The Role of Couple Discrepancies in Cognitive and Behavioral Egalitarianism in Marital Quality
- 757 Downloads
Although gender ideologies and perceptions of equity in the division of household tasks have been associated with marital quality, there is limited understanding of the relationship between discrepancies (in husbands’ and wives’ subjective ideals and accounts of the division of labor) and relationship quality. We examined cognitive egalitarianism (beliefs about gender roles), behavioral egalitarianism (perceptions of the division of household tasks and management), and marital quality among 220 heterosexual, newlywed couples (N = 440) living in east and central regions of the United States. We used multi-level modeling to examine associations between cognitive egalitarianism, behavioral egalitarianism, and marital quality with a specific focus on discrepancies in the reports of husbands and wives. As hypothesized, both husbands and wives had lower marital quality when their cognitive egalitarianism was discrepant from their partner, and such a discrepancy had a greater influence on wives’ reports of marital quality, especially for wives with higher cognitive egalitarianism. Although we expected similar results for the associations between behavioral egalitarianism and marital quality, we found that the strength of the association between wives’ behavioral egalitarianism and marital quality decreased as the discrepancy from their husbands’ behavioral egalitarianism increased. The association between cognitive egalitarianism and marital quality also increased as behavioral egalitarianism increased for wives but not for husbands. The results of this study illustrate the central role of spousal discrepancy in perceptions and enactment of household labor.
KeywordsEquity Egalitarianism Marital quality Newlyweds Couple discrepancy Household labor
This research was supported by a USDA/NIFA HATCH grant (Grant # ILLU-793-356) to the first author.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Elloy, D. F., & Smith, C. R. (2003). Patterns of stress, work-family conflict, role conflict, role ambiguity and overload among dual-career and single-career couples: An Australian study. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 10, 55–66. doi: 10.1108/13527600310797531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ferree, M. M. (1987). The struggles of superwoman. In C. Bose, R. Feldberg, & N. Sokoloff (Eds.), Hidden aspects of women’s work (pp. 161–180). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Galinsky, E., Aumann, K., & Bond, J. T. (2011). Times are changing: Gender and generation at work and home. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (2003). The second shift. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Huston, T. L. (1994). Courtship antecedents of marital satisfaction and love. In R. Erber & R. Gilmore (Eds.), Theoretical framework for personal relationships (pp. 43–65). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Nontraditional undergraduates. Retrieved from the Institute of Education Sciences: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/analysis/2002a-index.asp
- Peplau, L. A. (1983). Roles and gender. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Houston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 220–264). New York: WH Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Steil, J. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar