Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 71, Issue 5–8, pp 233–245 | Cite as

Sexual Assault Portrayals in Hindi Cinema

  • Uttara ManoharEmail author
  • Susan L. Kline
Original Article

Abstract

The Indian film industry has been criticized for perpetuating an environment for sexual violence, but little research has analyzed whether Hindi films provide a script for engaging in sexual assault that may perpetuate such violence. In this article, we employed script and sexual scripts theory to determine if there is a recurring sexual assault script in recent Hindi films that describes the pre-conditions, actions and outcomes of sexual assault. Our analysis of 24 Hindi films from the years 2000–2012 confirms the general presence of a sexual assault script. Pre-conditions for assault involve unmarried young males sexually assaulting young females who have assumed traditional gender roles. Female victims are often depicted as being responsible for the sexual assault. The assault itself is depicted with perpetrators combining sexual, physical and verbal assault actions, and females actively resisting the assault. The assault aftermath depicts the woman mostly suffering social damage or losing her life, while the perpetrator is killed by the woman or her family, or remains unprosecuted. We discuss how stereotypical and dramatized depictions of sexual assault in Hindi films may lead to inappropriate perceptions about what occurs before, during and after sexual assault.

Keywords

Hindi films India Sexual violence Content analysis Script theory Social cognitive theory Interpersonal behavior Rape scripts 

References

  1. “We the People” (2013). Do films celebrate women or “item”ize them? NDTV. Retrieved from http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/we-the-people/do-films-celebrate-women-or-item-ise-them/261719.
  2. Allen, M., D’Alessio, D., & Brezgel, K. (1995). A meta-analysis summarizing the effects of pornography: II. Aggression after exposure. Human Communication Research, 22, 258–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models’ consequence contingencies on the acquisition of imitative response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589–595. doi: 10.1037/h0022070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121–153). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Basu, K. (1978). Movement for emancipation of women in the nineteenth century. In Role and status of women in India (pp. 36–51). Calcutta: Firma KLM Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Baxi, P. (2000). Rape, retribution, state: On whose bodies?. Economic and Political Weekly, 35, 1196–1200. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4409115.
  7. Beck, V. S., Boys, S., Rose, C., & Beck, E. (2012). Violence against women in video games: A prequel or sequel to rape myth acceptance? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3016–3031. doi: 10.1177/0886260512441078.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennhold, K. (2012). The best countries to be a woman—and the worst. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved from http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/13/the-best-countries-to-be-a-woman-and-the-worst/.
  9. Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in Seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158–168. doi: 10.1080/00224499809551929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Census of India (2001). Religion, Census of India 2001. Retrieved from http://censusindia.gov.in/Census_And_You/religion.aspx.
  11. Central Board of Film Certification (2011). Annual report 2011. Retrieved from http://cbfcindia.gov.in.
  12. Chatterjee, P. (1989). Colonialism, nationalism, and colonialized women: The contest in India. American Ethnologist, 16, 622–633. doi: 10.1525/ae.1989.16.4.02a00020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaudhury, R. (1978). Status and role of women: Great Indian women through the ages. In Role and status of women in India (pp. 8–35). Calcutta: Firma KLM Limited.Google Scholar
  14. Chudasama, R. K., Kadri, A. M., Zalavadiya, D., Joshi, N., Bhola, C., & Verma, M. (2013). Attitude and myths towards rape among medical students in Rajkot, India. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences, 12(3), 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.ojhas.org/issue47/2013-3-4.html.
  15. Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance (2013). The criminal law (amendment) ordinance. Retrieved from http://mha.nic.in/pdfs/criminalLawAmndmt-040213.pdf.
  16. Crome, S. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Adult rape scripting within a victimological perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 395–413. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00013-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dasgupta, S. D. (1996). Feminist consciousness in women-centered Hindi films. The Journal of Popular Culture, 30, 173–189. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3840.1996.00173.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dasgupta, S. D., & Hegde, R. S. (1988). The eternal receptacle: A study of mistreatment of women in Hindi films. In R. Ghadially (Ed.), Women in Indian society: A reader (pp. 209–216). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Derne, S. (1995). Culture in action: Family life, emotion and male dominance in Banaras, India. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Derne, S. (1999). Making sex violent: Love as force in recent Hindi films. Violence Against Women, 5, 548–575. doi: 10.1177/10778019922181365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doniger, W. (2003). The Kamasutra: It isn’t all about sex. Kenyon Review, 25, 18–37. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4338414.
  22. Doniger, W. (2007). Reading the Kamasutra: The strange & the familiar. Daedalus, 136(2), 66–78. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20028111.
  23. Donnerstein, E., & Smith, S. (2001). Sex in the media: Theory, influences, and solutions. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 289–307). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Dutt, N. (2012). Eve teasing in India: Assault or harassment by another name. BBC News Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16503338.
  25. Eicher, J. B., & Roach-Higgins, M. E. (1993). Definition and classification of dress: Implications for analysis of gender roles. In R. Barnes & J. B. Eicher (Eds.), Dress and gender: Making and meaning in cultural contexts (pp. 8–28). Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Ellis, L. (1989). Theories of rape: Inquires into the causes of sexual aggression. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  27. Emmers-Sommer, T. M., Pauley, P., Hanzal, A., & Triplett, L. (2006). Love, suspense, sex, and violence: Men’s and women’s film predilections, exposure to sexually violent media, and their relationship to rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 55, 311–320. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9085-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Farvid, P., & Braun, V. (2006). ‘Most of us guys are raring to go anytime, anyplace, anywhere’: Male and female sexuality in Cleo and Cosmo. Sex Roles, 55, 295–310. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9084-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Flood, G. (1996). An Introduction to Hinduism. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  32. Gangoli, G. (2011). Controlling women’s sexuality: Rape law in India. In N. Westmarland & G. Gangoli (Eds.), International approaches to rape (pp. 101–120). Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ganti, T. (2013). Bollywood: A guidebook to popular Indian cinema (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Gupta-Cassale, N. (2000). Bearing witness: Rape, female resistance, male authority and the problems of gender representation in popular Indian cinema. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 7, 231–248. doi: 10.1177/097152150000700206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris, R. J., & Scott, C. L. (2002). Effects of sex in the media. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 307–331). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–90. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. International Center for Research on Women (2011). Evolving men: Initial results from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES). Retrieved from: http://www.icrw.org/media/news/men-and-gender-equality-evolving-union.
  39. International Center for Research on Women (2012). Baseline findings from the Safe City Delhi Program. Retrieved from: http://www.icrw.org/files/publications/Baseline%20Research%20of%20Safe%20Cities%20programme%20(1)[smallpdf.com].pdf.
  40. Joshi, S. P., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). Scripts of sexual desire and danger in US and Dutch teen girl magazines: A cross-national content analysis. Sex Roles, 64, 463–474. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9941-4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Kahlor, L., & Morrison, D. (2007). Television viewing and rape myth acceptance among college women. Sex Roles, 56, 729–739. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9232-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kanekar, S. (2007). An attributional perspective on sexual aggression in India. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15, 113–129. doi: 10.1300/J146v15n01_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kanekar, S., & Kolsawalla, M. B. (1980). Responsibility of a rape victim in relation to her respectability, attractiveness, and provocativeness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 153–154. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1980.9924310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kanekar, S., & Kolsawalla, M. B. (1981). Factors affecting responsibility attributed to a rape victim. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 285–286. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1981.9924381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kanekar, S., & Seksaria, V. (1993). Acquaintance versus stranger rape: Testing the ambiguity reduction hypothesis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 485–494. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420230506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kanekar, S., & Vaz, L. (1988). Attribution of causal and moral responsibility to a victim of rape. Applied Psychology, 37, 35–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1988.tb01124.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kanekar, S., Pinto, N. J., & Mazumdar, D. (1985). Causal and moral responsibility of victims of rape and robbery. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 622–637. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00905.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kohli, A. (2011) Gang rapes and molestation cases in India: Creating mores for eve-teasing. Te Awatea Review, 10, 13–17. Retrieved from: http://www.vrc.canterbury.ac.nz/docs/Te%20Awatea%20Review_Dec_2012_Vol10.pdf.
  49. L’Armand, K., Pepitone, A., & Shanmugam, T. E. (1981). Attitudes toward rape: A comparison of the role of chastity in India and the united states. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12, 284–303. doi: 10.1177/0022022181123003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leach, F., & Sitaram, S. (2007). Sexual harassment and abuse of adolescent schoolgirls in South India. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 2, 257–277. doi: 10.1177/1746197907081262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mehta, S. (1982). Revolution and the Status of Women in India. Delhi: Metropolitan Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Menon, S. A., & Kanekar, S. (1992). Attitudes toward sexual harassment of women in India. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1940–1952. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01531.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Menon-Sen, K. (2006). Better to have died than to live like this: Women and evictions in Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 1969–1974. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4418236.
  54. Mukherjee, C., Rustagi, P., & Krishnaji, N. (2001). Crimes against women in India: Analysis of official statistics. Economic and Political Weekly, 36, 4070–4080. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4411293.
  55. Naqvi, F. (2011). Perspectives of Indian women managers in the public sector. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 18, 279–309. doi: 10.1177/097152151101800301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs (2012). Crime in India 2012 report. Chapter 5. Crimes against women. Retrieved from http://ncrb.nic.in.
  57. Nayak, M. B., Byrne, C. A., Martin, M. K., & Abraham, A. G. (2003). Attitudes toward violence against women: A cross-nation study. Sex Roles, 49, 333–342. doi: 10.1023/A:1025108103617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Osella, C., & Osella, F. (1998). Friendship and flirting: Micro-politics in Kerala, South India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4, 189–206.Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3034499.
  59. Pandey, R. (1986). Rape crimes and victimization of rape victim in free India. Indian Journal of Social Work, 47, 169–186. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=104400.
  60. Prasad, S. (1999). Medicolegal response to violence against women in India. Violence Against Women, 5, 478–506. doi: 10.1177/10778019922181338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Radhakrishnan, S. (2009). Professional women, good families: Respectable femininity and the cultural politics of a “New” India. Qualitative Sociology, 32, 195–212. doi: 10.1007/s11133-009-9125-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ram, K. (2000). Instabilities in the discourse of ‘rights’ in India. In A. Hilsdon, M. Macintyre, M. Stivens, V. Mackie, & M. Stivens (Eds.), Human rights and gender politics: Asia-Pacific perspectives (pp. 60–82). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Ramasubramanian, S., & Oliver, M. B. (2003). Portrayals of sexual violence in popular Hindi films, 1997–99. Sex Roles, 48, 327–336. doi: 10.1023/A:1022938513819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rogers, M. (2008). Modernity, ‘authenticity’, and ambivalence: Subaltern masculinities on a South Indian college campus. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14, 79–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00479.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ryan, K. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65, 774–782. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sadler, A. G., Booth, B. M., Nielson, D., & Doebbeling, B. N. (2000). Health-related consequences of physical and sexual violence: Women in the military. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 96, 473–480. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00919-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  68. Sikdar, S. (2012). Delhi gang-rape: Victim narrates the tale of horror. The Hindu. Retrieved from http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/delhi-gangrape-victim-narrates-the-tale-of-horror/article4230038.ece.
  69. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60. doi: 10.1007/BF01542219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In J. H. Greer & W. T. O. Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 363–383). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  71. Singh, K. (2004). Violence against women and the Indian Law. In S. Goonesekere (Ed.), Violence, Law & Women’s rights in south Asia (pp. 77–147). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Sugirtharajah, S. (1998). Women in Hinduism. In P. Bowen (Ed.), Themes and Issues in Hinduism (pp. 56–79). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  73. Suri, S., & Khan, S. (2013). An analytical study of rape in Delhi. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 2, 60–68. Retrieved from: http://www.ijepr.org/doc/V2_Is3_Aug13/ij10.pdf.
  74. UNESCO Institute of Statistics (2013). Emerging markets and the digitalization of the film industry. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/culture/Documents/IP14-2013-cinema-survey-analysis-en.pdf.
  75. Vega, V., & Malamuth, N. M. (2007). Predicting sexual aggression: The role of pornography in the context of general and specific risk factors. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 104–117. doi: 10.1002/ab.20172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Verma, R. K., & Mahendra, V. S. (2005). Construction of masculinity in India: A gender and sexual health perspective. Journal of Family Welfare, 50(1), 71–78. Retrieved from http://medind.nic.in/jah/t04/s1/jaht04s1p71g.pdf.
  77. Verma, S., & Saraswathi, T. S. (2002). Adolescents in India: Street urchins or Silicon Valley millionaires? In B. B. Brown, R. Larson, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), The world’s youth: Adolescence in eight regions of the globe (pp. 105–140). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Virdi, J. (1999). Reverence, rape–and then revenge: Popular Hindi cinema’s ‘women’s film’. Screen, 40, 17–37. doi: 10.1093/screen/40.1.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of CommunicationOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations