. (2007). Teaching the male brain: How boys think, feel, and learn in school. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Jordan-Young, R. M. (2010). Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kaiser, A., Haller, S., Schmitz, S., & Nitsch, C. (2009). On sex/gender related similarities and differences in fMRI language research. Brain Research Reviews, 61, 49–59. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.065.
Klein, S. (2012). State of public school sex segregation in the United States 2007–2010. Washington, DC: Feminist Majority Foundation.
Lee, V. E., Marks, H. M., & Byrd, T. (1994). Sexism in single-sex and coeducational independent secondary school classrooms. Sociology of Education, 67, 92–120. doi:10.2307/2112699.
Liben, L. S. (2014). Probability values and human values in evaluating single-sex education. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2, Serial No. 269).
Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. (1987). Gender segregation in childhood. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 239–287). San Diego: Academic.
Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37, 431–446. doi:10.1037/0012-1622.214.171.1241.
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Patterns of gender development. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 353–381. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511.
Meehan, D. M. (2007). Learning like a girl: Educating our daughters in schools of their own. New York: PublicAffairs.
Meyer, P. (2008). Learning separately: The case for single-sex schools. Education Next, 8, 10–21.
National Association for Single-Sex Public Education (2011). Single-sex schools/schools with single-sex classrooms: What’s the difference? Retrieved from http://www.singlesexschools.org/schools-schools.htm
Office for Civil Rights (2011). Civil rights data collection. Retrieved from http://ocrdata.ed.gov
Patterson, M. M., & Bigler, R. S. (2007). Relations among social identities, intergroup attitudes, and schooling: Perspectives from intergroup theory and research. In A. Fuligni (Ed.), Contesting stereotypes and creating identities: Social categories, social identities and educational participation (pp. 66–87). New York: Russell Sage.
Patterson, M. M., & Pahlke, E. (2011). Student characteristics associated with girls’ success in a single-sex school. Sex Roles, 65, 737–750. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9904-1.
Planty, M., Hussar, W., Snyder, T., Kena, G., Kewal Ramani, A., Kemp, J., Bianco, K., & Dinkes, R. (2009). The condition of education 2009 (NCES 2009-081). Washington DC, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Powlishta, K. K. (1995). Intergroup processes in childhood: Social categorization and sex role development. Developmental Psychology, 31, 781–788. doi:10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1991.
Powlishta, K. K. (2004). Gender as a social category: Intergroup processes and gender-role development. In M. Bennett & F. Sani (Eds.), The development of the social self (pp. 103–133). New York: Psychology Press.
Rhodes, M. (2012). Naïve theories of social groups. Child Development, 83, 1900–1916. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01835.x.
Rosenberg, R. (1988). The limits of access: The history of coeducation in America. In J. M. Faragher & F. Howe (Eds.), Women and higher education in American history (pp. 107–129). New York: W. W. Norton.
Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). The development of gender-related constructs and content. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner, (Series Eds.), & N. Eisenberg, (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 858–932). New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Salomone, R. C. (2003). Same, different, equal: Rethinking single-sex schooling. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Salomone, R. C. (2004). Feminist voices in the debate over single-sex schooling: Finding common ground. Michigan Journal of Gender and Law, 11, 63–96.
Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters. New York: Doubleday.
Signorella, M. L., & Bigler, R. S. (Eds). (2011). Single-sex schooling part I. [Special Issue]. Sex Roles, 65(9/10).
Signorella, M. L., & Bigler, R. S. (Eds). (2013a). Single-sex schooling part II. [Special Issue]. Sex Roles, 69(7/8).
Signorella, M. L., & Bigler, R. S. (2013). Single-sex schooling: Bridging science and school boards in educational policy. Sex Roles, 69, 349–355. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0313-0.
Signorella, M. L., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1993). Developmental differences in children's gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 13, 147–183. doi:10.1006/drev.1993.1007.
Signorella, M. L., Frieze, I. H., & Hershey, S. W. (1996). Single-sex versus mixed-sex classes and gender schemata in children and adolescents: A longitudinal comparison. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 599–607. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00325.x.
Tavris, C. (1992). The mismeasure of woman. New York: Simon and Schuster/Touchstone.
Title IX of the Education Amendments, 20 U.S.C. § 1681. (1972).
U.S. Department of Education,34 C.F.R. § 106.34(b)(1). (2006).
Yates, S. M. (2011). Single-sex school boys’ perceptions of coeducational classroom learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 14, 1–10. doi:10.1007/s10984-011-9079-x.
The authors thank the members of the Gender and Racial Attitudes Laboratory at the University of Texas at Austin who helped with data collection and the teachers, parents, and students who graciously participated in the study. A previous version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, 2012, Vancouver, BC.
About this article
Cite this article
Pahlke, E., Bigler, R.S. & Patterson, M.M. Reasoning About Single-Sex Schooling for Girls Among Students, Parents, and Teachers. Sex Roles 71, 261–271 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0410-8
- Single-sex schooling
- Middle school
- Gender discrimination
- Gender differences