Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 71, Issue 3–4, pp 109–120 | Cite as

The Influence of Declining Homophobia on Men’s Gender in the United States: An Argument for the Study of Homohysteria

  • Mark McCormack
  • Eric Anderson
FEMINIST FORUM

Abstract

Generations of scholars have examined the variety of correlates of attitudes and behaviors of heterosexual men toward gay men. There has also been substantial exploration of the impact of homophobia on gay men and its gendering of heterosexual men. However, less research exists into the effects of the liberalization of sexual attitudes on these groups. In this forum, we call for scholarly engagement with a relatively new arena of masculinities studies: the impact of decreasing homophobia on socially acceptable gendered behaviors among heterosexual males in the U.S. We offer homohysteria as a concept to examine the social impact of heterosexual male’s fear of being thought gay; suggesting that homohysteria is an effective heurism for investigating micro- and macro-level processes relating homophobia to masculinity. Our thesis is that as homohysteria declines, heterosexual males are able to engage in homosocial relationships characterized by a number of positive traits, including: the social inclusion of gay male peers; the embrace of once-feminized artifacts; increased emotional intimacy; increased physical tactility; the erosion of the one-time rule of homosexuality; and a rejection of violence. We focus solely upon heterosexual males and their attitudes toward gay males because these are the demographics of the participants in the empirical research in this area. We then highlight eight key areas where further research could both develop homohysteria as a concept and enhance understanding of social life.

Keywords

Gender Heterosexuality Homohysteria Homophobia Masculinities Theory 

References

  1. Adam, B. (1998). Theorizing homophobia. Sexualities, 1, 387–404. doi: 10.1177/136346098001004001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, A. (2011). “Josh wears pink cleats”: Inclusive masculinity on the soccer field. Journal of Homosexuality, 58, 579–596. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2011.563654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, A., & Anderson, E. (2012). Exploring the relationship between homosexuality and sport among the teammates of a small, Midwestern Catholic college soccer team. Sport, Education and Society, 17, 347–363. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2011.608938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, H. E., Wright, L. W., & Lohr, B. A. (1996). Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 440–445. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.105.3.440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Afary, J. (2009). Sexual politics in modern Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, E. (2005). Orthodox and inclusive masculinities: Competing masculinities among heterosexual men in a feminized terrain. Sociological Perspectives, 48, 104–115.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, E. (2008a). ‘Being masculine is not about who you sleep with…:’ Heterosexual athletes contesting masculinity and the one-time rule of homosexuality. Sex Roles, 58, 104–15. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9337-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderson, E. (2008b). Inclusive masculinity in a fraternal setting. Men and Masculinities, 10, 604–620. doi: 10.1177/1097184X06291907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Anderson, E. (2011a). Updating the outcome: Gay athletes, straight teams, and coming out in educationally based sport teams. Gender and Society, 25, 250–268. doi: 10.1177/0891243210396872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Anderson, E. (2011b). The rise and fall of western homohysteria. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 1, 80–94.Google Scholar
  12. Anderson, E. (2011c). Inclusive masculinities of university soccer players in the American Midwest. Gender and Education, 23, 729–744. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2010.528377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Anderson, E. (2014). 21 st Century Jocks. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  14. Anderson, E., & Bullingham, R. (2013). Openly lesbian team sport athletes in an era of decreasing homohysteria. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1012690213490520.
  15. Avery, A., Chase, J., Johansson, L., Litvak, S., Montero, D., & Wydra, M. (2007). America’s changing attitudes toward homosexuality, civil unions, and same-gender marriage: 1977–2004. Social Work, 52, 71–79. doi: 10.1093/sw/52.1.71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Baker, P. L., & Hotek, D. R. (2011). Grappling with gender: Exploring masculinity and gender in the bodies, performances, and emotions of scholastic wrestlers. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
  17. Barrett, T. (2013). Friendships between men across sexual orientation: The importance of (others) being intolerant. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 21, 62–77. doi: 10.3149/jms.2101.62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Basow, S. A., & Johnson, K. (2000). Predictors of homophobia in female college students. Sex Roles, 42, 391–404. doi: 10.1023/A:1007098221316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Baunach, D. M. (2012). Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988 through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 364–378. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Beisel, N. K. (1998). Imperiled innocents: Anthony Comstock and family reproduction in Victorian America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Berila, B., & Choudhuri, D. (2005). Metrosexuality the middle class way: Exploring race, class and gender in Queer Eye for the Straight Guy. Genders Online Journal, 42. Retrieved from http://www.genders.org/g42/g42_berila_choudhuri.html.
  22. Bird, S. R. (1996). Welcome to the men’s club: Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender and Society, 10, 120–132. doi: 10.1177/089124396010002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Britton, D. M. (1990). Homophobia and homosociality. The Sociological Quarterly, 31, 423–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1990.tb00337.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bryant, K., & Vidal-Ortiz, S. (2008). Introduction to retheorizing homophobias. Sexualities, 11, 387–396. doi: 10.1177/1363460708091740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Burstein, P. (1998). Bringing the public back in: Should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy. Social Forces, 77, 27–62. doi: 10.1093/sf/77.1.27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Burton-Nelson, B. (1994). The stronger women get, the more men love football: Sexism and the American culture of sports. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  27. Cancian, F. M. (1990). Love in America: Gender and self-development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Chaves, M. (1989). Secularization and religious revival: Evidence from US church attendance rates, 1972-1986. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 464–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cleland, J. (2013). Discussing homosexuality on association football fan message boards: A changing cultural context. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1012690213475437.
  30. Coad, D. (2008). The metrosexual: Gender, sexuality and sport. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  31. Cocks, H. G. (2003). Nameless offences: Homosexual desire in the 19 th Century. London: I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
  32. Cohler, B. J., & Hammack, P. L. (2007). The psychological world of the gay teenager: Social change, narrative, and “normality”. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 47–59. doi: 10.1007/s10964-006-9110-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Connell, R. W. (1992). A very straight gay: Masculinity, homosexual experience, and the dynamics of gender. American Sociological Review, 57, 735–751. doi: 10.2307/2096120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19, 829–859. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Crenshaw, K. (1997). Intersectionality and identity politics: Learning from violence against women of color. In M. Shanley & V. Narayan (Eds.), Reconstructing political theory: Feminist perspectives (pp. 178–193). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  36. Dashper, K. (2012). ‘Dressage is full of queens!’ Masculinity, sexuality and equestrian sport. Sociology, 46, 1109–1124. doi: 10.1177/0038038512437898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dean, J. J. (2013). Heterosexual masculinities, anti-homophobias, and shifts in hegemonic masculinity: The identity practices of black and white heterosexual men. The Sociological Quarterly, 54, 534–560. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Demetriou, D. Z. (2001). Connell’s concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory and Society, 30, 337–61. doi: 10.1023/A:1017596718715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Derlega, V. J., Lewis, R. J., Harrison, S., Winstead, B. A., & Costanza, R. (1989). Gender differences in the initiation and attribution of tactile intimacy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13(2), 83–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00990792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Floyd, K. (2000). Affectionate same-sex touch: The influence of homophobia on observers’ perceptions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 774–788. doi: 10.1080/00224540009600516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Foucault, M. (1984). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. (F. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  42. Frank, D. J., Camp, B., & Boutcher, S. (2010). Worldwide trends in the criminal regulation of sex, 1945 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 75, 867–893. doi: 10.1177/0003122410388493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gee, S. (2013). Bending the codes of masculinity: David Beckham and flexible masculinity in the new millennium. Sport in Society, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/17430437.2013.806034.
  44. Gordon, A. R., & Meyer, I. H. (2008). Gender nonconformity as a target of prejudice, discrimination, and violence against LGB individuals. Journal of LGBT Health Research, 3(3), 55–71. doi: 10.1080/15574090802093562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gottzén, L., & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2012). Fatherhood and youth sports: A balancing act between care and expectations. Gender and Society, 26, 639–664. doi: 10.1177/0891243212446370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Greenberg, D. F. (1988). The construction of homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Griffin, P. (1998). Strong women, deep closets: Lesbians and homophobia in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  49. Halkitis, P. N. (2000). Redefining masculinity in the age of AIDS: Seropositive gay men and the “buff agenda.”. In P. Nardi (Ed.), Gay masculinities (pp. 130–151). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hall, L. A. (2013). Sex, gender and social change in Britain since 1880. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  51. Hamilton, L. (2007). Trading on heterosexuality college women’s gender strategies and homophobia. Gender and Society, 21, 145–172. doi: 10.1177/0891243206297604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hamowy, R. (1977). Preventive medicine and the criminalization of sexual immorality in nineteenth century America. In R. E. Barnett & J. Hagel (Eds.), Assessing the criminal: Restitution, retribution and the legal process. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  53. Harris, M. (1964). Patterns of race in the Americas. New York: Walker.Google Scholar
  54. Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes towards lesbians and gay men. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477. doi: 10.1080/00224498809551476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Herek, G. M. (2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 251–266. doi: 10.1080/00224498809551476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Herek, G. M. (2004). Beyond homophobia: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 1, 6–24. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2004.1.2.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hinrichs, D., & Rosenberg, P. (2002). Attitudes toward gay, lesbian, and bisexual persons among heterosexual liberal arts college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 61–84. doi: 10.1300/J082v43n01_04.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ibson, J. (2002). Picturing men: A century of male relationships in everyday life. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.Google Scholar
  59. Johnson, D. K. (2004). The Lavender scare: The cold war persecution of gays and lesbians in the federal government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Karimi, A. (in press). Iranian homosexuals: Social identity formation and question of femininity. Culture & Psychology.Google Scholar
  61. Keleher, A., & Smith, E. (2012). Growing support for gay and lesbian equality since 1990. Journal of Homosexuality, 59, 1307–1326. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2012.720540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kian, E. M., Clavio, G., Vincent, J., & Shaw, S. D. (2011). Homophobic and sexist yet uncontested: Examining football fan postings on Internet message boards. Journal of Homosexuality, 58, 680–699. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2011.563672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kimmel, M. S. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 119–141). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kimmel, M. S. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co.Google Scholar
  66. Kohut, A. (2013). The global divide on homosexuality: Greater acceptance in more secular and affluent countries. Washington, DC: Pew research center.Google Scholar
  67. Langer, G. (2013). ABC/Washington post poll: Gay marriage: Poll tracks dramatic rise in support for gay marriage. Washington, DC: Langer Research Associates.Google Scholar
  68. Lawrence et al. v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558-606 (2003).Google Scholar
  69. Loftus, J. (2001). America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973–1998. American Sociological Review, 66, 762–782. doi: 10.2307/3088957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lottes, I. L., & Grollman, E. A. (2010). Conceptualization and assessment of homonegativity. International Journal of Sexual Health, 22, 219–233. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2010.489358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lugg, C. A. (1998). The religious right and public education: The paranoid politics of homophobia. Educational Policy, 12, 267–283. doi: 10.1177/0895904898012003003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Luttrell, W. (2012). Making boys’ careworlds visible. Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies, 6, 186–202. doi: 10.3149/thy.0602.186.Google Scholar
  73. MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2012). Is homophobia associated with an implicit same-sex attraction? Journal of Sex Research, 50, 777–785. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.690111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Marsiglio, W. (1993). Attitudes toward homosexual activity and gays as friends: A national survey of heterosexual 15- to 19-year-old males. The Journal of Sex Research, 30, 12–17. doi: 10.1080/00224499309551673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McCormack, M. (2011). Mapping the terrain of homosexually-themed language. Journal of Homosexuality, 58, 664–679. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2011.563665.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McCormack, M. (2012). The declining significance of homophobia: How teenage boys are redefining masculinity and homophobia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. McCormack, M. (2014). The intersections of youth masculinities, decreasing homophobia and class: An ethnography. British Journal of Sociology, 65(1).Google Scholar
  78. McCormack, M. Metrosexual(ity). In P. Whelehan & A. Bolin (Eds.), The encyclopedia of human sexuality. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. (in press)Google Scholar
  79. McCreary, D. R. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles, 31, 517–531. doi: 10.1007/BF01544277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. McGuffey, C. S., & Rich, B. L. (1999). Playing in the gender transgression zone: Race, class, and hegemonic masculinity in middle childhood. Gender and Society, 13, 608–627. doi: 10.1177/089124399013005003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Michael, B. (2013). ‘Just don’t hit on me and I’m fine’: Mapping high school wrestlers’ relationship to inclusive masculinity and heterosexual recuperation. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1012690213501168.
  83. Moses, L. (2013, June 19). Millennial guys are turning to makeup. Adweek. Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/millennial-guys-are-turning-makeup-150313
  84. Negy, C., & Eisenman, R. (2005). A comparison of African American and White college students’ affective and attitudinal reactions to Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 291–298. doi: 10.1080/00224490509552284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Netzley, S. B. (2010). Visibility that demystifies: Gays, gender, and sex on television. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 949–967. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2010.503505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Norton, R. (1992). Mother clap’s molly house: The gay subculture in England, 1700–1830. London: GMP Publishers.Google Scholar
  87. Page, B., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of opinion trends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. PEW. (2013). Growing support for gay marriage: Changed minds and changing demographics. Washington, D.C.: PEW Research Center.Google Scholar
  89. Plummer, D. (1999). One of the boys: Masculinity, homophobia and modern manhood. New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  90. Plummer, D. (2011). Masculinity + HIV = risk: exploring the relationship between masculinities, education and HIV in the Caribbean. In J. F. Klot & V.-K. Nguyen (Eds.), The fourth wave: Violence, gender, culture & HIV in the 21st Century (pp. 139–156). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  91. Pollack, W. (1999). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  92. Pronger, B. (1990). The arena of masculinity: Sports, homosexuality, and the meaning of sex. London: GMP publishers.Google Scholar
  93. Pryor, J., DeAngelo, L., Blake, L. P., Hurtado, S., & Tran, S. (2011). The American freshman: National norms fall 2011. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.Google Scholar
  94. Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5, 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Riley, B. H. (2010). GLB adolescent’s “coming out”. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23, 3–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2009.00210.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rivers, I. (2011). Homophobic bullying: Research and theoretical perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Roberts, S. (2013). Boys will be boys…won’t they? Change and continuities in contemporary young working-class masculinities. Sociology, 47, 671–686. doi: 10.1177/0038038512453791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Robinson, J. P., & Espelage, D. L. (2011). Inequities in educational and psychological outcomes between LGBTQ and straight students in middle and high school. Educational Researcher, 40, 315–330. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11422112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rubin, G. (2012). Introduction: Sex, gender and politics. In G. Rubin (Ed.), Deviations (pp. 1–32). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (2010). Straight girls kissing. Contexts, 9, 28–32. doi: 10.1525/ctx.2010.9.3.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Russell, S. T. (2005). Beyond risk: Resilience in the lives of sexual minority youth. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education, 2(3), 5–18. doi: 10.1300/J367v02n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Russell, S. T., & Joyner, K. (2001). Adolescent sexual orientation and suicide risk: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1276–1281. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.8.1276.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Ryan, C., & Rivers, I. (2003). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth: Victimization and its correlates in the USA and UK. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 103–119. doi: 10.1080/1369105011000012883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Savin-Williams, R. C. (2005). The new gay teenager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Vrangalova, Z. (2013). Mostly heterosexual as a distinct sexual orientation group: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Developmental Review, 33, 58–88. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Schope, R. D., & Eliason, M. J. (2003). Sissies and tomboys: Gender role behaviors and homophobia. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 16(2), 73–97. doi: 10.1300/J041v16n02_05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Schwartz, P., & Rutter, V. (1998). The gender of sexuality. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  108. Seidman, S. (2002). Beyond the closet: The transformation of gay and lesbian life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  109. Shepard, B. (2009). History, narrative and sexual identity: Gay liberation and postwar movements for sexual freedom in the United States. In P. L. Hammack & B. J. Cohler (Eds.), The story of sexual identity: Narrative perspectives on the gay and lesbian life course (pp. 23–48). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sherkat, D. E., Powell-Williams, M., Maddox, G., & De Vries, K. M. (2011). Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 1988–2008. Social Science Research, 40, 167–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Shilts, R. (1987). And the band played on: People, politics, and the AIDS epidemic. New York: St. Martins.Google Scholar
  112. Smith, S. J., Axelton, A. M., & Saucier, D. A. (2009). The effects of contact on sexual prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 61, 178–191. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9627-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Spencer, C. (1995). Homosexuality in history. Florida: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  114. Stein, A. (2005). Make room for Daddy: Anxious masculinity and emergent homophobias in neopatriarchal politics. Gender and Society, 19, 601–620. doi: 10.1177/0891243205277309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Stotzer, R. L. (2009). Straight allies: Supportive attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in a college sample. Sex Roles, 60, 67–80. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9508-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Supreme Court of the United States (2003). Lawrence et al. v. Texas. 539 U. S. 558–606. Downloaded from Supereme.Justia.com.Google Scholar
  117. Supreme Court of the United States (2013). United States v. Windsor. 570 U.S. 1–17. Downloaded from Supreme.Justia.com.Google Scholar
  118. Szalacha, L. (2003). Safer sexual diversity climates. American Journal of Education, 110, 58–88. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9508-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Thompson, E. M., Sinclair, K. O., Wilchins, R., & Russell, S. T. (2013). It’s how you look or what you like: Gender harassment at school and its association with student adjustment. In R. Brooks, M. McCormack, & K. Bhopal (Eds.), Contemporary debates in the sociology of education (pp. 149–167). London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  120. Thorne, B., & Luria, Z. (1986). Sexuality and gender in children’s daily worlds. Social Problems, 33, 176–190. doi: 10.1525/sp.1986.33.3.03a00020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 1–17 (2013).Google Scholar
  122. Walls, N. E., Kane, S. B., & Wisneski, H. (2010). Gay-straight alliances and school experiences of sexual minority youth. Youth & Society, 41, 307–332. doi: 10.1177/0044118X09334957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Walters, S. D. (2001). All the rage. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  124. Ward, J. (2008). Dude sex. Sexualities, 11, 414–434. doi: 10.1177/1363460708091742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Way, N. (2012). Deep secrets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  126. Weeks, J. (1985). Sexuality and its discontents. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Weeks, J. (1990). Coming out: Homosexual politics in Britain from the nineteenth century to the present. London: Quartet.Google Scholar
  128. Weeks, J. (1991). Against nature: Essays on history, sexuality and identity. London: Rivers Oram Press.Google Scholar
  129. Weeks, J. (2007). The world we have won. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  130. Weinberg, G. (1972). Society and the healthy homosexual. New York: St Martin’s.Google Scholar
  131. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (2001). Gender role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45, 691–721. doi: 10.1023/A:1015640318045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Williams, C. L. (1995). Hidden advantages for men in nursing. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 19(2), 63–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Worthen, M. G. F. (2012). Understanding college student attitudes toward LGBT individuals. Sociological Focus, 45, 285–305. doi: 10.1080/00380237.2012.712857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Worthen, M. G. F. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual Women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68, 703–723. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0155-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Wright, L. W., Adams, H. E., & Bernat, J. (1999). Development and validation of the homophobia scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 337–347. doi: 10.1023/A:1022172816258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Yang, A. S. (1997). Trends: Attitudes toward homosexuality. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 477–507. doi: 10.1086/297810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Zuhur, S. (2005). Gender, sexuality and the criminal laws in the Middle East and North Africa: A comparative study. Women for Women’s Human Rights, 1–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied Social SciencesDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  2. 2.Department of Sport StudiesUniversity of WinchesterWinchesterUK

Personalised recommendations